Dressed to Kill

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Mohsin @ 08/01/2008 2:30:51 PM

    This is a comment on nawawaimohamad's comment. It is the highest form of vulgarity to assail someone's character. Pious men/women do not point fingers at others. They simply guard their own modesty.

    • Posted By: nawawimohamad @ 08/03/2008 6:01:35 AM

      Simply guarding the modesty is not good enough. The farce and facade must be revealed.

  • Posted By: Nobama thnx @ 08/01/2008 7:09:41 PM

    Treachery is the mentality of islamists; they'll do whatever they can without regard for women children or whomever's innocense they rob. War suck but good beats treachery every time. It may take a few years for them to sicken themselves with their antics. But hey, their a 1000 years behind anyway. What did you expect, civility from savages? And obama just wants them to fight it out on their own. Sounds like they're in the dying throughs; time to send in the women because the men are too scared!! hehe...

  • Posted By: nawawimohamad @ 07/31/2008 10:07:07 PM

    Farhana Ali is not looking at the obvious. The only reason that there are freedom fighters is because the US military is there in Iraq. Pull out the invaders and there will be no more freedom fighters. Why are you so concern with this phenomena and yet you did not say anything about the invasion and aggression by the US not only in Iraq but elsewhere. Farhana Ali, you are more american then the americans themselves, shame on you!

    By the way, the women in the US are nothing but sex objects, the irony is that the US women themselves are not bothered being sex objects, they like it.

    • Posted By: lalahakbar @ 08/01/2008 6:41:00 PM

      Do you even know what irony is? If you've got sex appeal, flaunt it. Women of the U.S. do enjoy being sex objects; we don't have to honor ancient sexual customs that serve men only. Our hair is not for the pleasure of only one man. Sex is not a one way street in modern cultures; we enjoy it; we use it; and we are not ashamed. Try it sometime, you might like it. If you're frightened that you'll be ordered stoned by your local Sharia judge; I totally understand. BTW did you see where Saudi Arabia banned selling dogs and cats as pets because of "men using them as a means of making passes at women"
      http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080730/od_afp/saudireligionanimaloffbeat_080730134513
      Now that is ironic. No pets because somebody might flirt. How 14th century!

  • Posted By: Mohsin @ 07/31/2008 10:58:23 PM

    It is such a wonderful feeling to see a Muslim woman have the audacity to speak the truth, and not be mired in political or religious prosecution. Ms. Ali offers an insight into an issue, hitherto ignored, and offers a pragmatic solution to the problem. There is nothing to be gained by either side by killing innocent people.

    • Posted By: MoJabar @ 08/01/2008 3:46:11 PM

      I know what you mean. Another such woman is Nujood Ali of Yemen, 10 years old married to a man of 30. Fortunately the girl was allowed to become a divorcee thanks to a very kind Sharia judge who only made her repay the dowry. Poor Nujood complained of being raped by her husband and beaten. The only thing that makes her case unique is that she had the audacity to ask for a divorce. Apparently, it's okay to marry an 8 year old according to Islam because Aaisha, Mohammed's favorite wife was 6 when she married, and 9 when the marriage was consummated. Nice culture, nice religion, nice judge.

  • Posted By: sjpersonal @ 07/30/2008 6:13:40 PM

    This war is such a lost cause, I do not believe that we in the West are able to wrap our minds around this particular level of crazy. We have our crazies but they are not a part of our normal culture. How can a socieity justify something like this or using children to kill people.

    I wish that there was someway we, the US could totally disassociate ourselves from the middle east. That is the border that we should be closing,

    • Posted By: summer4077 @ 08/01/2008 3:20:10 PM

      There is--we can lessen our dependence on oil. Unfortunately, I don't see that happening anytime soon.

  • Posted By: sjbrock80 @ 07/30/2008 7:29:58 PM

    We should have just bombed the heck out of Iraq and decimated the country instead of pussyfooting around over there. Now that our "wars" have become so impeded by liberal thinking that we aren't allowed to just destroy a country, they're all going to take 10-20 years to "finish".

    The Marines and Air Force could have and should have started and finished this war in about 2 weeks if we weren't so concerned about being nice. It's war, for pete's sake, not pattycake. Hopefully the US will learn from this mistake and be more hard-lined next time. Eventually we're going to go to battle against a country that isn't as nice or liberal as us and we will lose.

    • Posted By: MorningMom @ 07/30/2008 9:22:49 PM

      Your vein of thinking is exactly what's wrong with this country. Hopefully ignorance is not catchy.

      • Posted By: sjbrock80 @ 07/31/2008 3:52:13 PM

        My vein of thinking wins wars. If we thought in the past like we do today, we'd still be under the control of England.

        I'm assuming you're a mother based on your name. Think about war like dealing with an out of control child. The child has to be punished in one way or another to learn the error of their ways. Whether it be timeout or spanking, something has to be done. But, as a parent of 5 myself, I know that I cannot just give my child a little tap on the bum and follow him or her around constantly for 6 years to solve the problem. There has to be swift and meaningful consequences or punishment to fix the problem.

        • Posted By: summer4077 @ 08/01/2008 3:19:24 PM

          Uh, England seems to be a lot better off than America today--less violence, free health care, stronger currency to the dollar, etc. What's so wrong with England?
          You condone bombing a country into smithereens because you have never personally experienced that. Remember 9-11? Remember how we felt when we watched those innocent people die? Do you realize all the innocent people that would die in the countries you want to annihilate, simply because they were unlucky enough to be born there? They are no different from the innocent lives lost in the 9-11 attacks.

  • Posted By: Karenn1 @ 08/01/2008 9:21:22 AM

    The root of the problem is U S greed for oil.We sacrifice our young men for oil,so whats the big deal about women dying.Greed has no soul and its followers.

  • Posted By: Tan Boon Tee @ 08/01/2008 12:29:17 AM

    Should there be any surprise if the number of woman suicide bombers keeps increasing? Would any wife, mother or daughter not want to avenge the killing her husband, son or father?

    How could anyone, male and female alike, not resort to go to extremes when he/she is in great destitute and desperation?

    Would the torture from the vicissitudes of a tormented life not cloud the clear thinking of any normally sane person?

    Why are all the unnecessary killings? What is the cause? Where is the root of the problem? (Tan Boon Tee)

    • Posted By: lalahakbar @ 08/01/2008 7:26:08 AM

      In a word, Tan Boon Tee, the root of the problem is Islam.

  • Posted By: maiaechoe @ 07/31/2008 11:59:55 PM

    It's so wonderful that women have equal rights when it comes to dying, too bad their rights don't extend to anything else in these countries. Why are we surprised that the number is increasing, what choice do they have to say no!! What does all this blood shed reap? What victory can they claim when all their future lays bleeding in the dirt? It's very clear that war is the major export in these regions, if there was peace the citizens would start to hold their governments accoumtable for making their lives terrible.

  • Posted By: olderwiser @ 07/31/2008 7:59:38 PM

    As poorly as women are treated in most of the Muslim culture, you would think that more of them than the privileged men would take the "easy way out". Somebody, help me with this. I know I must be wrong, but you need to lay it out for me so that I can understand some of this madness.

  • Posted By: olderwiser @ 07/31/2008 7:55:48 PM

    This most imposing question begs for an answer. We've been told many times that many of the suicide bombers are expecting a number of virgins to be available to them after pulling the bomb switch in the middle of a crowd of innocent people who had obviously violated Hipparchus's rule of not seeming to be threatening to the suicide bomber, lest he wouldn't have tried to blow them up. Likely, their innocence offended the bomber. Else, why would he try to harm them? Anyway, the question that begs for an answer is, "what do female suicide bombers get for committing suicide, in lieu of virgins, for which they would have no need?"

  • Posted By: Hipparchus @ 07/31/2008 7:22:39 PM

    Most of those who were actively engaged in the fighting during the Crusades/Muslim Conquests would be considered ignorant by today's standards. Why many of you continue to argue today's strife using examples from the past is beyond me. A lot of you have valid points, but "Those that forget history tend to repeat it." If you can't figure out the implied meaning in this, don't worry, it only proves my point. Do I have solutions to the current situation? Yes, but only as they apply to today's situation. Most are really clean, while a few are extrememly bloody. The clean solutions being the most preferred and having the greatest chance at success. Freedom to determine how you live your life is desired by all mankind, from the far-left to the extreme right. Those who feel their desires being threatened are more likely to strike out at those who have different beliefs. The question today should be how do we go about our lives in a way that is not perceived to be threatening to those who believe differently from us. Isolationism or War? I would rather give them the same choices that I have today and wait to see where it takes them. Most of you won't be able to understand what I mean, but for those that do I applaud your innovative thinking.

  • Posted By: mfullerton2008 @ 07/31/2008 3:46:37 PM

    It looks like we are really winning now. They have been reduced to using women to fight their battles. If they (the women) are so concerned with the "occupation" why are they killing Shiites and not Americans ? The Iraq war hopefully is showing the Arab world that making a bargain with the devil (suicide bombings i.e. in Israel) would come back to haunt them (i.e. suicide bombings in Mosques)... Mark

  • Posted By: olderwiser @ 07/31/2008 2:17:43 PM

    Quit giving tax money to these nuts. They will start teaching this in school and we will be just like the Mideast, bombing each others' religions all the time.

  • Posted By: James_K. @ 07/30/2008 3:23:50 PM

    Your rhetorically question desires a rhetorically answer. Christianity is a peaceful religion. The Romans slaughtered thousands and thousands of people based on this peaceful religion. The Roman Catholic have killed, mutilated, and hung thousands and thousands of people because of their peaceful religion. Throughout history countries have gone to war based on religious reasons. So yes, Islam is a peaceful religion based on this standard.

    A gun is a 'peaceful' weapon. So is the Atomic bomb and Hydrogen bomb. Look at it this way, I have a gun and can kill you, this scares you to a point where you will not attempt any violence towards me. I have achieved peace. Therefore it is a 'peaceful' weapon.

    • Posted By: Slave of The Subduer @ 07/31/2008 10:35:02 AM

      Hahaha, that was nice.

  • Posted By: MoJabar @ 07/30/2008 12:57:36 PM

    Council on American-Islamic Relations put out a memo after 9/11 stating that "Islam is a religion of peace." I guess Iraqs Sunnis and Shiites failed to get the memo. Could somebody at C.A.I.R. please send the "Islam is a religion of peace" memo to the following folks: AlQueda, Hamas, Fatah-al Islam, Sudan's Janjaweed, Chechen Rebels, Muqtada al-Sadr's Shiite Militia, the Taliban, Somalian Islamist Militias, Mujahideen of India, Sharia judges who rule that a woman be stoned after she is raped, oh yeah Osama bin Laden failed to get it also. Is Islam a religion of peace? You decide?

    • Posted By: varembee @ 07/31/2008 9:14:42 AM

      Oh yes Islam is a religion of peace. The "Islam is a religion of peace" memo should be sent to George muderer Bush,Tony Blair,Hitler,the European muderers who exterminated the indigenious populations in the Americas and Australia, the crusaders, the Christian othordox Serbs in the Bosnian/Croatian ethnic cleansing, the apartheid system and its then sponsors in Washington, London and the Dutch reformed church.. History is awash with heroic resistance against oppression and domination and Iraqi will never be an exception.

      • Posted By: MoJabar @ 07/31/2008 9:51:15 AM

        Varembee, the Islamic-lady suicide bombers were Sunnis killing Shiite pilgrims on a religious pilgrimage! What does that have to do with "opression and domination in Iraq?" Looks more like a local religious grudge match with a body count..Just like the two Golden Dome Mosque bombings were. It's a shame that Sadaam is gone, becuase these practitioners of the "religion of peace" need a ruthless dictator to save them and their religious "treasures" from themselves.

  • Posted By: Notrepublican @ 07/31/2008 1:55:14 AM

    Your conservative views have put us in this suicide bombing war in the first place.

  • Posted By: olderwiser @ 07/30/2008 8:43:17 PM

    When countries go to war and kill people, they do it for patriotism. There are rules of war between countries about how they can and cannot kill. When religions go to war and kill people they do it for God. There are no rules between religions about how they can and cannot kill. The individuals who carry these killings out are under orders from their countries in one war and under orders from God in the other. Apparently, from the evidence throughout the ages, God really doesn't give a damn how you do it, and there you have your ancient Christian Crusades and your current suicide bombings and beheadings in the Mideast. This is the absolutely stupidest war in the history of personkind. We have put our troops in a position where they are charged with finding hidden weapons on women while they are under orders not to look at them. I cannot wait to pee on George Bush's library.

  • Posted By: Frank007 @ 07/30/2008 8:23:56 PM

    Your suggestion of a solution, to "...improve the socioeconomic opportunities for women by providing them with basic necessities such as education for their children, protection for their personal safety and equal rights" is almost laughable. These women are victimized into sucide by radical Islamic thinking, and Western liberal soultions like you suggest surely will not work.

  • Posted By: lalahakbar @ 07/30/2008 7:51:52 PM

    Farhana, when do you expect Islamic suicide-toddlers and Islamic suicide-babies to arrive on the scene, and what will their "motivation" be? (aside from the obvious motivation which is killing as many people as possible)

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse