Quantcast
 
 
 
PAKISTAN

A Bid for Control Backfires

nuclear pakistan khan kabul bomb
PAJHWOK / AFP-Getty Images (left); AP
Inside Job: U.S. officials believe Pakistan's ISI played a role in the July 7 Indian Embassy bombing in Kabul (left). Officials are bracing for the autumn publication of a memoir by jailed A.Q. Khan (right)
 
Sponsored by
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

 

Washington is losing faith that Pakistan's new civilian government can stop the expansion of Al Qaeda-linked terrorism in that country's tribal regions. One big problem: tensions between the ruling party of slain leader Benazir Bhutto and the Pakistani military. The latest evidence emerged just as the new prime minister, Syed Yousuf Raza Gilani, left for Washington last week to meet President Bush, NEWSWEEK has learned. In a maneuver attributed to Asif Ali Zardari, Bhutto's widower and head of the Pakistan People's Party, the government tried to wrest control of Pakistan's powerful intelligence service—the Directorate of Inter-Services Intelligence, or ISI—by placing it under the control of Rehman Malik, a Zardari associate who is de facto Interior Minister. That was a "rookie move," says a U.S. official, who declined to be named discussing a sensitive matter, and it backfired.

Before making its move against the ISI, U.S. and Pakistani officials say, the civilian government failed to consult with some top military brass, including President Pervez Musharraf, who until recently was the Army chief of staff. According to a senior Pakistani official who would speak only on condition of anonymity, Musharraf heard about the decision as he was leaving to attend a wedding. In disbelief, he called the ISI's director general to verify the news. "Were you consulted?" he asked. The answer was no. Another senior Pakistani government official, who also requested anonymity, blamed the fumble on Malik, saying he misworded the announcement to make it seem as if the Interior Ministry was taking over the entire ISI, when in fact it is only seeking control of "domestic operations." (Malik did not return calls. Zardari, reached on his cell phone, declined to comment.)

Malik's gambit followed a series of visits to Pakistan by CIA and other senior U.S. officials, who complain the ISI is still riddled with Islamist sympathizers. In fact, U.S. officials believe the ISI provided support to the perpetrators of the fatal July 7 bombing of the Indian Embassy in Kabul, Afghanistan. According to a Taliban commander who serves under Jalaluddin Haqqani, the militant leader implicated in the blast, Haqqani's forces moved their base after the ISI alerted them about the U.S. (Pakistan's ambassador to the U.S., Husain Haqqani—no relation—told NEWSWEEK that his government "has not been presented with evidence of any ISI connection.") Islamabad could be in for more bad news. The government is bracing for the fall publication of a memoir by Pakistan's rogue nuclear scientist, Abdul Qadeer Khan. Officials fear that Khan may disclose secrets about the country's nuclear capability.

© 2008

 
Discuss
Member Comments
  • Posted By: sb0614 @ 08/08/2008 1:59:19 PM

    Comment: Pakistan lacks even a rudimentary democratic infrastructure due to decades of military rule. ISI was created by the military to covertly support infiltration into Kashmir by fundamentalist jihadists without actually going to war with India. The same ISI recieved funds to arm the mujahadeen to expel the Soviets and then to create the Taleban. ISI did not have to answer to the Pakistani citizens (they would die first) or any other democratic institution because there was none!

    It is almost impossible now to put this genie back in the bottle.

  • Posted By: HillBillyBill @ 08/07/2008 9:14:04 AM

    Comment: Pakistan is accustomed to rule by military leaders. At the urging of the current U.S. administration using carrot and stick diplomacy, the military leader allowed himself to become a civilian leader, but now that he faces impeachment it is clear that the military leader retains power over the newly created civilian leadership. Just how the current U.S. administration thought this strategy would help root out the Taliban and Al Quada now well established in Pakistan is not at all clear. This is the same administration that told the world that any country harboring terrorists would be treated the same as the terrorists by the U.S. But Pakistan is a nuclear power, so backing that threat is obviously not an option by this administration. The few forays by air over the border has resulted in sharp rebuke by the Pakistani powers that be. The former military leader that was thought to be friendly to the U.S. against the will of most of the Pakistani powers and general population, lost his power to demonstrate his active cooperation with the U.S. to route out the Taliban & Osama Bin Laden's followers inside the Pakistan border. The next U.S. administration now faces a very difficult problem in trying to deal with this problem.

  • Posted By: emmarcee @ 08/06/2008 11:44:51 AM

    Comment: shut up, you Paki Pig. Of course India is there for buisiness and not to spread hate. Pakkiis should stop the India centrism and grow up.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
The Peek
 
 
PROJECT GREEN

Passing the 'fossil fools' in a CNG-powered car

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
Sponsored by
 
 
 
loadingLoading Menu