Pedal vs. Metal

 
Sponsored by
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

 

Most cyclists chalk it up to coincidence. But on bike blogs and other web sites, a debate is raging between the two user groups. Drivers charge cyclists with blatant disregard for the law—especially when it comes to stop signs and stop lights. And cyclists (some of whom defend their disdain for such regulations, arguing it's a pain to hop off their bikes at every stop sign) say drivers often act as if they don't exist.

"It's reached a certain level of madness," said resident Jim Blackwood, who kicked off a fiery discussion earlier this month when he blogged about nearly hitting a cyclist who was riding at night without lights or a helmet and had cruised through a red light. Two blocks later, Blackwood saw two more bikes without lights. "Why isn't the bike community insisting everybody have a helmet and lights on the front and back of the bicycles?," he said.

Schmautz, the Portland cop, notes a "militant" attitude among citizens, which may explain why traffic disagreements sometimes boil over into full-blown fights. "We have a protest culture," he said. "We see a certain willingness to speak out in a way that's not completely legal."

Schmautz added that he has noticed an uptick in telephone calls he gets from angry motorists and cyclists. Motorists complain that bike safety improvements come "at their expense," he said. Ninety-nine percent of all traffic citations the cops issue are to cars. The police conducted a two-day sting this week, but it was largely aimed at raising awareness, and officers mostly handed out warnings to cyclists—a powerful political constituency in town, Schmautz said.

Rick Adams, who videotaped the scuffle that involved the cyclist on the hood of the car, says the problem may be cultural. "As a society, you can flip someone off very easily," Adams said. "But we have no hand signal that says 'I'm sorry.' "

© 2008

 
Discuss
Member Comments
  • Posted By: crashtestdummy @ 11/05/2008 3:54:53 PM

    Comment: That's easy...the overwhelming belief is, "I'm right, I know I am, you think different from me, so you have to be wrong! HOW DARE YOU BE WRONG AROUND ME?"

  • Posted By: crashtestdummy @ 11/05/2008 3:42:24 PM

    Comment: The main failure of these arguments is that they respond to failed allegations. Taxes/fees/money paid is not an entitlement to road use. I do, however, believe that skills training is necessary. But motor vehicle licensing is more about traffic laws and less about skills at operating the vehicle -- skills develop a lot slower than the licensing process, but we can't wiat to license someone until they have the skills -- how are they going to get the skills without driving? 6 months for a learner's permit is a joke. YEARS are required to get even minimally skilled.

    ...so go floss yourself....

  • Posted By: crashtestdummy @ 11/05/2008 3:37:05 PM

    Comment: Motorists don't own the road either -- share!

Sponsored by
 
 
 
The Peek
 
 
STRATEGIES

Isn't it ironic: Xerox is hoping it can profit by teaching companies how to reduce their printing.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
THE WHITE HOUSE
Sponsored by
 
 
 
loadingLoading Menu