AFGHANISTAN

The Taliban’s Baghdad Strategy

The insurgents are closing in on Kabul, not in order to overrun the capital but to terrorize its residents and drive away investors. It's working.

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Trooper101st @ 10/10/2008 8:51:42 AM

    We don't have enough boots on the ground to be everywhere. We are confined to FOB's until we get an order to go outside the wire. There are hotspots all over A-stan. We can shut them down near Kandahar, or Khowst, they just move thier AO somewhere else. We must expand the ANA, and other Afghan security forces, so they can protect thier major urban centers. US forces know where the camps are in P-stan, we know the who, its WHERE are they gonna be tommorow that counts. US/UK, Canadian, Dutch, and French troops need re-inforcing. The members I mention above do almost all the fighting and dying, while other NATO members are hamstrung by caveats, ROE's, and thier spineless Gov.'s. NATO is a paper tiger. It has been exposed for wat it is. The US defended mainland Europe for too long, now when they are needed, they renege on commitments.

  • Posted By: Trooper101st @ 08/01/2008 6:24:30 AM

    Sultan Ahmed you sound as pained as most of us here do. Sad to say there will be no olive branches and peace overtures, there will be more killing and pain. The fundamentalists have been at war with the US for quite a while. A-stan will not know peace until security is improved. Wat can be expected is a steady flow of US troops, and soon strikes into P-stan where this cancer lives.

  • Posted By: Sultan Ahmed @ 07/31/2008 4:58:14 AM

    Doubless to say,
    it can be described it.
    as a baseless idea and useless guess,
    they adopted.

    ground reality is witness,
    the war against walled powered states ,
    is going on.

    Some time have to face defeat,
    and some war point are retaken,
    providing loss of life and meterial.

    the occarence has taken place recently,
    which afraid the whole europeb and united states.

    Every problem has its solution,
    but this problem has no solution,
    impossible it is impossible.


    Security council has resolved a number complicated issues,
    but sorry,looks great brain are helpless here,
    really has becom spectators.

    Ambition is great strategy,
    the last victory does not depent on arms and amonition.,
    it looks the commission to the cause.

    Time is not over,
    if Mr.Bush wante ,
    can offer a gifte to the world,
    in form of peace,
    that would greatest gift to the world,
    rememberable for ever.

    • Posted By: observer101 @ 07/31/2008 11:02:14 AM

      Peace?..The mid east knows of no such word...It wouldnt matter if we win, or lose and withdraw from there...Extremists do not want peace...If they were the only ppl left on this earth, they would, no doubt start killing eachother for more power to control you little lambs...Why?..Because ppl there are trained to submit to whatever warlord has the gun...You follow without minds of your own and dream of peace that will never come amongst you...Thats in your genes..Give up and follow the next dictator that kills a bunch of you in the town square as an example of their power, and then promises you eternal happiness if you kill others in cold blood and use the Koran as an excuse to do it..Just keep pretending to yourself, continue being a closet peace seeker while shouting death to infidels. Continue wishing for peace while watching your back to see if the "peaceful" Taliban uses you as an example for turning against them by daring to even mention the word peace...Bottom line is there will never be peace in the middle east, with or without the U.S. there.

  • Posted By: observer101 @ 07/29/2008 6:28:35 PM

    nawawimohamad:.You remind me of the little tokyo lady during the pacific war that would send radio messages over the air trying to convince allied forces to give up. Saying the rhetoric you do..Painting the Taliban as innocents and WE the U.S. are causing all the suffering and pain in Afghanistan...If my recollection of events are correct, the Taliban had ample opportunity to protect the ppl by giving up someone that was hiding in their midsts...They had control of what happened, and gave no thought to what would be brought their way...They chose bin Ladens protection money and chose IT over their well being....So the Taliban in all their stupidity deserve to "REAP THE WHIRLWIND" they brought on themselves...Hope they enjoy it...And ask them to pay YOU more so you can stay on here and post Taliban pity party crap 24/7 for their cause!

  • Posted By: Trooper101st @ 07/29/2008 9:02:50 AM

    There have been so many mistakes made after 9/11 you can't name them all. The REAL war was against AQ/T-ban. The US was engaged in this theatre, and that cowboy/oil man G.W. Bush went for the oil grab in Iraq, sucking all the good resources from A-stan. In the meantime he lost support from key NATO allies who may have engaged in combat ops. if not for the arrogance of this Administration. So, the ATO was neglected. The militants set up shop in P-stan, and the p-stani's continue to appease them, all the while saying "this is sovereign P-stani territory" and we keep sending these 2 faced swine money and warplanes. Do not credit this Administration with ANY success in Iraq. Gen. Petraeus and his team devised a strategy that seems to be working. If the 100 or so camps are allowed to flourish in P-stan, we will lose the battle of attrition. The P-stanis have no intention of stopping the growth of the number of camps and militants, so I keep hoping they let us loose and hit them where they live. An OP in those mountains, with not even a full company, are sitting ducks. 9 men lost thier lives and those fighters came from P-stan. Tell the p-stani's to stay outta the way, and bomb those camps to dust.

  • Posted By: hiero @ 07/29/2008 6:41:30 AM

    I recently came back from Afghanistan. It was a fascinating, terrifying, compelling 17 days. I promised a good friend there that I would do my best to keep Afghanistan in the public eye. I'm blogging about it, and the first part is here: http://thoughtswat.blogspot.com/2008/07/afghanistan-1-city-and-river.html. I'm a news junkie, and I came back feeling that I'd gone knowing nothing.

  • Posted By: wendyo @ 07/27/2008 11:42:48 PM

    When I read of the Taliban bringing along their families to help provide cover for them, my first thought is how cowardly these mem are. If they care so little for their own lives that is one thing but to show so litlle thought for their "loved ones" is dispicable!

    • Posted By: nawawimohamad @ 07/29/2008 6:00:16 AM

      Wendyo, I think you are more despicable because condoning the US invasion in the first place. Do you know how many innocent civilians have been killed by the US military? Why are you turning a blind eye on this?

      It???s like in the movies or Television drama series where CIA death squads are in operation to eliminate ???enemies??? of the United States. In Afghanistan, this movie is being played in real time with real people being killed and at times entire villages razed by an angry mob called the CIA paramilitaries.
      A United Nations investigator released a preliminary report citing widespread civilian deaths in Afghanistan, often at the hands of unaccountable units led by the CIA or other foreign intelligence agencies, including the Mossad ??? or Israel???s secret service.
      The British Intel is also involved in the secret battle in which the target is mostly civilians who knows too much about the Taliban and Taliban close allies in villages and cities.
      These ops ??? illegal according to the rules of wars ??? were condemned by Philip Alston who is the United Nations Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions Professor Philip Alston.
      ???My focus is on extrajudicial executions or what might be called unlawful killings. The principal actors whose conduct I have been examining include the Government, particularly the police, the international military forces and the anti-government elements, including the Taliban. The bottom line of my report is that there are many killings which are avoidable,??? he said after delivering a devastating report that showed the CIA were killing civilians with impunity in Afghanistan.

  • Posted By: slimpundit @ 07/28/2008 8:58:54 PM

    Check out a great blog at: http://slimpundit.wordpress.com/ ... this covers how to overcome all sorts of addictions, and you can support the author by sending a small donation to the author's paypal account: digital_velocity@hotmail.com

  • Posted By: profmarcus @ 07/28/2008 6:44:12 PM

    It would have added a great deal of context had you bothered to mention that Mr. Farooqi is an Afghan-American, U.S. passport holder, who can and will leave Afghanistan at the drop of a hat just as soon as he thinks the prospects for him continuing to make money hand over fist is coming to an end.

  • Posted By: khairy11 @ 07/28/2008 3:34:51 PM

    75% of pakistani army Talibani . you people do not understand the gravity for your urgent actions in Afghanistan. taliban means the one who seeking knowledge to get closer to GOD , unfortunate you call them cowards , despicable but the fact is you can not win. you american never win ground war. no matter how many people you kill you still loose. the fight you are in ,is not your fight. do not push your luck there.
    Joe lieberman stop screw his wife long time age , do you know why , l love his smile. he enjoy doing you ignorants

  • Posted By: James_K. @ 07/28/2008 2:01:48 PM

    The Politicians caused us to lose the war in Vietnam. The Politicians will cause us to lose the war in Iraq and Afghanistan. The Taliban will use all available resources to them to win the heart and mind of the people and to undermine the US advancement. This includes using 'human shields' of strangers or their own family. The Taliban have been conditioned to think outside of US values or moral. You can call them 'cowards', ' despicable scums' and heartless bastards but that is by your US standard. You might feel good about yourself calling them these names, but it does nothing to stop this type of tactic. The US cannot win the war in ???short terms??? given today???s standard of conduct. It will be a protracted war. Many lives will be lost. The best the US can do is beat down the enemy to a point where the war can be turned over to the existing government in these countries. If you really want to win this war quickly, study the war tactics of other countries and see who achieved the fastest and almost succeeded in victory. Are we willing to go this route? The answer is no.

  • Posted By: nawawimohamad @ 07/28/2008 4:29:24 AM

    The US should bring back the soldiers. Don't send them to their death or come back home maimed either physically or mentally. The US should spend the money on something better and not on killing people. The talibans have done nothing against the US. Whatever excuses the US administration gave are all fabricated lies to fool the people and justify the invasion. Furthermore, Afghanistan has no oil!

  • Posted By: wendyo @ 07/27/2008 11:48:09 PM

    For the Taliban to bring along their families as cover for their missions of killing and maiming is nothing short of cowardice! It's bad enough that these people who know of nothing but killing in the name of God to keep procaliming this is a holy war, but to put your "loved ones" in front of you as shields is dispicable.

    • Posted By: tc125231 @ 07/28/2008 12:25:20 AM

      Personally, I would agree with you that the Taliban are objectionable in any number of ways. Although --to be "fair" --it has to be pointed out that under the Taliban Afghanistan wasn't the source of 70% of the world's heroin.

      However, whatever the Taliban's many sins --you have to be naive if you think that anyone in Afghanistan is going to engage in "symetrical" warfare with the US and its allies, who, combined, certainly account for at least 70% of the world's military expenditures.

      This is not a romance novel. The US doesn't fight to lose, and neither do they. If they fight symetrically they will lose. Ergo, they will fight asymetrically because it is their country and that gives them some advantages to counter the tremendous disparity in conventional miltary power.

      It's a hard lesson, but it is a frequent problem when you try to engage in nation building in other people's countries.

  • Posted By: khairy11 @ 07/27/2008 10:15:23 PM

    i am white american born muslim, in hill what is your color go to do with Islam. i need more intelligent people than stupid one like you. i am muslim i am just try wake -up you people . american dream is almost over. it is fact you like it or not.

    • Posted By: wendyo @ 07/27/2008 11:50:24 PM

      The American Dream will never be over, whether those from other cultures try to convince themselves of that fact or not!!!

  • Posted By: newdee @ 07/26/2008 10:04:57 PM


    Fully agree with MJPD345. Taliban must be crushed fully. There's no other option. This could also be a trick of their Pakistani sponsers wanting them to hit Kabul, rather than areas adjacent to Pakistan. This would take away the focus from the border areas. Afghans hate Taliban. Crushing Taliban is fully doable.

    • Posted By: the-commish @ 07/27/2008 11:41:08 PM

      "Crushing Taliban is fully doable."

      Not as long as we are preoccupied with the senseless undertaking in Iraq, it isn't!

  • Posted By: 123surfs @ 07/27/2008 11:44:41 AM

    As we see dramatic reductions in the violence in Iraq, the liberal media now shifts it's focus to paint a grim picture of the situation in Afghanistan. It's all about the bottom line for these idiots, fear and bad news sells.

    • Posted By: the-commish @ 07/27/2008 11:33:25 PM

      Afghanistan going down the tubes is not fear mongering, it is a fact.

      I suggest you apply for a visa and go over there. Let's see how long you would last!

      Afghanistan and Pakistan are the REAL war o n terror, not Iraq. Anyone with any more than half a brain can see that. Iraq is a sideline, and it has sidelined us from the real objective.

  • Posted By: Farmerbob @ 07/27/2008 11:24:05 PM

    D-Duck the My lie massacre was recorded by US soldiers serving in the US military . If you look at Iraq and are honest with your self, the US military lost the war for the harts and minds of the Iraqi people after the US military releases images from Abu ghraib Prison. Images taken by who? Not representatives of the media? No they were recorded by the grunts on the ground, American US soldiers. What do the two have in common other than the images were recorded my US military personnel? Both of the victims were sexually abused, beaten, tortured, and maimed in My Lie and in Abu ghraib Prison.

    So before you go claim the media lost the harts and minds war in VietNam and Iraq get the facts by educating your self. The US military lost that war with out the help of the media. The only way for W???s warriors to win the harts and minds is to not allow US military personnel access to the internet and ban all digital recording devices from being used by all serving in the US military. Lets see how the battle harden troops deal with no internet or digital recording devices. I suspect they will all cry to their state Senators.

  • Posted By: Farmerbob @ 07/27/2008 11:23:08 PM

    D-Duck the My lie massacre was recorded by US soldiers serving in the US military . If you look at Iraq and are honest with your self, the US military lost the war for the harts and minds of the Iraqi people after the US military releases images from Abu ghraib Prison. Images taken by who? Not representatives of the media? No they were recorded by the grunts on the ground, American US soldiers. What do the two have in common other than the images were recorded my US military personnel? Both of the victims were sexually abused, beaten, tortured, and maimed in My Lie and in Abu ghraib Prison.

    So before you go claim the media lost the harts and minds war in VietNam and Iraq get the facts by educating your self. The US military lost that war with out the help of the media. The only way for W???s warriors to win the harts and minds is to not allow US military personnel access to the internet and ban all digital recording devices from being used by all serving in the US military. Lets see how the battle harden troops deal with no internet or digital recording devices. I suspect they will all cry to their state Senators.

  • Posted By: Musliman @ 07/27/2008 8:35:56 PM

    Who the hell is khairy11? For one thing, I know you are not a Muslim. Muslims do not present themselves in that way... I would say you are posing as a Muslim in order to belittle this beautiful religion. On another note... if Afghanistan, upon fighting and defeating Communist Russia, was not abandoned and hung to dry by the "good 'ol US of A, and instead was used to invest within that country... none of this would be going on. All of this excitement over Afghanistan started when Bush decided to plan an oil pipe line across Afghanistan. Iraq, as we all can agree... never threatened our way of life... conversely, WE CREATED THE AL-QAIDA insurgency which exists today in Iraq... which was not there before.

    I am a "white" American Born Muslim who loves his religion and his country. I'm not bragging, rather, I know there are plenty of stereotypes and bigots who think every Muslim is an arab/asian/african, etc. Islam preaches tolerance... I can take my camera and show you what harm Christians do everyday... but do they represent ALL OF CHRISTIANITY??? NO!!! Same with Jews, I can easily find how Jews manipulate the American public to fight in the name of ISRAEL... and other bad things, but I also know that there are good Jews out there as well, so I do not hold accountable all people for what a few might do.

    Selam (peace) to All! God Bless the World... not JUST America.

    • Posted By: the-commish @ 07/27/2008 11:15:27 PM

      You are correct, at least in one way, Musliman.

      When the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan in 1979, they did so not out of a desire for expansion (as we here in America were told by the Carter administration), but to quell what they believed (and rightly so) was a fundamentalist Muslim insurgency. At the time, the Soviet Republics bordering Afghanistan had lots of Muslim citizens, and the Soviets were afraid the insurgency would spread beyong Afghanistan and into their Muslim republics. So they considered it necessary to stop the fundamentalist insurgency.

      Both the Carter and Reagan administrations supported the Afghan insurgency (which was the beginning of the Taliban and al Qaeda. So after the Soviets left with tgheir tails between their legs, al Qaeda and the Taliban were free to do with the country anything they wanted.

      One other thing... the Soviet Politbureau voted twice not to intercede in Afghanistan, because they knew it would be a lot of headaches for them. It was only on the third vote that they decided that a fundamentalist government if Afgghanistan would threaten them so severly that they had to try to do something about it.

  • Posted By: D-Duck @ 07/27/2008 10:13:26 PM

    j.n
    opinions are like butts everyone has one and try to stick it in other peoples lives

    • Posted By: emmarcee @ 07/27/2008 10:19:21 PM

      I liked it! except that you don't have to keep your head where others keep their butts.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse