China’s Agony of Defeat

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: RedEye0088 @ 07/31/2008 9:36:57 AM

    This is one of the fairest articles I've read ever since the Olympic / Tibet / Human-right / Nadidadida issues come to international spotlight. I'm not a Chinese historian, so I cannot say whether you are 100% correct, but I do appreciate much your effort to portray and analyze in the most objective and understanding manner. Perhaps you are also acquainted with James Reynolds, the BBC journalist currently stationed in Beijing? He gives his very best shot as well.

    The Chinese love the West, praise the West, looks towards to the West. But we as a culture also leave you alone. The government in Beijing upholds the non-interventionist policy - isn't it very obvious as an ethical choice?

    As a young man who was born in Taiwan and educated in the West, I am out of the Party's propaganda reach. But my parents constantly remind me of my cultural roots, of the national humiliation, and the importance to strive as a Chinese individual. I believe it is our personal choices to be patriotic. The propaganda of the state is a mean to encourage its citizens, not brainwashing.

    I only worry one thing - that the counter-demonstation tides becomes over zealous.

    I sense that we as a Chinese don't ask for much. If the West, or the governments of the West, don't praise our achievements as we prefer, then at least leave us alone.

  • Posted By: RedEye0088 @ 07/31/2008 9:30:14 AM

    This is one of the fairer articles I've encountered ever since the Tibetan protests began. Thank you for providing this insight - I am not a Chinese historian so therefore I cannot say whether you are 100% correct, but I appreciate your huge effort. Perhaps you are in touch with James Reynolds, the BBC journalist staffed in Beijing.

    Even as a young man (1980's) who was born in Taiwan, studied abroad in the West, beyond the reaches of the Party Propaganda, I still feel passionate about the spotlight on China. My parents were the one reminding me of our cultural roots, made me wary of the possible Western agenda to keep Asia under the lid.

    I sense that we the Chinese people actually aren't asking for much. If the West cannot praise us as we wish, then at least leave us alone. The Asian way is that if we believe in our righteousness, we shouldn't have to explain for ourselves. (Well, certainly not recommended from the PR point of view).

  • Posted By: zouhair @ 07/31/2008 9:28:21 AM

    Wonderful! Finally an unbiased analysis that takes both perspectives into consideration. It was really time to see a fresh approach in understanding what China is about and why it is so. This is also a clear message to Western media: you're not doing any good by being overcritical. It is not by making the chinese uncomfortable about themselves that you'll make them more regarding to human rights and democracy.

  • Posted By: Qiin @ 07/31/2008 3:27:15 AM

    DWPitts, you should be proud of yourself for your achievements in China, instead of being sad when people react different from what you expect. I don't think your counterparts hated you or your country. It's the backfire that agitated them so much when they are trying to contribute to the Olympic Game. It's the Chinese people's wish to have the Olympic spiritual evolution and it has been disturbing by reporters lost tracks, religious politics, and world (part of the world) politicians. It's a complex world.

  • Posted By: Qiin @ 07/31/2008 3:24:42 AM

    DWPitts, you should be proud of yourself for your achievements in China, instead of being sad when people react different from what you expect. I don't think your counterparts hated you or your country. It's the backfire that agitated them so much when they are trying to contribute to the Olympic Game. It's the Chinese people's wish to have the Olympic spiritual evolution and it has been disturbing by reporters lost tracks, religious politics, and world (part of the world) politicians. It's a complex world.

  • Posted By: wanshousi @ 07/30/2008 10:26:39 PM

    What the **** is this? White colonists and imperialist invaded, blackmailed, killed, slaughtered one nation and another, and now they are urging victims to forget humiliation, insulation and to be "civilized".

    Are you Orville Schell really stupid or pretending to be stupid here?

    You think you know some oriental names, deng xiaopiang, Lu xun, Mao??? and you can brag your broad knowledge and be a China expert.

    Tell you, you are a clown.

    We shall come back. With revenges and ask you westerners to pay the debt: silver, gold, indignity and LIVES.

    You dare try to mesmerize Chinese, Indians, Africans, South Americans; you are only cheating yourselves. Who will give you a ***?

    An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth
    .

    • Posted By: DWPitts @ 07/30/2008 11:11:20 PM

      Do you really want to pound the drums of global war because some people in the world are free to speak their minds in a printed venue? According to you, the rest of us are not entitled to speak, only kow tow to you and your glorious motherland. Some of you sound more and more bent with each and every post.

      Get over yourself. This is an American publication and WE have the right to speak our minds. You don't rule the world yet, pal. But every time one of you spews this vile poison over OUR human rights, you move the neutrals farther from you. More people should pay attention to you, I agree. YOU are dangerous, and every day, you make your intentions more well known.

      In short, and in the most poetic terms I can muster, attempting my best to understand your background and long struggles, remaining as free from prejudice and malice as I can, but more simply put: screw you.

      Global war solves nothing. You may be prepared for it, relish it, long for it, savor it, glorify it, but I don't. You will also lose, as well, will we. But if you think you are going to bring that rotten attitude onto US soil and make those demands, you best prepare yourself.

      Do you really want to deal in death over printed criticism from ordinary people? Are you really that desperate? If you are, God save us all.

      • Posted By: wanshousi @ 07/30/2008 11:56:47 PM

        -Global war solves nothing.- Tell this to your current president and republican candidate who gained lead in recent national poll.

        americans are always so hypocritical and hilarious, by abusing in action while gushing some rhetoric quoting god.

        Your nation???s credit in almost every nations summing to 5.5 billion population I mentioned above (I suppose you take these 5.5 billion population as human beings) has irreversibly overdrafted and everyone hates you. if you don???t get why, go back to your history book to find out what your civilization had done to others and why you have to pay, inevitably.
        Of course, your history books are only stuffed indoctrinations like ???democracy and freedom prevail???.

        This is the reason you have president as current one and a republican candidate who gained lead in recent national poll.

        Take it, after WW2, you always have ???democratically elected presidents??? waging wars globally (Jimmy Carter is an exception). And I tell you, democratically electing war presidents is the only major reason world people hate you american people so much, because you elected him, you cover him, you are responsible for him.

        If everyone hates you, you must have done something hateful. And again of course, you could laugh it off since they are not ???civilized???.




        • Posted By: sgman @ 07/31/2008 1:27:24 AM

          your posts make me think you didn't read the article. or didn't understand it. when fenqing like you spew hatred at americans, it just makes china look bad. is that your goal? if so, then keep it up. otherwise, learn to have a rational discussion. and keep working on your english.

  • Posted By: Aditya Mookerjee @ 07/30/2008 11:14:42 PM

    China has advanced considerably since the end of World War 2. China never had a military tradition which was regarded, before the Second World War. Now it has a collective armed force, which is regarded favorably, when training, and discipline is considered. This military achievement is also notable, in a land which Confucius considered his home, and where he lived. China must realize, that in existence, there is no security.All life ends, including the lives of those, who are the leaders and members of the ruling party of that great nation. Because China is committed to an industrialization which is very robust, it has to see itself less committed to other matters which are equally important to her people, like clean waters in China's rivers, and her surrounding coastline, for instance. China is not unaware of this state of affairs. If the current President of China, is a engineer, by qualification, I am sure, he would urge other engineers, to appreciate other aspects to existence, other than engineering. This is vital, for the engineer, and for the members of society. However, China has a pragmatic and dynamic leadership. Pragmatism is expected in the land of Confucius. However, pragmatism and dynamism, is never a security for any situation. One has to have these qualities in all situations.

  • Posted By: chongyeeyap @ 07/30/2008 9:14:04 PM

    The USA icon merchant bank that I forgot is MERRILL LYNCH !

    • Posted By: DWPitts @ 07/30/2008 10:04:28 PM

      Merrill-Lynch is not a bank pal, its an investment house. What's your point?

  • Posted By: chongyeeyap @ 07/30/2008 8:15:02 PM

    Yeah ! Yeah ! Yeah ! You westerners try your everything to win the co-operation of India as a counter weight to the our beloved motherland; but I think India knows better. However, China has no fear of India noe the USA nor the west. I am sorry to say but we see India at the limits of their growth potential. The difference between China and India is that in India you see a mirage but in China we believe in the real thing; we do not need to trumpet to the world that we are the greaatest because we know we are the greatest. Let assure that India just got nowhere to go but down because their social structure built on the caste structure inhibits upward mobility of the talents; not so for China and if you watch the success stories produced by CCTV 9 of the innovations of our entrepreuneurs you will need to fear the future frowth of China. We have lots of headroom for our people to excel and we are only at the tip for now.

    We Chinese to quote Lee Peng (former PM) know bitter. It is only a fool who quotes the per capita income as a measure of wealth, because a night's stay in a Chinese 3 star hotel in China costs you US$30 but in Europe a no star hotel will put you back US$80 per night per person. My family went to Europe three years ago and that was the price of rooms in Europe. Thereofre talking of per capita is talking of oranges and elephants.

    Another thing that I want to catch you on, DON'T MAKE IT SOUND LIKE CHINA DEPENDS ON THE USA FOR HER EXPORTS; and right now China's trade with the Asean nations stands at US$100 billions and the growth of that market is picking at a fast clip of 44% year on year. The growth of Asean will close off USA participation in this part of the world. India is merely an observer at this Asean plus 3 (Japan, China & South korea). India is not even in Asean and so is not the USA. To tell you as it is the USA trade amounts to only 5% of China GNP.

    JUST DON'T EXAGGERATE THE IMPORTANCE OF THE USA TO CHINA; more like you need to look at what China is to the USA. Another trivia that you may want to know, today's news from Singapore is that Singapore company holds 20% of one of your American icon merchant bankers (is it Morgan Stanly or one of similar stature. I will get back to you when I remember.

    • Posted By: DWPitts @ 07/30/2008 10:00:37 PM

      Pinky: What are we going to do today Brain?

      Brain: Today, like every other day Pinky, we are going to plan to rule the world!

      (excerpted from every single episode of "Pinky and the Brain")

      =====

      So, if you are serious about the US being absolutely nothing, then, put your money where mouth is and swear off making all imports or being involved here at all. The US is obviously meaningless to you anyway. We don't need you either, by the way, and the sooner we realize that, the better. Oh, and take Walmart with you, lol.

      You may want to tone down that global domination speech just a tad. Telling everybody but Japan, Korea and Singapore to die, is probably not a real smart move on your part (even if that is the internal details of the next five-year plan). It also reveals your current weakness. If you were really all that, why would you need the others, lol.

      Enjoy "your" Olympics. You have convinced me to stay away from them completely, as China and its friends, now own the entire world, and we the peons, are not welcome in your grand celebration of global domination. No thanks, I would rather starve to death, than live under your oppression pal.

      Li Peng, huh? Hardliner, old school, life long internal adversary of Deng. So the hardliners are in total control again? You know it was Deng and the reformers that put you in this position, not the hardliners? Now I understand your foment. You truly are bent global domination.

      =====

      Oh, for reference, per capita income is not a measure of wealth, national greatness or the size of a certain part of the male anatomy (to quote from a popular commercial). It is a reflection of the natural cost of doing business. As people demand more, per capita rises. As per capita rises, the cost of doing business rises. As the cost of doing business rises, your export markets get impacted by foreign competition. At least, in the free world that's the way it works. I guess if you rule the world and oppress all other populations, then, obviously, it no longer matters, lol. I guess when the people demand more, you could always just beat them over the head and tell them to STFU.

      Good luck dealing with India, by the way, after you tell them how meaningless they are. I'm so certain they will be very thankful for your astute observation on their lack of a future, lol. Might as well go ahead and inform the Europeans they have no place in your new world order, either. They are a pretty smart bunch who will figure out pretty quickly, when you start shipping the rest of us into the gulags, lol.

      =====

      In case you don't understand, I'm having a little fun at your expense. It's called sarcasm, and with you fomenting like this, I just cannot resist, lol. I cannot force myself to take your post seriously at all. I just cannot stop laughing, sorry. Enjoy the Olympics. They are a sporting event, or at least, they used to be, lol.

  • Posted By: evalroy @ 07/30/2008 2:21:54 PM

    China???s Agony of Defeat is more like the Western???s Agony of Defeat. The author was comparing American ideology to Chinese ideology. And with 50 years of negative campaign on China, it???s easy to make up anything that fits your profile of China. It???s not the Chinese propaganda we see, but the western propaganda. China did not go invading countries for oil, nor did China actively butting in to other country???s business. Humiliation? Yes we feel humiliated, not for being Chinese, but for suckered in to American for 2 decades, while our counter parts in China is living a better life than we are.

    • Posted By: DWPitts @ 07/30/2008 3:49:20 PM

      If your view is representative of the majority, we in the US would be more than happy to completely bar the sale of Chinese goods in the United States to save you from the horror of us buying your products, lol. I didn't realize just how bad it was for the poor, struggling Chinese to be forced to sell goods here. I'm so stupid, i thought US trade with China was a good thing for you....Apparently not, as the OP has clearly stated how horrible it has been for them to make billions of dollars off of the United States consumers. How dare us buy your cheap, lead paint infested wares! We are clearly evil.

      We should learn from these folks and impose high tariffs on the importation of their goods, much as they do to ours. The OP is right. Stop all trade with China immediately, or stand to be convicted of damaging their great nation by buying their cheap goods, lmao.

      Your view is what the original article was mentioning. You demand respect and understanding from the world, yet you have none to give in return. Sooner, or later, you need to drop the crutches and fully join the world community. When the interactions between us work the same in both directions, then come back and complain. It's not enough to say, "Somebody did something bad to us 75 years ago, so we are justified doing something bad to them now". Sounds like teenaged thinking to me, lol.

      In case you don't understand, this post contains sarcasm. In light of the massive imbalance in trade and tariffs, your post is very misguided at best. Sorry.

      • Posted By: dodoaunt @ 07/30/2008 4:44:51 PM

        This post is an unacceptablly distorting of the truth. Do us a favor, and try all your might to raise the tarriff and stop the trade.Throughout the years,wWe produced trillons dollars of goods and send it to the US to be consumed by your poeple. What do we get in retune? US dollars, which are just printed papers recycled from garbage. So stop the trade, then our people will have a chance to enjoy the welth created by our own hard work. We don't need your inflated papers.

        • Posted By: DWPitts @ 07/30/2008 7:22:32 PM

          With the main problem being, the majority of your people don't have the disposable income available to buy all of these things you produce. Further, when you raise the per capita income to a level where you don't need the western markets, you will no longer be the low cost manufacturer, and then, you will be complaining about those evil Indians taking away your jobs, lol. In actual fact, the population growth rate in India far exceeds your own, and they will be the largest population on earth within the next 20-30 years.

          I accept the fact that English is probably not your first language, so I will overlook the fact you missed the point that my post was sarcasm. Maybe take a moment and look up in the dictionary what that word means.

          But there is no denying that China is dependent on foreign markets to sustain its economic growth. This callous disregard for the rest of world is what people are pointing to as being out of the norm.

          Go in peace.

      • Posted By: evalroy @ 07/30/2008 4:21:23 PM

        Really? Your are the one that should join the world community. Your news agency forgot to mention The three Major US Car companies sold 9 billion dollars of SUVs to China last month. Because they needed this to survive. While consuming 20 billion barrel of oil a year and still blaming China for Spending 7billion. I look forward to the day that the US stop trading with China. Unlike what you expected, US is not the only Major player in the World, with the dollar getting cheaper, it doesn't make sense to sell to the US anymore. A example that you can understand is Nintendo selling their Wii in Europe, instead of the states. Yea you should be able to find that in the news.

        • Posted By: DWPitts @ 07/30/2008 7:02:54 PM

          I guess you and the previous poster missed the sentence where it said this is sarcasm, lol. In your blind ramblings and spewed invectives, you don't know what that means, do you? And as far as China buying 9 billion (USD) worth of SUVs last month, that also is outrageously wrong.

          I apologize for baiting you with sarcasm, truly. I did it to make a point, which sadly, you and the previous poster fell right into. Have to viciously attack anything that doesn't imply worship, right?

          So go on and wail, claiming you did this all alone because of your superiority and might. But in your ranting, maybe take a moment to reflect that this type of thinking is what gets you isolated from the rest of the world, and justly, sets you up for criticism.

          And by the way, I don't think Nintendo is going to be knocking on your door anytime soon for you to be an official Nintendo spokesman, lol. In real business, you can't afford to throw away markets because of your racist beliefs. Sorry.

          PS good luck selling off all those US bills and notes y'all bought up, lol. If they were so worthless, why did you buy them? Maybe, you made a mistake? Heaven forbid, that could never happen, right?

          PSS i showed you a mirror using sarcasm, and you barked at yourself. Fascinating, lol.

  • Posted By: chongyeeyap @ 07/30/2008 7:16:55 PM

    To rabbit ! Read all the comments and take notice that 98% of respondents are westerners who comments negatively on China and our stirling performance in these last 20 years. From my perspective, there is no need to argue otherwise from their wishful prayers for an imminent "implosion" of our great motherland. We have been consistently a robust civilization for more than 10,000 years and we have come to re-take our place in the world as a leader.

    It is better to demonstrate what the west has become than to argue. The latest figure that has been released from the White House of the USA says that the USA this year face a budget deficit of one half of a US$trillion; and add on to that another 1/2 a trillion that is seeping into the US budget from Iraq & Afghanistan then the true budget deficit will be closer to one trillion. Imagine a budget deficit of 1 trillion per year and throw in another US$685 billion to bale out those in the poor house of the mortgage crisis and you will have a budget deficit of 2 trillion. IS THER ENOUGH PAPER TO PRINT ALL THOSE TRILLIONS OF US$ ON THE FACE OF THIS PLANET ?

    There is no USA economy; there is a huge money printing shop in the USA.

  • Posted By: bobma @ 07/30/2008 7:04:32 PM

    let's be honest. The only reason we criticize china so much is because we fear its growth. From its pollution, to its use of African resources, we love to point the finger and tell them to stop it. Yet, when the western world was industrializing, we were pumping all kinds of smoke into the air and stealing African resources to get where we are now. But now that we're done with that stage of growth, sittin fat, happy and satisfied, we can now tell everyone else to think about the environment, stop using resources, don't do this, don't do that. Stay where you're at. Don't grow, don't improve. Etc, etc etc

  • Posted By: evalroy @ 07/30/2008 4:57:26 PM

    Here is a YouTube video that you should all see, doesn't matter which side you support, and yes I have read the book he mentioned in the video while in College. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uQhDll880Y4

    • Posted By: rabbit77 @ 07/30/2008 5:19:14 PM

      All these comments about China's impending retribution and "defeating" the West, (Buh, ha, ha, ha!) are not only misdirected, it shows clearly that in fact the Chinese government (and some Chinese people, evidently) really have no interest in promoting a "Harmonious Society". It signals that everything China wants it wants at the expense of other nations. When in fact, the opposite is true. Nations must work together. This is not a zero sum game, evalroy, there will be many great nations, China included, but not simply because you build more cell phones than any other country. True greatness means standing shoulder to shoulder with other nations, great and not so great, to promote the happiness of all people, not one group at the expense of all others.

    • Posted By: evalroy @ 07/30/2008 5:10:15 PM

      The book at Amazon http://tinyurl.com/69ccsn

  • Posted By: AussieLouis @ 07/30/2008 6:27:47 AM

    The analysis is, just as any analysis of China by a non-Chiness, shallow. It's however right in stating that the Chinese have been humiliated by the West and the Japanese. The thieving west, particularly British buccaneers, took advantage of a peaceable, civilised nation. With their guns and robbers' attitude they find excuses to rob the Chinese. In one pretext, by creating a provocation the French and the Chinese depleting a whole palace of ancient Chinese treasures which are now "gloriously 'displayed in their museums. It is fair to say though that the only western friend they had, the before the second world war were the Americans because of the latter's abhorrence of colonialism. That their attitude changed after the second world war believing they saved the world and are therefore entitled to be colonialists themselves, is the beginning of a another sad episode in world hegemony. The Americans are still in hegemony, Iraq being a great example, especially after the end of the cold war. They have just managed to start another cold war through Bush.

    The Chinese are a patient civilisation having gone through thousands of years of war and peace. However, a they were not expecting and unaware of the robber states of the west and their avaraciousness. And like the civilised Athenian Greeks before them they were not armed and unprepared for modern barbarious robber states. However, no country in history has conquered them after all. Their social and cultural resilience, their wisdom and intelligence and their abilities to emerge strongly from disaster and set- backs has allowed the Chinese nation to thrive for thousand of years. When the anglo-saxons and celts were going around in bearskins, they had already a civil service made up of the best of their intelligentsia, chosen through a meritocratic examination system, a thousand years old. To most Chinese, including the Chinese diasporo around the world,doing well everywhere, what is fifty or hundred years of setbacks campared to the 5000 years of their history.?After all, they did not create the problems which made them 'the sick man of Asia, an insulting term used by the Japanese and the West to add to the injury of robbing them. Wise Chinese would tell you to learn lessons from defeat but never to forget what your enemies have done to injured you. All is fair in love and war but do not mistake insult and injury, especially committed on you with the barrel of a gun.

    It is up to the West and others whether they want to wise up or continue to injure a people with not only the means to retaliate but with a large intelligent and patriotic populace. With only a few million, Jews can harness the resources to master the peoples of the US and Europe, initially their oppressors now their unwitting servants; what do you think a billion or more Chinese can do?

    • Posted By: DWPitts @ 07/30/2008 3:18:58 PM

      To say that China has a long and memorable history goes without saying. But to look back and state that it is a long history of peace and understanding is completely divergent from actual Chinese history. I guess in many ways, we all suffer from similar romantic revisionism of our pasts. The truth is; the entire world's history is filled with vengeance, avarice, greed, corruption and a never-ending series of wars that have introduced generations to misery. No country's past is squeaky clean.

      Warring States, Three Kingdoms, the impositions of the Dynasties on the populace. The emergence of the Mongols. Construction of the Wall. The never ending struggle to keep the country unified. Chinese history contains just as much force, corruption and greed as any other. Really read the writings of Confucius and his followers on how to keep your head attached to your shoulders (literally) when appearing in the old mandarin courts. His waters ran deep when analyzing how to hold sway before the courts (and his total disdain for the eunuchs handling state affairs).

      Don't care for Confucius, try reading from the Taoist literature then, if you can find it still. The early communists burnt most of the temples, containing the old manuscripts, to the ground, fearing people would long for a return to the old Dynasty ways. Try to find a copy of the I Ching today. It's the oldest known publication in world, yet, is it even available in the place of its origin?

      Indeed, Chinese history and literature are rich sources for documenting and understanding the human condition. I love the stories of ???A Journey to the West??? and ???Romance of the Three Kingdoms??? (amongst others, including Sun Tzu's Art of War, from the Chinese translation, though, not the western one most people have read). Early Chinese cinema also holds some real gems (I really like The Red Lantern for instance).

      At some point in these discussions, a distinction needs to be made between people, and those that rule them. Casting broad nets of criticism and accusation against whole populations is always a mistake. Saying Americans are hegemonic because of the ambitions and mistakes of some its leaders is not a fair assessment. Most are still really upset because of the World Trade Centers and want justice, not global domination as implied by the OP.

      In the time I spent in China, I found that most people were just like me. Industrious, fun, outgoing, wanted the best for their families and friends, and always had time to share a good meal, some laughs, and juicy bits of gossip about their neighbors. I never wished anything ill for their families, nor did they wish ill for mine. If not for geo-political posturing???

  • Posted By: evalroy @ 07/30/2008 4:39:02 PM

    All this humiliation talk sounded very familiar to what going on in the US right now. Read the Top news. McCain portrays of Obama. We can throw dirty in each other's face all day long. Nothing will be solved. China is going to have the Olympics, unless some of you are planning to stop it. Its a done deal.

  • Posted By: rabbit77 @ 07/30/2008 3:49:54 PM

    This "humiliation" complex is a pretext thrust upon the West for China's own failures going back to its becoming occupied first in the Yuan Dynasty by the Mongols followed by the Qing Dynasty, the Mongolians. The West never occupied China such as these two dynasties had. Its failings continued under the Chinese Ming Dynasty. The Ming Qianlong Emperor himself humiliated the British Macartney Embassy in the late 18th century by submitting that they kow tow to the empty emperors throne, he himself refusing to meet the delegation personally. He further refused all requests for trade stating that Europe had nothing China needs. Had he a little less ignorant about under-estimating the West and over-estimating the Middle Kingdom he would have known that in fact there was much at that time that China could learn from the West. China's problems, these "humiliations" if you will, were all homegrown. Inept, poorly managed, self-serving. That's what led China to become so backward following its glory days of the Tang Dynasty. The West need make no apologies for that, thank you. It's the Communist Government that indoctrinates this idea of humiliation in the Chinese people for the sole purpose of deflection attention to its own shortcomings. Because the people live, breath and eat government propaganda from the time they are born its no surprise that the Chinese people behave in in such a xenophobic and nationalistic, and might I add, dangerous manner.

    • Posted By: evalroy @ 07/30/2008 4:08:38 PM

      What you are saying could be said the same to yourself. Your government also life, breath and eat its own propaganda. From the time your were born. 50 years your people been teaching your children that there are children in china that don't have anything to eat. How do you clearly see whats going on when you are being taught that while growing up.

  • Posted By: rabbit77 @ 07/30/2008 4:05:17 PM

    If my comments weren't clear enough some of the more rabid readers its this: No one has humiliated China more in the last 1,000 years of Chinese governments up to and including the present one. That's a touch thing to live with and thus it's much easier to blame others. The Chinese government has the audacity to complain to Japan about the "truthiness" of its textbooks when Chairman Mao, arguably the greatest mass murder of all time is held up as China's own George Washington figure. That's bold. This is what happens when there is no freedom of speech or the press. The Chinese complain about CNN and the BBC as if their own Chinese television, newspapers, Internet, books, magazines, et all, are not owned and managed by the Communist government. To do so would admit that they don't know propaganda when they see it - which is all the time. Its hard to live in a world like that and expect people to be objective.

  • Posted By: Metro3D @ 07/29/2008 10:52:21 PM

    Posted by Stephen, San Jose, CA
    Taiwan is not part of China.
    You don't find Taiwan travelling in China, sorry.

    Taiwan will participate the Olympic, independent of and competing China's team

    • Posted By: evalroy @ 07/30/2008 2:26:11 PM

      Taiwan is not part of China at the moment is true, but with 90% of your businessman in China, China is Taiwan's second Home. No China, No Taiwan. 50million Taiwan people is in China right now, no Taiwan travelling in china? are you kidding me?

  • Posted By: Wonderful @ 07/30/2008 3:35:19 AM

    The west would like to see a China frozen in time. Of course, to their advantage so that the west can continue to dominate the world which is in their genes and dna. A strong China is posing a threat to their dominance and survival, the west will do everything and anything just to retard China growth. Remember, in 1994 they did on Japan which is on the way to replace America as the no.1 economic power. Now, the west is focusing on China and through George Soros they managed to retard the growth of Asean region which have a very strong and friendly relationship with China. This brought forth 1997 Asian financial crisis and brought untold miseries to the people of South East Asia. The west did not realise that China manage to sustain and grow to todays gigantic size and is recognised as the 4th largest economy in the world. An achievement that have rendered China unpopular and threathening the western superiority complex. By the grace of GOD, China will pull through this Olympic game as they have done in 1997 Asian financial crisis. I wish the Chinese the very best from the bottom of my heart that they will have the best olympic ever.

    • Posted By: DWPitts @ 07/30/2008 1:28:51 PM

      Where to start: First, the 1994 event in Japan, the so called bursting of the bubble economy, was not an internationally generated event by westerners to control Japan. It was the manifestation of an overheated and over-valued economy, where real estate in Tokyo at one point was selling for $1kk per square foot.

      Henceforth, loans made on assets in this over-valued state then became vulnerable, as the true value of the collateral was exposed when the markets corrected. Hence, Japanese banks were sitting on a bundle of bad loans (unsecured and under-collateralized). The central bank then began pumping money into the system to alleviate the mounting risks, eventually causing large-scale inflation. In the end, the economy suffered, not because of big-nose intervention, but because capital became short while inflation sky-rocketed. It was a domestic economic event, not an international one. I worked with BoJ officials during this time, and not once did they blame us for their troubles.

      The 1997 event was more international in nature, given the entry of the western aid agencies in their attempts to stabilize the failing currency and bond values throughout the area (especially the Thai Baht where it started). China, maintaining an unconvertible currency throughout, was largely immune to this because unlike most countries in the region, it refuses to float its currency. The Yuan to this day, is still an unconvertible currency. So basically, it wasn't China's strength that gave it immunity in the 1997 event, it was the weakness of its currency (through its protected status).

      Your reference to George Soros is also somewhat misguided, as it was a collection of wealthy investors who entered the mix. They were attempting to break the peg between the Hong Kong and United States dollars; as per treaty agreement, the United States Treasury is the underwriter for the valuation of the HK dollar (and still is to the best of my knowledge). If the HK dollar starts falling, it???s the responsibility of the US treasury to buy HK dollars until the price stabilizes, ensuring the US-HK dollar peg is maintained. This arrangement was put in place in 1983, following the British announcement HK would revert to the mainland in 1997. After this, the Hong Kong dollar and the Heng Seng Index went into freefall until the US treasury intervened.

      I was in HK the day after the handover in 1997, and was allowed to see what was happening. Wholesale capital flight was taking place at that time, with money being transferred mainly out of the region. The international group you refer to, at the time, was attempting to force the break in linkage (I guess freeing you from those evil people in the US who were underwriting your losses). The peg survived, so I guess, the international investors and the US taxpayers lost.

      Please work a little bit harder before wailing away on recent global history.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse