A Catharsis in Denver?

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Bass Pro @ 08/08/2008 3:01:31 PM

    josesmarti is a good one too talk about standing up. Why don't you standup and criticize your G OLD P for sending troops to die in a war cooked up by your party and it's leaders you idolize. COWARD! Your boy McCain is already losing by more than 100 electoral votes. Are you worried that Clinton being on board will sink the republican's ship for years to come. When will you desert marti? Before or after the convention?

  • Posted By: josemarti @ 08/08/2008 2:40:41 PM

    Mr. Obama. You have to assert yourself. Bill Clinton should NOT be allowed to speak the same night as your VP candidate. He will upstage him. Not only that, ANY appearance by Bill Clinton undermines your message of CHANGE. Why can't you stand up to these people? What is wrong with you? Yes, by standind up to them you might loose the vote of some of their crazed supporters, but you stand to gain the vote of the much larger number of undecideds who are looking for signs that you are not another pushover like Kerry.

  • Posted By: John Hirsch @ 08/08/2008 2:33:51 PM

    Stop using Hillary to generate interest on Obama now that Obama is losing the polls.
    We Hillary Loyalists would never vote for him. NEVER. See the difference? Once you get to know Hillary, you actually like her for being so strong and you stay with her. The only people who hates her or campaigns about hating her is the Republican mean machine and the African Americans who is sooo racists that they would never vote for a white person, if an incompetent African is on the table.

  • Posted By: olderwiser @ 08/08/2008 10:42:10 AM

    Probably one of the most effective campaign tools of the Mc Cain campaign is to have a large number of his supporters write posts which pose as disgruntled Hillary supporters who have been terribly and emotionally wounded by the results of the Democratic primary. Some of these are blatantly visible as the use of that tactic. Others are more artfully done, but the scheme shines through. Its clear intent is to either cause a Mc Cain vote in retribution, or a petulant refusal to vote for anyone at all. It is sad that the only way that this tactic can work to erode the Obama campaign is for Bill and Hillary to hang onto some kind of idiotic ceremony to tell them goodbye at the Democratic convention and have a last chance to take attention away from the party's nominee. It is eerily consistent with the often expressed idea that they intend to try to deprive their party of a victory in November so that Hillary can take a shot at the office in 2012 against Mc Cain who by then will be babbling in the oval office nursing home. Whether this is true or not, they do not seem to realize that it is so consistent with what they have been doing, ever since Bill said back in the primary that Mc Cain would be a better commander in chief than Obama, that even if Obama loses and she wins in 2102, American History will brand it as the largest betrayal of all time.

    • Posted By: pumapurr @ 08/08/2008 2:10:18 PM

      Aha! So that's it. McCain's secret pod people are infiltrating everywhere! I knew it. I think the same folks broke in and reprogrammed my TIVO. Curses! Bill and Hillary swapped my couch cushions and thought I couldn't tell!? Oh, I'm on to them- I know lumpy when I feel it.

      Obama is going down in history all right, but not the way he planned it. Better get your deposit back on your kool-aid bottles now. They won't be redeemable after Nov. 5.

    • Posted By: AskPlus @ 08/08/2008 11:26:48 AM

      But isn't it sooooo transparent that she has no chance in 2012? I think so. The ones who can come back, are the ones who can go away.

    • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 08/08/2008 11:04:08 AM

      Wow! Stunning comments, olderwiser. Excellent analysis!

      • Posted By: olderwiser @ 08/08/2008 11:07:19 AM

        Best I could do. Old brain's fading out la bella mia. Come 'sta?

  • Posted By: lxhobson @ 08/08/2008 2:06:03 PM

    Everyone with a piece of a brain knows that Jonathan Alter is enamored with Obama. How many positive articles has he written about Obama? How many negative? Now ask yourself the same question, only substitute the name McCain. How about trying the question with the name Hillary Clinton?

    See what I mean?

  • Posted By: miriamac @ 08/08/2008 1:56:17 PM

    I have a solution.
    Sen. Stevens was indicted for taking in kind kickbacks.
    Clinton voted for the Iraq War, and campaigned to extend the US security umbrella to the UAE while she & her husband received millions from a partnership (Yucaipa) with the Emir of Dubai and reported this as ">$1,000" on her disclosure forms.
    The discrepancy between Clinton's tax returns & the disclosure forms has been obvious since April.
    Surely with all the law school summer interns out there to do the grunt work some US attorney can get her indicted before the convention.
    It would be a great servce to the country and the people of NY State.
    We would be rid of the Walmart Evita once & for all and maybe some women who had qualifications to lead other than being married to Bill Clinton could come to the fore.

  • Posted By: wchang @ 08/08/2008 1:10:43 PM

    antifish -- at least you're been clear about your association, not posing as a Clinton supporter.

    But what rules are you talking about that were broken on Obama's behalf? Clinton wanted Michigan's election to be counted, even though Edwards and Obama took their names off the ballot prior to the vote out of respect for the DNC's determination that Michigan had violated rules by attempting to change their election date, and the DNC penalized Michigan by invalidating their election. These are rules that Clinton's advisors helped to create prior to the election.

    when it became clear that Clinton was losing in the primary process she tried to make the results of that election count: Clinton 599300, undeclared 304930 -- or whatever the numbers were -- claiming all these votes she had earned for herself (and of course zero for Obama), and claiming that this was in some way a fair representation of the will of the voters. That's a big sham, obviously, and if you, as someone who favors McCain, have to resort to this sort of argument to benefit your candidate, isn't that saying your candidate has no valid argument to make for himself?

  • Posted By: groucho51 @ 08/08/2008 1:06:46 PM

    The best catharsis is for Hillary to declare publicly to the world that she lost, fair and square. Then she and her supporters can step aside and go to work for the winner. As long as she allows her supporters to believe she lost because Obama didn't treat her right or because his campaign was somehow sexist or because the party didn't change the rules for her benefit in Michigan and Florida, or because the media were biased against her, she is hurting the Democratic Party. The reason Clinton lost is because Obama organized in the caucus states and she didn't. Period. End of Story.

  • Posted By: Driver of wagons @ 08/08/2008 12:51:29 PM



    Ron Suskind Must be the only real journalist left in this country but I guess its just the "Way of the World"


    By Ron Suskind
    What just happened? Evidence. A secret that has been judiciously kept for five years just spilled out. All of what follows is new, never reported in any way:

    The Iraq Intelligence Chief, Tahir Jalil Habbush -- a man still carrying a $1 million reward for capture, the Jack of Diamonds in Bush's famous deck of wanted men -- has been America's secret source on Iraq. Starting in January of 2003, with Blair and Bush watching, his secret reports began to flow to officials on both sides of the Atlantic, saying that there were no WMD and that Hussein was acting so odd because of fear that the Iranians would find out he was a toothless tiger. The U.S. deep-sixed the intelligence report in February, "resettled" Habbush to a safe house in Jordan during the invasion and then paid him $5 million in what could only be considered hush money.

    In the fall of 2003, after the world learned there were no WMD -- as Habbush had foretold -- the White House ordered the CIA to carry out a deception. The mission: create a handwritten letter, dated July, 2001, from Habbush to Saddam saying that Atta trained in Iraq before the attacks and the Saddam was buying yellow cake for Niger with help from a "small team from the al Qaeda organization."

    The mission was carried out, the letter was created, popped up in Baghdad, and roiled the global newcycles in December, 2003 (conning even venerable journalists like Tom Brokaw). The mission is a statutory violation of the charter of the CIA, and amendments added in 1991, prohibiting the CIA from conducting disinformation campaigns on U.S. soil.

    So, here we go again: the administration is in full attack mode, calling me names, George Tenet is claiming he doesn't remember any such thing -- just like he couldn't remember "slam dunk" -- and reporters are scratching their heads. Everything in my book is on the record, with many sources. And so, we watch and wait....

    There will be more falling by the wayside after this book is read and there may be an impeachment in the works. Wait there already is! This will give it lots of strength. If you are a patriotic American write all of your congressmen/women and senators and ask them what's up with this.


  • Posted By: wchang @ 08/08/2008 12:50:58 PM

    "the ham in a Bush sandwich"?? Heh heh.. that's probably the funniest thing I've heard in a while.

    Clinton as envoy to the Middle East sounds good -- wonder if they are talking about this.

  • Posted By: Phishmelt @ 08/08/2008 12:44:04 PM

    wait until they start attacking him directly and not just his policies. He can barely keep up now. Ayers -just guy on my block. Slums- I didn't know sewage was coming out of their sinks. Shown experience.... empty suit.

  • Posted By: alexblack @ 08/07/2008 11:26:54 PM

    Hillary won the most votes in the Democratic Primary, but lost due to Obama stirring up the far left base in caucases, and the Superdelegates coming down with a major case of Obama-infatuation. And now, in a year in which a Democratic tree stump should be 15 points ahead of the Republican nominee by now, it's almost a dead heat. Think Hillary and her supporters are "over it"? They know that they were out-hoodwinked and out-bamboozled, and their catharsis will be going on from the convention through the election. They were mugged, and they know it.

    • Posted By: loriw @ 08/08/2008 1:07:03 AM

      No Hillary didn't win the most votes because many of those votes were due to Operation Chaos and wouldn't have been there for her in November. The Clintons would love for everyone to believe that her loss was due to some Obama trickery but in reality Hillary never really was winning in the end. The Clintons lost because of Bill's bad acting from when he was POTUS and because the people were not impressed with Hillar's sniper fire exagerations and thiabvious entitlement attitude toward the White House.
      s

      • Posted By: al2k @ 08/08/2008 12:43:03 PM

        Enter Your Comment Are you kidding me! sniper fire statement!

  • Posted By: Pete Kent @ 08/08/2008 8:06:37 AM

    What a refreshing moment of candor from Alter. I wonder if he will have the courage to say the same on the hack Olbermann show? The Clinton's will not give up power easily. This week has opened up a window on the rift in the Democrat party that has not yet been healed.

    Bill is still licking his wounds in Africa and Hillary is courting her PUMAs and planning her roll call. Party Unity My Ass, indeed!

    It is amazing to me that Clinton, the former Icon of his Party, could have been treated so shabbily this election year and that the Obama campaign and its supporters would be so willing to throw him under the bus along with so many others. That he is pissed and feeling dissed is entirely natural.

    It would be a mistake to think that there are not many other Democrats who are feeling similarly bruised and while not yet ready to defect are not all that enthusiastic about Obama, who after all only got 50% of the votes in the primaries to 50% for Mrs. Clinton. Do not discount that Bill???s treatment and resentment over it has potentially moved the polls in NY a nudge.

    Obama is about to take a week off. To me that is an amazing move. While it is undeniable that a significant segment of the population is sick of hearing about him, it is a huge mistake to leave the playing field to your enemies.

    Both McCain and the Clintons can use the week to sharpen their knives (and claws) get ready for the sprint to the Conventions.

    • Posted By: xeyeldinTX @ 08/08/2008 8:23:12 AM

      It is horrifying to me, that with all the truly vital issues of our times, with a sitting President whose popularity is in the outhouse, the Democratic Party is willing to commit political Hari Kari in such a way. Forget the economy, the war, our failing national infrastructure let's have internal warfare because it FEELS good.

      • Posted By: al2k @ 08/08/2008 12:38:43 PM

        Enter Your Comment no of those issues can be fix if you put an idiot as president.

      • Posted By: olderwiser @ 08/08/2008 10:26:28 AM

        Ain't democracy wonderful. And to think that we want stick this system on the unsuspecting Iraqis. Now they can blow each other up for the party.

  • Posted By: ZapMama @ 08/08/2008 11:17:51 AM

    Every time a disgruntled loser's name is placed in nomination, encouraging their supporters to withhold support for the party's nominee, the party loses! Losers only beget losing. Losers would rather settle for the spoils of ruining the party than helping their party win. Hilary is clearly a loser and needs to make peace with that reality. Obviously, like Hilary and Bill, Hilary's supporters don't care about defeating the Republicans. BooBoo!

    • Posted By: AskPlus @ 08/08/2008 11:21:36 AM

      For sure real sore. Never thought I'd see an ex-President pout.

  • Posted By: independent from IN @ 08/08/2008 9:05:33 AM

    As a 55 year old white female I am appauled at the was Hillary has acted. She has to always have drama surrounding her. I would love to have a female in the white house but one that is more focused and less dramatic. One who doesn't behave like Tanya Harding. Hillary has many good qualities but as this election has continued, fewer and fewer of them have been displayed. Her inability to move on gracefully is appauling and her campaign debt should be a good indication of how she would perform as president. In addition, the way many of her supporters have been so negative and reactionary further supports the fact that she is extremely devisive. Having Bill trying to win votes for her shows that it is difficult for her to stand on her own as a woman rather than as an extension of him. Rather than putting her energy and talents into supporting Obama, she is, once again, focusing one herself and her goal to become president. Very sad for women in general.

    • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 08/08/2008 11:05:08 AM

      Excellent!

    • Posted By: nancysabet @ 08/08/2008 10:28:31 AM

      have you taken your pils today dear?

      • Posted By: olderwiser @ 08/08/2008 10:51:21 AM

        Well nancysabet if she did take a pill, it was a smart pill. IndependentfromIN is right on with a well stated point, to which I would add that Hillary's continual inability to detach herself from a narrow defeat illustrates a clear lack of ability to perform as a president. Her conduct smacks of the hard hardheadedness of our present white house dweller-intruder-decider-divider-warmongering-dumbass with his "stay the course even if it doesn't work" philosophy. Just think of her trying to force congress to her will with this defect. Her emotionally unstable stubbornness is a disability that we cannot afford as she lays sleeping by the red phone in the wee hours.

  • Posted By: Native New Yorker @ 08/08/2008 10:22:05 AM

    As they say, "it ain't over til the fat lady sings"...I have yet to hear a note out of Billery!!! My money says she puts her name in for the nomination, has a roll call vote and wins! The Clinton's are no fools....they see "The One" declining in the polls, his inability to make whole sentences or salient points without a teleprompter. He is basically an empyt suit with a gift of oratory. His hubris is coming home to haunt him, while destroying the politial process.

    • Posted By: SPIRITED AWAY @ 08/08/2008 10:51:11 AM

      RE: "My money says she puts her name in for the nomination, has a roll call vote and wins!"

      If what you predict comes to pass, there will be riots in Denver unlike anything we've ever seen. And the DNC will be left split in two. It's unnerving just thinking about the repercussions.

      • Posted By: olderwiser @ 08/08/2008 10:55:49 AM

        It's too late for riots in Denver. This is already a riot.

  • Posted By: chezmadame @ 08/08/2008 8:14:32 AM

    Why should Hillary Clinton's delegates be treated any differently than the delegates for all of the previous Democratic Conventions?
    There have only been four conventions since 1832 during which the nominee was decided by acclamation instead of a ballot, and all four nominees were incumbents (FDR, LBJ, Bill Clinton, and Al Gore).
    According to DNC rules
    Hillary Clinton???s supporters simply want her to have the same opportunity that all of her predecessors have had. Barack Obama is still a candidate, albeit the presumptive nominee, but he is not an incumbent. Imagine the outcry if Senator Clinton had been selected by the DNC and the historic opportunity for Obama???s name to be put in nomination was stonewalled by party insiders in the name ???appearing unified???.
    Frankly, if Senator Obama can't face the same challenges that all other non-incumbent Democratic nominees have had to face, how on earth will the Democratic Party be able to beat John McCain?

    • Posted By: nancysabet @ 08/08/2008 10:30:28 AM

      Amen!! Obama can not fight, plain ans simple. He wants to run his campaign without any real oponent, just like he did in Chicago for his senate seat.

  • Posted By: nancysabet @ 08/08/2008 10:24:41 AM

    FEC Investigation of Obama Eligibility
    The petition

    The signers of this petition request the Federal Elections Commission and Mr. Donald McGahan, FEC chairman, to take responsibility to verify the eligibility of Mr. Barack H. Obama to be President of the United States. Mr. Obama has refused to produce a physical certified, stamped copy of his birth certificate. An electronically-displayed image displayed by his official campaign website has been alleged to be a forgery. We request that the FEC require Mr. Obama to authorize the FEC to obtain an official copy of his birth certificate and if he does not produce the authorization that the FEC reject his registration as a presidential candidate; that the FEC not monitor his campaign finances during the primary or election; that votes cast for Mr. Obama and reported by the states??? boards of elections not be recorded and displayed by the FEC; and that Mr. Obama be considered in violation of 2 USC 437g for filing a false statement on FEC Form 2, as specified on that form.
    http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/Federal-Elections-Commss

  • Posted By: ReCon USMC @ 08/08/2008 7:53:39 AM

    Jonathan Alter has long stopped being a Fifth Estate Journalist .
    He is a full blown far leftist .
    It is fine for him to be a leftist but he should be writing in the Daily Kos or Move on ,org with a BIGL''L'' in from of his name .
    Yet he wants readers to think he just happens to be left on this One issue thouands of times .
    Rush , Shaun Hanity , Ann Coulter and about 30 other say they are Conservatives up front . Katy C, \MATT lauer are not called Liberals nor are
    John Kerry , Teddy Kennedy are all called DEMS not Liberals or MODERATES .B/S !

    • Posted By: CmoreGlass @ 08/08/2008 7:59:35 AM

      Conservative? Leftist? I don't think those words mean what you think they mean. What does it feel like, down deep in your soul, to report to Ann Coulter, for duty? I think we can see who you hate, but who do you Love?

  • Posted By: Toppy @ 08/07/2008 11:33:35 PM

    Coronate? Coronate? Mr. Alter, ! expect better of you! And where are the editors? Obviously not polishing their crowns!

    • Posted By: olderwiser @ 08/08/2008 10:21:37 AM

      Toppy, you should not complain of the manner in which Mr. Alter informates us.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse