Don’t Call Me—I May Call You

I have been, I guess the word is lurking around these boards for a while, I have posted a few times before but I prefer reading the posts, and I have to say that the level of rage amoung some Clinton supporters is absolutely horrible. There is no logic behind this, at this time in US history, they are choosing to vote for someone who will continue to lead us on the path that we have been on for the last 8 years. Shame on you. I to voted for Sen. Clinton during the primaries and was very upset that she didn't win, but it was a contest. True there were quite a bit of sexism and racisim being thrown around, but we really need to work to get past this. The goal, for me at least, is to make sure that John McCain out of the white House.

I did notice one blogger in particular that appears to have multiple personalities and runs around growling and foaming at the mouth at others like a rabid Chihuahua. All of her posts are extremely condescending and deliberately vicious for no reason. She claims to be a Clinton supporter, but the Hillary Clinton that I supported would be ashamed to call this person one of her base. This person goes by the following tag names;

123waz
zrrr
legume
xczy14
what?

In my opinion this person is just an angry woman spitting her venom because that is all she has. I shall name her Sybil the multi-personality angry Chihuahua!

Hillary was a briiliant, accomplished young woman before she met Bill, and she was destined for greatness. After her commencement speech against the Vietman war in 1969, many of her fellow classmates conculded she would be thee first female president someday. On her own, she was listed as onne of the youngest women amongst the top 100 lawyers nationally, If she never hitched with Bill, we likely would have had our first female presidnet already - Hillary ROdham.

Just as Jane Goodall studied monkeys I wanted to study another species of Animal - The Democrat.

In my experiment I stated that Hillary for 2012, Democrats unite vote Mc Cain this election and Hillary will win in a landslide in 2012.

Not once in my post did I say I was a woman. The Democrats in their BRILLIANCE on here ASSUMED that I was a woman. Once this occurred I just sat back and WATCHED the Democrats call me hormonal, my panties were in a bunch (don't wear panties obviously boxerbriefs if you must know, lol).

I thought Democrats were supposed to be the party of Unity? I thought there were supposed to WELCOME women into their party, embrace women, love women????? Boy was I shocked at all the ANTI-WOMEN remarks coming out of die hard Democrats mouths!!! The ignorance of Cloudosmoke and other dummies on here shocked me but even more so was the INTOLERANCE towards women and to the 18 million MEN and women who did vote for Hillary in the primaries. I would prefer Hillary a BILLION times over Obama and his socialist ideas as she is more intelligent, more experienced and her policies are clearly more thought out.

But nonetheless I decided to reveal my research. Democrats not only are dumber than an educated person could even imagine their OWN BELIEFS about what a Democrat is - Loving, Accepting, Non Judgemental, etc, etc is PURE BULLSHIT! The male Democrats reveal their TRUE nature - MISOGYNISTS.

For 90% of Democrats reading this Misogynists are men who hate, dislike or mistrust of women.

This Democratic convention is going to be HILARIOUS as angry Clinton voters are now going to be allowed to vent and show their anger at the election that was STOLEN from them.

In case you wonder who I really am, I'm a man, 37, 6 foot 5 and 252 lbs, bench 285 lbs 6 times, drive a BMW 335i and this year will make between $400k and $500k and have an IQ of 172. (maybe double the average Democrat on here, LOL)

Great News ! Today's state by state polls and the electoral map swayed to Mc Cain.

Yesterday it was Obama 284 and McCain 241 with 13 tied votes for Virginia.

Today we picked up Colorado which makes it Obama 275 and Mc Cain 250 with Virginia still tied.

Just to contrast this in 2004 SAME DAY Kerry had 327 and Bush 211.

Obama may get a bump after his Corronation ceremony but then comes the real deal, a debate and Obama is absolutely horrible when not reading off a teleprompter and not reading speeches his fantastic speechwriters made for him. He'll get destroyed in an apples to apples comparison against Mc Cain. Policy for Policy Obama losses in every one EXCEPT for Pro Life and the Iraq war.

I think most people care about keeping as much of their hard earned money as possible and want to KEEP THEIR JOBS and thus will vote for Mc Cain, the proven and experienced maverick over the crazy and scarry obama.

Bill Clinton seems to believe that Hillary would have somehow redeemed his tarnished presidency. However, while everyone believes his strengths as president outweiged his behavior (having the affair when he knew the GOP was looking for something to accuse him of and then prevaricating instead of just telling the truth) the electorate didn't necessarily want the Clintons back in the White House. We forgave him is excesses--and although some of us questioned Hillary's enabling Bill, we were happy to see her forge her own career. But, again, it doesn't mean Democrats, let alone Independents, wanted to relive the drama of the Clintons. Hillary and Bill Clinton seem to need to live in the public eye--they've been political partners throughout their marriage and one has to wonder whether they are afraid of live alone with each other without constantly having a political campaign to hold them together. Hillary Clinton opened up this year because Obama's success forced her to. I can't help wondering what kind of woman she would have been if she hadn't "hitched her wagon" to Bill Clinton. She is more of a throwback to women of the 1950s than she realizes. In fact, I think Hillary is a mystery to herself. Maybe, at this stage of her life, she is beginning to find herself. The primary was a good start on her personal journey of discovery. Bill needs to find another way to redeem his tarnished presidency. He has used Hillary long enough--and she has been an enabler long enough.

Senator Gramm,who tagged Americans as whiners, is back in good graces with McCain, now! That should give Moderates and Democrats something to whine about!

I'm going to send Senator Obama an e-mail and tell him to read this story. Considering that both candidates want to TAX THE HEDGE FUND DEALERS, that's why our economy is in the shape it is in because of unequal taxation. There are approximately five big investment banks that virtually control the HEDGE FUNDS and the QUESTIONABLE DERIVATIVES that they are now trying to sell to the pension funds. They have gotten the Commercial banks in trouble and caused the housing crisis so it's going to take Senator Obama and Senator Clinton, who both want to TAX HEDGE FUND DEALERS and just to show the multinational corporations that they mean business, he should take Ralph Nader as his Treasury Secretary . Someone has to call their bluff that say that "Taxes should be based on ability to pay." The middle class is getting tired of these free-loading multinational corporations.
Yours truly, Disgusted Blue Dog Democrat, LaVern Isely

I think the Clinton's need to let go along with her supporters. They are only making it harder for her. She lost and can't go back. All those supporters are doing is giving the Republicans ammuntion agaist the Dems.

Plans for Clinton convention rallies intensify
The Hill By Bob Cusack 08/10/2008

Frustrated supporters of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.) are planning multiple rallies at the Democratic convention in Denver, coupled with television and print advertisements.

The disenchanted Democrats want to express their disappointment with the party???s presidential primary process.

The Denver Group, formed a couple of months ago by two Clinton backers, says it has filmed a television commercial and is looking to air it soon. The fledgling group adds that it has received such a strong response to its scheduled Aug. 26 reception in Denver that it had to book an overflow room.

Meanwhile, another pro-Clinton group called ???18 Million Voices??? is organizing a march on Aug. 26 in Denver ???and nationwide to support Sen. Clinton and advocate for women???s rights worldwide.??? It will also be holding ???a celebration in a beautiful Denver City park during the day, and throughout the evening on Aug. 26,??? according to the 18 Million Voices website.

Sen. Barack Obama???s (D-Ill.) campaign has been in contact with Clinton aides to come up with a plan that will unify the party as well as honor Clinton and the roughly 18 million people who voted for her during the presidential primary.

But any compromise is unlikely to satisfy Clinton???s most ardent backers.

For example, some of the Denver Group???s goals are contrary to the Democratic Party???s.
Its goals include: an open convention; Clinton's name placed in nomination with no symbolic roll call vote; speeches allowed by supporters of Clinton on behalf of her candidacy; a genuine roll call vote with Clinton as a legitimate candidate; and ???no coronation.???

Asked about Clinton last week, Obama said, ???As is true in all conventions, we???re still working out the mechanics, the coordination.??? When pressed if he would favor a roll call for Clinton, Obama responded, ???I didn???t say that.???

News and Notes, you best get your Notes pad ready since you did tell me that you are observing this blog. Here is a suggestion, start observing Careerdaytrader's hate posts about Obama before you accuse Obama supp. Read this poster's comments below this page. You did accuse SJPersonal and I of name calling and devisiness when we defended Obama, did you not? You only call out the Obama supporters, no one else. So, who is really devisive?

News and Notes, after reading more of your comments, I now realize that I was mistaken regarding your intentions. I do apologize. Thank you.

The Convention will separate the apples from the onions. And you can have the onions, they smell, cry and complain way too much. Anyone (1-2% at best from Camp Hillary) that is willing to turn their backs on their party will bear their own burdens. I won't spend time weeping. Besides there are more than enough Republicans voting for Obama to make up for them. The demographics should be very interesting once the results are in. It will likely show the overwhelming middle class working people of both multi-'races' that voted Obama and upper class suburbia (which is nothing in terms of numbers) that voted McCain. Come November, the rest of the nation will see McCain as the elitist, out of touch, Bush policy friend, war mongering, kick the little man while he's down, o.d. 'old despot' that he is.

I am bothered, in the first place, by the promises being made by both men. I am bewildered that both men are making legislative promises.

???When I am president,??? each man says, ???I will ...??? Now correct me if I am wrong, that I might have missed something while I was busy getting old, but when I studied government in school, I think I remember that there were three branches of government: executive, legislative and judicial. For the purpose of this essay only, the judicial branch of government will be overlooked.

In an over-simplification of job descriptions, the president and cabinet are the executive part of the branch trio. The president should keep himself busy conferring with the cabinet and agencies, being commander in chief, setting policy, giving state dinners, making nice with other countries, declaring states of emergency, signing or vetoing legislation, etc. The legislative part of the trio (the representatives and senators) has as its job initiating legislation as needed for the good of the country and their constituents, serving on investigative committees, etc.

Now we get to my contention. Both Senator McCain and Senator Obama are expounding on what they will do as president while continuing to speak like legislators. What they are promising to do in the future as the executive is what they should be proposing now in their current positions as legislators.

Come on now, fellas, if you believe so strongly in what changes need to be made for the good of the country???s problems with the economy, the oil crisis, education and health care, why have you not been back in Washington rallying support in the Senate and writing bills which would begin the miraculous cures now that you are promising for the future? Both you senators remind me of poker players with your cards clutched to your chests. Both of you are bluffing that you have a straight flush, ace high, while holding nothing more than a pair of jacks.
Unfortunately, the other people sitting at the table are about to be taken. Their names are Americans and Voters. Come on now, fellas, if you plan to play this game, show us your cards. Lay them on the table. Show us how you plan to win the game. Show us a workable plan for the cures you are promising. If these plans are so good, why haven???t you been busy in the Senate doing what you are paid to do for the country? Why are you holding back? Is it all a bluff?

Up to this point in the election process, the only thing that has been shown to the voters is age and charisma, experience and inexperience, war hero and academic scholar, pedigree and boot strap climber. Show us some substance. As the commander in chief, how, I repeat, how will you act as leader to make your promises reality? I need to know before I vote; otherwise I will continue to be bothered and bewildered, but certainly not bewitched.

There will be a roll call vote. Hillary Clinton's name will be put in nomination. Her supporters will have a chance to march through the aisles of the convention floor for about 15 minutes. Every state delegation will get its 30 seconds of air time to tout the "peanut capital of the world" or "the cheese capital of the world" or "the home of the biggest ball of yarn in the world." There will be a vote. And when everyone has had their say, the chair will recognize Sen. Clinton in the New York delegation who will move that Sen. Obama be sominated by acclimation. Everyone will cheer: YEAAAAAAA! Balloons will fall. Confetti will flow. Srangers and rivals will hug and kiss. Everyone will go home feeling good and no one will be grumpy at Obama's historic acceptance speech on Thursday. Then 76,000 people will stream out of Mile High Stadium and fan out across the country to canvass their neighbothoods, man phone banks, hold house parties, sign up for election day carpools. And in the late hours of Nov. 4 or the wee hours of Nov, 5, our long national nightmare will be over and Republican rule will be no more -- with any luck, for the rest of my natural life! It's all good.

I just read through the article in the current Atlantic Monthly and the series of memos it secured from the Clinton campaign. What a disaster it would have been if Sen. Clinton had managed to secure the nomination. Throughout the campaign, she was unable to control or direct her own staff. She was indecisive and dithering. Then, when things went wrong, she'd get angry and demand instant action. She could never decide on a coherent policy and kept switching "favorites" among her advisors, who apparently all hated each other. What a circus! Thank God for Obama!