FACTCHECK.ORG

Bluegrass Gasoline Blues

Mitch McConnell's ad casts his Senate challenger as a villain behind high fuel prices, a big exaggeration.

 
Sponsored by
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

 

Summary
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky is running an ad blaming his opponent for contributing to high gasoline prices in the state. We find that's a big exaggeration. At most, prices are 12.1 cents per gallon higher as a result of the 1980 tax change that was favored by Democratic candidate Bruce Lunsford. That's less than 3 percent of gas prices today, and actually less than the rise in general inflation since 1980.

Analysis
In his ad titled "Gas Tax" and an accompanying Web site, Republican Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky takes a page out of John McCain's playbook, focusing blame for high fuel prices on one individual – his opponent, Bruce Lunsford.

Self-Raising Taxes
The McCain ad we wrote about on July 22 holds opponent Barack Obama responsible for "rising prices at the pump." McConnell also blames his Democratic opponent for at least part of Kentucky's "soaring" gasoline prices. But that's a huge stretch.

Mitch McConnell for U.S. Senate Ad : "Gas Tax"
Mitch McConnell:
I'm Mitch McConnell and I approve this message.
Announcer: Gas prices are soaring and Kentucky's gas tax just went up again. Why? Nearly 30 years ago, Bruce Lunsford lobbied for automatic gas tax increases.
Bruce Lunsford: We changed the way we tax gas in this state to give us a budget that could grow.
Announcer: The Lunsford automatic gas tax has already cost Kentuckians hundreds of millions and today, Lunsford wants to pump taxpayers for even more. Bruce Lunsford, automatic tax increases, more expensive gas.

The ad says, "Gas prices are soaring and Kentucky's gas tax just went up again." Why, it asks? "Nearly 30 years ago, Bruce Lunsford lobbied for automatic gas tax increases."

In fact, Lunsford can't be blamed for more than a very small portion of the prices pictured in this ad. It's true that as an aide to a former governor, Lunsford lobbied the state Legislature for a 1980 tax change that currently accounts for just 12.1 cents of the price paid at the pump in Kentucky. McConnell's ad shows images of gasoline pumps displaying prices of $4.19 to $4.39 per gallon and at one point a pump showing a total cost of $65.59. Viewers could easily get the impression that Lunsford is somehow to blame for those amounts, which is nonsense. Even if Lunsford were solely responsible for the tax increase, which he isn't, the tax rise amounts to less than 3 percent of the prices and amounts the ad pictures.

Just to put the matter into perspective, Kentucky taxes gasoline by 8.5 cents per gallon less than the average for all states, according to the American Petroleum Institute. In fact, Kentucky's gasoline tax is still 2.8 cents per gallon lower than would have been required to just keep pace with inflation, as measured by the Consumer Price Index.

Lunsford has taken partial credit for the tax switch, and he still defends it: "We changed the way we tax gas in this state to give us a budget that could grow," Lunsford has said, in a video clip that McConnell includes in his ad. But Lunsford was not solely responsible, of course. He lobbied for state law H.B. 973 as an aide to then-Gov. John Y. Brown, a Democrat. It was passed by the state Legislature and signed into law by Brown. It replaced the state's 9-cents-per-gallon gasoline tax with a tax based on the value of the fuel rather than the number of gallons—making it 9 percent of average wholesale price. This is called an ad valorem tax, or one that is pegged to the value of the thing being taxed.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: mccainsupporter @ 08/08/2008 10:16:49 PM

    Democrats under the leadership of Barack Obama want to effectively give away in trust our offshore exclusive economic zone by standing in the way of any current offshore development. Under the 1982 United Nations Law of the Seas Convention the US has an exclusive economic zone of 200 nautical miles and mineral seabed rights up to 350 nautical miles extending along the Continental shelf. A nautical mile is 6080 feet so our exclusive economic zone extends about 240 miles and mineral seabed rights extend 420 miles. The US has the world's largest offshore exclusive economic zone totaling 4.4 million square miles. In comparison, the total land area of the United States is only 3.4 million square miles.
    On the East coast alone, if you drive from Key West Florida to Bangor Maine it is 2000 miles. Multiply the 2000 miles by mineral seabed rights extending out 420 miles results in a total of 840,000 square miles of ocean acreage. Because we have the world's largest offshore coastline which is twenty-five percent greater than our land area, it only makes common sense that we exploit our offshore resources to achieve our energy independence.

  • Posted By: mccainsupporter @ 08/08/2008 10:14:07 PM

    Democratic disdain for energy production by US companies is evident with the current ownership of former US energy companies. Is it any surprise that the jewell Arco Oil Company which owned 80 percent of our Alaska Oil Reserves was bought out by British Petroleum Corporation at the end of the second administration of Bill Clinton due to the hostile Democratic attitude toward energy companies. It is no accident that the largest US builder of nuclear power plants, Westinghouse Nuclear Power Construction Division was bought out by Japan Toshiba Corporation. While 80 percent of France electricity is generated by nuclear power, only twenty percent in the US is generated due to the successful efforts of Democratic party to kill the US nuclear power industry. Significantly, nuclear power is not considered a mainstay of Democratic plans to address our energy crisis.There is also a worldwide shortage and backlog of orders for oil drilling platforms and oil drilling ships but US shipyards are not building these ships. Only one percent of the world's commercial ships are built in US shipyards. Hold your breath for the Democratic outcry and push for government help to US ship builders to build oil drilling ships in the US.

  • Posted By: Driver of wagons @ 08/05/2008 9:24:30 PM



    According to TIME magazine

    http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1829354,00.html?cnn=yes

    John McCain's sole idea to "drill here and drill now" won't produce oil until the year 2030, and then it will only be 200,000 barrels per day. In comparison, the government estimates that if everyone made sure their car tires were fully inflated, we could start to reduce our oil consumption by 800,000 barrels per day, right now.

    Extend your inflated PAIN with your vote for McCain



Video

Newsweek Originals: Politics Video

 
 
The Peek
 
 
MEDIA

Just a year after buying The Wall Street Journal, the press rapscallion has revitalized the fusty paper.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
Sponsored by
 
 
 
loadingLoading Menu