It is difficult to understand the critics of Russia who fail to establish the connection between the West's support for the independence of Kosovo and the Russian intervention in Georgia. In 1999 NATO intervened in a strikingly similar, though much more brutal way, bombing Serbian army and civilian targets for 3 months in order to save the Albanian rebellion. The Serbian army and police had practically destroyed the Albanian guerilla whose leaders are now indicted for war crimes in the Hague, but after heavy bombing they eventually had to withdraw from Kosovo. Like Russia today, NATO paid no respect to Serbian sovereignty and used the same humanitarian reasons to justify it's action.
Supporting Kosovo's independence in February this year, western politicians kept repeating that Kosovo is a unique case that will not be used as a precedent but failed to explain what exactly makes it so unique and who will make sure it is not used as a model by any of the hundreds of ethnic disputes around the world. In one thing one must agree with Russian diplomats: after invading Serbia and Iraq, the US and Britain have little credibility left to reproach Russia for doing the same. That is of little comfort to the small countries like Georgia or Serbia, but one should expect from commentators to show some more respect to common sense.









Discuss