Pedal vs. Metal

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Quints @ 07/29/2008 10:01:50 AM

    Yeah, its a pain to hop off the bike at every stop sign and light but I rather be safe than sorry. Since I tend to lose my balance when using hand signals, I get off my bike at lights and stop signs, wait for the the lights to change and walk across in the cross walk. It is much safer. Much of Bicycle safety is common sense. Follow the rules of the road, wear a helmet. Don't hog the road, ride with traffic and as far over to the right as possible and stay off the side walks. Common sense and curtsy will go a long ways. There also needs to be a push for bicycle lanes, preferably separated from the road.

  • Posted By: Oldcop121 @ 07/29/2008 10:01:13 AM

    Cyclists in Texas ride on the wrong side of the street facing traffic, disregard traffic signs like red lights and stop signs. Then they wonder why the heck they got run over?

  • Posted By: maiden1511 @ 07/29/2008 10:00:25 AM

    Insurance companies not paying for injuries if not wearing a seat belt? Sounds good, I'd sign that waiver for lower insurance rate.

  • Posted By: grendel @ 07/29/2008 5:25:22 AM

    As a cyclist if I have to stop at red lights fine; but remember if I follow all the laws I will take all the lane! With that said I do wear a helmet most of the time, a headlight all the time when riding at night , and I stop at the lights as I don't want to give my life to some motorist to kill but I do take off early as to get into the lane and be seen by the cars behind me.

    • Posted By: chickenbutt @ 07/29/2008 6:24:59 AM

      You need to get out of the way period, that what makes everyone mad is you cyclist going along a major road holding up traffic. I think all bikes shoud stay off the main roads, you cause more accidents by holding everyone up!!

      • Posted By: jims51jim@hotmail.com @ 07/29/2008 9:54:31 AM

        I agree, my son in law was critically injured in his auto. A cyclist traveling in the middle of the road posted at 47 mph. Another driver came upon him blindly and had to swerve into the other lane to miss the cyclist hitting my son in law head on. The cyclist kept going until a passerby alerted the police with a description etc. He was charged with failure to yield. Untill they strap a paid for license plate on their butt, OR there is a designated bike lane they should stay off the highway. Same for joggers who seem to believe they have to be in the middle of a lane and fail to give it up. Cyclist, $105 fine, Son In Law, crushed pelvis, broken ankle and knee cap. Sever laceration to eye socket, he wore glasses and the air bag caused it. To top this all off, you are required to have insurance to operate a vehicle on public roads, but not cyclists.So THINK about that the next time you feel compelled to "take" all the lane!

        • Posted By: jims51jim@hotmail.com @ 07/29/2008 9:58:36 AM

          Meant 45MPH not 47 mph, typo

      • Posted By: dragonmaster69 @ 07/29/2008 7:19:52 AM

        Well you just need to learn to share the road us bicyclest don't need much room to ride,so shut up and give us the room that we need.Bicycles were on the road before cars.How talking to the cyclist and see why they ride,or shut up and ride a cycle your self and see just how people in cars treat people on cycles

        • Posted By: a14711b @ 07/29/2008 8:07:04 AM

          And horses were on the road efore bikes. That is a stupid argument. Anyway, I thiink that most cyclists are respectful of others, as are car drivers, but there are the few that make it bad for all. Weaving in and out of stopped traffic, hopping the sidewalk when traffic is stopped, andslapping cars as they pass is behavior that causes ill feelings to breed. Share the road means just that and while on the road, the same laws should be obeyed and enforced

  • Posted By: GeorginaKlanica @ 07/29/2008 9:12:25 AM

    Bicyclist need to obey the EXACT same rules as motorists. Weaving and blowing thru intersections is not OK. Inconvenient? Tough. I'd get ticketed in a car doing those things, and so should you.

    Also, medical insurance should not pay out for cyclist injuries where the cyclist wasn't wearing a helmet and/or was not using headlight after dusk, in fog (as cars are required to do).

    • Posted By: amfinn @ 07/29/2008 9:58:19 AM

      What sense does that make, "medical insurance should not pay for injuries when not wearing a helmet?" Should we not pay for injuries to drivers not wearing a seat belt?

  • Posted By: maiden1511 @ 07/29/2008 9:58:10 AM

    I ride a road bike and notice that there are a lot of idiot drivers and cyclists, and these are the ones that we hear about. The percentage of bad drivers/cyclist are probably the same. I see bikers riding more than one across when they know cars are coming and I see cars hogging the right side of the road...both are wrong, but this will not likely change. We cannot have bike paths on every road...it's just not possible. People have to be more understanding, patient and less intimitated when these idiots present themselves on 2 or 4 wheels. I cannot count the number of times drivers have passed me on a blind corner and just missed oncoming traffic when they could have slowed and passed after the turn. They would be no farther behind. I've also seen plenty of bikers riding the wrond side of the street and crossing traffic at bad points. Natural selection takes care of some of these idiots, but they do seem to breed faster.

  • Posted By: runorbike @ 07/29/2008 8:11:13 AM

    People who whine about cyclists are usually the ones who do not exercise, and eat sausage biscuits for breakfast every morning. They are the same ones who whine about runners too. Maybe they should try to get their lazy ASSES out there and do something other than whine and eat.

    • Posted By: cheesefondue @ 07/29/2008 9:55:22 AM

      Yeah, demonizing the other side of the argument is very productive. I understand the Iraqis had it coming too for not living like you.

  • Posted By: Erynnds @ 07/29/2008 9:48:07 AM

    Perhaps if all the "bike haters" would lobby their local government to use more of the collected tax dollars to widen roads (i.e. more bike lanes), it would alleviate some of the tension and allow more space between cars and bicycles. Perhaps there's some jealousy that the cyclist isn't paying $4+ per gallon while they're doing something healthy for themselves and the planet. ALSO, if motorists would quit talking on their cell phones while driving they might be more aware of their surroundings (including cyclists and motorcyclists) and it would speed up reaction times.

  • Posted By: ChrisIL70 @ 07/29/2008 9:47:13 AM

    I have noticed a series of these articles being published by the corporate owned media outlets over the past few months.

  • Posted By: Mr. SP @ 07/29/2008 9:46:00 AM

    While I don't mind cyclists on the roads I must complain about their disregard for traffic laws. Almost everyone on a bycycle ignores stop signs and signals. Yet if I were to hit one of them while they were blowing a red light I would be the bad guy.. The cyclists also disregard one way streets and lanes.
    The game is the same for cars and bikes, You have to obey the rules of the road.

  • Posted By: bikeshoplady @ 07/29/2008 9:38:58 AM

    Actually, we sell more bikes to adults than children here in my corner of northwest Oregon. (Near Portland.) Most of these adults own homes and cars and and have jobs and DO pay a boatload of taxes. (I know I do.) I'd like to point out that the first two incidents in the report were not a bike/car problem. They were due to an ALCOHOL problem. People, do not drive drunk, and do not ride drunk! It's illegal, wrong and evil. I think the problem is being blown way out of proportion. It makes for good new stories, though.

    • Posted By: Along_for_the_ride @ 07/29/2008 9:45:12 AM

      I would dare say that those bikers that were 'blown out of proportion'...literally...might just disagree with you. The fact remains, as was pointed out earlier in this rather entertaining vinue, that physics always win out in the end, the only way to prevent it is to use ones head for something other than target practice.

  • Posted By: bikeshoplady @ 07/29/2008 9:43:41 AM

    In my area, (close to Portland) we sell more bikes to adults than to children. Most of these adults own homes, cars and work so they DO pay a boatload of taxes. (As do I.) The first two incidents in this article were not due to bike/car problems. They were due to ALCOHOL problems. People, do not drink and ride/drive. It's illegal, wrong and evil! The whole issue is being blown WAY out of propotion, but it sells newspapers.

  • Posted By: calitexgal @ 07/29/2008 9:43:33 AM

    Bike riding and using it for commuting to work and for running errands is the wave of the future.
    I'd like to see the roads for bicyclists, and just one lane for cars.
    That'll help get rid of our dependence on oil coming from places that hate us.

  • Posted By: Erynnds @ 07/29/2008 9:39:18 AM

    Cyclists have as much right to be on the road as everyone else. I agree it can be frustrating to be caught behind a cyclist if there are no shoulders for him/her to ride one. However, that is not the fault of the cyclist. You can very easily pass them (safely) and put them behind you (and out of your way). Perhaps instead of hating cyclists (or taking your anger out on them), you should lobby your local government to spend some of your tax dollars on widening roads so there will be room for both cars and the cyclists. After all, we all live together in our communities, and we should be able to co-exist peacefully. Neither group is more important than the other and we need to be able to get along. Maybe there's even a little jealousy that the cyclist isn't spending $4 + per gallon on gas AND they're doing something healthy for themselves and the planet.

  • Posted By: *Straighttalker* @ 07/29/2008 9:38:34 AM

    I live in the DC area, and I hate bike riders riding on busy roads and highways. It causes a major disturbance in already aggressive traffic, as it causes cars to trail behind bikes at 25 mph. It is completely selfish, inconsiderate and dangerous for bikers to do this, considering that that there are bike trails along the road all over the place!! I mean wth, seriously. It should be illegal for people to ride their bike on a road.

  • Posted By: lookin4space @ 07/29/2008 9:37:30 AM

    All I can say to motorists is get used to it. Instead of whining about cyclists maybe you should go after the barons selling gas for 4-5 bucks a gallon!

  • Posted By: DALE S. @ 07/29/2008 9:35:58 AM

    In Sc the cyclist is at a disadvantage. I personally have experienced cars left of center when meeting them head-on. Coming from behind they get right up close to you and hit the horn. It's a sudden shock that could cause you to fall into the cars path. It is not unusual to have a full beer bottle zing by your head or a dog bare his teeth while chasing you. The resutls have been, two of my ride friends now carry a concealed weapon when we ride. I doubt they could responed without falling, but it sends a message to the perp." You're not going to get away with your actions!" I personally don't like the gun thing but, for most situations, the cyclist is not at fault. They can't always move over for automobiles to pass, and the drivers don't have to go so fast in areas where there are a lot of bike riding. Also cyclist should not ride on any US highways except where it is designated. Why? Because a cyclist can't match the posted minimun highway speeds. Some dummy riders don't get it and cause a lot danger for all of us.
    Upstate South Carolina is now home to the Us Pro Cycling Championships. We are the most popular destination in the East to ride. However, there are those drivers that get to close. I don't beleive they realize they are squeezing you off the road.
    I sometimes wish I had the gun, for those *** with road-rage who just want to prove they have the power to move you out of their way. And yes, the Highway department still lets the dumbass have a license here too! There is no state laws to protect the cyclist. Pedestrians have the right of way but, beyond that , cyclist are on there on.

  • Posted By: wishfulthinker @ 07/29/2008 9:35:09 AM

    The kid thing is a preposterous thought. As legal guardian, I am required to be responsible for all my child's actions.......
    As for the road tax, it is true that it comes from the purchase of fuel. As such, it is supposed to be used for road repairs, upkeep, etc. It even pays to have those nice bike lanes put in....

  • Posted By: boleo @ 07/29/2008 9:15:17 AM

    all this makes sense. one of the most liberal cities in the country. everyone runs around mad about the fact they are afflicted by the worst mental disorder known to man, liberalism. i would probably spend most of my day yelling incoherently at everyone if i was a brainless liberal. i guess when you have so many places to go in one day, i mean between the protests, and the conspiracy club meetings, the dungeons and dragons tournament. i can see how bike riding has increased. so much to do, none of it worthwhile.

    • Posted By: Along_for_the_ride @ 07/29/2008 9:33:25 AM

      I like the way you think! LMAO

  • Posted By: lookin4space @ 07/29/2008 9:32:02 AM

    I ride a bike to work, but I have a lot of alleys and back roads to use. I tend to stay off the main roads and avoid the whole road rage thing in the first place.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse