Don’t Laugh. Paris Is Right.

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: get serious @ 08/12/2008 3:10:34 AM

    It seems to me that if you look at supply quickly falling behind demand in the areas of oil and food production you must come to the conclusion that the real problem we need to discuss is the population explosion. We can barely support the human population now and forget what will happen if the predictions for 50 years from now are accurate. Sure we need to deal with global warming and the energy crisis and the food shortages we are starting to face today. Even if we can fix these problems what are we going to do when the planet's population is doubled? We really need to start discussing the population problem or we are just wasting time with all the other discussions.

  • Posted By: cferns1530 @ 08/11/2008 1:10:10 PM

    As long as lobbyists and corporations exist in the political process America is going nowhere but clinging onto promises that even the politicians who are funded know they cant change. Oil owns America and the ones who provide it have invested heavily in the American economy. Its the same as American consumption depends on China. America can only gradually change to better alternatives or fuel efficiency. The real person who can change America is the American consumer.

  • Posted By: simonanunhappydem @ 08/11/2008 2:01:56 AM

    Yes Mr. Feinman you are correct: Paris Hilton, and just about any rationally thinking average American, understands and sees our energy problem better than our politicians, democrat or republican. This is because of our flawed system of elections. Every politician is beholden to the legion of lobbyists controlled by the oil industry, among others. To get elected they need their money. Hence, they do not care about the interest of we the people, they only care about the interest of the big corporations expressed by their lobbyists. In this respect Obama is no different from McCain or Clinton. We need to finally get corporations out of our politics by reforming how elections are financed. It works in Europe, so no one can say this is impossible. Their system is not perfect by far, but it is much better than ours.

  • Posted By: coltraning @ 08/08/2008 2:03:07 PM

    Howard - get a clue. While I cannot believe I am typing this sentence, Paris Hilton's "ad" described Obama's energy plan, the same one as being proposed by the gang of ten. Still, the media are responsible for allowing the fiction to continue that drilling will have ANY effect on oil, when even Bush's own department of energy says NO oil will be in the market from offshore for 10 years. You are guilty of journalistic malpractice by not reporting this

    • Posted By: sharenews @ 08/08/2008 2:44:45 PM



      While Obama was recovering from the Primaries, McCain had his energy plan established. He made use of that time period when Obama was preoccupied. McCains established his energy plan is called the Lexington Project back in June and Obama has slowly been flopping into it.

      JOHN MCCAINS LEXINGTON PROJECT.

      Highlights of McCains Energy Plan:

      * Expanding Domestic Oil And Natural Gas Exploration And Production

      * Taking Action Now To Break Our Dependency On Foreign Oil By Reforming Our Transportation Sector

      * Investing In Clean, Alternative Sources Of Energy

      * Protecting Our Environment And Addressing Climate Change: A Sound Energy

      * Strategy Must Include A Solid Environmental Foundation

      * Promoting Energy Efficiency.

      *Addressing Speculative Pricing Of Oil


      DETAILS about John McCains Energy Plan:

      http://www.johnmccain.com//Informing/Issues/17671aa4-2fe8-4008-859f-0ef1468e96f4.htm

      • Posted By: DavidCA @ 08/10/2008 7:41:13 PM

        It's true that McCain calls his energy plan "an all of the above energy solution," which sounds a lot like Fineman's suggestion: "let's try everything!" But, on closer examination, it's revealed to be an amalgam of every crackpot gimmick he can think of (just as long as they don't step on Big Oil's toes). Want electric cars? McCain proposes a ... prize!? Want cheaper gas? McCain proposes a gas tax holiday and, apparently, simulateously drilling everywhere in the entire USA. Is this what he thinks leadership looks like?

        McCain's energy policy makes about as much sense as telling someone who just got a foreclosure notice "Have you considered buying a lottery ticket? I hear those things can pay off really big!"

      • Posted By: AskPlus @ 08/08/2008 4:45:54 PM

        Posted By: AskPlus @ 08/08/2008 14:31:34
        Comment: It wouldn't help anyway. At all. Ever. There are 17.8 billion barrels of undiscovered recoverable resources - not actual oil, but potential oil in areas currently off limits, according to the U.S. Geological Survey.
        The Energy Information Administration says that once opened, leasing would not begin until 2012, production would not begin until 2017, and would not be of sufficient scale until 2030 to have any impact at all on the US oil or natural gas market. By this time, offshore oil drilling would add approximately 250,000 barrels a day to the U.S. market, against an overall current demand of about 21 million barrels.
        New oil 250k
        Demand 21Mill
        Waste of time.


      • Posted By: AskPlus @ 08/08/2008 4:45:16 PM

        Posted By: AskPlus @ 08/08/2008 14:23:02
        Comment: Big Oil is saying cost won't drop for 30, no profits for 20. The media is screwing this up. Drilling will help nothing for two generations. I wonder why people are so eager to do nothing. Hurry up to wait.

    • Posted By: AskPlus @ 08/08/2008 2:23:02 PM

      Big Oil is saying cost won't drop for 30, no profits for 20. The media is screwing this up. Drilling will help nothing for two generations. I wonder why people are so eager to do nothing. Hurry up to wait.

  • Posted By: Notrepublican @ 08/09/2008 3:01:48 AM

    See, just by reading your post, you made me spell idiot, udiot.

  • Posted By: Notrepublican @ 08/09/2008 3:00:02 AM

    No, you're an udiot. Please stop talking and bringing down everyone elses IQ. Thank you.

  • Posted By: PatrickJKiger @ 08/08/2008 10:24:30 PM

    No way, man. I do not want to see McCain without his pants on.

  • Posted By: mfenwick @ 08/07/2008 4:09:16 PM

    I swear to god she'd make a better president than either one of the bastards.

    • Posted By: Nor-Cal for Obama @ 08/08/2008 3:31:13 PM

      ...and thats why you are a felon, and cannot vote.

      • Posted By: mfenwick @ 08/08/2008 7:49:09 PM

        Have you visited www.chimpout.com? Funny as hell.

  • Posted By: Ethel @ 08/08/2008 2:22:51 PM

    Go Paris!

    After all the primary excitement and talk of "change," it has been business as usual with the name calling.

    • Posted By: ewwade @ 08/08/2008 2:35:00 PM

      If Paris is right it must of taken many baxes of cigars for the Clinton's to get Paris to say this, I mean alot of cigars. But we should not worry about Paris, Obama has alreay picked a running mate for VP. France gave him the money and help him pick Usama Bin Laden... So now it will be the Obama and Usama Bin Laden ticket for President

      Thanks EW

      • Posted By: AskPlus @ 08/08/2008 2:39:18 PM

        Look a new one. Why just write bad words? Just keep it in. You wouldn't say this in public, why hide your hate here?

        • Posted By: ewwade @ 08/08/2008 2:42:29 PM

          i'm sorry I really hate it when the truth is out is told.

  • Posted By: mjbruce @ 08/08/2008 4:10:23 PM

    We need to do everything to get this country into an independent enegry mode. Neuclear, oil, wind, solor and whatever we can do. However, Obama is dead wrong to think that checking the air in our tires and
    getting tune ups, that most cars do not have anymore, will save as much as we could drill. I think Obama is having space soup for lunch too much.

  • Posted By: mnjam @ 08/08/2008 12:36:57 AM

    OCS drilling off the Atlantic and Pacific coasts (not the Gulf) is an expression of (1) our inability to face up to the crisis or (2) move on to the real solutions. Obama is at least leveling about this. McCain is not, instead mindlessly repeating his "drill here, drill now' mantra as if the ban on OCS drilling were the cause of US oil dependency and massive imports of oil.

    • Posted By: sharenews @ 08/08/2008 3:45:27 PM

      While Obama was recovering from the primaries, McCain had his energy plan established. He made use of that time period when Obama was preoccupied. McCains energy plan is called the Lexington Project which he established back in June and Obama has slowly been flopping into it.

      JOHN MCCAINS LEXINGTON PROJECT.

      Highlights of McCains Energy Plan:

      * Expanding Domestic Oil And Natural Gas Exploration And Production

      * Taking Action Now To Break Our Dependency On Foreign Oil By Reforming Our Transportation Sector

      * Investing In Clean, Alternative Sources Of Energy

      * Protecting Our Environment And Addressing Climate Change: A Sound Energy

      * Strategy Must Include A Solid Environmental Foundation

      * Promoting Energy Efficiency.

      *Addressing Speculative Pricing Of Oil


      DETAILS about John McCains Energy Plan:

      http://www.johnmccain.com//Informing/Issues/17671aa4-2fe8-4008-859f-0ef1468e96f4.htm

  • Posted By: rube @ 08/08/2008 1:26:33 AM

    Ok. Senator Obama has expressed alternative energies for some time now-
    wind, solar, hybrid fuels and development of alternative energy systems to augment with oil- with oil!!!
    Look at his voting record that is if you can read!
    The truth is out but the 75% are not listening- we cannot drill our way out of the current mess. Not enough oil infrastructure- oil rigs, refineries, oil tankers etc. The truth is we need to diversify and break the oil monopoly that is choking our nation! Democracies need competition to thrive you should know this and should also know that monopolies kill democracy!

    The distinction is clear. Obama is progressive,McCain is a Washington insider- centralized politics!
    Remember most you Bushies gave us the same old song and dance for 2000 and 2004 and he turned out to be the worst president in modern day history! And now some of you want to vote for his GOP brother?

    • Posted By: michaelp0429 @ 08/08/2008 2:06:57 AM

      Bush is the worst president ever. Totally bought and paid for by the oil companies - see the Bush Cheney Energy bill that was written in a closed room by ENRON and all the other oil companies. YOu are right to disparage him. BUT, you are grossly ignorant of what you speak when you assume McCain is another Bush. Remember that disasterous, multi-billion dollar give-away to the oil companies Bush Cheney Energy Bill? McCain voted against it because it, Obama voted for it. Obama claims Clinton and McCain are bought and paid for by oil, that they are old Washington politicians but it is he who votes with his Oil Company funders. McCain and Clinton both had the integrity, independance and correct judgement to vote against Big Oil when it counted. Obama only speaks out against them when he wants your vote, but when it comes time for him to stand against the oil companies or beside them, he voted with them. He is a hypocrit and has you fooled.

      Nobody hates Bush more than I. I thought he was a fool from the beginning. I thought he had insufficient experience and no voting record for us to judge him by. I thought he was telling voters whatever they wanted to hear - nice talk about change, being a Washington outside, ending our partisan politics in Washington, and HOPE - Bush said all of those things to get elected but I argued then that we had no idea what his real beliefs were. I was right. Now I have the exact same arguments against voting for Obama. He says the same platitudes Bush did. HE is just a liberal version of Bush - smarter to be sure but just as untested as the idiot Bush.

      Do some research before you just assume McCain is evil because he has been in Washington before and Obama is great because he is a new face. We need experienced, qualified leaders with the judgement to do the right thing, not panderers who give great speaches and tell you whatever you want to hear.

      • Posted By: sharenews @ 08/08/2008 3:19:12 PM

        Great post, and so true. : - )

  • Posted By: AsperGirl @ 08/08/2008 6:50:32 AM

    Obama isn't a good celebrity because he's not inclusive enough. Just like his arguing with John McCain's "let's do everything" energy policy, where we drill offshore for oil, invest in renewable energy, conserve and build nuclear power plants. Obama just wants what is in his comfort zone.

    Paris Hilton has a better energy policy, a better celebrity personality and, despite what Maureen Dowd says, Paris Hilton is hot but Obama is not.

    As a celebrity, as a policy leader, as a man planning a party (convention), Obama's not inclusive, he's divisive and he comes off more like a controlling narcissist than a leader.

    As a celebrity and a prospective leader, Obama could be more "Hiltonian".

    • Posted By: summer4077 @ 08/08/2008 11:41:01 AM

      Paris Hilton had the "let's do everything" policy, not McCain. McCain's ads are "Drill here, Drill now."

      How is Obama divisive? He has repeatedly encouraged Americans to speak about important issues, like race and poverty divides, and has tried to project a message of unity. As far as narcissistic, I disagree completely. He's intelligent and eloquent, and the small minded Americans want to write that off as being full of himself. I'd respect him less if he tried to dumb himself down. We've had 8 years of a moronic, dumb cowboy in office that has been an embarassement to the country. Why have another 4 with an out of touch, doddering old man? The world is changing, and Obama is the person to begin guiding us out of this mess.
      You see no problem with McCain constantly making childish swipes at Obama? I'd rather have someone who stands by hope and change rather than mudslinging insults at the other guy. Really, neither one of them are saying anything of substance, but I prefer positive people.

      • Posted By: sharenews @ 08/08/2008 3:10:57 PM





        While Obama was recovering from the primaries, McCain had his energy plan established. He made use of that time period when Obama was preoccupied. McCains established energy plan is called the Lexington Project he designed back in June and Obama has slowly been flopping into it.

        JOHN MCCAINS LEXINGTON PROJECT.

        Highlights of McCains Energy Plan:

        * Expanding Domestic Oil And Natural Gas Exploration And Production

        * Taking Action Now To Break Our Dependency On Foreign Oil By Reforming Our Transportation Sector

        * Investing In Clean, Alternative Sources Of Energy

        * Protecting Our Environment And Addressing Climate Change: A Sound Energy

        * Strategy Must Include A Solid Environmental Foundation

        * Promoting Energy Efficiency.

        *Addressing Speculative Pricing Of Oil


        DETAILS about John McCains Energy Plan:

        http://www.johnmccain.com//Informing/Issues/17671aa4-2fe8-4008-859f-0ef1468e96f4.htm

  • Posted By: cheesedad @ 08/08/2008 12:12:17 PM

    The writer is wrong. If we increase oil production, we will drop the conservation approach which we can control a lot more than we can control production. Increasing domestic oil production will be a blip of that which is produced in the world. Reducing what we buy reduces sending trillions of $ to the terrorists, lowers our costs, supports non-oil industiees like those developing non-gasoline cars, wind power, geothermal power, etc. The more oil we produce the deeper the hole will be that we are digging.

    • Posted By: AskPlus @ 08/08/2008 2:31:34 PM

      It wouldn't help anyway. At all. Ever. There are 17.8 billion barrels of undiscovered recoverable resources - not actual oil, but potential oil in areas currently off limits, according to the U.S. Geological Survey.
      The Energy Information Administration says that once opened, leasing would not begin until 2012, production would not begin until 2017, and would not be of sufficient scale until 2030 to have any impact at all on the US oil or natural gas market. By this time, offshore oil drilling would add approximately 250,000 barrels a day to the U.S. market, against an overall current demand of about 21 million barrels.
      New oil 250k
      Demand 21Mill
      Waste of time.

  • Posted By: cheesedad @ 08/08/2008 12:14:41 PM

    Hey - McCain couldn't even write a comment like this on the internet. He admits that. And we trust him to have the right ideas on everthing that our country needs? What a joke.

  • Posted By: Sinibaldi @ 08/08/2008 11:57:22 AM

    Aurora cristiana.

    S'apre la vallata,
    in sul nascer
    del mattino: odo
    un canto palpitare,
    onde lieto e
    quinci allegro
    cinguetta il passerotto,
    come augello
    canterino che nel
    chiaror si desta
    e per la via festeggia;
    ridente e viva
    apparmi la montagna,
    in sul fiatar del
    sole, e ancor pe
    l'arie fugge al
    dì costante il suon
    della novella rima,
    sì soave e quasi
    in candido rumore.
    Codesto in cantilena,
    nel fior che nasce
    onde fulge l'avvenire,
    nei suoni dolci
    del passato, e ancor
    nel canto, d'amabil
    sorte e d'umano pianto.

    Francesco Sinibaldi

  • Posted By: upinsmoke @ 08/08/2008 12:41:04 AM

    Expat2000 made some great points but he forgot about one thing. I do not have to own a cell phone , a computer and that is why I have no credit card debt. I have not found a good way to get to the store and work without a car and the fuel that goes in it, but when I do I will quit buying gas also!

    • Posted By: expat2000 @ 08/08/2008 1:05:03 AM

      The point I was making wasn't about what you can and can't do without, it is about using the term "obscene profit margin," to describe the oil industry. I don't like paying $3-$4 a gallon for gas any more than you do, but the profit percentages are not even close to obscene when compared to pharmeceuticals, banking, finance, tech, etc., yet people are crying for windfall taxes? To what end?

      As I said previously, I don't trust the government to make wise choices when it comes to spending money, and a "windfall tax" would just give them more to waste.

      • Posted By: summer4077 @ 08/08/2008 11:49:27 AM

        I agree, expat. Americans pay nowhere near what Europeans pay for gas. Germans are paying just under $10/gallon (adjusted to convert liters to gallons), and much of Europe has been paying well over $5/gallon for many years. This is why they have much more energy efficient cars and better mass transit. Frankly, I don't see anything wrong with paying that much for gas. We've been coasting under the radar for too long. It's time to make a REAL energy change away from dirty fossil fuels, and that isn't gonna happen with Drill Here Drill Now policies. Those are just a knee jerk response to a much larger, sustained problem.
        Upinsmoke, having a car IS a choice. There are bicycles, carpooling, buses, and motorbikes. It may not be an easy choice, but it is still a choice.

  • Posted By: sjpersonal @ 08/07/2008 6:03:30 PM

    What happened to the rest of the comments, there were comments by sportlock and others? Weird!

    • Posted By: AskPlus @ 08/07/2008 6:30:01 PM

      What? Are they gone?

      • Posted By: sjpersonal @ 08/08/2008 11:35:37 AM

        Yes, I guess Newsweekhad a melt down yesterday and lost some comments. I know that the server was down for a while. Sportlock was one of the first people to comment and his comment along with the other initial comments are gone.

    • Posted By: SPORTLOCK09 @ 08/07/2008 6:47:53 PM

      I know, what gives?

  • Posted By: willnotvoteobama @ 08/08/2008 7:27:05 AM

    To all who thinking of taking that leap of faith and voting for obama (the [mess]iah ) lets talk about faith. Now faith is real easy to come by if you have nothing at stake, picture if you will a tight rope walker up on the tight rope pushing a wheel barrow, you watch him go back and forth across the tight rope over and over again! Then he looks down on you and asks do you think I can do it again? And you shout yes! He says okay then get in the wheelbarrow! Will you do it? Do you still have faith that he can make it across? It???s a little different now right because you are at stake! Now lets take a look at obama he is a great speaker and seems to be intelligent. But is he the answer to our problems? Can he really do what he says? I myself can take that leap of faith because obama is not proven nor has he been tested in real leadership, he may be able to run this country once he has more experience under his belt but I don???t think he is ready now! If we put him into office and he is not able to deliver then we will have to deal with far more problems than we have right now! Take a good look at barrack obama and ask yourself is he ready? What about his problems with things like rev. Wright and William Ayres, Tony resko and the list goes on and on , if he was doing business with these folks that right there should question his ability to have sound judgement of what???s right and wrong! so with that being said there is a lot at stake in november, If you still choose to support barrack obama then so beit but remember it will be a long drop out of that wheel barrow and the ground will hurt when you end up there! AND THERE IS NO SAFETY NET !

    • Posted By: summer4077 @ 08/08/2008 11:30:20 AM

      I will post the same response I've posted to your previous postings about faith. Faith is way too underminded these days. Why is there a USA at all?? Because our forefathers had FAITH that they could create a better country, and faith that they could overthrow British rule. That worked. Faith carried us through some of our darkest moments--WW II and 9/11 just to name a couple. I'm not talking about religious faith, either, though that certainly helps. I'm talking about faith in ourselves as American people--that we will return to our values of right and wrong, that we will ditch the corruption. Faith in yourself allows you to achieve great things, and faith in the collective whole will allow this country to become great again.

      Besides, your argument is moot. We are ALL taking a leap of faith on any Presidential candidate, because no one can predict the future. What if McCain fails to live up to his promises? Same silly wheelbarrow situation.

  • Posted By: KennyF @ 08/08/2008 10:42:41 AM

    Sure, let's criticize Paris hilton for being a bimbo. That's easier than to admit we are all being gasolene bimbo about energy policy. Paris has her credit cards at Tiffany's - we have our SUVs and our Visa cards sucking down gas as fast as we can NO QUESTIONS ASKED. The only time we get mad is when gas skyrockets then we point the finger everywhere but at ourselvessounding like a selfish debutant whose father stopped the credit account at Neimann Marcus. Sorry guys, but Paris is the grown-up here not you. I like her energy policy with one addition. minimum fuel standards of 50 mpg because that is the only way to get us to give up our self-indulgent lifestyle. When Paris Hilton teaches us a lesson in maturity and self-sacrifce - we are in DEEP trouble.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse