Southern Discomfort

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: pamanator @ 08/04/2008 3:25:15 PM

    You know there are some who still what to live back in civil was times, just like some people still belive they were abducted by aliens. But guess what most people live for right now and forget so much, even 9-11 is forgotten until the news media does there thing. Obama wants to run on the color of his skin not on his merrits as an American he runs scared of the things he has been involved in that shows he cares very little for American and we know where his wife stands even though they used American for all the things they get because they are black. You know Bush is not running McCain is so why call it Bush and Obama come on McCain might not be the greatest but at least we know he loves America. Bush might not have done everything right but who has. The war well yes lets starting working our way out but we went to help a people that were being treated no better than rats and also to clean up the real rats that were there. So they South is not all about the Confederate War where people still want slaves. It is real people in a real world that are worried about today. I mean the Black Americans of today have no Idea about the life of the slaves they were not there, the white people of today do not worry about slaves we were not there so give me a break.

    • Posted By: rapidron @ 08/04/2008 3:29:25 PM

      Such a perfect example of the labeling 'racist' thing people here complaining about. Hilarious.

      • Posted By: sharenews @ 08/04/2008 6:02:01 PM

        I was so exhausted from reading the above blogs that I didnt have the energy to even think on jumping in. Unreal discussion. : - )

    • Posted By: joeshmo @ 08/04/2008 4:22:35 PM

      If Barack Obama and Michele Obama don't love America then what country do they love? England, France, Ireland, Turkey, Iraq, Iran, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia??, umm....Netherland, Germany, Indonesia, China, umm....Venezuela, Bahamas, Costa Rica, Cuba, Puerto Rico??
      I am sorry but the level of idiocity in your comment baffles me. It is no surprise that whenever an American politician stands up and recognizes that we cannot go around bombing people and we have to work with our allies, all over sudden he is a traitor and does not love America. It is probably a good thing that people like you were a not around during the great depression because you would have made very hard for hard working people to get through these tough times and would not have voted for FDR; come to think about it maybe you don't love America.
      If Barack and Michelle don't love America please tell me what else do they have? Maybe they have double citizenship or something. Interesting how you can shun a fellow citizen for no good reason, I am sure you would do the same thing if it was Colin Powell or JC Watts. Republicans did it to Kerry and guess what he is a war veteran; partisanship is something isn't it.
      Also they are where they are today not because of handy me downs but because of their brain power. You should probably exploit that; you have one too.

  • Posted By: Georgiapuma @ 08/04/2008 5:59:01 PM

    The democrats are the ones that left the house, Republicans are still working on an energy bill the people asked all of them to stay and not leave DC until they came up with a bill for energy. Some Democrats and some Republicans have worked on one. Nancy needs to stop acting like a B----and hop on a plane and tell everyone to get back there and do the job they were hired to do.

  • Posted By: Georgiapuma @ 08/04/2008 5:55:58 PM

    This clown wil not be President, the oil reserves are for emergencies only. The south will not vote for OBAMA, and they will not put the democrat bums back in congress.

  • Posted By: Trytofocus @ 08/03/2008 7:06:36 PM

    You poor, ignorant bastards. Your alcholic wives abuse your children while your unionized, blue collar base drinks itself to death in filthy, underpoliced cities. In spite of your of obscenely high taxes, your public school systems are an inoperative nightmare. You send your children to private schools in the name of your future while discuss your closely held racism over cocktails. Is it any wonder your only national politician was one of the great frauds in history? You have no natural talent. Only the good fortune that your latitude is comparable to that of the United Kingdom led to the Ivy League being located in your underachieving midst.

    • Posted By: Envlatty @ 08/03/2008 8:59:49 PM

      When you are criticizing a different region of the nation and singling out their education system make sure that you're spelling and grammar don't undermine your argument. I have been to the South on numerous occassions and can say that the reason non-southerner's might look down on the region is because of your curious history. In no other region of the country would a people dare to state they are the most patriotic Americans despite the fact they are the only region to have seceded from the Union. Additionally, how a people can claim that the Confederate flag is a symbol of national patriotism and Americanism (as was claimed in a recent trip to the region last week) is beyond puzzling. How a region can claim that a symbol of hatred and treason is truly American shocks nearly everyone I know outside the South. Despite my devoutly liberal opinions on nearly everything and my sense of compassion towards most issues I cannot see too many benefits the nation as a whole have received from retaining the southern states in the Union. This post by Trytofocus is a succinct example of the vast deficiencies found in this backwards region of the nation that is an international embarassment to many Americans and commonly demands that the nation's natural drive towards progress move at their more leisurely pace.

      • Posted By: Cssndra @ 08/04/2008 10:34:20 AM

        The Confederate flag is just a piece of cloth and holds no more significance to me than a diaper. I can trace my roots back to a land grant in the N. Ga. mountains from King George, so I consider myself a legitimate southerner and genuine American mutt. Consider that during the pre-Civil War era all industrial development and all areas of economic development were by and large confined to the north. The south was poor except for a few large sea ports and other areas made prosperous by trade. Taking an economic look at the war (saying that we fought the war to end slavery is not entirely true, just like saying we fought the war to reunite the country isn't entirely true), shows you that the northern states had the larger concentration by far of financial resources at their disposal. The South was fighting for a bigger piece of the pie; ironically, then just as now the only two ways to acquire it are to have it homegrown (thanks wachovia) or to bring it in from abroad (Volkswagon).

        At any rate, we have plenty of people who are more than happy to enjoy our warm climate, or reasonable cost of living, and our relatively low taxation rate. I'm always happy to have new neighbors move into my neighborhood. Welcome to the south, y'all! I promise we aren't snotty and we don't all eat grits, pick a banjo, or run around with nooses!

        • Posted By: ncsucountrygal @ 08/04/2008 5:39:40 PM

          Thank you! For once someone who is mentioning that the Civil War wasn't entirely about slavery. For most southerners who fought in the Civil War it was about states' rights and the economy.

    • Posted By: Envlatty @ 08/03/2008 9:00:40 PM

      When you are criticizing a different region of the nation and singling out their education system make sure that you're spelling and grammar don't undermine your argument. I have been to the South on numerous occassions and can say that the reason non-southerner's might look down on the region is because of your curious history. In no other region of the country would a people dare to state they are the most patriotic Americans despite the fact they are the only region to have seceded from the Union. Additionally, how a people can claim that the Confederate flag is a symbol of national patriotism and Americanism (as was claimed in a recent trip to the region last week) is beyond puzzling. How a region can claim that a symbol of hatred and treason is truly American shocks nearly everyone I know outside the South. Despite my devoutly liberal opinions on nearly everything and my sense of compassion towards most issues I cannot see too many benefits the nation as a whole have received from retaining the southern states in the Union. This post by Trytofocus is a succinct example of the vast deficiencies found in this backwards region of the nation that is an international embarassment to many Americans and commonly demands that the nation's natural drive towards progress move at their more leisurely pace.

      • Posted By: notroubleatall1963 @ 08/03/2008 9:58:16 PM

        Excellent post. As a product of the Ivy League and former inhabitant of the UK, albeit an American Citizen, I concur wholeheartedly with your eloquent, polite response. There is an element within our country that the GOP has given more than its fair share of political "voice" and they are, unfortunately, the laughing stock of the country and the world at large. Laughing stock actually doesn't quite capture it. More to the point, this element is to be feared for its passionate hatred of the better part of the society it claims to be patriotic toward. You made some great points. Thanks!

        • Posted By: ncsucountrygal @ 08/04/2008 5:37:23 PM

          This is an argument I absolutely hate. Don't mention the Confederate flag as being unpatriotic just because slavery was AN issue (not THE issue) of the Civil War. On that note, let's ban the Christian cross because of the Crusades and the American flag because of things like the Trail of Tears. Let us not forget that even the swastika was originally a good symbol until Hitler destroyed its reputation by using it for the Holocaust. For that reason, should those that used the swastika as a religious symbol prior to the Holocaust be forced to remove it from years of tradition? I wish people would stop bashing the Confederate flag as a racist symbol.

  • Posted By: thetruthandonlythetruth @ 08/04/2008 4:31:19 PM

    People of the USA. How can one say that Obama has been anointed? If you are being fair you would be able too see that the man has been the most scrutinized candidate in the race. Think back for just a minute about all the stories that have come and gone since this process has begun. Now tell me who has been put through the ringer and who has not. I bet the only thing you could think about were Obama stories, and they were not the best in your mind. The press has crowned him King! Whatever...

    • Posted By: sharenews @ 08/04/2008 4:56:56 PM



      His friends and associates, his life as a whole, is resurfacing because he was not thoroughly vetted to the degree all Presidential candidates get vetted:

      INTERVIEW with Author of The Obama Nation, Dr. Jerome Corsi, Ph.d

      Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UdFs6hjPnyw

      Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PgaGFITnTAQ


      NEW BOOK: The Obama Nation by Dr. Jerome Corsi, Ph.d

      THE OBAMA NATION :
      Leftist Politics and the Cult of Personality

      Available Now:

      http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Obama-Nation/Jerome-R-Corsi/e/9781416598060/

      http://www.amazon.com/Obama-Nation-Jerome-R-Corsi/dp/1416598065/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1217792859&sr=8-1

      • Posted By: thetruthandonlythetruth @ 08/04/2008 5:14:19 PM

        Wrong. He was vetted just as the rest were. You said one key thing and it is that his whole life has not been put on the shelf for you... Shame. All candidates are human and are not perfect that includes Obama. That said, I can't wait too here McCains life story. Not five years but ALL...

        Also, I ilked McCain before he went against everything that he stood for. How could anyone vote for a man that is willing to sell himself out in order to become president? He will end up selling America out...

        • Posted By: sharenews @ 08/04/2008 5:29:37 PM

          Sure, if America feels they dont have enough knowledge of McCain they (media, pundits,etc.) should flesh his life a bit more if that is what the people want. There is still alot that we voters dont know about obama and given he doesn have substance either, that makes it that much more important to find out who he is, his true beliefs, how he's lived his life, etc. You gotta remember that McCain has been around the block for years and has more than likely make mistakes and learned by they. Obama is sailing into a POTUS position for which he will be learning on the job making mistakes - which you dont want happening in a position at the top. He is just green. I will not take a chance on him. He does not have the qualitiees I want our POTUS to have.

    • Posted By: raddave @ 08/04/2008 4:57:40 PM

      Only people that have claimed Obama has been annointed is the far right.

  • Posted By: Jackerella @ 08/04/2008 3:47:52 PM

    Here's one for EVERYONE to think about>
    CATCHING WILD PIGS
    You catch wild pigs by finding a suitable place in the woods and putting corn on the ground. The pigs find it and begin to come everyday to eat the free corn. When they are use to coming everyday, you put a fence down one side of the place where they are use to coming. When they get use to the fence, they begin to eat the corn again and you put up another side of the fence. They get use to that and start to eat again. You continue until you have all four Side's of the fence up with a gate in the last side. The pigs that are use to the free corn start to come through the gate to eat, and then you slam the gate on them and catch the whole herd. Suddenly the wild pigs have lost their freedom. They run around and around inside the fence, but they are caught. Soon they go back to eating the free corn. They are so use to it that they have forgotten how to forage in the woods for themselves, so the accept their captivity. THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT IS HAPPENING TO AMERICA. The GOVERNMENT keeps pushing us toward socialisn and keeps spreading the FREE CORN out in the form of PROGRAMS such as SUPPLEMENTAL INCOME, TAX CREDIT FOR UNEARNED INCOME, TOBACCO SUBSIDIES, DAIRY SUBSIDIES, PAYMENTS NOT TO PLANT CROPS (CRP), WELFARE, MEDICINE, DRUGS, ETC, ETC, ETC. While we continue to LOSE OUR FREEDOMS- JUST A LITTLE AT A TIME. One should REMEMBER THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A FREE LUNCH !! Also, A POLITICIAN WILL NEVER PROVIDE A SERVICE FOR YOU CHEAPER THAN YOU CAN DO IT FOR YOURSELF. So if You see that sll of this WONDERFUL government "HELP" is a problem confronting the future of DEMOCRACY in AMERICA, you might want to copy this little message I have sent to you and send it on to your friends. IF YOU THINK THE FREE RIDE IS ESSENTIAL TO YOUR WAY OF LIFE THEN GOD HELP YOU WHEN THE GATE SLAMS SHUT !!! This is a "VERY IMPORTANT" Election Year, listen closely to what the candidates are promising you - just maybe, you will be able to tell who is about to SLAM THE GATE on AMERICA. ' A Government big enough to give you Everything you Want, is Big Enough to kade away everything YOU Have' Thomas Jefferson

    • Posted By: thetruthandonlythetruth @ 08/04/2008 4:12:05 PM

      So you are voting for an independat right? Because Republicans are as bad if not worse than Dems when it comes too programs and spending.

      • Posted By: Jackerella @ 08/04/2008 5:26:10 PM

        Comment: I think everyone needs to open their eyes !! If you read this then you should of also read were the government is allowing health insurance companies get into your prescription records. They are calling it a health credit report. I've had enough of both parties and am really going for change and going to try to get others to follow and get our Government back where it belongs ( in our hands). Vote Lib, or writing in Ron Paul. REVOLUTION TIME !!!!

    • Posted By: rapidron @ 08/04/2008 5:13:47 PM

      I haven't ever gotten any free corn from anyone, and yet I don't share your viewpoint.

  • Posted By: rckrmoo @ 08/04/2008 4:18:36 PM

    In the end it all comes down to who will do the best for this country. Poverty, housing loss, unemployment, and so much more has come out of the past few years. In all of the turmoil and worry we have nobody to blame or turn to. I'm not saying to vote for any one. Just think of what the current children and our children will have to put up with not enugh money means more starvation, more fighting, and hostility towards friends and neighbors. and a divided country is a vulnerable one. I am 20 and just now getting out of college after starting early and i have no money due to college costs even after all of the grants and scholar ships there is no job or career that is left in my field to work in. in saying that there are no jobs in this country that people can work at to make a living in this crashing economy.

    in the year 1999 the american dollar had its highest value and since then the russian ruple has surpassed
    the dollar in value exponentially there economy is the fastest growing in the world.

    to make a long story short it all comes down to what we do today that will effect our future and that of our children

    • Posted By: sharenews @ 08/04/2008 5:19:59 PM

      Dont forget , the majority Democratic Congress that has been in place has had much to do with the situation we are in . They have a 9% approval rating, lower than even Bush!! They are very much of our problem too. They just went on a 5 week recess leaving the whole Oil energy saving issue to hang!

  • Posted By: directaction @ 08/03/2008 5:16:10 PM

    A very thoughtful article, and indeed it will be interesting to see if this next general election gives any sign(s) or a shift in voting patterns.

    As for what you term "Lincoln's unifying message" it specifically did not include a call to free slaves. Lincoln famously remarked that he'd end the war by freeing no slaves or all slaves. What was important in his view was ending the war, not emancipation.

    • Posted By: ncsucountrygal @ 08/04/2008 5:18:23 PM

      And don't forget...the Emancipation Proclamation only freed the slaves "in the States of Rebellion" not the slaves in Union states. Granted the system of slavery in the North was different from in the South. In the South you had mainly plantation slaves while in the North you had primarily house slaves.

  • Posted By: amrobinson @ 08/04/2008 2:14:06 PM

    Funny how it's never mentioned, even once, that every single one of those ol', while murdering racist ba*****ds where Democrats, one and all.

    • Posted By: bluebloodedLV @ 08/04/2008 2:25:04 PM

      Yes and Lincoln was a republican. Funny how you know this, but you don't know that the party platforms have switched 180 degrees since then. Today, Lincold would be a democrat and the mudering racists would all be republicans.

      • Posted By: simply tracy @ 08/04/2008 3:23:25 PM

        Funny that you don't know that the GOP or Republican party WAS the Democratic Party, that they changed their name to Republican to show that they were for the Republic, not for the separation of the states, or that the Whigs and a bunch of other little parties joined together and hopped on the Democratic name in order to confuse the voting public into thinking that they were the GOP, but continued their own politcal ideology. It's not the name that is responsible for whether or not something was done, but the people in the party.

        • Posted By: raddave @ 08/04/2008 5:17:48 PM

          You actually have that backwards. The Democratic party is the party that evolved from the Democratic-Republican Party. The Republican party was formed in 1854 whose members came mostly from the Whig Party.

  • Posted By: Pudbert @ 08/04/2008 4:52:16 PM

    No way the South votes for this fake turd SOCIALIST... It'll NEVER happen, they're not as dumb as you think down south...

    The LEFT coast is the only real area that's ignorant enough to vote for this Anti-Christ..

    • Posted By: cotillion @ 08/04/2008 5:09:54 PM

      Let's see what other crap you can spew out from your extreme right news. I would love to hear an original thought... also before you make any more ignorant comments, I am born and bred in Virginia. Lastly, nice comparison between the Son of Satan, and a liberal politician, the obvious correlation there is striking.

    • Posted By: raddave @ 08/04/2008 4:54:12 PM

      You are the anti-Christ and will never get my vote.

  • Posted By: southernbornandraised @ 08/04/2008 2:53:05 PM

    Blueblooded...wow..again another divisive statement. The more educated you are the more liberal you are. Bssically "you" are saying that if you vote conservative you are uneducated and too stupid to make a right decision. wow, whew...back up there. That statement was sooo terrible. I guess my wife and i went to college, grad school, law school, but we are too stupid to know who to vote for...wow...man you taught me alot..Thank you.

    • Posted By: bluebloodedLV @ 08/04/2008 5:02:02 PM

      It's hilarious to me how the Southern Republicans are so sheltered that they don't even know that the other republicans don't like John McCain! You guys must have a chip on your shoulder about something or else your comments wouldn't be so defensive! Swallow your pride for a second, there may be some truth in the article.

      And, by they way, your response was totally defensive - I didn't say YOU were ignorant, you did. The statement I made was a fact. Since you were able to navigate your way to this website, you should be able to find the 2004 electoral map supporting this FACT. But then you'll probably just turn around and say - no it's not - la la la la la la la - covering your eyes and ears.

    • Posted By: rapidron @ 08/04/2008 2:56:08 PM

      Prove it.

      • Posted By: markus1976 @ 08/04/2008 3:01:24 PM

        uh, I think he already "proved it".

        I lived in North Carolina for years. I'm from Massachusetts.
        I don't think all Conservatives are uneducated backwoods idiots, but they definitely don't help their cause when they suggest all Liberals are uppity, educated elitists.

        Is there an in-between??? LOL

        • Posted By: rapidron @ 08/04/2008 3:17:13 PM

          Sorry, I was telling southernbornandraised to prove he is of the education level he flippantly states he and his wife are. People too easily lie to gain credibility for more ignorant statements.

          (Ignorance does not equate to stupidity, per se)

    • Posted By: cotillion @ 08/04/2008 3:02:23 PM

      The statement she made is a fact based on statistics. It does not apply on an individual level. If you look at the pure numbers, it is true that the more educated people tend to be more liberal. As to the why this phenomenon occurs, I would not presume to have the answer, but we each can come to our own conclusions.

  • Posted By: Farmerbob @ 08/03/2008 12:18:59 AM

    Your attempt to focus on the south and bring understanding to the national issue of racism failed. The only thing the story did was Balkanizing our nation. Most every working class republican seems to be anti Obama and spreads the false Messiah rumors. Yet Obama still can win because most Americans are becoming dirt poor.

    I suggest for your next story is that you should dispatch your scribblers and travel around upstate New York. Ask the people. After 911 are you willing to vote for a man black man with an Islamic name? I know you would never do such a thing since that would be like urinating in your back yard.

    Instead you do a report for the nation that rallies bigots in preparation of an Obama win. You now have given a platform to all bigots that sow the seeds of division in the South. Do you really want to provoke civil unrest once a black man moves into the nations White House and blame the South for the unrest?


    Like I said, what sorry attempt to Balkanize our nation. Leave us hard working god fearing southerners alone. With the high prices of commodities and the fact that we now have some of the biggest industries located or relocating to the South we do not need the North with their rustbelts, decaying infrastructure, perverted morals and their 147 year old bigotry. Send us your workers not your hateful stereotypes.

    • Posted By: TheVigil @ 08/03/2008 9:23:40 PM

      Barack Hussein Obama's middle name comes from his father, who had next to no contact with him just about ever. The man saw his child once when he was ten. And Barack Jr. had nothing to do with the choice of his legal name.

      The fact that you hold the son accountable for the sins of his father shows, sir, that you are the one here espousing prejudice.- Though, the phrase "like urinating in your back yard" probably would have tipped most people off anyway.

      • Posted By: ncsucountrygal @ 08/04/2008 4:58:51 PM

        Obviously you missed the point of FarmerBob's comment. He was not saying anything against Obama's name from his perspective. He was just doing the same thing this damn article did. The article took Obama's race and made it an issue in the South where the Civil Rights Movement was biggest and most profound. FarmerBob took Obama's name, which is a Muslim name irregardless of the fact that Obama is Christian, and said to ask New Yorkers how they would feel. In case you forgot, it was Muslims that destroyed the Twin Towers and the Pentagon. FarmerBob's response is more about trying to make people realize how idiotic it is to make this presidential race about race.

  • Posted By: ohreally @ 08/04/2008 4:57:06 PM

    It's all too easy to discuss the prejudices of the Southern whites but racial prejudices are just as prevalent throughout the United States. Try a borough in Boston, New York, Chicago or Los Angeles and you will find the communities that have just as many prejudices against each other, whether it be African-Americans vs Caucasians vs Native Americans vs Hispanic vs Oriental and so on.

  • Posted By: ssonya7149 @ 08/04/2008 4:00:02 PM

    It is a shame that the people in the United States comment in the people of the south with the same biased views that you insist we have. Apparently you are right, racism is rappant and not only in the south but towards the south. It is amazing that you can call yourself a news reporter. We will never get past the views that the media themselves wish to instill in the ignorant.

    • Posted By: rapidron @ 08/04/2008 4:54:13 PM

      I believe the term is: 'backlash'

  • Posted By: czbz @ 08/04/2008 4:35:47 PM

    Mr. Dickey wrote a great article that is balanced and fair. For my part, it is not that I don't want to vote for a black man; I just want to vote for someone more conservative than Barack Obama. I wish that this had been a vote between Barack Obama and Colin Powell. That way, we'd have a real vote on issues and the color barrier would be broken regardless of who won.

  • Posted By: Hokeypokie3336 @ 08/04/2008 12:21:35 PM

    Any person who votes for either Obama or McCain because they believe that candidate is going to further their cause is a fool. Obama is not going to bring the troops home, increase healthcare coverage, make it easier to get an abortion or reduce gasoline costs McCain is not going to eliminate taxes (except for the rich), eliminate gay marriages, twart socializm. If you remember over the past 20 years both Republicans and Democrats have held Congress, the Senate and the Presidency and neither party did ANYTHING positive. All they did was make themselves wealthy, famous and corrupt. This country is being lead down the path of mediocrity by absolutely corrupt to the core politicians and the American people can do little or nothing to stop it.

    • Posted By: reallyticked @ 08/04/2008 12:48:01 PM

      To hokeypokie3336: You are absolutely correct! Just remember that the majority of Congress and the Senate has been made up of Democrats for sixteen or more years and, who for some reason, are unable to make a decision that would benefit the people that they represent. There is a way to get all the crappy people out of office. Vote for somebody else who will do the job. For some reason the people keep putting the same ones back in every election. Look at Strom Thurman who was in his ninties I believe before he left office. Why? Because the people kept putting him back in office. There should be a term limit for all Senators and Congressmen just like the President. Once these people get in office and learn how to work the system they will spend any amount of money to stay in there.

      • Posted By: simply tracy @ 08/04/2008 4:33:27 PM

        Ok, no. The Democrats did not hold Congress for the last 16 years; only the last 2 1/2, though they were getting closer each time after the Contract with America expired. But, look at it. Since they took Congress, gas prices have spiralled out of control, people have lost their homes, food prices are going higher, and jobs are disappearing. Yeah, let's just keep voting them into office.

      • Posted By: vogelk2 @ 08/04/2008 1:23:39 PM

        I absolutely agree. However, it's our citizens laziness in learning about other canidates that make it easy for reelections. I am simply putting that out there because a term on Senators has been suggested many times and nothing has come to fruition. Therefore, the one thing we could do, as a democracy (people-rule), is take matters in our own hands by doing our homework and voting.

    • Posted By: Cssndra @ 08/04/2008 1:28:20 PM

      This southern born, party line crossing, agnostic says "can I get an Amen in the back row!!!"

      Right on.

    • Posted By: lhwilk0 @ 08/04/2008 12:41:53 PM

      Agreed! One of the smartest things I've read here yet.

  • Posted By: daedalus @ 08/04/2008 4:24:31 PM

    In response to dfingles and/or anyone else who reads this article, it is just that, one person's priority for making "their" point. Let's recognize that for what it is and move on. Outside of that, the article raises several debatable subject areas, touches on several truths and realities and just plain gives one food for thought.

    • Posted By: thetruthandonlythetruth @ 08/04/2008 4:31:51 PM

      So true!

  • Posted By: Uncle Gweto @ 08/04/2008 3:33:19 PM

    Interesting article. I will vote for McCain not because of color but because of concern. Concern for a lack of experience, concern for a lack of training, concern for a lack of understanding the economic mess we find our country in and lastly concern that the deomcratic candidate may be the most media made man of the current century. No other SENATOR could have traveled to the middle east and enjoyed the moment by moment coverage that Obama enjoyed. It was actually sickening to see our beloved press pre ordain the chosen one. He is not even the official candidate of the Democratic pary and he is already elected, fixed the economy, solved the energy crisis and given every man, woman and child a warm fuzzy feeling. PLEASE. Please note that the government CANNOT FIX YOUR PROBLEMS. Individual effort will be required and I just hope and pray there enough individuals who will put forth the effort to fix our problems no matter who is elected.

    • Posted By: thetruthandonlythetruth @ 08/04/2008 4:26:00 PM

      I bet that you used the same logic when voting against Bush. Right?

    • Posted By: Jkyacht @ 08/04/2008 3:43:13 PM

      I agree. It is scary how the media and the "free" press has Heralded this guy like he is the Second Coming!
      As a Moderate and Independent I find myself questioning the motives of the press and the electronic media. What the heck are the motives? Can anyone tell me/us? They help the current administration sell the war in Iraq and the press railroaded John Kerry with the Swiftboat coverage and now they are bashing a moderate like John McCain for wearing 500 dollar italian shoes for crying out loud...

    • Posted By: southern-sweettea @ 08/04/2008 3:35:04 PM

      Well put!!

  • Posted By: bluegrass101 @ 08/04/2008 3:54:03 PM

    It's really to bad that he white people in the South do not take a look at these facts and vote accordingly. The South has been the poorest States in the country for a 100 years, the most illiterate(LACK OF EDUCATION) not dumb, the most bigoted, and they are still the poorest. You would think that they would want to change for the better. Maybe in their hearts give a Black Person a chance. He certainly could do better then Bush and Cheney.

    • Posted By: droflove @ 08/04/2008 4:23:30 PM

      Its really bad that people in the north don't look at these facts. The treatment of southerners by the north following the civil war set the entire region back a generation (socially, technologically and economically). Most people in the south lived as sharecroppers until after WWII. Then they were expected to catch up socially and economically overnight. Many feel the north made the south poor as punishment following the civil war, and well, without money, it is tough to pay for an education.

  • Posted By: kls1112 @ 08/04/2008 4:00:40 PM

    As someone who lives in the South, I feel that this article is contradictory to the way a lot of people in the south feel. Some parts of this article, especially when the author implies that we southerners "still aren't used to these brown people running around," are very offensive to me. Yes, there are plenty of people who resist change, but the author is ignoring a large part of the population who are welcoming change whole-
    heartedly. Also, many of the reasons that the south is troubled and disconnected directly result from this current administration and most of the people I have talked with can overlook skin color. Let's face it, I don't care if Obama is bright green, I would vote for him over someone who is in Bush's back pocket ANYDAY!! Many people here are ready for change so don't stereotype all of us as old rednecks who live for re-enacting the Civil War. Not only is it insulting, but for the majority, its untrue.

    • Posted By: AlaTide @ 08/04/2008 4:18:26 PM

      I think anyone's objection to the article ought to be that the South has some kind of patent on racial stereotyping. of course there are Southern racists. Is that news to anyone? But you shouldn't be offended that he attempted to paint the south with a board racist brush, but you should care that he seems to imply that the rest of the country is exempt from these problems. What a laughable crock!!

      The South has its issues but please don't let this writer or anyone else imply the remaining states are pure and wholly enlightened because they are not.

      I AM SO SICK OF THE "HOLIER THAN THOU" ATTITUDES FROM NON-SOUTHERNERS!!!!!

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse