This is one of the fairest articles I've read ever since the Olympic / Tibet / Human-right / Nadidadida issues come to international spotlight. I'm not a Chinese historian, so I cannot say whether you are 100% correct, but I do appreciate much your effort to portray and analyze in the most objective and understanding manner. Perhaps you are also acquainted with James Reynolds, the BBC journalist currently stationed in Beijing? He gives his very best shot as well.
The Chinese love the West, praise the West, looks towards to the West. But we as a culture also leave you alone. The government in Beijing upholds the non-interventionist policy - isn't it very obvious as an ethical choice?
As a young man who was born in Taiwan and educated in the West, I am out of the Party's propaganda reach. But my parents constantly remind me of my cultural roots, of the national humiliation, and the importance to strive as a Chinese individual. I believe it is our personal choices to be patriotic. The propaganda of the state is a mean to encourage its citizens, not brainwashing.
I only worry one thing - that the counter-demonstation tides becomes over zealous.
I sense that we as a Chinese don't ask for much. If the West, or the governments of the West, don't praise our achievements as we prefer, then at least leave us alone.









Discuss