The Case Still Isn’t Closed

NO ONE KNOW WHO WILL BE THE NEXT PRESIDENT OF U.S


TRY WWW.PREDICTIONET.COM

.http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.predictionet.com%2Fcontent%2Fprediction%2Fhow-many-voters-will-vote-barack-obama-next-election-us&title=How+many+voters+will+vote+for+Barack+Obama+in+the+next+election+in+the+US+%3F

Hands Massage http://traditional-medicine-traditional.blogspot.com/2008/08/hands-massage.html

This is the governments way of warning people, who understand the way the government warns people, about future events.

The draft is scheduled to return in 2009.

The most important link NOT made is how the liquid anthrax Ivins worked with was made into the "weaponized" form found in the letters. Weaponized anthrax is easily dispersed; liquid anthrax is not. That process is very sophisticated and Ivins did not have access to that type of equipment.

Bruce Ivins passed two polygraph tests and a handwriting analysis comparing samples of his handwriting to writing contained in the anthrax letters, U.S. officials familiar with the investigation say.

In 2001 the FBI sent the envelopes to Ivans lab so that the envelopes that had been sent could be analized; now the FBI are shocked at the results of the new VILE test that show Ivans had the strain the FBI sent to his lab.

No Doctor who looked at Ivans as part of his continuous clearance reviews, which are standard, found him less than mentally ideal, only a multiple drunk driver ,who is not a doctor who needs a plea bargain, thought Ivans was wierd; none of his co-workers did either.

The officials concede that more than 100 other people , including some Arab-American scientists, had access to the batch and that the virulent Ames strain was found elsewhere.

Indeed, prosecutors had not delivered the case to a grand jury for indictment. And the Pentagon had not revoked Ivins' security clearance; he still worked at the lab till the day he died.

Prosecutors were equally confident another scientist, Steven Hatfill, was the anthrax culprit before recently agreeing to pay him $6 million in damages. And Jewells the Olympic bomber in Atlanta:not.

The government newspaper parrots do not reveal this evidence of innocence; WHY do they not simply read the governments reports before writing?

Intelligence analyst: Getzel

Dick Chaney made him do it.

Bruce Ivins passed two polygraph tests and a handwriting analysis comparing samples of his handwriting to writing contained in the anthrax letters, U.S. officials familiar with the investigation say.

In 2001 the FBI sent the envelopes to Ivans to that had been sent; now they are shocked at the results of the new VILE test that show Ivans had the strain the FBI sent him

No Doctor who looked at Ivans as part of his continuous clearance reviews, which are standard, found him less than mentally ideal, only a multiple drunk driver who is not a doctor.

The officials concede that more than 100 other people ??? including some Arab-American scientists ??? had access to the batch and that the virulent Ames strain was found elsewhere.

Indeed, prosecutors had not delivered the case to a grand jury for indictment. And the Pentagon had not revoked Ivins' security clearance; he still worked at the lab till the day he died.

Prosecutors were equally confident another scientist, Steven Hatfill, was the anthrax culprit before recently agreeing to pay him $6 million in damages.

The government newspaper parrots do not reveal this evidence of innocence; WHY?

Intelligence analyst: Getzel

Why would they expect anthrax in his house, car or clothes? If you are working on Military biological Warfare, the first thing you would make sure is, that the biological agent doesn't get onto clothes, cars, and houses. And these scientists would have been carefully trained not to do that willfully. He used them to terrorise others not his family. Don't understand the logic.

Why would they expect anthrax in his house, car or clothes? If you are working on Military biological Warfare, the first thing you would make sure is, that the biological agent doesn't get onto clothes, cars, and houses. And these scientists would have been carefully trained not to do that willfully. He used them to terrorise others not his family. Don't understand the logic.

Why would they expect anthrax in his house, car or clothes? If you are working on Military biological Warfare, the first thing you would make sure is, that the biological agent doesn't get onto clothes, cars, and houses. And these scientists would have been carefully trained not to do that willfully. He used them to terrorise others not his family. Don't understand the logic.

Bruce Ivins passed two polygraph tests and a handwriting analysis comparing samples of his handwriting to writing contained in the anthrax letters, U.S. officials familiar with the investigation say.

In 2001 the FBI sent the envelopes to Ivans to that had been sent; now they are shocked at the results of the new VILE test that show Ivans had the strain the FBI sent him

No Doctor who looked at Ivans as part of his continuous clearance reviews, which are standard, found him less than mentally ideal, only a multiple drunk driver who is not a doctor.

The officials concede that more than 100 other people ??? including some Arab-American scientists ??? had access to the batch and that the virulent Ames strain was found elsewhere.

Indeed, prosecutors had not delivered the case to a grand jury for indictment. And the Pentagon had not revoked Ivins' security clearance; he still worked at the lab till the day he died.

Prosecutors were equally confident another scientist, Steven Hatfill, was the anthrax culprit before recently agreeing to pay him $6 million in damages.

The government newspaper parrots do not reveal this evidence of innocence; WHY?

Intelligence analyst: Getzel

Writing as a criminal defense attorney familiar with the burden of proof in criminal cases, I think the evidence is convincing that Ivins mailed the letters, even if there could have been an acquittal at trial. Compare O.J. Simpson, who was acquitted under the strict proof requirements of a trial, but has been found guilty -- and I think rightly so -- by history. The situation with Ivins reminds me of the Kennedy assassination. Many brilliant people wrote books, made movies, and even held congressional hearings, suggesting all sorts of theories other than what the Warren Commission found. But over time, the evidence and reasoning of the Commission prevailed. We may need another Warren Commission for this case. It does seem important to note that the critics now railing against the FBI's investigation and conclusions aren't suggesting the real culprit was a Muslim terrorist, which is what Ivins (or whoever sent the letters) wanted us to think.

Is the case ACTUALLY closed? Or will the FBI treat it as closed? Can they assure the public that this strain of anthrax will not threaten us again?

google battelle institute anthrax king coal fossil fuels nuclear power weapons now Battelle is also in charge of the nation's renewable energy strategy