As a prostate cancer survivor, (seed implants), I was also perscribed Viagra for treatment in 2003. At that time the perscription plan provided a huge discount for erectile dysfunction agents. In 2007 the plan was changed as a cost cutting measure by AT&T that removed the huge discount to management employees for erectile dysfunction agents and fertility agents. Non-management (bargined for) employees continue to receive the huge discounts but management must pay up to 4 times the cost for the same perscription. Discrimination? Bargined? The CEO of AT&T, in early December, addressed his Fortune 500 counterparts to propose the new presidential administration follow the lead of AT&T in their health care cost cutting. Studies concluded before those comments prove that the shift of costs to the employee by increasing deductibles and other costs just delay the more expensive treatment of illness to later years. Employees, tryinjg to save money, delay treatment of minor problems until they become major issues in later years and the overall cost of treatment escalates costing both employee and company more. Where is the savings????








Discuss