What do I do when my ex wife refuse our son to speak to me over the phone throughout the week . I only have visitation on Thursday & Friday so I have to go without speaking to him about his day for 5 consecutive days
Much of what's wrong with family law today lies in warmed-over stereotypes of men as unsuited to caring for their children.
What do I do when my ex wife refuse our son to speak to me over the phone throughout the week . I only have visitation on Thursday & Friday so I have to go without speaking to him about his day for 5 consecutive days
Holly Collins' claims about her high-profile custody case are disputed by her own mother, grandmother, sister, brother, former in-laws, her ex-husband and his wife, numerous doctors, Guardians ad Litem, social workers, mental health professionals and all seven judges who have heard this case. Journalist Glenn Sacks has examined the other side of this case and found there are many problems with Holly Collins' version of events. Sacks' analysis of the court record can be found at http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=3265
After 10 years plus, I have thought to myself, enough is enough. I have lost 2 children to an obsessive, pathological lying step grandmotther who not only stole my kids from me but her own step daughter so that she may have kids of her own. I have all court documents to prove it I am planning on a one man march to Austin, Texas' capital from south florida with nothing but a camcorder and pen and paper to document itself. If anyone, I mean anyone would like to assist me in my 1700 mile walk, please contaxt me at 772-260-9901 my name is Brian and my kids need me. Thanks
The best thing to do is seems to represent yourself. You can't do much worst than what the lawyers give you and it will save money. How? Go to a library and read what to do. Ask the reference desk person where to find stuff. Go to the courthouse and check out a file of a recent divorce and review and copy the pleadings. It is all public record. All lawyers do anyway is cut and paste pleadings (petitions, answers, ect.). Law libraries have manuals you can read.
The best thing to do is seems to represent yourself. You can't do much worst than what the lawyers give you and it will save money. How? Go to a library and read what to do. Ask the reference desk person where to find stuff. Go to the courthouse and check out a file of a recent divorce and review and copy the pleadings. It is all public record. All lawyers do anyway is cut and paste pleadings (petitions, answers, ect.). Law libraries have manuals you can read.
I???m the father of amazing little girls that I share with my ex. When my ex and I were still married she was having an affair. Within a month of have our 2nd daughter she was back to her old ways. She would leave for work before the kids woke up and get home after they went to bed. I was a single father long before we separated. Then one day she moved out and left me and my two kid???s a 2 years old and a 7 month old. From before my youngest was born I was the one caring for the kids. I got them ready, I did the bed time stories, I dropped off and picked up from the day care, it was me and me alone. I was even the one that potty trained them and got them off binkies. And yet the court system gave HER custody because the kids were so young. We are now going on year 4 of a custody battle. She doesn???t want the kids; she just doesn???t want to lose.
I was glad to read this artical, and believe it or not, I read it in my lawyers office while waiting to discuss complications in my fight for custody of my three year old son. My wife of four years a 22 year old college student has decided that she didnt get to live life yet...and filed for divorce. although I was surprised by this, my focus was shifted to how to minimize the effects on our son. Immediatly she started to sell things including furniture out of our house to convince me to sign her divorce papers that I said I would not sign (as is) when this didnt work, she quit letting me see our son or talk to him on the phone. My lawyer was making some serious progress in getting me to be the temporay custodian of our son until the divorce decided custody. When her lawyer told her that this prospect was a possiblity she instantly filed a false emergancy protective order on me, taking away my right to see or talk to my son for a minimum of 14 days. in doing so she has also greatly decreased my chances of getting a status of primary resident cusotian of my son.
For the first time in my life I feel that the laws do not defend me, in the stead, I am guilty until proven guilty and the only proof she needs is that she "felt" threatened. no clearification or elaboration...I'm guilty of domestic abuse...abuse to a woman I have supported thru school, loved and cherished, a woman I have never raised an angry hand to...and the son I love more than anything in the world is left to be used as a weapon by the people who's wages we all pay. my frustration can in no way find its way to this comment, and I hope that their are enough good fathers, out there that will come together to change the laws to protect both the women that are truly being abused and the good loveing fathers from the women who use the system as a weapon a weapon that does not belong to them.
Thank you for listening to my rant...
Rant on my brother. I too live the same life. There are "good" dads out there. Unfortunately we are all judged by the actions of "bad" ones. Mothers are viewed as the nurturers but fathers can be nurturers as well. The biased legal system needs to address custody in a case by case basis. Unfortunately there are no resources to investigate these matters. Oh, you can call in investigators and therapists to give thier opinions. That costs money and time. I exhausted my finances and time at work to fight for a couple of hours after school one day a week. Extentions on court dates and negating false acusations took its toll. 2 years of litigating and court fees were gone to waste. In the court system the father has to fight an uphill battle to fight the stigma of a non-nuturing dad. They do exist and they are forgotten. The children suffer the most. Thier voices need to be heard. And these non-violent custody cases should not waste the courts time and be settled by a mediator.
thats just my opinion.
It's about time we men stood up for equal rights---god knows that feminists will never do it for us. After all, feminism has never been about equal rights. Feminism has always been about more rights for women. I encourage all men and women who are truly interested in equality to stand up for fathers and men---reject feminism in favor of EQUALISM. Men and women are different. We are not the same. We fulfill different roles and functions. And we are EQUAL. Feminism has destroyed this natural balance. We must find a way to honor both men and women again. The best place to start would be with family courts. Let men be fathers to their children. Let children have their fathers. Honor and respect the wisdom and guidance that only a father can give his sons or daughters. Encourage men to be good fathers for their children. Stop treating them like walking ATMS. Stop separating children from their fathers. What good can come from such things?
EQUALISM NOW!!!! STAND UP FOR IT, MEN!!!!
Please let my employer know I am equal...I make about 35% less than my male counterparts in the exact same field. My ex and I have the same degrees...he only a BS, I an MS, and I have awards and patents besides, and I make 40% less than him. How bigoted to say that only a father can give his sons or daughters wisdom and respect. My ex taught my child agression, and the child is constantly in trouble for it. Stop treating women like walking wombs. Stop separating children from their mothers!!!!!
Read Warren Farrell's "Why Men Earn More."
You're welcome.
The only thing that Warren Farrell is an expert in is incest. From his 1977 Penthouse interview: "...millions of people who are now refraining from touching, holding, and genitally caressing their children, when that is really part of a caring, loving expression, are repressing the sexuality of a lot of children and themselves." Funny you would quote someone who thinks "We have forgotten that before we began calling this date rape... we called it exciting." His words. Penthouse interview: http://nafcj.net/taboo1977farrell.pdf
You're welcome. Signed, verylonelymom
You are correct, feminism was never about equal rights, it was about women getting ANY rights. And feminism hasn't destroyed the natural balance - how absurd, there WAS NO BALANCE to begin with. What the author of this post really means is that things should go back the way they were, when men had considerably more rights in all areas than women..
Having said that, there is no question that fathers are critical to the healthy emotional development of their children. The more caring adults in a child's life, the better.
But true family court reform will only happen when the children's rights are the most important in the equation, not the parents'. All children in a divorce case should have their own representation, and all divorced parents should have mandatory counseling and mandatory parenting classes.
Too many children end up as the prize in their parents' ego-driven dysfuctional battles with one another. For too many parents, its about making the "other" parent the "loser" instead of making the child the winner.
We need reform - for the children, not the fathers OR the mothers.
Don't put words in my mouth and tell me and others what I "really mean." You are simply stating how you interpreted my words.
DONE.
There should be no default in family law. The child(ren) should not default to the mother or the father; it should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis where only proven facts are relevant. If the child is old enough to articulate preference, that should at least be taken into consideration.
???Why the desperation?
Because Vice President Sarah Palin would mean Americans could actually end up electing a woman president without tapping a manipulative, soulless, stay-married-just-to-stay-in-power socialist.
How dare the Republicans threaten to do that? Only the "progressive" party is supposed to be allowed to put the first articulate woman in line for the White House! Why, it's just like when the Republicans dared to put a conservative black man on the Supreme Court. It's so wrong!???----Vin Suprynowicz (Las Vegas Journal Review)
Here are just a few more of the outrageous statements that Richard Gardner, the so-called father of PAS junk-science theory, has written in his own books published by his own vanity press:
"Pertinent to my theory here is that pedophilia also serves procreative purposes. Obviously, it does not serve such purposes on the immediate level in that children cannot become pregnant nor can they make others pregnant."
When a child has been sexually abused and feels guilt about it, Gardner suggests, the child may be helped to appreciate that "sexual encounters between an adult and a child are not universally considered to be reprehensible acts. The child might be told about other societies in which such behavior was and is considered normal." If sexual urges continue after the abuse ends, Gardner suggests such children be encouraged to masturbate.
As for the alienating mother, Gardner suggests that vibrators can be useful and "one must try to overcome any inhibition she may have with regard to their use."
. . . . An apparent benefit of the mother's use of a vibrator is that "her diminished guilt over masturbation will make it easier for her to encourage the practice in her daughter, if this is warranted." With this imagined solution, Gardner believes, the mother's "increased sexuality may lessen the need for her husband to return to their daughter for sexual gratification."
All of the above quotes are from Gardner's self-published True and False Accusations of Child Sex Abuse: A Guide for Legal and Mental Health Professionals, Creative Therapeutics, 1992, as reprinted in Ralph Underwager's self-published journal "Issues in Child Abuse Accusations", Spring 1993, pp. 115-118, under the title "A Theory About the Variety of Human Sexual Behavior" and Richard A. Gardner, M.D. , The Parental Alienation Syndrome (1992).
There are so many mothers losing custody to their abusers that there is a national conference on it every year:
http://www.batteredmotherscustodyconference.org/
Many, many thousands are loosing custody to their batterers. Now how can that be good for the children, especially when the children witness the abuse??
I'll second that, MaMaBear1968.
Irresponsible reporting.
The facts are at our fingertips. It's pure opinion and propagates negative stereotypes of women while defending violent men. We ALL should be appalled.
Here's who Fathers Righters turn to for help to rip children from their mothers (of course all they can cite now is his PAS junk science since Gardner committed suicide):
''What I am against is the excessively moralistic and punitive reaction that many members of our society have toward pedophiles ... (going) far beyond what I consider to be the gravity of the crime.''
"...there is a bit of pedophilia in every one of us."
Sex Abuse Hysteria: Salem Witch Trials Revisited
Creskill, NJ, Creative Therapeutics, 1991. p. 118.
RICHARD A. GARDNER, M.D.
Popularized "PAS" PARENTAL ALIENATION SYNDROME,
a "diagnosis" generally applied to mothers who accuse fathers
CREATIVE THERAPEUTICS
Cresskill, NJ
That's ISBN 0933812221 for the pediphile's book (see his own quote below):
"...there is a bit of pedophilia in every one of us."
Sex Abuse Hysteria: Salem Witch Trials Revisited
Creskill, NJ, Creative Therapeutics, 1991. p. 118.
RICHARD A. GARDNER, M.D.
Popularized "PAS" PARENTAL ALIENATION SYNDROME,
a "diagnosis" generally applied to mothers who accuse fathers
CREATIVE THERAPEUTICS
Cresskill, NJ
IRRESPONSIBLE REPORTING
Under the list of things your batterer will say to you if you leave him or try to, #2 is "I'll tell the judge you're a bad mother; you'll lose custody of the kids." I used to think that was a threat.....5 months later I learned otherwise, and I'm not alone. There are literally thousands of mothers losing custody to their ex-abusers. NOT the "good" fathers who share EQUALLY parenting costs or cares. It's the dad's that want the mother out of their child's life to "pay her back" for leaving him. It's the abusive drunk ones who drink and drive with their kids, threaten their kids they will take away toys or pets. OH....and the #1 on the list of things your batterer will say to you is "If I can't have you, NO ONE WILL". Thankfully, I believed that one.
http://thoughtsongod.wordpress.com/2008/08/23/misuse-of-order-of-protection-mom-the-terminator/
Fathers have everything stacked against them. No evidence is needed to obtain an order of protection. No filing fees, no attorney, nothing other than the claim that ???I???m afraid.??? The father???s presence at the hearing is not required. A judgment can be issued against you with no opportunity to face your accuser. Your house can be taken away, your car, and your children can all be swept away in an instant. http://thoughtsongod.wordpress.com/2008/08/23/misuse-of-order-of-protection-mom-the-terminator/
http://thoughtsongod.wordpress.com/2008/08/23/misuse-of-order-of-protection-mom-the-terminator/
Fathers have much stacked against them. No evidence is needed to obtain an order of protection. No filing fees, no attorney, nothing other than the claim that ???I???m afraid.??? The father???s presence at the hearing is not required. A judgment can be issued against you with no opportunity to face your accuser. Your house can be taken away, your car, and your children can all be swept away in an instant. http://thoughtsongod.wordpress.com/2008/08/23/misuse-of-order-of-protection-mom-the-terminator/http://thoughtsongod.wordpress.com/2008/08/23/misuse-of-order-of-protection-mom-the-terminator/
What's wrong with family court is that batterers often gain custody of children. That's not a stereotype, that's the truth. The ABA says 25--50% of custody battles involve domestic violence. The American Judges Foundation says batterers are successful about 70% of the time. Moreover, when women allege abuse they are seen as vindictive liars (this article also propagates that myth). In fact Bala & Schuman (2000) found that men were more likely to falsely accuse.
While I have no doubt men also experience discrimination and bias, gender task forces often point to women being disadvantaged. Both genders have some legitimate gripes, but we must honestly work for the best interest of the children --and need truth to do so. Concerned men would be just as alarmed at batterers getting custody ---we must work together to ensure this doesn't happen.
I was glad to read this artical, and believe it or not, I read it in my lawyers office while waiting to discuss complications in my fight for custody of my three year old son. My wife of four years a 22 year old college student has decided that she didnt get to live life yet...and filed for divorce. although I was surprised by this, my focus was shifted to how to minimize the effects on our son. Immediatly she started to sell things including furniture out of our house to convince me to sign her divorce papers that I said I would not sign (as is) when this didnt work, she quit letting me see our son or talk to him on the phone. My lawyer was making some serious progress in getting me to be the temporay custodian of our son until the divorce decided custody. When her lawyer told her that this prospect was a possiblity she instantly filed a false emergancy protective order on me, taking away my right to see or talk to my son for a minimum of 14 days. in doing so she has also greatly decreased my chances of getting a status of primary resident cusotian of my son.
For the first time in my life I feel that the laws do not defend me, in the stead, I am guilty until proven guilty and the only proof she needs is that she "felt" threatened. no clearification or elaboration...I'm guilty of domestic abuse...abuse to a woman I have supported thru school, loved and cherished, a woman I have never raised an angry hand to...and the son I love more than anything in the world is left to be used as a weapon by the people who's wages we all pay. my frustration can in no way find its way to this comment, and I hope that their are enough good fathers, out there that will come together to change the laws to protect both the women that are truly being abused and the good loveing fathers from the women who use the system as a weapon a weapon that does not belong to them.
Thank you for listening to my rant...
Enter comments if any for reporting abuse
Discuss