What Bush Got Right

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: monster2 @ 08/13/2008 11:50:09 AM

    Thank you, Mr. Zakaria, for your insightful and analytical article. I firmly believe that President Bush is the worst president since Buchanan (Harding didn't serve long enough), but his major international blunders were all in his first term. Those were all monumental, of course;, but his second term has been, I must reluctantly admit, far more successful. We still have enormous problems, but the change in influence from Cheney, Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld, et. al, to Rice, Gates, and the others had been a godsend. Whether that was from an admission of failure or an actual philosophical change is, frankly, academic. Bush claimed in 2000 that any inexperience he had in foreign policy would be remedied by his reliance on his closest advisors; the tragedy of the second Bush's presidency is that it took 4 years, thousands upon thousands of lives, and trillions of dollars to figure out who the correct experts were.

    • Posted By: rhondarhn@yahoo.com @ 08/13/2008 12:27:35 PM

      I am never ceased to be amazed there there are still 20% of you folks out there that support Bush.

      Let's not forget that Bush would not have to be making all these about faces in the first place had he not been such a failure to begin with.

      This article was just excuses!

      Let's also not forget that we started with a $2.5 million suplus, and now, thanks to Bush irresponsible spending of my taxpayer dollars, my grandchildren will have to be paying off the $4 TRILLION deficit that Bush personally made! THAT is his legacy!

      And what about the fact that 9/11 occurred under his watch, and did he go after Osama Bin Laden? NO! He possibly forged a false document to start an illegal war in Iraq! WHY? The real enemy, Bin Laden, was never there!

      And now it comes to light that Iraq has an $80 billion surplus because of the price of oil, but are they spending their own money? NO! Why should they, when Bush gives away our own money to them?

      And you crow about his "gift" of my taxpayer dollars, $700 million, to a corrupt government in Africa who will never use that money for AIDS. Did anyone ask me if I wanted to throw that money away? NO! Why didn't we spend that $700 Million here in the United States? What, Bush didn't notice that we are having a recession as Bush gleefully spends more deficit money?

      Bush should be imprisioned for his crimes. THAT should be his legacy to my grandchildren.

      • Posted By: star3 @ 08/13/2008 8:32:24 PM

        Yeah, just shows there are still at least 20% who are smart. Don't know where you got that figure, but can guess it was from CNN; they are notorious liers, and famous for bending the facts.

        • Posted By: Notrepublican @ 08/14/2008 1:13:58 AM

          Not like fox, who ever lied, or the Oreilly show, or the Mccain ads. None of those have ever been proven false and have said complete and utter lies. Oh wait, they have.

          • Posted By: star3 @ 08/14/2008 3:58:06 PM

            Name one, and I don't mean something they disagreed on with your CNN, give us an example of an actual lie, and don't forget, we will research it.

            • Posted By: Skypoint @ 08/14/2008 6:51:51 PM

              Star, He can't. I've been through this before with NR.

      • Posted By: observer101 @ 08/13/2008 4:44:46 PM

        Why was Clinton never jailed for his crimes of LYING in a REAL court of law...In REAL proceedings, that had a real vote for IMPEACHMENT? Doesnt that mean he was found to be guilty of something of a crime? If it had been you or I we would have been cuffed right there in the courtroom...This silly crap fantasy of prosecuting Bush for something that was okd by both parties is stupid...In that case lets prosecute everyone that voted yea! Sounds just as dumb as going after Bush.

  • Posted By: Bass Pro @ 08/13/2008 8:48:56 AM

    Georgia Burns while Bush and Rice fiddle!

    • Posted By: SPIRITED AWAY @ 08/13/2008 1:01:23 PM

      Oh come on bass-you can't blame Bush for everything. Geez.....

      • Posted By: Skypoint @ 08/14/2008 5:02:13 PM

        I like your spirit, Spirit!!!

  • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 08/13/2008 9:46:13 AM

    I have been debating with myself for days whether to post a comment for the president since I did vote for him both times and I am now an Obama supporter. All I want to say it that 1- the anti-Christ and demonizing comments need to stop. No matter how we feel about him,(I know I will probably get yelled at over this) he is after all, still our president and nothing changes that until January of 2009. We all agree that the war in Iraq is horrific and it is his fault but there is plenty of blame to go around.. Congress voted in favor of the war. Congress was given the same intelligence reports. Both Dems and Reps in Congress could have, should have, voted No. They didn't and the war in Iraq is the tragic result.

    • Posted By: SPIRITED AWAY @ 08/13/2008 1:15:20 PM

      Your comments are always refreshingly honest when it comes to Bush, etc. I was against the Iraq war from the beginning. Like Colin Powell told Bush, "If we break it, we own it". And now, no matter how unfortunate it may be, we do "own" this mess. My cousin just finished his 2nd tour and has now (only three months at home) been sent to Kabul. He's completely committed to serving our country. (He was in the first Iraq war, too.) But every time we hear that more of our troops have died, I wonder is it him? I'm more nervous now that he's in Afghanistan. If we (Bush & congress) had stayed out of Iraq, Afghanistan would be stabilized by now and Osama would have been captured or killed. No matter whom gets elected, I feel that most of our combat forces will be out of Iraq by 2010. Sorry if I've been rambling-lack of sleep. ;o)

      • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 08/14/2008 1:16:59 PM

        Hello and thank you T. I hope and pray your cousin comes home safe.

    • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 08/13/2008 10:16:19 AM

      continued-2) Obama has been getting the same villifying treatment the president gets and he is not president yet. I can only imagine the hatred we would see on these blogs if he were.

      • Posted By: sharenews @ 08/13/2008 3:59:49 PM


        . . . then there is the flipside of that. Obama supporters have been very devoted to their candidate just like Hillary supporters were with her in the primaries. Given that and Obama has gotten this far down the road. . . should he lose, I just cant imagine the reaction by his supporters in general and I mean not just in the blogs. I cant wait until Nov voting is done cuz at this point I dont care who gets in as long as Bush and Chaney get out of that White House.

        • Posted By: Notrepublican @ 08/14/2008 1:21:22 AM

          Anything's better than Bush, even Mccain.

  • Posted By: Bass Pro @ 08/14/2008 12:50:07 PM

    Here's a sample of the respect Bush has earned our Country. " Yep, I looked into his eyes and knew he would be a good friend". Putin has been in Bush' face every since reverting back to cold war rhetoric.


    "yep, Iraq's Prime Minister of Iraq al-Maliki is our friend and a chief ally of our Country." al-maliki, American kills innocent women and children. America must get out!

    I doubt we can stand any more of this kind of respect.

  • Posted By: Berlin @ 08/14/2008 10:32:57 AM

    Only Democrats are good Presidents, that is a law of nature or a law of media. With Obama the world will fall in love with the USA but loosing respect. Mr. G. W. Bush for a third presidency !!!! NOW

    • Posted By: Bass Pro @ 08/14/2008 11:03:28 AM

      Not worth a comment!

  • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 08/13/2008 12:26:00 PM

    Just got my hands on the tentative schedule for the DNC Coventions opening night. Thought everyone would like to see it...........................

    Theme......We are the people we have been waiting for.

    Presentation of colors (weather permitting)...... Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, Former Domestic Terrorists and People Who Just Happen to Live in Obama's Neighborhood.

    Invocation....Rev. Jeremiah "Goddam Ameri-kkk-a" Wright, Obama Spiritual Advisor and Retired Pastor, Trinity United Church of Christ, Chicago

    Call to Order....Honorary Chairpersons: Chris "Tingling-Feeling-Up-His-Leg" Matthews, Keith "Somebody-Who-Can-Take-Her-into-a-Room-and-Only-He-Comes-Out" Olbermann, and Randi "Clinton's a whore" Rhodes

    Introduction of Michelle Obama...Mrs. Louis Farrakhan, Chicago

    Note: Nation of Islam leader, the Rev. Louis Farrakhan, who had a previously scheduled engagement with Muammar al-Gaddafi, sends his regrets.

    Address: Michelle Obama on....Why America is, Just Downright Mean

    Taped Greeting......Antoin "Tony the Fixer" Rezko, U.S. Federal Prison Facility, Chicago

    Keynote Address,,,,Bitterness... delivered by His Excellency, Raila "Hands Dripping with Blood" Odinga

    Benediction...... Father Michael "Hillary-Believed-that-She'd-Win-Because-She's-White" Pfleger... Obama Spiritual Advisor and Pastor of St. Sabina, Chicago

    NOBAMA!!!

    • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 08/14/2008 7:54:44 AM

      HR, this doesn't tell me when the convention is...you know. what dates this month. No one ever posts the date.

    • Posted By: Notrepublican @ 08/14/2008 12:50:42 AM

      Wow, your jokes are a hoot. You Joke, I mean Joker. Not like Joker in the movie Batman, where he makes mean and evil "jokes", but just, a joker, that makes jokes.

      • Posted By: sharenews @ 08/14/2008 3:29:03 AM

        Oh, c'mon, Notrepublican, you have to admit, HolyRoller was very creative in this post. I found it very humorous. ; - D

    • Posted By: sharenews @ 08/13/2008 3:38:57 PM


      Holy, you crack me up!! LMAO.

  • Posted By: Berlin @ 08/13/2008 1:01:55 PM

    It is always the same. Media always hate Republicans from Reagan, Bush sen. and Bush jun. In Germany e.g. 70 percent hate the USA independent who is president. It is a myth when a Democrat will be president the world fall in love with the USA. The world hate the Americans for ther wealth, for their pride, for their economy, for their religion and so on. Now the Amercians, here the media and the entertainment support worldwide antiamericanism, but why the Americans elected this president? That is not democracy, that is hypocrisy and submission to german, european, islamic and worldwide antiamericanism.

    • Posted By: Notrepublican @ 08/14/2008 12:31:12 AM

      Yeah, except for the part of the media that loves the republicans, you're exactly right. Except for the part where Bush was independant, and the fact that Bush pissed everyone off in the first place, and put our economy at one of its lowest rates, which means we're not the wealthy, pompous, Americans that we were once before, and for the fact that the world does not hate the Republicans, just the Republicans that pissed everyone off. But besides that, you're exactly right.

      • Posted By: Berlin @ 08/14/2008 7:17:01 AM

        Oh, you and the majority of the Americans are so naive so greenly. Not for a short time for hundreds of years the people around the world hate the Americans. Most wish the downfall of the USA and hope for a weak president in future. In my Country the people say about US-Americans, they are ALL fat, rasist, silly and so on. They hope Obama will make USA to a unimportant nation, this was the background of the joy ( gloating) at the berlin speech. For one year 200.000 people wanted to see the president dead and some month later 200.000 people want to see who is the president which distribute german antiamericanism. If you have elected Mrs. Clinton the people in Germany have got respect, but now the majority feign friendship and hope for change but really hope to see the downfall of your nation. Come to Germany and ask about their "friendship" to Americans, they hate Democrats too. Try ist Mr. Change!

  • Posted By: Bass Pro @ 08/11/2008 3:38:48 PM

    Small children and G OLD Pers should leave the room. The nightmare for the mouth-breathing, out of touch party (MBOOTP) continues. In 2000 Bush beat Al Gore by 271-267 winning 29 States to Gore's 21. In 2004 Bush beat Kerry 286-252 winning 30 states to Kerry's 20. Barack is Leading McCain 309 - 229 with McCain winning Virginia which is exactly tied in the polls at 46.7 %. Obama leads in 26 States to mcCain's 24. The party's over.

    Only one question remains. Will the Right wing desert mcCain before or after the convention? It's going to be fun watching the feeble Corn-holey-Roller and the ever cowardly josemarti claim they never were for him. Marti has been weaseling lately, with "He wouldn't be my choice" line. The far right out of touchers like Limbaugh and Fox-types are setting the table by suggesting that McCain must pick a cave-dwelling conservative. They know he won't and that will pave the way for their defection. I love it, I love it, I can't get enough of it.

    • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 08/11/2008 9:56:30 PM

      You are a racist, like the rest of the White DNC massa's. As your leader said......................

      "I'll have those n*ggers voting Democratic for the next 200 years."
      ...........-- President Lyndon B. Johnson, to two governors on Air Force One according Ronald Kessler's Book, Inside The White House"

      There is your truth about the DNC.

      NOBAMA!!!

      • Posted By: Notrepublican @ 08/14/2008 1:32:44 AM

        Wow, maybe you should think over your statement before you say. Because one, that was stupid( how is he racist, he's for Obama, that doesn't make sense). And two, using the ni*ger on the internet is pushing the boundary, don't you think. I mean, your whole comment doesn't even make sense and you use the n word, wow. You gotta think over your comments man, that's pretty bad.

  • Posted By: skyway45@comcast.net @ 08/10/2008 9:57:11 PM

    Bush has made many mistakes but it is easy to view in hine site. In point to fact when the planes hit the towers he was finished no matter what he did. If he tried to get everyone to go with him and we were hit again he was toast. Instead he went ahead with what he thought was the correct way and now is toast.

    I did not agree with Iraq but now we absolutely have to win this or we are in deep trouble. Bush understands one thing a lot of people do not. Most of the Muslim word hates us and has no wish to live in peace. They simply want us dead.

    Also most people are blind to the reality of this confict. Religion is only a excuse. The real issue is power over what you do and believe. Bush does understand this. His biggest failing as been the people he put in place to actually run things.

    Wheither people want to recognize it or not we are in a batttle for our survival. Who ever is the next president had better see this or when my grand childern are grown they will not speak English or have the freeedon we seem so intent on throwing away.

    Even though I disagree with Bush on many thing I suspect that future generation will view him in a different light than we do.

    • Posted By: star3 @ 08/14/2008 12:28:03 AM

      Excellent post, Sky! And to quote Mother Teresa: "If someone hates you for doing the right thing, do the right thing, anyway, for it was always between you and God---never between you and them."

    • Posted By: wadennis @ 08/10/2008 10:08:52 PM

      Bush has taken away more power of thought and actions then the terriost ever dreamed of taking. He has exposed this countries underbelly for what it is. Make them live in fear and they line up like sheep with the most ignorant as their leader. I am sick of this line of thought that defends the indefensible by people in so much denial they probally believed OJ was innocent. Give mea break and get your head out of the sand. WE are Americans and we should be above the crimminal behavor we endouse by our complicity.

      • Posted By: skyway45@comcast.net @ 08/10/2008 10:19:59 PM

        Actually Bush has not taken away anything. People have given it up. The world has changed and even though many want to live in our old world it will never return. The last five presidents of both parties have sold our technoloty and everthing else for politics. We as "Americans" have gone along with this. YOu say because wer are Americans. That means nothing. What the individual does is what means something and most have said they value security above freedom so what is what we get.

        In point of fact we are in a war for our survival and if we lose we lose all.

        • Posted By: raddave @ 08/11/2008 4:44:44 AM

          The people did not give up any rights, the Government took it from us.

  • Posted By: soldout2truth @ 08/10/2008 10:21:56 PM

    Skyway45 is right! If anyone would care to delve into the readings of the Muslim liturature (espeacially the radicalist groups) they will find that they are committed to killing us period. Once the-powers-that-be look the other way from them, they will continue to push their cause and destroy all those who do not agree that "Allah's flag" should be raised around the world. I wish that others would read their creed's and doctrine's (e. g. Hamas). Religion may be their excuse, but it is the fuel of passion that is being bred into the young minds in their cultures.

    • Posted By: skyway45@comcast.net @ 08/10/2008 10:26:30 PM

      You are exactly correct. I have traveled in most of the Muslim world and know first hand how they feel about us. They have no plans for peace. Their goal is our death and destruction. I have taken courses to understand the Koran and it does not tolerate freedom of anything, especially when the Saudi's are involved.



      • Posted By: Cazador1972 @ 08/10/2008 10:58:25 PM


        Sky, if, as you say, you have traveled for most of the Muslim world, from Morocco to India, it sounds like you went out of your way to avoid the vast majority of moderate Muslims. It really sounds like you met exactly the type of people you wanted to meet. I have several Muslim friends and although they have a bias against the US I find enervating, them and their families are hardly radical. I went to the UAE last year and in spite of some real old time conservatives, they were welcoming and hardly radical. Some were devout but most, people my age, had alcohol in their houses (you have to buy a license for alcohol), watched The Simpsons and American Idol and wore Western clothes.

        All those radicals you mentioned you met must have hidden from me. I guess we see what we want to see.

        • Posted By: skyway45@comcast.net @ 08/10/2008 11:15:15 PM

          Actually I have seen, met and talked to people from leaders to workers in mines almost every type. The vast majority would probably never think of blowing themselves up. I have lived for weeks out in the wilds of Indonsia and other places, eaten and sleep next to many. This involved most social classes.

          Most were nice and polite but as I spend time there I found that they thought of us as almost lower forms of life due to not being Muslim. Unles we converted to Islam and believed as they do we were not redeamable.

          I also found that if we died, even at their hand, it was not a problem as we really do not count.

          As hard as you may find this to believe I have a number of Muslim friends. Even at that they do not accept me as not being a Muslim but toterate my disbeilef in the hopes that I will come to my senses one day (an acutal quote from one of them.)

          The point I am making that the basic belief of the Muslim religion does not toterate any freedom of relgion for other than Islam.

          • Posted By: star3 @ 08/14/2008 12:19:06 AM

            Sad & scary, Sky, that they are so adament about not accepting any belief system except their own, yet they expect us to just forget everything we have always believed and embrace theirs. Can't they see the irony in that? We are not asking them to change what they believe, only that they show us the same curtesy. Our God does not teach us to kill anyone just because they disagree with us, and I could never accept one that would, that isn't God, thats evil. And can't they see that teaching them to kill for such a reason, while at the same time claiming to be a peaceful religion, is an oxymoron? How sad to see so many misled. Jesus is the only one whose name is recognized in Heaven as the savior. It is only through acceptence of him and the sacrafice he made for all who believe, that we are saved; only by grace, not by any effort on our part. Its God's gift to us, and all we are required to do is accept it, no strings attatched. If we truly do that, then it would, naturally, follow that we would desire to do the right things that are pleasing to God. Our God teaches us to pray for our enemies--not kill them, but being a Christian does not mean being afraid to defend ourselves or our country, that is different from killing because we disagree with the way someone else believes; one's beliefs should be between them & God---not between them and other people.

          • Posted By: Cazador1972 @ 08/10/2008 11:55:41 PM


            Sky, thanks for your response.

            I do believe you might be mistaking individual and local bias with proper Muslim conduct. As I'm sure you've read, Christians and Jews are seen as "People of the Book" in the Koran, which means that a devout Muslim has a duty to help and protect them. In Early Middle Ages Spain under Muslim rule this meant they were indeed second class citizens, but hardly that a Muslim can kill a Christian or Jew with impunity. Not according to the Koran. The fact that this may happen in certain places doesn't mean the religion itself condones that behavior. Let us remember too that when the Crusades took place, the crimes committed by Christians against Muslims were also egregious. That treatment does not represent Christianity itself, at east not the Christianity I was raised under, but were the actions of individuals under the banner of religion.

            "The point I am making that the basic belief of the Muslim religion does not toterate any freedom of relgion for other than Islam."

            Again, this is not accurate. Christians and Jews are seen as people who received revelations from Abraham and thus a devout Muslim has a duty to protect and help them, and I emphasize this, according to the Koran.


            • Posted By: simonanunhappydem @ 08/11/2008 12:27:26 AM

              Cazador, you probably have read a different Koran. Yes, per the Koran Jews and Christians are people of the book, but that does not mean that Muslims have a duty to protect them. What the good book says is that they are eligible to dhimmi status, which is a subservient status to Muslims, and as long as they are paying their special taxes they should be tolerated. If this is tolerance then the equal but separate dogma of the US before the civil rights laws were enacted was paradise. Neither is true.

              • Posted By: Phaedrus @ 08/11/2008 1:57:38 AM

                The Koran starts off with a liberal (not in the current definition, but in the literal one) tolerance of Christianity and Judaism, but as it progresses, it becomes less tolerant and more violent in its attitude to the "people of the book" - Jews for purportedly changing the Torah to suit their own agenda (whatever that was) and Christians for being multitheists because of their belief in the Trinity.

                Which part should we believe they follow - the early or the late sections? The word abrogation is used in the case: later verses cancel out, or abrogate the earler verses. Abrogated verses are called "mansukh" and abrogating verses are called "nasikh. This is not a new idea for Muslims, as unbelievable as it is for Westerners. Abrogated verses are used when speaking of Islam to Westerners - they just aren't told that these more tolerant verses have been cancelled out.

                • Posted By: Cazador1972 @ 08/11/2008 4:33:47 PM


                  I already stated that Christians and Jews in Dar al Andalus (Spain) where second class citizens, absolutly, but that is a long way from being fair game for any Muslim who felt like it, as was stated. Bear in mind too, that Sephardic Jews left Spain precisely when Isabel and Fernando successfully kicked the Muslims out, because their reign was LESS tolerant of other religions than the Muslims ever were.

                  Care to quote which sections of the Koran you are talking about? Nowhere, and I do mean nowhere, does the Koran say or insinuate Muslims can kill "people of the book" with impunity.

                • Posted By: Slave of The Subduer @ 08/11/2008 2:35:28 AM

                  I would like to add something the Qur'an was revealed in many lights and when certain situations arose. The people of the book is a status name because they have a portion of Gods words, but once they added or deleted verses it ceased being the complete word of God, thus just another book. The jews and christians used to like the prophet Mohammad(peace be upon him) but one of the first things that started the problem was when the Allah ordered the muslims to pray towards Makkah. If you check the history the jews kept breaking treaties with the muslims which eventually led to them be kicked out of Medeenah, most christians living in the Arabian penisula and in east africa became muslims very quickly, because they recognized the truth and their books were not exposed to the greko-roman change that the euoropeans suffered from. But if one truly searches history they would see that the christians and jews lived under islamic rule and were very prosperous, the tax that was demanded by them was not just particular to them, the muslims also pay a tax called "zakat", also if the jew or christian living in a islamic state were to poor to pay the "jizeyah" then it was not levied upon them.
                  Now regarding the harshness towards jews and christians in the Qur'an, they deserved it, the christians lied and told the prophet mohammad to send us people from the muslims to talk about islam, the the christians killed the people the prophet sent. The jews stay continuious in there fabricated lies and kept breaking teaties with the inhabitants of Madeenah, and other things took place. So yes, Muslims must keep a jew and christain at distance, because a Muslim should not get stung in the same hole twice.

    • Posted By: raddave @ 08/11/2008 4:42:01 AM

      If you would delve into Islam, the Qur'an specifically state that Christians and Jews are People of the book and should be treated with tollerance. Yes, the extremist want to wipe us out, but the average Muslim doesn't feel this way.

  • Posted By: 90Sapphire @ 08/11/2008 4:18:50 PM

    History will prove that President George W. Bush was one of the most important presidents of our time. I am sick to death of the constant mispresentation, twisting of facts and flat out inaccurate reporting by the liberal, completely out of touch media. They have done their best to brainwash and convince themselves and all of America that Pres. Bush is a failure. You can say whatever you want over and over but that doesn't make it true ---

    I am so thankful that he has been our president for the last 8 years. Who knows what the state of our national security and economy would be if Gore or Kerry had won.

    • Posted By: wwew @ 08/11/2008 5:21:22 PM

      history has already spoken my dear. bush is the worst president ever. you can say bush ISN'T a failure all you want, but it doesn't make it true. name ONE success. oh that's right, you cant. and dont give me the we havent been attacked since 9-11 crap (anthrax). chicago hasnt been hit with a meteor and san francisco hasnt had a giant earthquake either. i suppose you want to make the same illogical conclusion that bush had something to do with that.

      and if it wasnt for the so called liberal media repeating the lies about gore and kerry and propping up this moron and uncritically cheering him on during his march to war based on lies, we would have never had to suffer the last 8 years and the coming 20 that it will take to clean up his mess.

      • Posted By: star3 @ 08/13/2008 11:44:15 PM

        And your saying he is the worse won't make it true either. You want his best successful accomplishment, also, his first? He kept Kerry & Gore out of the White House. After that, everything else he accomplished was just whipped cream on the pie, and his ability to ignor morons to go on to accomplish what he & the rest of America knew was the right thing, was the cherry on top. Any other thoughts you want to share, dear?

    • Posted By: RO in Reno @ 08/11/2008 4:53:18 PM

      Had Gore or Kerry won, people would not be losing their homes, we would not have lost another 450,000 jobs just in 2008, and its only August.
      The Treasury of the United States of America would not have been drained dry,
      You, Your children and grandchildren would not be faced with the debt incurred by Bush to finance his folly, profitable for him but devastating for American at large, in fact we would probably still have a surplus.
      I could go on but to what end? If you think Bush is going to be remembered fondly you are beyond reason.
      The only debate is likely to be if Bush is the worst president ever or the only the second worst.

      • Posted By: star3 @ 08/13/2008 12:25:15 AM

        Thats right, Ro, we'd all be standing on street corners, holding up cardboard signs that say "Please, Mr. Bush, deliver us from this mad man! We were soooo wrong! What were we thinking?!? Help!!"

    • Posted By: star3 @ 08/11/2008 9:23:35 PM

      Applause! Applause! Hear! Hear! Glad to know someone out ther has common sense. The DIMocrats sure aren't shy about spouting their propoganda, and its great to know there are som Republicans who will speak out the truth, so, Sapphire, kudos to you! When the democrats chose a jackass for their party symbol, they sure got it right--and thats the only thing they've gotten right for awhile! They use to be a pretty good party, until they were invaded by liberals who couldn't think beyond singing "Give Peace A Chance"---well, we gave peace a chance, and this is the result. I believe the Kennedy brothers---JFK & Bobby were the last of the "real" democrats, and that may be why they were killed.

  • Posted By: ajaxtheleast @ 08/11/2008 8:52:45 PM

    Been to enough funerals to know a mortician's facial when I see one.,,,looks like he was propped in his coffin for the shoot,.,,,Your Bush photo fits perfect this two-face liar.

    The PhotoShop man is definitly a Democrat!!,,,,Bless him for conveying in graphics what would have here taken a fifty-line paragraph that nobody would've read.,,,

    Too bad a PhotoShop artist cant clean up the inside as well.,..,,He's going down as the worst and he'll be lucky if no future administration gets so corrupt that the public wants to hang them and they need to wag the dog and turn to investigating George for the war criminal that he is to take the pressure off of themselves.

    Otherwise no future administration will deal with "a past American President's" war crime and he's home free as a retired war criminal. ,,,Oh and, Fareed, this is not one of your honorable pieces, but I guess there were " obligating" circumstance that had you come up with it. ,,We all have to make a living.,,right?

    • Posted By: star3 @ 08/13/2008 11:32:54 PM

      Ajax, go scrub something---like your grungy butt. While you're at it, your mind could stand a bit of cleaning up, as well.

  • Posted By: rab1525 @ 08/13/2008 3:29:44 PM

    The cover was great, but it shold added , see centerfold.
    And then you should have left it blank.......November can't come quick enought !!
    bob bernacki, hollywood, fl

  • Posted By: observer101 @ 08/12/2008 4:28:43 PM

    Harley as well as Obama are desperatly trying to nit pick there way from the truth that McCain will win...Obama has No experience with Washington, No experience with foreign policies, No real reasoning for his CHANGE slogan...Change what?...Does he honestly think HE will change Washington?..No, Washington, as Chicago did will change him...Bush did what he had to do in a post 9/11 state! Saddam did the wrong thing to taunt the U.S. in a time of extreme heightened awareness, and we were NOT going to let the Taliban, Iraq or any other rogue regime take advantage of us...Everyone was all for this and was waiting in anticipation for the Iraq war to start! Now that CERTAIN ppl see that this is unlike their video games and ppl actually have to die for what we believe, they are quick to point out the faults and down falls ONLY, and not the good that our men and women died for..No instead we get ppl who would rather use the deaths of these fine ppl to make their own political points..Nevermind who died in the World Trade Center in the 90's, or the too numerous bombings to name off on other Presidents watches...All that matters to some ppl is that we fail in Iraq to prove that Bush is a lousy leader..Well alot of good that Clintons policies of live and let live did for us. We cant just blame Bush for these events that we are in the midst of, Clinton deserves a fine round of applause for his "do nothing" attitude for our safety that made us vulnerable in the first place. He deserves a standing ovation for his NAFTA ideals that left thousands in the U.S. jobless...Blaming our current state on just Bush is a sad attempt by others to get their revenge and anger out for the now..To point a finger somewhere else and not at themselves...Iraq is NOT the start all and end all for everything thats wrong in this nation as some desperatly seeking re-election would want us to think.

    • Posted By: Bass Pro @ 08/12/2008 6:08:56 PM

      Of course Bush is not the only one to blame. You can add Cheney, Rice, Powell, Rumsfeld and now McCain for their willingness to sacrifice our brave young men and women in iraq. A war cooked by these dispicable Republicans. Your idol McCain has pledged to send as many as it takes to secure the mouth-breathing G OLD P votes. Add one more to the list, yourself. how can you look at yourself in the mirror knowing that you're aiding and abeting the sacrificing of our troop just so your party of hate can keep the white house.

      • Posted By: summer4077 @ 08/13/2008 2:47:59 PM

        Agreed, with the exception of Powell. Colin Powell jumped ship long ago--he didn't believe invading Iraq was wise. I think he is an honorable man whose name got dragged through the mud with all the others.

      • Posted By: observer101 @ 08/13/2008 2:44:17 PM

        Im not going to rewrite my post for you so where it says Bush add the word Administration...Where it says Clinton or Dem add Adulter/Liar/Impeached/Scammer, which ever you want....:)

  • Posted By: stonehenge @ 08/11/2008 4:24:33 PM

    McCain will nuke Iran and then Russia. Same policy different President.

    • Posted By: SPIRITED AWAY @ 08/13/2008 1:30:51 PM

      Nuking Russia will be the END of all of us.

  • Posted By: charlescaroled @ 08/13/2008 12:03:22 PM

    August 13, 2008

    Newsweek.com
    Jon Meacham
    The Editor???s Desk

    You make an interesting point differentiating between George Bush???s first and second terms and I am sure it will be taken by the few of us that read. However, for the vast majority of the population that just look at pictures your cover message is ???Bush got it Right???

    Charles Doherty
    Los Angeles, CA
    charles.f.doherty@att.net

  • Posted By: charlescaroled @ 08/13/2008 12:02:27 PM

    August 13, 2008

    Newsweek.com
    Jon Meacham
    The Editor???s Desk

    You make an interesting point differentiating between George Bush???s first and second terms and I am sure it will be taken by the few of us that read. However, for the vast majority of the population that just look at pictures your cover message is ???Bush got it Right???

    Charles Doherty
    Los Angeles, CA
    charles.f.doherty@att.net

  • Posted By: ajaxtheleast @ 08/13/2008 12:02:20 PM

    Fareed, you and your What Bush Got Right topic heading over-stayed your 15 minutes. ,,,Besides, that disgusting photo!!!..........It looks like the REAL George Bush,,,,sneaky, sneering a real back-stabbing red neck,,,Very depressing,,,,,Go, Fareed, write something intelligent.,,,,,Which I personally know that you can do.

  • Posted By: observer101 @ 08/11/2008 10:08:49 PM

    Where did PIApockets go?..You dont seems as gungho as you were when Hillary was running..PIA PIA you were here, but now your gone, you left you quotes to carry on...

    • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 08/11/2008 11:10:30 PM

      My name is Pia. I don't know what the pockets is supposed to mean. If it's a taunt, forget it.

      • Posted By: observer101 @ 08/12/2008 11:17:54 AM

        Its a goofy name if came up with for your online id...Well PItA POCKETS are good, but believe me its nots a favorite of mine...Speaking of favorites, why dont you start a campaign to encourage Hillary to change all the rules in how a president gets elected..Remember your boohooing when she WAS running about how unfair the DEMS own rules were to themselves? And she even had the gall to try and change the rules to try and win...HAHA Told you it wouldnt work then. Rest assured if Clinton can find a loophole(like she does in all her scams) she will..Keep hope alive PItA POCKETS.

        • Posted By: Skypoint @ 08/13/2008 10:58:49 AM

          Observer101,

          You have little room to talk about other's names. The content of your post, along with the "101" in your own name indicates a basic lack of knowledge, and therefore the urgent need to "observe" and learn.

          Do so, why don't you?

        • Posted By: Bass Pro @ 08/13/2008 9:05:58 AM

          How does Sobserver suit you? I think it fits your cry baby style. Whining about the media coverage,boo Hoo!, crying about piblic financing, wah, wah!, sheding tears over how unfairly your mouth-breathing G OLD P is being treated. Sob, Sob!

          Sobserver..Defined as a person who serves up a sob when he loses. Why don't you shed a few tears for the 4000+ troops the Republican's have sent to their deaths in a cooked up war in iraq. How can you continue to defend this dispicable act. Don't you share some responsibility for those deaths because you support these villains?

        • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 08/12/2008 5:21:07 PM

          In case you haven't noticed even though you say you know me from the primaries, I have never supported Hillary. I support Obama.

          • Posted By: Skypoint @ 08/12/2008 7:13:08 PM

            Pia amore mio, non hai bisogno di me per difendere voi, ma per favore non lasciate che questo cretino arrivare a voi. OK?

            Ciel Azzurro

        • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 08/12/2008 5:10:34 PM

          Observer, you are rude and boring. If you are going to make fun of my given name, do yourself a favor, don't post to me, thank you. Believe me, you wouldn't want to tangle with me. Btw, Pia means Pious, as in Pope Pious. Duh.

  • Posted By: Bon Jour Lausanne @ 08/13/2008 3:47:24 AM

    Bush pleased China by ignoring Taiwanese' determination to have an independent country. When Bush and his administration claimed to bring democracy to Iraq, why did he ignore Taiwanese' right to form an independent country through a referendum? When world leaders try to get in bed with China, why should Taiwanese pay the prices? When world leaders advocate human rights in China, please think about what you have done to Taiwanese.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse