The Fiction Behind Torture Policy

The lawyers designing interrogation techniques cited Jack Bauer more frequently than the Constitution.

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: tmkwan @ 04/06/2009 2:49:53 AM

    Many years ago President Reagan was filmed quoting from what he said were the words of an admiral during world war two, who on seeing his young pilots take off from an aircraft carrier, ???where do we get these men from???? The trouble with this was the quote was not one from a real person rather it was from a war film based on a book of fiction. To top it all the book and film were set in and about the Korean War not WW2. Reagan confused what he saw on screen and spoken by a fictional character with the real thing. Years later this confusion between reality and fiction happens under the Bush administration with a television series called ???24???.
    I note that some people who have written abusive comments in response to this article and I am amazed at their inability to accept anything was wrong with what officials in the Bush administration has done in the name of the American people following the example of a television show. They also seem to ignore that this confusion with reality has happened before. Some segments of American society are so out of touch they really scare the rest of us who have to live in the real world.

  • Posted By: gwf11 @ 03/06/2009 11:27:08 AM

    are you kidding me. save one life for the death of many others? the risk is worth it. just look at the writer shes as dumb as crap.

  • Posted By: badlawdog63 @ 01/30/2009 5:05:24 PM

    John Yoo is that yoo? Loved your last post. Brilliant legal analysis! Go git'm big guy! You totally rock! Love you! Thanks for saving America, you legal studmuffin.

  • Posted By: ikez78 @ 01/13/2009 7:11:09 PM

    what a pathetic and patently snooty, priveleged liberal article who doesn't really have to worry about protecting anyones life because real people have been tasked with it, not snobbs in their ivory towers.
    you lefties are really such a joke

  • Posted By: roadeo @ 01/09/2009 2:23:59 PM

    Absolutely fabulous writing. The line containing the phrase/words "...casual toggling between television and the Constitution." is brilliant. Give me LOTS more of Dahlia Lithwick, please!

  • Posted By: wizest @ 08/04/2008 10:02:32 PM

    IF BUSH HAD DONE HIS JOB, YOU WOULDN'T BE HAVING TO WORRYING ABOUT IRAQ OR THIS CONVERSATION .

  • Posted By: Taerros @ 08/03/2008 3:17:31 PM

    Interesting article, but there are no facts to back it up, only hearsay and accusations. The author and publisher have failed the very basics and should either retract the article or prove this theory.

  • Posted By: navycaptainretired @ 08/02/2008 11:42:41 PM

    Lithwick's conjecture is pretty preposterous. Having interviewed some of those "charged" with abusing prisoners, it is pretty clear that there was no central authority who granted permission for abuse. Yes, the cuprit IS Hollywood, the center of so much moral outrage and hand-wringing over the inhumanity of the Bush administration's effort to actually treat terrorists as enemies instead of misunderstoood teenagers or righteous avenging angels for America's s "misdeeds" around the world But it is hardly Jack Bauer or the fictional escapades of "24". that taught everyone in America that doing whatever it takes to make the right thing happen, whether it is legal or not, is the "moral" thing to do. Having grown up on Mickey Spillane and endless movie/TV depictions of police detectives and private eyes "getting their man" through legally questionable or downright illegal means, it doesn't surprise me or any thinking person that young officers and soldiers, confronted with real-life moral dilemmas (unlike most of their twit critics) have often opted to "do whatever it takes" and let the consequences fall on them. Thank you Hollywood. Now lay off them or do something constructive in this mess, rather than hassle the men and women doing the job or their Commander-in-Chief.

  • Posted By: amilitarybrat @ 08/02/2008 11:37:56 PM

    The Nixon Administration had Watergate precipatated by his underlings watching too much Mission Impossible. Now we have "24' and Jack Baurer. The Bush GOP has done it to us again. How anyone could vote for a republican after some of the fiascos I've been reading about lately is beyond me. His fiascos in foreign policy will take a hundred years to repair. Likewise our children will be paying for the deficit created by his domestic/war fiascos.

  • Posted By: amilitarybrat @ 08/02/2008 11:35:32 PM

    The Nixon Administration had Watergate precipatated by his underlings watching too much Mission Impossible. Now we have "24' and Jack Baurer. The Bush GOP has done it to us again. How anyone could vote for a republican after some of the fiascos I've been reading about lately is beyond me. His fiascos in foreign policy will take a hundred years to repair. Likewise our children will be paying for the deficit created by his domestic/war fiascos.

  • Posted By: amilitarybrat @ 08/02/2008 11:33:59 PM

    The Nixon Administration had Watergate precipatated by his underlings watching too much Mission Impossible. Now we have "24' and Jack Baurer. The Bush GOP has done it to us again. How anyone could vote for a republican after some of the fiascos I've been reading about lately is beyond me. His fiascos in foreign policy will take a hundred years to repair. Likewise our children will be paying for the deficit created by his domestic/war fiascos.

  • Posted By: amilitarybrat @ 08/02/2008 11:24:32 PM

    The infamous Watergate breakin was a result of watching too much Mission Impossible by the Nixon underlings. Now this. More policy based on fiction and movies. The Bush GOP has done more to ruin my country than I believed possible. I can't wait to have these oafs out get a President that can put a subject, verb, and object in a sentence. It will take a hundred years to regain the trust of other people.

  • Posted By: North Carolina Boy @ 08/01/2008 10:10:52 PM

    It's very simple: either a person is a prisoner of war or he or she is a criminal suspect. There are rules for dealing with either. Using physical pressure to make someone talk isn't part of either set of rules.
    People on the government payroll who behave otherwise are my enemies and enemies of the Constitution and of the entire free world--they'r esubhuman scum, and their motives don't matter.

    Discussion over.

  • Posted By: GWBasher @ 08/01/2008 5:23:03 PM

    So what is being said is legal and good to do! Now if one of these blogger or one of there relatives, children, parents, etc pissed someone in the federal government off by blogging an illegal happening of this person and he, she, or they decided, like the scientist suspected of using the anthrax on people, to send him to Guantanamo as a terrorist, it would be OK?? With all that this administration has gone out of it's way to deceive the American People this would be very acceptable behavior. Those creeps lie to themselves, never mind what they've done to this country. Look in a mirror. You need some soul searching!!

  • Posted By: michele1313 @ 07/28/2008 9:04:06 PM

    I do not watch "24" because of the use of torture that are part of the story. I find the show morally repugnanat for that reason. When I was a child I thought that we were the good guys. I am not so naive as to believe that now. I am sorry to say that I expect that forces within our government have probably been using it for a long time and it sickens me. Looks like our country is no better that any other that uses torture to further its interests.

    • Posted By: jlc1287 @ 08/01/2008 2:43:42 PM

      I would like to say that I was not and am not for the war. Not because I think we should never do so, but because we were lied to about why. However, I have no problem with torturing a terrorist when many innocent lives are at risk. How would you deal with terrorists michele1313? Bring them cotton candy and ask sweetly ask, "Honeybun, where's the bomb?" I'm sure that would work wonders. NOT!!!!! There is no reasoning with them. Do not for a second, think that they wouldn't skin you alive(I mean, they would actually skin you alive) if they could and then dismember anyone with you. You may turn the other cheek all you want and all you will get is another slap on the cheek.
      Also, I don't really believe this article but wouldn't put it past them. 24 is the best! Jack Bauer is a great fictional character. You can tell he's FICTIONAL, because he's willing to do what it takes and NOT point fingers later. He never places blame on others for his actions. Definately fictional.

  • Posted By: blbtampa @ 08/01/2008 11:56:35 AM

    Wasn't there a case a few years ago where an Army Officer held a gun to a suspected terrorist, fired off a round next to his head thereby, getting information that saved the lives of one of his platoons. The reason I remember this, the media reported that he was being court-martialed for this "offence???.

  • Posted By: Southernman99 @ 08/01/2008 11:37:17 AM

    You can't expect us to take you seriously. The only disconnect is between political parties in powwer at the time of war. We have become so civilized that we can no longer defend ourselves when it gets past the lawyers waving their flaccid little legal papers in the cold hard wind of the reality of rabbid murderers we are facing worldwide. War is not civilized and if you think it is anything less than murdering your fellow man and it can be fought humainly then you are deluding yourself.. The only humane way to fight a war is once your IMPOTENT diplomats have reached a point where vague threats and bribes have failed and we commit troops to battle is to," cry havoc and loose the dogs of war." in other words, become war destroy your enemys without mercy or remorse until our sons and daughters can return home victorious and any other regime that might choose to take us on would think long and hard before being stupid enough to do so. The term torture has been redifined by a worldwide group of individuals who do not believe that war is never justified. I am an individual that believes that war is the absolute worse endeavor that man can undertake, BUT there is a difference between discomfort even extreme discomfort and torture. None of the individuals claim to have been beaten, or have their finger of toenails pulled out or their testicles pummeled or actually have their heads submerged under water for two minute+ periods. We certainly have not cut off their heads which is their favorite ending to a session of torture. My biggbest question I need answered is why is our Fourth Estate quoickly becoming our enemy's Fifth Column? Do you think they believe in the First Amendment?

  • Posted By: kithara @ 07/31/2008 1:39:00 PM

    I once met the man who trained interrogators for the army during WWII. He emphatically stated that the US did not use torture techniques against Nazi leaders during that War.

  • Posted By: gnomic @ 07/30/2008 4:44:19 PM

    The question remains: Will we hold ourselves and our leaders accountable for these war crimes or will we demonstrate that we are no longer the moral leader that we once were? Our leaders sactioned war crimes and lied to the public about it - surely a high crime worthy of impeachment.

    And this debate isn't about the terrorists. Its about us and the nation we say we are. And its about the treatment that our soldiers will suffer in the future. And its about our leadership in the world.

    We have joined the ranks of the small, petty nations and sanctioned thier crimes with our own. Our leaders have done more harm to America than the terrorists ever could, destroying our legal system, our reputation, and our moral core.

    No matter what your politics, these are crimes and people should be held accountable. Those who believe otherwise are not patriots, but hypocrites and political hacks and -- like it or not -- in league with the terrorist agenda to destroy America.

    • Posted By: mightymouse123456789 @ 07/31/2008 2:38:32 AM

      I just want to hit on that "no longer the moral leader that we once were" comment. Have you ever researched any of the wars we've ever been in? I mean a single one at all? Torture has been used in every war that we've ever been in. We haven't joined the ranks of small, petty nations and sanctioned their crimes with our own, we've been torturing for information since this country was founded.

      The people who do these things are trained. Part of the process as stated in one of the posts below is that you get a dose of the medicine you're handing out. People need to do their research before they make comments like the one's on the majority of these posts. Unlike what the enemy is allowed to do, we still maintain moral standards. We put restrictions on physical torture. Most torture performed is psychological anyway. Water boarding has no serious threat of killing the subject, it only makes him feel/think he is drowning. So instead of cutting off our enemies' heads and other horrific things we set and maintain standards for ourselves. It may not make every American happy because there's no way to make every single person happy no matter what the case is, but it sets us apart. Here's a question I pose to you, If you had a family member or friend who's life could possibly threatened and the only way to get the information to stop that threat was to get it out of someone who knew how to save them, what would you do? Now add the fact that there is a time constraint and you don't know when or where exactly. It's not the same case for our government or military exactly but instead of a family member, it's a squad of Soldiers (Generally 12 Soldiers), or a convoy of humanitarian aid supplies going through Iraq, or even an attack on our own soil that could harm civilians much like yourself.

  • Posted By: kevjohn @ 07/29/2008 9:17:15 AM

    It's sickening to think national policy is being led by the writers of a fictional television show. What next, is Homeland Securty going to employ dark knights in high-speed tanks to patrol city streets? Maybe they can get some iron men to crush the terrorists' crystal skulls.

    • Posted By: mightymouse123456789 @ 07/30/2008 2:17:54 AM

      I'm dumber for reading your comment. If you actually believe this crap then I feel sorry for you and others like you. You people need to get it into your heads that we are at war. War isn't about coddling a known terrorist or enemy combatant after he's been captured. Information has been the key to this war. Anyone would be naive to think that all the information extracted from torture is useful, but the reason that many civilians like yourself and Soldiers are still alive today is because information has been gained from torture that has made leaps and bounds in this war. You need to stop believing everything you see or read from the news agencies. Sure some things are true, but when is the last time you heard about a new school being built in an Iraq or Afghanistan neighborhood? You don't. It's not news and it doesn't reel in people who believe the kind of crap that comes out of articles like this. With all that said, I have a challenge for all of you who buy into crap like this. Read more than one article from more than once source before you make mindless comments like those posted on this article.

      • Posted By: Mac13 @ 07/30/2008 5:36:11 PM

        As a Vet of the Afghan War I could not have said it better. Thanks

      • Posted By: LongtimeObserver @ 07/30/2008 3:49:02 PM

        All experienced interrogators know that torture rarely yields any truthful information, and the truthful information it does yield can be extracted through other means. You make the statement that "torture saves lives" not because you have any evidence for such a claim (because even the US Government does not have this evidence, or else it would have presented it years ago), but because you want to believe it.


        People said the same thing about the PATRIOT Act and domestic surveillance without any evidence that those policies helped locate or convict terrorists or "protect freedom." Really, your case could be easily restated as "We are at war, and I am thinking tribally, and that means that my tribe has the right to do anything it wants against the other tribes in order to win the war. Consequences be damned." Little do you know that you are not winning this war, that you cannot win this war, and that you are only destroying your country in the process.

    • Posted By: jimbo3800 @ 07/29/2008 9:34:30 PM

      What is truly frightening is that people like you actually BELIEVE THE ARTICLE!

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse