WORLD AFFAIRS

Democracy in the Dock

What if a Turkish court does ban the ruling party, prime minister and president?

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: erenkoy @ 07/27/2008 2:16:16 PM

    hakann999tr,

    "Would you ever force little school children to start every day with a ceremony where they swear to follow the founder's principals no matter what?" Obviously you have not heard "the pledge of allegiance" which is recited at many public events and schools. Some American Liberals might be uncomfortable with the pledge because, in 1954, religious interest groups added the phrase "Under God" to the pledge. When a Gulen & Co government tries to add religious phrases to the pledge you will see us protesting as well. At the moment, when Kemalists think about Atatuk's principles they think about representitive democracy, secularism and rule of law which, I assume, no liberal would have a problem with (some might object to the idea of any pledge at all but this is hardly the case you defend -you want Ataturk's principles to be out of your way).

    "Would you ever think of forcing to close political party because they think differently than you do on certain issues?" First, the case against AKP was not opened because they thought 'differently' but because they violated the constitution. Second, the president and vice-president of the US can also be impeached if they violate the constitution (Nixon, almost Clinton). There have been many campaigns organized by liberal Americans for impeachment of Bush & Cheney (In the US individuals get elected not parties) because they think Bush administration has violated the constitution. Similarly many Kemalists think AKP has violated the constitution -the secularism principle of constitution to be exact.

    "Would you instill extra non-elected bodies (like constitutional court, national security council, etc) to check and re-check the democratically elected government and not let them govern the country?" The US Supreme Court is also a non-elected body and can overturn laws and executive actions it deems unlawful or unconstitutional. The system where the power of elected governments is not checked and balanced would be called 'the tyranny by the majority' not "representative democracy".

    If you are worried about undemocratic bodies restricting our liberties you should focus on the ones that oversee the universities (YOK) and media (RTUK). Once upon a time you were complaining about these two a lot...now AKP uses these two institutions to silence the opposition and censor the media. The policies about YOK and RTUK showed us that AKP has never been interested in liberties. Actually AKP has used the authoritarian tools (trying to silence university profs through YOK, censoring media through RTUK, breaking up labor traditional demonstrations violently and intimidating opposition using police force) more rigorously than the previous governments. And let me remind you that a woman will spend 6 months in jail for wearing 'loose clothing in public'...Democracy?

    • Posted By: Star-in-East @ 07/27/2008 9:47:15 PM

      "Some American Liberals might be uncomfortable with the pledge because, in 1954, religious interest groups added the phrase "Under God" to the pledge. When a Gulen & Co government tries to add religious phrases to the pledge you will see us protesting as well." As you put forward this statement, it is really obvious that you dont know the Turkish National Anthem which is full of references to God. "Our Nation who adorns God, deserves the indepence" In this struggle, the radical laicist side will be tought a damn good lesson. At least, they will learn to respect the values of our Nation.

      • Posted By: erenkoy @ 07/30/2008 9:46:45 AM

        Star-in-East: "they will learn to respect the values of our Nation" Which nation is this? Judging from you guys' negative attitude towards everything Turkish (language, traditions, Anatolian Islam etc) I assume you are talking about values of Saudi or Iranian regimes.

        • Posted By: Star-in-East @ 08/01/2008 10:32:15 AM

          Saudi and the Iranian regimes were your old trump cards. You should use the Malaysian pattern which is the newest one for Turkey, haha. Because you have nothing with Islam in your personal life which I heartly respect, You accept our culture as foreign basically Saudi, Iranian, and malaysian recently:) No, it is not like that. Islam is not only for Arabs or Iranians. Turks were a good pioneer power for Islam for about six hundred years, after which Turkey Republic is founded on, denying its Islamic roots unfortunately. All your problem is that you find Islam as the main reason for the collapse of Ottaman Empire which in fact the ITTIHAT AND TERAKKI is the responsible for. I still call you to be one in hearth. Turkey is all ours. We can live all together without any political crisis. Today, we are very happy to hear that AKP continues to be the governing party, thanks to God:)

  • Posted By: azmimm @ 07/28/2008 2:16:01 PM

    It seems to me that the AKP has been lobbying very firmly in the US and in Europe in order to shape public opinion in a way which serves only for their interest. This last minute lobbying is all about propaganda which in their view could generate a pressure on the Turkish Constitutional Court via the elite and hence avert the banning of the party. Surely, there would be economic and political consequences of banning the AKP. However, for many Turks, the primary goal, well before economic prosperity and political stability, is to preserve Kemalism and its principles.

  • Posted By: princedavid @ 07/28/2008 4:45:34 AM

    I see this trial as an attack to the democracy. Cuz, in modern world the closure of political parties is unaccaptable. Political parties have a critical importance for the democratic life in a country. As far as I know, there is no any solid evidence to shut the ruling party down. When all these taken into consideration the top court decides to close it, I am sure the majority of the people in Turkey will not trust this court anymore. By banning the AKP, the Constitutional Court would not only violate the convention, but also its own principles regarding the freedom of organization. A closure decision also risks highly negative consequences for the Turkish economy by increasing uncertainty about the future and deterring investment, with the most unwanted consequences of falling growth rates, increasing unemployment and poverty. My advice to all the judges of the court, they better think the benefit of the community, benefit of the state, and also the benefit of democracy. Greetings to all and be in peace.

  • Posted By: Anadolulu @ 07/27/2008 6:36:08 PM

    For my whirled peas friend: Godwin's law states something to the effect that the likelihood of a Hitler analogy creeping into an internet discussion increases as the thread gets longer. I think you just set a new record. When Hitler appears so early in the discussion, I assume the writer is too intellectually challenged to come up with any arguments what so ever and that's why he/she is resorting to that old cliche almost immediately. That of course leaves the rest of us with nothing to reply to. Sigh!

    • Posted By: For the world peace @ 07/28/2008 2:25:15 AM

      I would like to inform the commenter who called me ???mentally challenged??? just because of using a Hitler analogy ???in his perspective- so early in this argument. Godwin???s Law does not state whether any reference or comparison to Hitler or the Nazis might be inappropriate, but only asserts that the probability of such a reference increases over time. And it certainly does not assert that an argument will be belittled just because there is an analogy to Hitler ???so early???- whatever the criterion is for being early. If this commenter???s logic applies, Michael Rubin who wrote his wonderful article on WSJ last month -at the start of these political discussions- titled ???Turkey???s Putin deserves to go??? might be considered as ???mentally challenged??? as well since you can find hundreds of documents regarding the comparisons between Putin and Hitler whether at a early or late phase of a discussion if you are not so ???mentally challenged??? to write ???Hitler and Putin??? on Google.

      • Posted By: For the world peace @ 07/28/2008 2:45:20 AM

        Sorrry for the mix-up. It is all about the Turkish keyboard :) First, please ignore the question marks. The phrase *mentally challenged* should also be replaced by *intellectually challenged*, of course. And I also pointed out that many leading columnists -including Can Dundar and Burak Bekdil- and even the head of the main opposition party in Turkey have built up analogies between Erdogan and Hitler over the last couple of months.

  • Posted By: Star-in-East @ 07/27/2008 9:26:09 PM

    Turkey Republic is not a natural-born state. It was born on an artificial ideological basis. The whole founding philosophy is to inactivate the devout Muslims and slaughter the Kurds (the Otherized). It was quite easy to do so in fascist 1920s, but today it is no longer possible to carry it out. That is the whole problem.

  • Posted By: Lazturk @ 07/27/2008 6:53:50 PM

    Yes, I too was getting ready to respond again to some of the simplistic (usual democracy and liberty for the masses) views and US-centric comments here but I just read about the terrible terrorism news coming out of Istanbul with many dead and wounded.

    This is not the time to bicker with each other or attack other's ideas. We all want and wish the best for Turkey but have different thoughts and approaches in getting there. I would like to think all who follow these posts are too intelligent to want to continue under such atmosphere and would all strongly condemn such terroristic and cowardly chaotic act anywhere, including Turkey. So let's call it a truce for a while, shall we?

  • Posted By: meanchat @ 07/27/2008 6:34:16 PM

    We Turks are a funny breed. If you read our newspapers, you will notice that we pay great attention to what the "West" is reporting on the country. I was made aware of this Newsweek article after reading a poor translation of the summary in the leading online newspaper. Having lived in the U.S. for a majority of my life, I find myself unable to comprehend my hardline secularist friends in the country. The secularists are havign quite a tough time accepting their more religious brethren amongst their ranks. If you watch popular tv shows, you will notice that the women with the headscarves are usually portrayed as the maids, janitors, etc. They are considered uneducated and backwards. Now that they are more prevalent in society (i.e. wives of the President and Prime Minister), they cannot deal with this. The comments are usually, how the West must see Turkey as backwards and that this is an insult to Ataturk's reforms. Who cares what the West thinks? If the country moves forward on a path of economic reform, it can be stronger than a lot of the countries in Western Europe.

  • Posted By: For the world peace @ 07/27/2008 5:02:52 PM

    Erenkoy wrote a perfect reply for another comment below.
    I totally agree with Erenkoy. No comment could have given the real picture in Turkey better. Thank you so much :)

  • Posted By: For the world peace @ 07/27/2008 4:33:54 PM

    Calli,ng Erdogan as "a man of democracy" is like making Hitler " a man of peace" .. Erdogan , who memorized Kuran in Arabic as his high school education, was a firm supporter of Taliban. Then, after his previous party was closed because of anti-secular activities he had no other option than being "democratic". After he came to power, he finished his biggest rival , media tycoon, Cem Uzan using the power of state the way he wanted. His priority was obviously to keep media under control and now there is not even one TV channel in Turkey openly opposing Erdogan and his party. He helped his-son-in-law's company to take over one of the biggest TV channels in the country. Unfortunately, there is not a strong opposition against him.
    Old politicians are glued on their chairs never letting young ones come out and lead the people. Erdogan and democracy ??? How big our founding father Ataturk is that Erdogan still has to seem democratic and secular for the fear of Ataturk.

  • Posted By: Lazturk @ 07/27/2008 4:10:17 PM

    This one-sided article should be taken as seriously as the recent book by "scholar" Sevan Nisanyan it cites, which links Ataturk's founding philosophy to Italian Fascism of the 1920s and ...... blah .. blah .. blah. This "deep thinker" and a "brilliant person," Sevan, recently had a lawsuit filed against him for collecting his feaces in a bucket and dumping it on his wife's head. Yes, that kind of a "solid" dependable view is important and I would take his words as religiously as all the Muslim fundamentalists who pollute youtube with their Ataturk hatred by calling Ataturk a Jew, a gay, a dog, etc etc - all the things every Muslim fundamentalist loves to hate and can generate a rally and support around.

  • Posted By: DEMİRCİ @ 07/27/2008 2:52:52 PM

    . Having suffered coups of various flavors that brought down numerous elected governments since 1960, endured 24 party closings, having been tortured, murdered, bombed, threatened by fascist organizations like Ergenekon, the Turkish people are now showing a resolve and determination not seen before in the history of the Turkish Republic. "Would you instill extra non-elected bodies (like constitutional court, national security council, etc) to check and re-check the democratically elected government and not let them govern the country?" The US Supreme Court is also a non-elected body and can overturn laws and executive actions it deems unlawful or unconstitutional. The system where the power of elected governments is not checked and balanced would be called 'the tyranny by the majority' not "representative democracy".

  • Posted By: Anadolulu @ 07/27/2008 6:49:18 AM

    it is heartening to see that publications in the West like Newsweek have begun to see through the fog of confusion, distortion, and even outright lies generated by the secular fundamentalists to get at the real problems facing Turkey and the Turkish electorate. Having suffered coups of various flavors that brought down numerous elected governments since 1960, endured 24 party closings, having been tortured, murdered, bombed, threatened by fascist organizations like Ergenekon, the Turkish people are now showing a resolve and determination not seen before in the history of the Turkish Republic. They are demanding that their will be respected. Regardless of the outcome of this sham trial, Turkey is on an irreversible course to a true democracy. If AKP is banned, a new party will take its place, and it will be stronger and have wider support. At some point, even the Kemalist fundamentalists will have to see the futility of trying to block this progress.

  • Posted By: hakan999tr @ 07/26/2008 8:19:15 PM

    The post by erenkoy is pretty funny. Lets make a test about a liberal New Yorker being like a Kemalist.
    As a liberal New Yorker, would you ever think of banning people from university because of what they choose to wear? Would you ever think of forcing to close down a political party because they think differently than you do on certain issues? Would you ever force little school children to start every day with a ceremony where they swear to follow the founder's principals no matter what? Would you force every school, every government office to have a certain person's portrait or statue everywhere? Would you instill extra non-elected bodies (like constitutional court, national security council, etc) to check and re-check the democratically elected government and not let them govern the country? Would you belittle religious people, try to avoid them whereever you go and hate them?

  • Posted By: hakan999tr @ 07/26/2008 8:07:48 PM

    Earlier comment is pretty funny. A Kemalist is no different than a liberal New Yorker! The funniest comment I heard since some time. Well, lets see, lets make a test. As a liberal New Yorker would you ever think of banning a person from university because he/she choses to wear something? Would you ever think of banning a party and its top members because they think differently on some issues and act upon their thoughts? Would you force little students to chant the name of your country's founder and make them swear every day to follow his footsteps, and fight his enemies?

    I think not!

  • Posted By: erenkoy @ 07/26/2008 3:53:50 PM

    "...the AKP response to a ban would be to reconvene under a new banner, and then campaign in new elections. Then it would move to draft a new constitution that would shift power to elected governments..." if this true I strongly urge the court to ban AKP and its leaders; We will not only get rid off likes of Erdogan and Gul also get a revised more democratic constitution.

    "...In one recent book, scholar Sevan Nisanyan of Istanbul Bilgi University links Ataturk's founding philosophy to Italian Fascism of the 1920s..." What a joke! Accusing the left with fascism has become a theme... Did not Jonah Goldberg (American right-wing columnist) accuse American liberals, including Newsweek, to be the real fascists on his book, Liberal Fascism? Here's the New York Times' review on that book which is perfectly applicable to Nisanyan's book: "...This book is less an exposé of left-wing hypocrisy than a chance to exact political revenge..."

    By the way it is worth to note Newsweek's recent hostility against Ataturk. I have to ask my liberal friend in the West not to follow Newsweek's lead since it would damage the trust between the liberals on both side. Living in NYC I can ensure you that a Kemalist is no different than a liberal New Yorker. The difference is that you are being bashed by Fox News while we are by Newsweek. Strange world...

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse