What Bush Got Right

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: OnlyCureJGK @ 08/18/2008 11:10:00 PM

    The murder triial should have started for Bush a long time ago.
    War Crimes against humanity, civil liberties ect.....
    And you who support him and voted for him a second time are aiding and abeding so keep defending the modern day HITLER.

  • Posted By: Objektiv @ 08/17/2008 10:47:07 AM

    U.S. history has been punctuated with the right men at the right time: Lincoln during the Civil War, FDR during WWII, JFK during the Cuban missile crisis. With George W. during 9/11, our luck ran out. Not even as brilliant an analyst as Fareed Zakaria can whitewash the reality that Bush Jr. has taken this country into a tailspin from which it may never recover.

    • Posted By: star3 @ 08/18/2008 10:18:37 PM

      I do not agree. After 9/11, the country wanted--needed a hero, someone who would go after the bad guys like a superman, and do justice for us, so they all backed Bush's attack on Afghanistan--the shock & awe effect. We all sar around out TVs watching the agressive attacks on the enemy, and cheered. Then when Saddam decided his country was being left out of all the action, he began his WNDs song & dance routien. We had just been hit by a terrorist attack, and were not in any mood to deal with a joker who was prancing around the sidelines, waiting for his chance to di the same to us, and who was even bragging that he was prepared to do so. What the hell did you expect---that the military would tap Saddam on the shoulder and ask him to "play nice"??! Then when we called his bluff, the Iraqi people were happy that we did, and helped by ripping down his statue. They wanted him and his evil, controlling regime gone! Did anyone actually believe that would take care of everything nicely, wrapped up and finished? Get a reality check! It was only the beginning of what would be needed to be done there. Did you really think we could just go in, take Saddam out, then walk away, saying, "Well, good luck, folks, have a nice time fixing up this place and, oh, by the way, try to pick a better system of government next time." So, when things did not get done in the order some of you wanted, or in the time you felt was enough time to finish up, then, suddenly, the hero became the villian, because you needed to place blame somewhere, so why not your president? Are you not even considering that Mr. Bush is not the only president we have had in this century, and that this situation has been brewing a lot longer than just before 9/11. 9/11 was just the day the boiling kettle boiled over. So, why wasn't it handled by previous presidents before it reached this point? You don't like facing that question, do you, because having to answer that would take away your reason to blame Bush. I'd like to see any one of you whiners be president for just one week, and see how much better you would do, or even better, get your name on the ballot, and put your better way to work if you can get yourself elected.

  • Posted By: thefactsplease @ 08/18/2008 8:25:30 PM

    When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir?
    -John Maynard Keynes

    It was as irksome to read your Bush-bashing editorial as it was to read Fareed Zakaria???s article. I can???t help feeling that nearly everyone at Newsweek with a word processor feels duty-bound to denigrate the current president. The Bush foreign policy changed as the facts changed. Isn???t that what we expect of our leaders? Why then do you fault them for it? It would be wonderful to have leaders that knew the perfect course to take for every eventuality, but we don???t and never will. We only have a surplus of critics that keep reminding us that we should.

  • Posted By: Aditya Mookerjee @ 08/18/2008 8:29:39 AM

    Mr Zakaria, you mentioned international treaties and formal agreements. I believe, that treaties perhaps exhibit the insecurities that nations feel towards themselves, and their relations with other nations.

  • Posted By: Aditya Mookerjee @ 08/18/2008 8:21:59 AM

    I do not know, whether Kuwait is a Shia or a Sunni state, or comprises of both the major sects of Islam, but Saddam Hussein had destabilized the Middle East, by its military actions in Kuwait. Saddam Hussein had carried out his initial military actions, against Kuwait because of oil, I gather. Even Saudi Arabia, supported military action against Iraq. This makes one ponder, the aggrieved feelings of Saddam Hussein's administration towards Iran. Perhaps, Saddam Hussein was blatantly opportunistic in a world which admires opportunism. George Bush perhaps pondered the possibility of another strike by Iraq, possibly, again, against Kuwait. Would nations have approved another aggression against Iraq? Who would have led the coalition? Saddam Hussein did not have the trust of either Saudi Arabia, or Iran. He was on the decline, as a statesman.

  • Posted By: WorstPresidentEver @ 08/18/2008 12:28:39 AM

    Do I hate the man? I don't really think it matters. It doesn't change what a terrible person he is. But I'll give you an answer anyway. No, I don't hate him. That's much too strong a word. I don't hate anybody. I hate what he has done to this country. I hate it that there are 4144 US soliers who have died needless deaths because of this man's monstrous evil. I hate it that the rest of the world looks upon us with contempt and scorn because of this man's arrogance and stupidity. I hate it that when I travel abroad I have to answer embaressing questions about how we can allow such a terrible person to be the leader of the most powerful nation on earth. I hate it that his war has served as a recruitment for untold numbers of new terrorists. I hate it that people in the Middle East who might otherwise be friends see us as colonizers, occupiers, a new generation of crusaders. You would hate it too if you could see past your ideology.

  • Posted By: WorstPresidentEver @ 08/17/2008 11:51:08 PM

    I thought my answer was perfectly clear but I'll spell it out for you, if you like. I never gave Bush a second thought on 9/11. I'm not really sure why you're asking or what it has to do with anything. It doesn't change the fact that Bush is a war criminal who deserves to be arrested and prosecuted. My thoughts and my support on 9/11 was with the people from my neighborhoods here in the northeast who were losing loved ones that day. As far as Bin Laden is concerned, you have no better idea than that idiot in the White House whether he's been made ineffectual or not. You have no idea where he is or what he's planning. What both of know is that we had the men and resources in place to get him. But Bush decided to turn his back on that in order to start a war based on lies, lies and more lies. You know. I know it. The only difference is that you won't admit it. But, I guess Hitler and Stalin still have their supporters too.

    • Posted By: Skypoint @ 08/18/2008 12:11:04 AM

      No, you weren't clear. You just crucified the man! Now you say you never gave 9/11 a second thought, so you must have agreed with him.... then you compare him to Hitler and Stalin? How about you save yourself and the rest of us some time and just say you hate the man and get it over with.

      Okay... we got it... Give it up.

  • Posted By: bruce5149 @ 08/17/2008 6:08:49 PM

    I guess Bush is finally trying to establish some semblence of a legacy, but he takes complete ownership of 7 years of pure disaster, McCain attended a dinner two days ago with GW, but no press were allowed. That's convenient. People will ramble on about why McCain should be the next President, but it's not going to happen. People would be doing themselves a justice by learning more about Obama, because nothing, but nothing will stop the beating McCain will take in this election much like the abuse he has dished out over the years. But, life goes on and Obama is going to surprise the Republican faithful and could be a D minus performer and look better than George Bush.

    • Posted By: thehappyamerican @ 08/17/2008 9:59:56 PM

      Something , but something can stop Mccains (political) beating and permit him to squeek into the White House and beat Obama in November:
      The present (and chronic) VERY LOW APPROVAL of the US Congress! It's ran by the DNC...Obamas' party.
      Neither Hillary or Obama ,AS MEMBERS OF THE CONGRESS, were able to generate leadership enough to draw the DNC majority toward doing the things that would improve the approval of the Congress!
      Nor could Hillary or Obama --or both together -- preform this very important step for any Democrats' success at winning the White House. A job to create conditions for success that is beyond the leading Democrats ability.
      Now at present, this question of the importance of DNC/Congress standing (in public approval ) is not important to voters... today ..4 months from election day.
      It will come to the fore the closer we get to election day, and may be crucial in the last 30 days. The DNC/Congress public approval will still be FLATLINED! Because the DNC will not give up it's Americans Suck First campaign . They have nothing else! And THAT is what is hurting DNC approval and public confidence.
      McCain can WALK into the White House though Obama may run a brilliant, energetic and flawless campaign for his part. Because George bushes approval is consistantly above the approval of the congress! And by several point!
      When graded on the curve, Bush (republicans) get a C- whereas the Congress (Democrats) are doing good to earn an F+ from the American electorate! And this correlation is not going to change in 4 months!
      I don't think Hillary really wants the nomination for VP or president as much now as she did several months ago. She sees it , too!

  • Posted By: WorstPresidentEver @ 08/17/2008 9:30:42 PM

    Since you failed to answer my charges against George Bush other than to respond with a rambling, poorly worded diatribe against Bill Clinton I am left to collude that you have no intelligent answer to give me. I'm not surprised. After all, you can't defend the indefensible. I didn't vote for Bill Clinton but I'leave you with an oft repeated phrase: No one died when Clinton lied.

  • Posted By: aljthe3rd @ 08/17/2008 8:09:32 PM

    I find it a little sad that only when a prsident becomes lame duck does the media allow him (or her) to chagne their practices without calling it flip flopping whereas before that they are filleted by some faction of the right or left for not holding their ground. This president did that and we everyone thought it was in too many instances the worst possible plan of action. Now he has changed his position on many of these issues and Mr Zakaria has some good things to say about him. We could all take a page from this current playbook of the President..

  • Posted By: bruce5149 @ 08/17/2008 6:41:23 PM

    For the happy american, you sound like the miserable american. The American people and our country are great. I fought for it for 22 years. Yes, this liberal is retired military and what our military have had to endure the past 7 years is unimagineable. So take your Republican gobbledygook and plant it where the sun doesn't shine. You are a closet bigot..........................

    • Posted By: thehappyamerican @ 08/17/2008 7:41:04 PM

      I'm a lot happier than you think!
      I can't participate in the last 7 years of very fighting because I'm a disabled vet...and Retired from that hell i went threw to learn to function somewhat normalLy! Thanks for reminding me, though!
      I got YOU to admit the American people are GREAT! Wow!
      Wow Wow!
      Bigot's--closet and otherwise-- usually are those who subscribe to DISCRIMINATION CAMPAIGNS against someone!
      Now for decades I have had TWO (2) major organizations putting me and millions of other Happy Americans in an amazing crossfire (military term) of baseless discrimination campaigns! Sevral of them, in fact!
      The liberal press like Newsweek here, and the DNC (that's two!), are imaginative and cunning!
      They have an Americans Suck First Campaign within which are sub- discrimination campaigns against Christians, firearms owners, ARMED FORCES EXPERTS (helloOOOooo!), police and law enforcers and ACHIEVERS of any kind, even broadening this to include the Boy Scouts, fer cripes sake!
      Despite the worst they can do toward upsetting as many Americans against us as posible, I am a Happy American! This is an Awesome country! Awesome people!And don't let ANYONES discrimination campaign convince you it's not true...
      ... or you'll be seeing closet bigots behind every rock!
      That could make you very unhappy, there, Bruce.

  • Posted By: thehappyamerican @ 08/17/2008 5:19:42 PM

    Presidents take an oath to FULLFILL that office. It has Rules. Laws. It is a job discription! Step out of bounds and a President can be IMPEACHED!
    Obama's talk of "change" ignores the fact HE will have to FULLFILL this oath of office within the rules. And he'll be inheriting the same problems a long list of former Presidents have passed on.
    He isn't going to "change " jack!
    If change is what you want FOR REAL, Obama is not the political route to it!!
    That real, direct route is called a Constitutional Convention ! Where the job description of the President can be changed and ratified!As can the Constition!
    Notice Obama is not calling for this REAL change?
    He's a fraud! And hopes we're dumb enough to believe he's about change!
    ....hahh!

  • Posted By: waitingandserving @ 08/17/2008 1:42:20 PM

    When George W. Bush was elected he did exactly what was expected of him, he provided changed. As Fareed Zakaria points out he changed everything he could, because he thought that's has his party wanted and that's what the people wanted. He was wrong, very wrong, in not looking closely at the issues. Very soon he realized how wrong he was and has since tried to correct those mistakes. He is listening to the people and to the best of his ability trying to make change in the direction the citizens of this fine country want. That is not to say that some of these mistakes are irreversible, but there is nothing we can do. This article does a fine job in pointing out that we have to move forward and deal with the situations as they are today and not in the past. I thank President Bush in realizing that he was wrong and in moving in a more positive direction. As a nation we need to stop focusing on the past and dwelling on these mistakes and take a que from our President and move forward to a better, more positive future.

  • Posted By: waitingandserving @ 08/17/2008 1:41:50 PM

    When George W. Bush was elected he did exactly what was expected of him, he provided changed. As Fareed Zakaria points out he changed everything he could, because he thought that's has his party wanted and that's what the people wanted. He was wrong, very wrong, in not looking closely at the issues. Very soon he realized how wrong he was and has since tried to correct those mistakes. He is listening to the people and to the best of his ability trying to make change in the direction the citizens of this fine country want. That is not to say that some of these mistakes are irreversible, but there is nothing we can do. This article does a fine job in pointing out that we have to move forward and deal with the situations as they are today and not in the past. I thank President Bush in realizing that he was wrong and in moving in a more positive direction. As a nation we need to stop focusing on the past and dwelling on these mistakes and take a que from our President and move forward to a better, more positive future.

  • Posted By: star3 @ 08/17/2008 12:49:06 PM

    Question: How many countrys does anyone know of that has their politician's mistakes and faults broadcast all over the world news, and posted on blogs to be discussed by anyone who cares to? How many countrys allow their citizens access to the private lives of their leaders & celebraties? Celebraties, perhaps, but their leaders---? Even if the people are aware of any disgraceful activity, how many would feel free to discuss it, or speculate about it, or make comments, even to each other that may or may not be true concerning their leader? There are some, yes, the more civilized ones, but the question was how many, besides America, that is? Freedom os great, isn't it? If we, truly cherish it, how do we go about protecting it, and making sure it isn't stolen from us? America has had to defend its independance and right to be who we are ever since its beginning; it has been a constant battle to remain strong and free, and despite our various differences and opinions, we have always managed to pull together long enough to win our battles against outside enemies, we have even settled our desputes with enemies from within---until now. Are we really ready to allow all those good things we have as a family to be thrown away for the sake of proving a point that may or may not even be remembered years from now, but what will be remembered, especially by outsiders, will be our inability to work together as a team, as we once did. So, are we willing to sacrafice all we have struggled for, to those who are like vultures, waiting for the death? We had better know who the REAL enemy is and ask ourselves some very hard questions about what we REALLY want. Bickering will not solve anything, but maybe letting go of our defenses against each other, and building them back up against the force that is trying to destroy us will. God Bless America!

  • Posted By: davetopper @ 08/17/2008 10:25:24 AM

    It is too late to get around to propping Mr. Bush up on a pedestal now. And once that is tried it is our civic duty to take that pedestal away. There is no point in considering what Mr. Bush got right, ever got right. When we are still trudging through all the mess he has got WRONG.

  • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 08/16/2008 9:56:02 PM

    Star, sorry, have to post above.. Your comments about Harley being a sick puppy are cruel. Whatever he said to you should be no excuse because we know that two wrongs do not make one right.
    I want Harley, he is one of my blog buddies and he watches over all Obama supporters. Harley is the Obama supporters blog hero. I hope you never leave us Harley... Here is a hug coming to you (((Harley)))

    • Posted By: star3 @ 08/17/2008 12:27:46 AM

      Pia, its OK, I admit it was a bit much, and I was just being sarcastic. Afraid I sometimes get too carried away with this bickering between people who are on opposing sides. I realize Obama supporters are just as adamant about their beliefs as we are about ours. While I do not hate Obama, I do not feel he is qualified, at this particular time in our history, to be the president. Wheather McCain is or not remains to be seen, should he win. As I stated in one of my other post, he was not the first choice of many of us republicans, but since he was the one who won his place on the ballot, we are hanging out hopes on him. Anyway, we will all find out in November who will be our next leader, and whoever it turns out to be, we will put our support and trust behind him 100%, unless he turns out ot be completely dis-loyal to the country. My apologizes to Harley for letting my political feelings over ride my common sense, that is not who I really am or what I, normally, would do, so hope there are no hard feelings, and we can agree to dis-agree without resorting to name calling or insults.

      • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 08/17/2008 8:51:14 AM

        Star, I understand. Very good of you to apologize. Thank you.

  • Posted By: Berlin @ 08/14/2008 6:43:18 PM

    The majority of the Americans are so naive so greenly. Not for a short time for hundreds of years the people around the world hate the Americans. Most wish the downfall of the USA and hope for a weak president in future. In my Country the people say about US-Americans, they are ALL fat, rasist, silly and so on. They hope Obama will make USA to a unimportant nation, this was the background of the joy ( gloating) at the berlin speech. For one year 200.000 people wanted to see the president dead and some month later 200.000 people want to see who is the president which distribute german antiamericanism. If you have elected Mrs. Clinton the people in Germany have got respect, but now the majority feign friendship and hope for change but really hope to see the downfall of your nation. Come to Germany and ask about their "friendship" to Americans, they hate Democrats too. Try ist Mr. Change!

    • Posted By: star3 @ 08/17/2008 1:04:23 AM

      P.S. By-the-way, some of my ancestors were German; thank God they were smart enough to leave! Were you ever taught about your great leader, Hitler, and how he betrayed your country? Lets discuss that next time you are in the mood to criticize. Before you judge anyone or their life, first, educate yourself about them, know the facts, instead of the propoganda spoon fed to you by biased, opinonated insects, who have their own reasons for wanting you to believe their lies! The U.S.A. has its faults, granted, just as any country does, but it has, also, shared its wealth with practically every nation on the planet, including those who once attacked us. We have come to the aid of every country that asked us for assistance, and loaned $$$ to them, which we will, probably never see repaid! The list goes on of the benefits America has given to other people! So, Berlin, do you STILL want to discuss HATE? Go on, tell me about all the wonderful things YOUR country has done for the rest of the world! As I said, I am part German, but its people like you, who are so narrow minded that makes me cringe. There are many fine German people, just as there are in every country, but, unfortunately, there are, also, far too many like you.

    • Posted By: star3 @ 08/16/2008 10:16:20 PM

      Berlin, the only thing green showing here is your obvious envy of our freedom which we worked hard for; a group of brave, determined, strong-willed people told old King George to shove it, and left to find a better life for themselves and their families in a land where they were often met with hostility from the elements, the land they were attempting to farm, plus the natives who were here, but those things all got worked out, eventually, due to a lot of false starts, bloodshed, and mis-understandings, because they refused to give up their dream! And the whole world has benefitted in some way because of these brave souls! Hated?? Yeah, we are so "hated", that people from all over the planet are trying to come here to become Americans, even risking death to come illegally, which we will not encourage or tolerate. So, don't talk to me about hate, unless you want to discuss how we feel about enemies who pretend to be friends until the chips are down, then their true colors show. Hate is just a word, it really means jeleousy of something you don't even try to understand, you don't think we deserve all the wonderful things we enjoy---tough! We deserve them because we WORKED to have them. Your country, as well as others had millenniums to accomplish what we did in only a couple hundred years, yet they did not. And, you know something else, Berlin, we STILL have that same determined spirit of our forefathers flowing through our veins! "God Bless America" is not just a song, its a fact! We will NEVER cave to the likes of whimpy little green- with- envy *** roaches who can only complain & whine instead of doing something productive to improve their own situation! WE ARE AMERICANS!!!

  • Posted By: verdad123 @ 08/16/2008 7:53:33 PM

    No mention to the success of Plan Colombia, where the last two Administrations have been engaged and the FARC terrorist group has suffered considerable looses.

  • Posted By: jeffswanson @ 08/15/2008 5:59:36 PM

    Whatever "Bush got right" in the twilight of his second term, it is the background color of this week's cover that evokes the true legacy of this President: the needless bloodshed in Iraq, a runaway budget deficit at home, and the angry, divisive politics of raw power. When many Americans think of Bush, they just see red.

    • Posted By: star3 @ 08/16/2008 3:51:41 PM

      Jeff, speaking of red......Obama's remark about "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need." Does that have a familiar ring to anyone? Wasn't it either Karl Marx or Lennin who, basically, said the same thing...?

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse