What Rielle Hunter Told Me

It takes to to tangle. Edawards didn't just dall off the turnip truck. Neither did Rielle. Their actions were selfish and inconsiderate. All people can be tempted to enter into elict liasions. The decision as to whether to engage in one is p to the iondividual. I can and do not respect anyone who has a spouse with a serious health problem refuting their marriage vows. If a person does this, he or she is not trustwirthy to honor and keep any committment. I always felt that Edwards was a slick willie!

Read between the lines, this woman targeted Edwards when he was under great personal and professional stress. Sure it takes two to tango, but it is rather unfair when only one person knows that they are dancing. When did targeting another woman's spouse become part of women's liberation? Perhaps this woman is trying to help, but living in HellLA I've seen many of her type, trying to find a man of power to grab on to and validate herself with. I feel sorry for Elizabeth Edwards, isn't being terminal enough of a burden? To now have to deal with this hurt. John Edwards knew better, but if that woman, Hunter, really cared for people and for her karma, she would not have done such a thing. To go after a married person is wrong, under any circumstances. It was a malignant action, and by her own belief systems, she will pay for it. Is it worth your fifteen minutes of fame to sell your soul, Ms. Hunter? I think not!

what a whack job. she needs psychological help!

ObamaYesWeCan: Are you insane? What horrible things to say about someone who has a terminal illness. You don't even know the woman. Don't you think you should have some kind of proof before you start blathering about how horrible she is? You need to get some kind of help - you're sick.

This Spiritual Social Commentary blog article by someone who knew Rielle in the early 1990's explains the origin of her name and shares important lessons to be learned from this situation: http://www.spiritualcommentary.com

By "whore", I presume you meant Edwards. Right?

Why is this whore receiving any attention?

What amazes me about this story is instead of telling the American people what kind of person this woman is, sleeping w/ two married men and wrecking their families; you guys give her an interview and let her slam a woman battling cancer....bravo

She did help him.

Of course John Edwards would be happy to take a DNA test. He already knew that his mistress's permission would be needed to provide the baby's DNA and he knew that she would refuse as she is receiving large sums of hush money and would not risk losing her livlihood, plus she thinks she is in love with him and would do anything to protect him. What a skank....both of them

Ahe has helped him make history.

As usual Rush is right about the drive by media

if this article is your pennace, it is accepted. you are absolved of your biased reporting and obamagaga. but regaining trust is anotehr thing. this is the second story i've seen in teh msm in recent days where "reporters" are claining that they tried to get this stoy and that theyre not just obamafied. but this is a time in an election when people need info on all subjects from trustworthy sources. you failed to retain trust and that will more than a few penitential articles to overcome. i hope you change

dude, the mainstream media including this guy failed to report the story because of their leftist affiliations and loves. this is the second story i've read by "reporters" caliming they were trying to get the story. i guess this is your left wing pennance. your unwilingness to write about this because of your fear of hurting obama is too obvious regarless of how you try to patch it up. appearances mean everything right now and it looks like you guys are really so far off field in this election that your trustworthiness factor is far below anything we expected. i hope you change

Contrary to the commentary here, the only news about Edwards that could possibly draw my attention is his Bill Clinton zipper problem. Now, I wait with anticipation for some Main Stream Media reporter, (there are few journalists among them) to follow the money, and tell us just who paid the mother of Edward's child to refuse the testing that Edwards has dared volunteer for. How much, and whose money?

Why is it that Reps defend Mr. McCain's affairs with yes, "the Dem's did it too", then want to harpoon Mr. Edwards? Reps do that a lot. Edwards is not going to be VP or Pres. Right? The adulterer who is running is Mr. McCain. And by the way, it doesn't matter what your political affiliations are. A cheat is a cheat.