DISPATCH

Obama’s Reagan Moment

He passed a test in Berlin, but harder ones await.

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Driver of wagons @ 08/08/2008 9:39:15 PM



    This is interesting: A good government group is set to ask the Justice Department to open a criminal investigation into the two big McCain stories of recent days -- the bundled contributions from Hess executives, and the bundling by Harry Sargeant, the guy who raised cash for McCain from a host of unlikely donors.

    The request, which will be made on Monday by Campaign Money Watch, which first flagged the Hess story to us, raises at least the possibility that such a probe could be initiated during the campaign. Barring that, it could keep the stories going in the press a bit.

    David Donnelly of Campaign Money Watch confirms to me that they'll make the formal request on Monday, and also is request for a Federal probe in an email that just went out to supporters. Donnelly says that his group's request is being triggered by McCain's letter to the donors whose contributions had been bundled by Sargeant.

    Donnelly said that the letter, which advised the donors of the legal ins-and-outs of such contributions, didn't go far enough in trying to determine what had happened.

    "What he didn't say was, 'Tell us who was responsible for giving you money to give to me, and we'll urge the authorities to prosecute to the fullest extent of the law," " Donnelly said. "The letter raises the question, 'Is the McCain campaign covering for his bundlers?"
    Asked why Sargeant, whose company holds a huge contract to deliver fuel to military bases in Iraq, merited an investigation, Donnelly said: "An executive from a company that has a billion dollar contract to deliver oil to U.S. bases in Iraq possibly violated election law to funnel contributions to McCain. We think that warrants an investigation."

    And on the Hess matter, Donnelly said: "An office manager for an oil company that stands to gain millions in profits from offshore drilling makes donations for the first time this cycle to McCain, and did it at the same time nine other Hess donors do. That's worth an investigation."

    "Drill here drill there drill everywhere" McCain said:

    Extend your oil boring PAIN with your vote for McCain


  • Posted By: Driver of wagons @ 08/08/2008 9:38:16 AM



    Ron Suskind Must be the only real journalist left in this country but I guess its just the "Way of the World"


    By Ron Suskind
    What just happened? Evidence. A secret that has been judiciously kept for five years just spilled out. All of what follows is new, never reported in any way:

    The Iraq Intelligence Chief, Tahir Jalil Habbush -- a man still carrying a $1 million reward for capture, the Jack of Diamonds in Bush's famous deck of wanted men -- has been America's secret source on Iraq. Starting in January of 2003, with Blair and Bush watching, his secret reports began to flow to officials on both sides of the Atlantic, saying that there were no WMD and that Hussein was acting so odd because of fear that the Iranians would find out he was a toothless tiger. The U.S. deep-sixed the intelligence report in February, "resettled" Habbush to a safe house in Jordan during the invasion and then paid him $5 million in what could only be considered hush money.

    In the fall of 2003, after the world learned there were no WMD -- as Habbush had foretold -- the White House ordered the CIA to carry out a deception. The mission: create a handwritten letter, dated July, 2001, from Habbush to Saddam saying that Atta trained in Iraq before the attacks and the Saddam was buying yellow cake for Niger with help from a "small team from the al Qaeda organization."

    The mission was carried out, the letter was created, popped up in Baghdad, and roiled the global newcycles in December, 2003 (conning even venerable journalists like Tom Brokaw). The mission is a statutory violation of the charter of the CIA, and amendments added in 1991, prohibiting the CIA from conducting disinformation campaigns on U.S. soil.

    So, here we go again: the administration is in full attack mode, calling me names, George Tenet is claiming he doesn't remember any such thing -- just like he couldn't remember "slam dunk" -- and reporters are scratching their heads. Everything in my book is on the record, with many sources. And so, we watch and wait....

    There will be more falling by the wayside after this book is read and there may be an impeachment in the works. Wait there already is! This will give it lots of strength. If you are a patriotic American write all of your congressmen/women and senators and ask them what's up with this.


  • Posted By: Driver of wagons @ 08/05/2008 9:31:11 PM



    According to TIME magazine

    http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1829354,00.html?cnn=yes

    John McCain's sole idea to "drill here and drill now" won't produce oil until the year 2030, and then it will only be 200,000 barrels per day. In comparison, the government estimates that if everyone made sure their car tires were fully inflated, we could start to reduce our oil consumption by 800,000 barrels per day, right now.

    Extend your inflated PAIN with your vote for McCain



  • Posted By: sharenews @ 08/04/2008 11:41:20 PM



    I had to take a double take when I saw these stats:

    RASMUSSEN REPORTS
    Daily Presidential Tracking Poll
    Monday, August 04, 2008

    TIED

    John McCain - 44 %

    Barack Obama - 44%


    WITH LEANERS:

    John McCain - 47%

    Barack Obama - 46%


    This is the first time McCain has enjoyed a statistically advantage since Obama clinched the Democratic nomination on June 3rd.

    Tracking Polls are released at 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time each day.

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

    AMONG UNAFFILIATED VOTERS:

    McCain - 52%

    Obama - 37%

    FAVORABLY VIEWED BY THE NATIONS VOTERS:

    McCain - 55%

    Obama - 51%


    This is the LOWEST rating for Obama since he wrapped up the nomination.

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

  • Posted By: sharenews @ 08/04/2008 11:39:06 PM



    If you have not seen this article, you might want to read it. It is very well written and informative. It provides readers with some insight into Barack Obamas early political career. The time between his first campaign for the Illinois State Senate in 1995 and his race for U.S. Senate in 2004, which can fairly be called the LOST YEARS, the span of years that you never hear Obama talk much about.


    Weekly Standard
    Barack Obamas Lost Years
    by Stanley Kurtz
    08/11/2008, Volume 013, Issue 45

    The Senator Obamas tenure as a State legislator reveals him to be an Old-fashioned, Big Government, Race-Conscious Liberal.


    Article:
    http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/015/386abhgm.asp?pg=1

  • Posted By: sharenews @ 08/04/2008 11:37:59 PM


    Obamas friends and associates, including those he made during his early political years that he stayed close with, and those individuals in his life as a whole are coming to the forefront again, only with a deeper account of how he got to where he is today. A new book is out about him: THE OBAMA NATION


    INTERVIEW with Author of The Obama Nation, Dr. Jerome Corsi, Ph.d

    Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UdFs6hjPnyw

    Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PgaGFITnTAQ


    NEW BOOK: The Obama Nation by Dr. Jerome Corsi, Ph.d

    THE OBAMA NATION :
    Leftist Politics and the Cult of Personality

    Available Now:

    http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Obama-Nation/Jerome-R-Corsi/e/9781416598060/

    http://www.amazon.com/Obama-Nation-Jerome-R-Corsi/dp/1416598065/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1217792859&sr=8-1

  • Posted By: muslimsforpresidents @ 07/30/2008 3:49:45 PM

    Hey Sporduck, looks like with 7 of us posting, you are a sitting duck. When you turn off the bigotry, and mean comments when people post, then the seven of us will stop too with you. Your choice. Your way outnumbered. Have you ever posted anything reasonable? When you do, then we will become silent. There are other bigots besides you that we will be dealing with shortly.

    • Posted By: SPORTLOCK09 @ 07/30/2008 6:26:25 PM

      Are you really telling me 7 geeks got together to be an internet blog gang? LMAO You must not be familiar with my work. Where ya been the last 6 mos? All you've said so far is I have 7 people to make fun of. Hope that self esteem is ok. You sure wrote a check your azz cant cash on this one.

      • Posted By: marksgershenson @ 07/31/2008 12:27:00 AM

        I am number eight can you dig it dumbo from the sportsworld. You better believe it, eight people are watching and waiting to call you out on your bu!! sh!t everytime you post as a bigot. I was taught long ago, if you quack like a duck, have feathers like a duck, and swim like a duck, chances are good you are seeing a duck. In your case you talk like a bigot, act like a jerk, and have no business dissing on everyone who disagrees with you. You love dishing it out son, but when it is dumped on your lap, you fall apart.

        I have my eye on your postings. Even though I am on vacation, I do read all the commentaries that people place. You and cornholyoil are the top two biggots that post throughout Newsweek. I can and will bring a ninth person on if necessary to call you out on your bs. When you decide to chill and grow up with your postings, we will leave you alone. It is your call sportdud.

        • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 08/04/2008 4:16:11 PM

          Hey Mark! Good to 'see' you. Looking forward to having you back soon.

        • Posted By: SPORTLOCK09 @ 07/31/2008 4:06:17 PM

          8? I said better have atleast 14 other names you call yourself didnt I? You can call yourself whatever you want, means nothing to me. Better get the 9th personality out, why wait? For the record I NEVER fall apart. Never failed at anything Ive put my mind too. I excel under pressure so please, bring your 4th grade retoric. Once you get to 14 let me know and I will put my attention and efforts to you. I wouldn't recommend
          awakening sleeping giants though. Japan had to learn the hard way too!

  • Posted By: Driver of wagons @ 08/01/2008 10:07:29 PM



    Which brings us to myth number two: Jimmy Carter wrecked the economy, and Reagan's bold tax cuts saved it.

    This is utterly absurd. Economic growth indices -- GDP, jobs, revenues -- were all positive when Carter left office. All plunged after Reagan policies took effect.

    Reagan didn't cure inflation, the main economic problem during the Carter years. Carter's Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker tried when he raised interest rates. That's the opposite of what Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan has done to keep inflation low.

    Carter's policies and people fought inflation, but maintained real growth. On the other hand, Reagan's policies helped cause the worst recession since the Great Depression: two bleak years with nearly double-digit unemployment! Reaganomics failed in less than a year, and it took an entire second year for the economy to recover from the failure.

    Carter didn't cause the inflation problem, but his tough policies and smart personnel solved it. Unfortunately for Carter, it took too long for the good results to kick in. Not only didn't Reagan help whip inflation, he actually opposed the Volcker policies!



    • Posted By: jimbo3800 @ 08/02/2008 9:26:46 PM

      Now's that's a grand piece of revisionist history! OMG, that's a beaut, and runs exactly counter to the actual events of the 1980's.

      You liberals are a riot. The true measure of Reagan's success is shown by your ongoing disdain for him.

      • Posted By: Driver of wagons @ 08/04/2008 2:37:43 PM




        Why do you even type anything in the comment box. Your handle says it all!



      • Posted By: You are a FOOL @ 08/02/2008 9:48:21 PM

        and you conservatives are god like. hahahahahhahahahhahahahahha

  • Posted By: Driver of wagons @ 08/04/2008 1:31:17 PM




    In reality, Reagan did nothing to bring down the Soviet Union.

    By 1980, the Soviet Union was trying to cut its own defense spending. Reagan made it harder for them to do so. In fact, Reagan increased the possibility of a nuclear war because he was -- frankly, and sadly -- senile. He thought we could actually recall submarine-launched nuclear missiles (talk about a Reagan myth), and bullied the Soviets to highest alert several times.

    Critically, Reagan never even tried to bring down the Soviet Union.

    Wasteful overspending on defense didn't end the Soviet Union. In fact, it played into the hands of authoritarian "Communist" hard-liners in the Kremlin. Reagan thought the Soviet Union was more powerful than we were. He was trying to close what he called "the window of vulnerability."

    This was sheer idiocy.

    No general in our military would trade our armed forces for theirs. If it were to happen, none of the Soviet military command would turn down that deal. We had better systems, better troops, and better morale.

    Heres the truth: we'd already won the Cold War before Reagan took office. All Reagan needed to do was continue the tried-and-true containment policies Harry S. Truman began and all subsequent presidents employed. The Soviet Union was Collapsing from within. The CIA actually told this to Reagan as he took office.

    Here's an example: the Soviet Union military couldn't deal with a weak state on its own border, the poor, undermanned Afghanistan. Most of the Soviets' military might had to make sure its "allies" in the Warsaw Pact and subjects along the South Asian front didn't revolt. Even Richard Nixon told Reagan he could balance the budget with big defense cuts.

    Reagan ignored this, and wrecked our budget.

    We didn't have to increase weapons spending, but Reagan didn't care. He ran away from summits with the dying old-guard Soviets, and the new-style "glasnost" leadership of Mikhail Gorbachev baffled the witless Reagan and his closed-minded extremist advisors.

    Maggie Thatcher finally cajoled the Gipper into meeting Gorby, and Gorby cleaned Reagan's clock. Reagan's hard-right "handlers" nearly had to drag Reagan out of the room before he signed away our entire nuclear deterrent. Reagan -- and the planet -- was lucky Gorbachev sought genuine and stable peace. Had Yuri Andropov's health held, Reagan's "jokes" and gaffes might have caused World War III.

  • Posted By: Driver of wagons @ 08/04/2008 1:30:56 PM




    Eventually Reagan even gave Gorbachev his seal of approval. Visiting Moscow before the August Coup, Reagan said the Soviet Union was no longer the "Evil Empire." He predicted his friend Gorbachev would lead the Soviet Union for many years to come.

    As usual, Reagan was wrong. A few months later, disgruntled military officers kidnapped Gorbachev, throwing him out of power forever. Reagan remained disengaged: nothing he did caused the coup, and nothing he did made the Soviet military support Boris Yeltsin over their superiors.

    We're all fortunate things happened as they did -- but once again, Reagan did nothing to make this fluke more likely.

    All this is vintage Reagan. Reagan took credit for others' hard word and hard choices, and blamed them for his failures. Reagan even blamed Jimmy Carter for Reagan's foolish, fatal, and reckless decision to leave 243 Marines stationed in Beirut, helpless and unguarded.

    Reagan hired over 100 crooks to run our government, and broke several laws himself. His policies were almost uniformly self-defeating, wrong-headed, immoral and unfair.

    Reagan was an actor playing the part of the president. He was style over substance: lucky, not good.

    And once the myths are stripped from the "legacy", the truth becomes obvious: Reagan was by far the most overrated man in American history.



  • Posted By: jamasp42 @ 08/01/2008 2:53:24 PM

    yes on reagan time people want to become united with east germany , this time people did com because obama thank you fariborz j Esfandiary

  • Posted By: Driver of wagons @ 07/31/2008 7:53:23 PM



    "I have great admiration and respect for Senator Obama."

    If so, McCain has a funny way of showing it. All we've seen and heard from him for the last month is a string of personal attacks, culminating in yesterday's ad smearing Obama as "the biggest celebrity in the world." He's just another famous, pretty face, in other words, and not ready for the presidency.

    True? No. Childish? Yes. But that's not all. This ad is also deliberately and deceptively racist.

    Of all the famous celebrities they could have compared Obama to, why not Tom Cruise? Or Arnold Schwarzenegger, or Donald Trump, or Oprah Winfrey? Why Britney Spears and Paris Hilton? Why two white blond bimbos?

    Only one reason. It's a somewhat tamer version of the white bimbo ad used so successfully against Harold Ford in Tennessee. In juxtaposing Barack Obama with Britney Spears and Paris Hilton, the McCain campaign is simply trying to plant the old racist seed of black man hitting on young white woman. Not directly, but subliminally and disgracefully.

    One thing for sure. This isnt the John McCain we first saw in 2000, running a campaign on the issues. And this isn't the positive McCain campaign he himself promised us for 2008. This is a campaign that, from the beginning, is nothing but negative, personal, dirty and, yes, racist

    Even the most challenged politically envolved can see this yes even you "ROVEBOTS" and that is exactly why you are not touching this. You all know this is McCains suicide note. Probably the last nail in his political coffin. I bet right now the movers and the shakers in the Republican Party are scrambling for someone else they can nominate at their convention. The Republicans knew McCain was a terrible candidate they have just been proven most assuredly correct.

    I feel your PAIN with your vote for McCain


  • Posted By: jeff7915 @ 07/29/2008 12:52:54 PM

    So Obama passed a test by giving a speech in front of a huge crowd which has gathered for a free concert. (Everyone seems to conveniently leave that part out). A large percentage of people who actually showed up for the speech were the usual European Socialist types.

    • Posted By: firetheprincipal @ 07/29/2008 8:06:15 PM

      They were a bunch of Nazis that showed up. Yah, along with the Commies, and lets not forget the Rock and roll groupies too. Oh I left you out there, sorry, next time I will make sure your included.

      • Posted By: jeff7915 @ 07/30/2008 9:41:26 AM

        You mean "I will make sure YOU'RE included" not "your included", professor.

        • Posted By: SPORTLOCK09 @ 07/31/2008 4:10:52 PM

          Thats not why the pricipal got fired. It was because of a 13 yr old little girl...

    • Posted By: jimbo3800 @ 07/29/2008 7:40:28 PM

      God knows they weren't at work. I'd love to know how many in attendance are on the socialist "dole".

  • Posted By: axnix @ 07/31/2008 3:05:31 PM

    Your Obama praise is beyond the pale. What ever happened to fair and balanced reporting?

    axnix

  • Posted By: axnix @ 07/31/2008 3:03:51 PM

    Your Obama comments go beyond the pale.. What ever happened to fair and balanced at Newsweek?

    Axnix, E
    Moline, IL

  • Posted By: ellerby @ 07/31/2008 10:53:05 AM

    What "test" did Obama pass? What "challenge" currently exists in Berlin for Obama to address?

  • Posted By: Driver of wagons @ 07/31/2008 10:50:58 AM



    Let's begin our examination of the real Reagan Legacy by taking a look at myth number one: Democrats dominated Congress all through Reagan's terms, and called all his budgets Dead On Arrival.

    That's numerically and historically false. Reagan's people shoved his program through the Congress during the early Reagan years. James A. Baker, David Stockman and other Reaganites ran roughshod over Tip O'Neill and the divided Democrats in the House and Senate, and won every critical vote. This is because of the GOP majority in the Senate and the GOP-"Boll Weevil"(or "Dixiecrat") coalition in the House. Phil Gramm was a House Democrat at the time, and he even sponsored the most important Reagan budgets.

    Only after the huge Reagan recession -- made worse by utterly failed Reagan "Voodoo Economics" - did Democrats regain some control in Congress. They halted some Reagan initiatives, but couldn't do much on their own. That was a time of gridlock.

    Six years into Reagan's presidency, Democrats retook the Senate, and began to reverse some of Reagan's horrendous policies. By that time, Reaganomics had "accomplished" quite a bit: doubled the national debt, caused the S&L crisis, and nearly wrecked the financial system



  • Posted By: Driver of wagons @ 07/30/2008 8:09:19 PM




    Reagan saying, "Mr. Satan, tear down this wall of fire."

    Satan replies, "Do you think it's actually that easy, Ronnie, my boy... that all you need to do is read the teleprompter and such things will come to pass? Although, I can see why you would believe so -- because you were always so richly rewarded for that kind of nonsense in the last world -- but things are different here in Hell. You see, the purpose of these flames is to burn the lies away from your eternal soul... and between the amount of lies you've told in your lifetime and the massive amount of grease you have slicked into your hair -- you should burn for eons to come"

    Reagan: You got the wrong guy: I'm strictly a white hat kinda cowboy.

    Satan: I am not the least bit concerned with your kinky, Village People kind of dress-up fantasies. Those are not the kinds of sins that condemn you to be cast into Hell's soul-searing pits of fire. For the misguided people who habitually commit fashion transgressions -- or Sins of the Fabric -- as they are known here -- I have devised other forms of punishment: Here in Hell, we give them an involuntary infusion of good taste -- and then we force them to watch film-loops of themselves walking around in public dressed as they did during their lifetimes. Oh, the wails and lamentation, they emit! Oh the sweet music of perdition!

    Reagan: Watch it there, buddy. Don't you go implying I'm one of those... those... types... just because I was an actor.

    Satan: Those types of what?

    Continued below

    • Posted By: emmarcee @ 07/31/2008 9:02:24 AM

      I think we should rename this as Ronnie in Leberal Heaven.

  • Posted By: Driver of wagons @ 07/30/2008 8:08:53 PM



    Continued from above

    Reagan: Oh come on, now. You have plenty of them down here.... Those prancing, limp-wristed, light-in-the loafer sort of people.... You know....

    Satan: Are you referring to homosexuals? You still can't say the word out loud, can you? Just like you couldn't lift a finger to help those who were afflicted with AIDS during your presidency -- isn't that right? You caused a huge amount of pain and suffering with that choice.... My complements. Fine bit of work that was. Couldn't have done a better job myself.

    Reagan: But...but I thought it was God who wanted me to allow queers to suffer for their sins -- not you... Next, you're going to tell me that God didn't want to me fight commies, either.

    Satan: You donned a uniform and risked life and limb facing the enemy on the battlefield -- You did that personally...? Sorry, I must have missed that.

    Reagan: I wore the uniform of the Commander and Chief and it's said that my steely resolve brought down the Evil Empire.

    Satan: Do you actually believe that nonsense? Or did General Electric pay you so much money that you actually started to believe it? You know, I'm somewhat of an expert in that area -- The business of buying and selling of souls is my particular specialty -- and Ronnie, let's face it: You were simply a snake oil salesman, peddling the goods of the National Security State.

    Not that I have anything against snake oil salesmen or war profiteering, mind you. And you were good, damn good -- you had the technique down: Just keep the dumb bastards reeling between fear and false hope -- that's the trick -- and you'll end up with their loyalty and their money, if not their very souls, every time.

    You had enviable technique. You had the gift, Ronnie Boy -- The ability to convince people to support actions that were against their own interest... by employing the seductive ploy of telling them that their virtues are sins and that their sins are virtues... That whole "greed is a good thing," that was an inspired piece of work -- I salute you for it.... You not only allowed the powerful to exploit the needy -- but you made the greedy feel good about themselves for having done so.

    Even the words you used were exquisite: "Supply Side Economics..." I adore the serpentine alliteration of the S's in the phrase. I can't resist it: S-s-s upply S-s-side Economics-s-s-s: The phrase just insidiously slithers right inside my serpent's soul. And Trickle Down theory... That one is so rich with irony -- because here you are: Your soul certainly did trickle -- right down to Hell.

    Didn't it, Ronnie, my boy?

    Reagan: But... didn't you see my funeral? They all loved me so.

    Continued below


  • Posted By: Driver of wagons @ 07/30/2008 8:03:56 PM



    Continued From Above

    Satan: Lies are a very precious thing. And you were very generous with yours. You bestowed the glittering gift of denial. You see: People are terrified of change. I count on that human trait; it plays into my strengths as a master of persuasion. I've learned that people will follow, even deeply love, those who tell them that they need never look within themselves to find the root of their suffering.

    Reagan: But they all say that I made Americans feel good about themselves again after Vietnam and Watergate.

    Satan: America left millions of corpses in South-East Asia and re-elected Richard Nixon in a landslide -- then only turned on Nixon when evidence of his own corruption was revealing too much about their own.

    Reagan: The country was sick with malaise -- stricken with self-doubt. I restored their sense of pride.

    Continued Below


Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse