What Rielle Hunter Told Me

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: bigboy8836 @ 08/12/2008 5:09:13 PM

    Blabbity, blabbity, blabity, blah, blah. Hey Darman....next time give us a story with an ending! Sheesh!

    • Posted By: hallidegas @ 08/12/2008 5:15:14 PM

      As I was saying! Where did he learn to write?! Yuck!

      • Posted By: CokiCat @ 08/12/2008 6:04:12 PM

        It's first person, so it can only cover experience. The writer has to avoid conjecture to avoid a lawsuit. As an editor and writer, I thought it was a good piece. Sharing details like the color of her hair roots and demeanor are precisely the relevant facts a good writer includes in a first-person piece.

        • Posted By: CokiCat @ 08/12/2008 6:12:02 PM

          I noticed a few posters were bothered by the piece "not going anywhere." It's a first-person piece. Unlike most newspaper/magazine reading, it doesn't actually force you to a conclusion. To be honest, neither should a typical article, but that is what readers have come to expect: "Tell me what to think."

  • Posted By: Ms. K @ 08/12/2008 6:11:18 PM

    Has there ever been any politician's wife that did NOT stand by her cheating lying publically humiliating scum-bag man??????

  • Posted By: Bethia @ 08/12/2008 6:11:10 PM

    It's unfortunate that someone with so much potential has what I would deam a very significant character flaw. It is a matter between he and his wife, however, it becomes a matter of public opinion as well. After so many examples of political figures that have been caught in affairs, you would THINK that he would use recent history as a reminder of whats right and wrong if for no other reason than the risk of getting caught is VERY VERY high. You would THINK that his family would be a little more important than someone he admittedly didn't even love. You would THINK the country that he cares about so much about and the people that have worked so hard to support him would deserve more. As a mother, I am so sick and tired of having these issues with President/Presidential candidates x rated affairs on the news and radio. Keep it in your pants and if you can't, get the hell out of politics!!!!!!!

  • Posted By: TraceyRumley @ 08/12/2008 6:10:35 PM

    I think Rielle lady has a serious issue. I also think she had motive for something but it didn't work. I feel that even maybe Elizabeth Edwards could have been hurt because this women obviously seemed to have something going on for Edwards and maybe was going to hurt the wife..NEVER KNOW!

  • Posted By: Correcto @ 08/12/2008 6:09:37 PM

    Here is a perfect example of the MSM (Newsweek) having the goods on John Edwards early and never pursuing it. I find it remarkable that this man calls himself a journalist. The whole article sounds more like he was trying to compete with Edwards on getting into this trollops panties than tracking down the truth about the affair.

  • Posted By: Correcto @ 08/12/2008 6:09:23 PM

    Here is a perfect example of the MSM (Newsweek) having the goods on John Edwards early and never pursuing it. I find it remarkable that this man calls himself a journalist. The whole article sounds more like he was trying to compete with Edwards on getting into this trollops panties than tracking down the truth about the affair.

  • Posted By: poet1951 @ 08/12/2008 6:08:40 PM

    Don't we have enough crap going on in the world than to give Edwards press over an affair that happened two years ago, and the legitimate press didn't feel was worthy enough to even pursue, even though the guy was a potential candidate for the highest office of our country. Perhaps because that office had already been defiled by the other adulterers who had resideded there....give me a break...kick this loser to the curb with his huzzy and illigitimate kid and let's get focused on the real problem here...we are about to elect our next president and the main issue is not whether he is qualified by his experience and knowledge, but by his age or race....we have soldiers on the battlefield who is waiting to hear who the next commander and chief will be....that is the most important thing we should be looking at....poet1951

  • Posted By: Correcto @ 08/12/2008 6:07:36 PM

    Here is a perfect example of the MSM (Newsweek) having the goods on John Edwards early and never pursuing it. I find it remarkable that this man calls himself a journalist. The whole article sounds more like he was trying to compete with Edwards on getting into this trollops panties than tracking down the truth about the affair.

  • Posted By: Steamers @ 08/12/2008 6:06:02 PM

    Yes lets move on and forgive and forget....that way we can focus on the Republicans and stop any efforts they make to dig this country out of the muck and slime that comes out of our partys mouth every time we speak...GO Obama and Hillary! defeat those terrible Republicans and their endless efforts to keep corproate America from going bankrupt...those terrible, terrible corproations that kill us all and poolute our children with jobs and food and schools and cars and...only two weeks a year vacation

  • Posted By: Twister51 @ 08/12/2008 6:05:15 PM

    Wow! This woman's thinking is W-H-A-C-K-E-D!!!

    Edwards: another fallen politician.

    Romney wouldn't, and didn't, ever do anything like this.

    Romney 2012!

  • Posted By: Steamers @ 08/12/2008 5:58:07 PM

    Yes this shall pass and the Dems will continue to put scam artist and liberal trash in Washington to stop any progress this country can achieve

    • Posted By: Disgruntled @ 08/12/2008 6:03:33 PM

      Why does it always come down to this? I'm a Liberal and I want what's best for this country - and it's NOT John Edwards, Hilary Clinton nor John McCain. I have no love for George W., but I TRY to respect him as president - note, try - it has nothing to do with his party affiliation, I don't hate all republicans and anyone who hates an entire party is small-minded and illogical.

  • Posted By: odysseus14 @ 08/12/2008 6:01:05 PM

    I think it is a knee-jerk reaction for people to say automatic things like "I made a terrible mistake, let people down, whatever contrite response". As a society, we need to develop and permit a better view of sex and sexual relations. I don't think they made a mistake at all.

  • Posted By: JSearcy @ 08/12/2008 6:00:23 PM

    Well I liked John Edwards before and I STILL like him. He committed adultery against his family though and I'm sure he's being held accountable there. He wasn't married to the press or the public. He made a bad decision and people have a right not to trust him again for a while. Beyond that, I say to the media especially, GET A GRIP! This story is TWO years old and the most important person in all of this (HIS WIFE) has dealt with it and she still loves her husband. I believe we the public deserve better attention from the media than harping on this trite, yesterday news. Let's move on with the real issues that affect our future.

  • Posted By: wgasa @ 08/12/2008 5:59:07 PM

    Amazing..................why in the world do we......Americans........have any passion for any of our politicians?????
    In all of America......we .....the media.....and us have chased away the "good ones"............who in their right mind would run for president?????????????only the egocentric cheaters and slime of the earth will put themselves out there.
    Sooooooooo very sad.
    Shame on all of us1

  • Posted By: NOONEUNEEDTOKNOW @ 08/12/2008 5:56:30 PM

    The reason this is a story is because Edwards made very poor choices during a presidential campaign that put him, his party, and the presidency at risk. McCain cheated on his first wife after he had not seen her in 5 years because he was a prisoner of war, and while he was a private citizen outside of the public eye. Sure moraly its the same thing. However, the reason Edwards story is relevant is because he did it as a public figure with so much to lose. His actions during a campaign show his hypocracy and poor ability to make good decisions.

  • Posted By: NOONEUNEEDTOKNOW @ 08/12/2008 5:55:58 PM

    The reason this is a story is because Edwards made very poor choices during a presidential campaign that put him, his party, and the presidency at risk. McCain cheated on his first wife after he had not seen her in 5 years because he was a prisoner of war, and while he was a private citizen outside of the public eye. Sure moraly its the same thing. However, the reason Edwards story is relevant is because he did it as a public figure with so much to lose. His actions during a campaign show his hypocracy and poor ability to make good decisions.

  • Posted By: Steamers @ 08/12/2008 5:54:28 PM

    Edwards spent his life scamming the legal system with class action law suits that took down companies and products, causing people to loose jobs while gaving little to nothing to his clients for their supposed damages...only to build his mansion(s) and increase his wealth...typical washington liberal. He is the moral equivilent of...well, a liberal. The 33% who would vote for anyone who makes the dems ticket regardless of what they have done...so long as they can win. Integrity does not matter to his party, in fact many likely think this makes him more "cool".

  • Posted By: alljoy @ 08/12/2008 5:48:55 PM

    It's unfortunate that we now know that John Edwards is a MAN...a HU MAN.....and that's OK...That does not take away from what he believes in for the Country. His position regarding health care and poverty is still true. This is a private matter between a married couple....These days the media wants to inform us about everything going on in anyone's life....It has become sickening....I noticed from the news commentator's that if you want to say something positive about Edwards and his family they redirect the question toward "don't you feel betrayed".....OOOOK...it's disappointing but if Newt came back after giving his wife divorce papers in her hospital bed dying of cancer I'm sure we will get over Edward's affair AND I might add, an affair that Elizabeth Edwards was well aware.

    • Posted By: Disgruntled @ 08/12/2008 5:53:52 PM

      I know what you're saying, but he's the one who played himself up so much as a man of character - he paraded his sick wife around to show their unity and his loyalty to his dying wife. If he had stood on the issues from the beginning, it would be different, but he was the one happy to promote this boyscout image - it just makes people all the more mad. And I think we're all fools if we think this broad is the only one he's slept around with.

  • Posted By: rmagee @ 08/12/2008 5:53:06 PM

    For those of you who are faulting only John Edwards, Wise up!!! This woman is a nut case and obviously Had more than a little to do with throwing herself at him and tempting him to make a serious error in judgement. Elizabeth Edwards has stood by him and that should speak volumes about who he really is. This is a classic case of the age old problem of infidelity. There is generally never just one person to blame and there are many problems in every marriage. I am a woman who has been on both sides of this problem in the past and it is far more complicated than the people who wish to judge him are making it. Keep your chin up Mr & Mrs. Edwards. As they say and this too shall pass.

  • Posted By: JMO197 @ 08/12/2008 5:04:02 PM

    The reason people are up in arms about this is not that he cheated, it's what it takes to cheat that speaks volume about his character -- lying, deceiving, reckless, selfish, betrayer. Those are not the characteristics we want in a leader. If he could so easily throw his political career and family away for a piece of tail he met at a bar, how can we entrust him w/ our country? That was why Gulianni has no chance and if people would just look into McCain's history and how he left his 1st wife for his mistress (divorced number 1 in Feb. and married 2 in May), never mind the recent "inappropriate" relationship that the Times uncovered. NOT the characters we want -- we want more evolved humans who think w/ their big brain -- not their small head.

    • Posted By: Juiceman0909 @ 08/12/2008 5:06:04 PM

      This so-called "inappropriate" relationship was proven to be bogus as I am sure you are aware. And if it wasn't, would it have gone away so quickly. No way!

      • Posted By: JMO197 @ 08/12/2008 5:08:41 PM

        You mean the way that for over a year the mainstream and Edwards dismissed his affair? Please!

        • Posted By: Juiceman0909 @ 08/12/2008 5:53:06 PM

          No, I mean the allegations against McCain about the inappropriate relationship. That was dismissed as bogus.

        • Posted By: JMO197 @ 08/12/2008 5:13:53 PM

          The mainstream media dismissed this story as tawdry trash when in reality it speaks volume about a person's integrity and judgment. Then again we had Clinton who cheated, got us out of debt and governed over one of the most prosperous time in US history and we got non cheating Bush who got us in debt and billions of dollars in debt. So go figure.

          • Posted By: Cuisinekj @ 08/12/2008 5:28:47 PM

            That is the most ridiculous comment I've heard all year! You're trying to say that a cheating President performs better than one that doesn't cheat on his wife???
            Perhaps this is your way of justifying your own cheating, so you feel more like a man for doing it, and not a louse who brings risk back to his wife and family! Good thing you;re not running for office!

            • Posted By: JMO197 @ 08/12/2008 5:52:51 PM

              First there's no way it can be more ridiculous than, "I made a mistake" in reference to cheating on his cancer stricken wife for over a year and still by all accounts while lying to the. Or "I have no idea" about the payoff to Hunter by his national financial advisor or that another in his inner circle housed Hunter and just happens to claim to be the father. Which is so sad for Young's family b/c either he's a scum and Hunter is just a one woman homewrecking crew or he's so spineless and such an Edwards sycophant he would throw his own family under the bus to save Edwards' reputations.

              Second, are you kidding that you got from my comments that I said that cheating makes you a better president and that I approve of it? Obviously that triggered a core issue for you, but please read ALL my comments about it before you jump to such a "ridiculous" conclusion. I was trying to say what Edwards did was not okay, but whether it interferes w/ governing isn't always so black and white and that not cheating doesn???t always make you a better president either. Life is funny that way -- many shades of gray.

          • Posted By: austinlover @ 08/12/2008 5:50:42 PM

            I don't understand why people think Clinton was so great on the economy. A monkey would have done as well with the tech boom going on. As we now know a lot of that was not "reai money. He did some good things while in office . However, the tech bust happened right after Bush came into office followed closely by 9/11. Not to menton Katrina. Also,if Clinton had paid more attention to what was going on in the middle east instead of running a hotel for his Hollywood buddies maybe we wouldn't be in this mess in the first place.

          • Posted By: JMO197 @ 08/12/2008 5:28:01 PM

            "into war" not just debt.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse