What Bush Got Right

I agree that there are plenty of problems from W's adminstration, but with concerning Iraq and Afghanistan, I believe we cannot make a complete judgement right now... as General Eisenhower said at the end of WWII regarding our takeover of Germany, "The success of this occupation can only be judged fifty years from now. If the Germans at that time have a stable, prosperous democracy, then we shall have succeeded."

Ike knew you cannot judge history when you are in the midst of it... unfortunately, the people who run the country will be long gone by the time we can objectively say whether or not they did the right or wrong thing.

When I picked up this edition and saw the title, "What Bush Got Right" I immediately realized that this will be the shortest version of Newsweek ever!

When I picked up this issue and saw the title, I immediately realized that this will be the shortest version of Newseek ever!

There is a cure but you dont want to hear it.

The raping of civil liberties is over now so what happens next?
Dictatorship is all set up ready to go into full action as soon as the next Katrina, or a "terrorist attack" happens. Then all hell will break loose round up all the insurgents who want no more death and mayhem.
The new name for peacefull protest will be insurgents. protest of anykind against them is considered a threat to national security. FEMA was slow in reacting to Katrina because it was not set up to deal with a Major hurrican persay. It was set up to keep the peace in the event of a nuclear disaster. Thats where the shadow governent run by the vice president came from. And by the way Bush Sr was the vice president when that unholy thing was created.

Fareed is wrong about the current situation in Iraq. Sadar's militia has not been disbanded or disarmed, which was one of the goals of the surge. They are only observing a cease fire. The Sunni Awakening troops have never exhibited loyalty to the Central Government. Baghdad is islands of walled areas patrolled by militia or Government troop loyal to the ethnics in each community. The Kurd's ignore the rest of Iraq. Regarless of when we leave, there will be a civil war.

Fareed makes a major mistake in describing Iraq's present situation. Sadar's militia have not been disarmed or disbanded which was one of the surges goals. They are observing a cease fire but all hell will break out as soon as we leave. The Sunni Awakening soldiers have never accepted that they owe loyalty to the Central Government but now they are better armed. Baghdad is made up of walled communities.








protected by their own militias

Senior French sources accused Mr Blair of a faulty memory. "Only four out of the 15 members of the Security Council supported a new resolution and Britain needed nine to win approval. It is completely wrong to blame it on France," said one official.

France had to stand by as the Dual world power of US and Britain waged a campiegn on there own to take a country down who had no ability to make Weapons of Mass destruction or even fight its nieghbor Iran if it had to.
Why would such a thing be nessesary? After the first Gulf war Iraq was under constant eye and control by the US govenment.

Civilian deaths at alarming rates is the norm in war fare today.
This is supported by the US government.
What is to stop them from turning on me a civilian because I dont like them?
What is to keep them from killing my family because they are related to someone that does not like them?
I will never be freinds or like someone who kills people just to make a point. Bully
And if I die because I say this so be it. I would rather die having peace knowing i did not participate in there activities in fact i detest there activites.

France let it go for peace.
Would Germany have done that?
Would Russia have done that?
Would the US have done that under the current system?
No. Now is the worst time in US history.
Kennedy made a speech you should listen to. He was very concerned about secret societies and secret government agencies. He was right but he was killed. And some say by one of those secret agencies right in the US government that was under the direction of George Bush Sr. and now look at things under Jr.

The French loved america so much they allowed it to purchase the south that it had colonized in the Louisianna Purchase.
Rather than go to war they let it go.
Would England have done that?

By slick means i mean many things curruption, esponage, spy agencies, shadow government, back door meetings, secret societies, propoganda. All the things that the founding fathers feared from England their enemy. Who would call the founding fathers terrorist only England because they viewed revolutionist in america messing with there trade routes and supplies as terrorist.
England Has Won the War on Terror in the US by defeating the Constitution of the United States and setting up a Dictator and an organization to keep it that way the CFR.

Who sent over the statue of Liberty the French.
What did England send only the bankers to take your GOLD.

Dont you find it odd that Bucknging Ham palace is still standing after all the bombing of England. Hmm maybe there is something to that dunno. And France was left to be run over by the NAZI's hmm maybe there is something to that.
But keep your head in the sand because blind following of a tyrant is what tyrants want.

France took the high road and said no to BUSH.
Even there people have it bad because of curruption in government. But they have never supported this blood bath or the previous ones.
They seem to have more sense and for that reason i admire them.
Britain and the US are basically the same now a dual world power.
The English finally re-conquered the new world again.
The French who supported america in it's bid for independence from tyranny of England have been left standing with no one.
And the power brokers have seized the oppurtinity given them through slick means.

The 21st century already has it's worst dictator --------------- and he is a US president.

Yes it is murder to send someone else haples soldiers to fight a war under a pretense of Weapons of Mass Destruction. The US never lost control of IRAQ since the first war with IRAQ that obliterated them. So Jr had to go in for what reason? Clean up the mess pop left behind no doubt. Something needed cleaned up.
In acient times civilian causulties where not acceptable. Only crimanals resort to killing civilians to prove a point. Bullying. There is no military in IRAQ so why be there there was no military before they went in to speak of.
Skypoint and others who defend this tyrant must be doing so because they are blood guilty themselves and it hurts to hear it was wrong.