Photos: Of Moas and Monsters

And by the way, this chimera looks big and intimidating. But in fact, the photographer has taken a close-up of this 'thing', which gives the illusion of being something very big.

Hi all. This photo is a fake one! It has been photoshoped. The body could be that 1 of a dead dehydrated rabbit, that 1 of a new born dog or the one of a little chick. As for the head, it resembles strangely to a dead chicken!! Dead chicken's head looks weird when its dead. The eyes look so weird. U might be saying that chicken doesn't have teeth, I know. But since it is photoshop, it could have been added from there!!

Hi. This picture is a fake! It has been photoshopped. The body could be the one of a dead and rotting rabbit, a new born dog or simply just a little chick. For the head, I would say that is that one of a dead chicken. I have seen dead hen a lot of times and when the die, they are really horrible!! Yeah I know, you will say that hens have to teeth. But since this is photoshop, its all too easy for anyone to add them.

There is a bandage on one of the paws of this "dog". An abused pet fled from its master? Just a theory.

Hey you guys and to all:
This picture is a photo shop picture. The body is a dead dog. The head is much smaller than the neck. Who ever did this on photo shop didn't compare the head with the neck. So when you maximize the picture, you will see the cut (disordered) lines on the neck showing that the dog's head was cropped out and entered another bird head.
I have addressed this picture to the authorities and it seems that this is just a fake photoshop picture. You can go to the website www.worth1000.com and see many photos done by photoshop.

Regarding this issue which focus more on the authenticity of the picture, well we really cannot say that what we see in picture is always true or real since we all know how the technology is growing nowadays.

The best proof to this is the item or the subject of the picture itself.

This is where the word "obsession" takes place. Since for sure if this is true, the person who took the picture will nott settle on the copy only but as well on the real item of the picture.

And i believe he/she thought of that before this was posted but again "if TRUE".

Goldenoneto has the best original "thats what it might be" comment, but I've never seen a turtle without a shell. If someone is going to take photos of things like that why don't they get more photos and expose the oddity so that we may have a better opporunity examine the darn thing.

I think it's giving all of you the finger.

it is real, but not a monster, i think is this kind of esperiment creating mutations to animal and some body took this away jus becouse that esperiment fell. wherever who this that is the monster, and make me think i alot of ground up kids that playing as a creaters.

Comment: I'm not a photographer, but I know how to use Maya and Photoshop. The picture in the beach is so easy to make. Now I don't want to sound like a lawyer this time but on the other side of the picture I'm very particular about veritable hard evidence. Picture may come as a hard copy but can never be a reliable source of hard evidence in this modern world. Sorry.

The lochness one appears to look like a man with his right hand in the air and is drifting to the left or a baby elephant that learned to swim on its back, The one that was found in Nyork though looks like a wild seal cross swassdog with dolphin sharped teeth. I think it should be called a Water Spydak humantaneous.
Big foot was a joke to somebody but it actually existed and so did the yeti millions of years before dinosaurs. Thats what I think and anything else they show well, It's probably dead real or dead and buried at sea (Prank)

It's probably a dog. The earlier posting about the flesh simply gone, revealing the muzzle of the skull seems like a pretty good explanation to me. You guys are right, if it was a new discovery, there would be several more pictures tken, a lot more coverage, and a lot of scientific studies being done.

The lochness monster one actually looks like somebody is swimming to the right of the page. It could also appear as an elephant who was captured at sea and is escaping for its life. Defintely a myth. It would be interesting to find the real fossils of the lochness.

Wow trinitario. As a member of the military I learned a long time ago, the soldiers who say "I've been in the ***", and things of that nature are generally FULL of ***. If you were really such a hard charger, you wouldn't be trying so hard to convince everybody of it when it has nothing to do with the subject of these postings. Sorry for the insults man, just letting you know how your posts sound. Just relax, there's no reason to curse at people for stating their opinions is there?

its obviously a dog. look at the hind legs and the tail. whoever did this did it well or we wouldnt be speculating. i agree with elede, who posted before me, i would have taken several photos if the thing was right in front of me. i may have even called the humane society, i have the number in my phone for when i come across lost animals with no tags or dead animals. no one wants a putrid animal corpse in the neighborhood. so just taking a picture and blogging it is pretty suspicious.

its pretty obvious that this is a dog. look at the hind legs and the tail. and the color and focus is inconsistent along the body. whoever did this photo did it well though, for what he/she was trying to do, or we wouldnt be speculating. and i agree "elede" who posted before me, i definitely would have taken several photos of this if it were right in front of me.

I so agree only one photo... come on... I dont think this could realy be possible. and if it is real wat the heck is it... its ugly!!!!!!

I'm a graphic designer and an amateur photographer. Last time I went to the beach I found a mantis and even though is not a rare creature but an unusual insect, I did more that 10 pictures of the little monster.
How come there is only one shot of this monster??? Does it disappeared after the picture was taken,
For me, this is just a simple joke.

I'm a graphic designer and an amateur photographer. Last time I went to the beach I found a mantis and even though is not a rare creature but an unusual insect, I did more that 10 pictures of the little monster.
How come there is only one shot of this monster??? Does it disappeared after the picture was taken,
For me, this is just a simple joke.