Pushing Russia’s Buttons

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Glenno @ 08/14/2008 11:38:03 PM

    Is American press more balanced than Russian? The US interest and involvement makes them as responsible for this massacre as Georgia, and it is not mentioned anywhere in US media. At least the European news have a bit more balanced view.

    • Posted By: Mike S. @ 08/15/2008 2:47:55 PM

      Are you kidding? The United States has the first amendment guaranteeing freedom of the press. Do you really believe that Russia has a free and indepnedent press. I am glad that Russia has an english language paper that to exist. But, let's be real, the majority of the media (tv, radio, etc) is controlled by the Kremlin and the Kremlin's cronies. How many independent media outlets in Russia were forced out or taken over during Putin? Even the St. Petersburg press that you referenced stated that the government controlled media was spreading only one side of the conflict. You wll find the full sprectrum of opinions in the US.

  • Posted By: bsmith2420 @ 08/15/2008 2:23:01 PM

    Hirsh you are correct. The US is pread very thin. American soilders are dying in Iraq and Afghanistan not for democracy and freedom - these people don't even know what this means. Nor are their brains splattered on the streets of Iraq and Afghanistan for oil. We all know full well that oil has always been limited and new technologies could have been developed long ago. It is for the rich Saudi masters that control this government. Do you see any Saudi, Israeli or German soilders dying over there? huh?

    That's right. Who are the masters (rich Arabs) and who are the slaves S A...? This country better get its act together cause Latin America is huge in numbers with Russian weapons at your doorstep. Don't be stupid. Nations rise and fall and the US is on a slippery slope.

  • Posted By: garysgary @ 08/15/2008 9:42:34 AM

    Did McCain really say "...in the 21st century, nations don't invade other nations." This geezer is over the hill. I'll bet he will be a lobbyist by March.

  • Posted By: HillBillyBill @ 08/15/2008 7:44:39 AM

    Reduced to it's simplist element, the world has long wanted to be like America. So, when GWB invaded a soverign country, anyone with the ability to do the same has a precedent to follow, Secretary Rice's comments notwithstanding.

  • Posted By: Glenno @ 08/14/2008 7:07:07 PM

    St.Petersburg Times is a newspaper handed out for free and most restaurants and shops in St.Petersburg and it is in English. www.sptimes.ru . How can this be controlled by the Kremlin? They have a more balanced view in the media than the US, where every resistance against US imperialsm is a "brutal attack against freedom and democracy".

  • Posted By: Mike S. @ 08/12/2008 11:06:09 AM

    Russia has historically been a paranoid nation. However, should the west just cede the sovereignty of those border nations that don't want to be intimidated by a powerful neighbor? If those border states want to be a part of the west, we should not ignore their requests, just to make Russia feel better about its security. If Russia wants to become a true democracy, which does not seem to be the case under Putin, they would view those border nations as trading partners bridging to the west rather than some building threat.

    • Posted By: trueworld @ 08/14/2008 11:38:50 AM

      mike you have no idea what you're talking about! want to know waht really hapent in georgia wach russiatoday.com western media doesnt tell the truth no more!

      • Posted By: Mike S. @ 08/14/2008 5:00:18 PM

        Is there any actual dissent allowed in Russia anymore? In the west, you have the opportunity to hear from the left, right and center. Now that all Russian media is controlled by the Kremlin, what happens if you do not tow the party line? I have not heard one iota of dissent from any Russian concerning this "invasion".

    • Posted By: Atavie @ 08/12/2008 7:42:08 PM

      Well, how do you like to have a Russian Federation and Russian "missile defense" installed in our backyard (Mexico, Cuba, Venezuela, Bolivia, etc.)? Likewise, the Caucasius is Russia's backyard. Let the states in that region sort things out by themselves. The US got enough problems at home and in Afghanistan and Iraq to come to the rescue of a little thug like Saakashvili. Last couple of weeks Condi Rice stopped by and warned him not to do anything foolish. He went ahead and used bombs, heavy artillery and tanks to attack and killed unarmed Ossetian civilians and destroyed 10 Ossetian villages (which he claimed to belong to Georgia), hence committing war crime against his own people. He cried uncle after being swatted down by Russia; however his uncle Bush could do nothing except whining that the Russians army used disproportionate force against Georgia. Didn't his mom Condi already told him - poke the bear with a stick. and you get eaten?

      • Posted By: quique11000 @ 08/12/2008 9:24:52 PM

        Mike

        Are you talking about Venezuela?

        Just wait until we have the Ruskis in our backyard!

        • Posted By: langs13 @ 08/13/2008 6:54:15 AM

          And we can Blame Bush for it. Do unto others as you wish done to you.

  • Posted By: Landman @ 08/14/2008 3:09:53 PM

    Mr. Hirsch???s excellent analysis incorporates my own point of view. Both McCain and Obama are discredited by their opportunistic comments regarding the Russian invasion of Georgia. Both candidates, each of whom fully comprehends the Hirsch analysis, nevertheless, seek to take political advantage of the conflict without regard to the long term consequences for U.S. foreign policy. In the coming Presidential election, American will be asked to choose from which one of these carpetbaggers they will buy a used car.

  • Posted By: Mwalimu @ 08/14/2008 1:00:48 PM

    Bravo!!
    At last an article that tells the truth!!!!!
    Perhaps because of a lack of space, Hirsch fails to mention the terrorists revenge attacks committed by Chechens against innocent Russias: the attack in a Moscow theatre where about 700 or 800 people died, one or two (I forget the number, sorry) Russian civilian aircraft blown up midair by terrorists (women with bombs attached to their bodies,) or the siezure of a middle school near the Chechen border where 200 or 300 innocent Russian children died. Might this have come effect on Russia's policy? Doesn't Russia feel obligated to avenge these attacks? Granted. Georgia had nothing to do with these attacks. But then Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11,. Conservative pundit Jonah Goldberg advocates bombing and shaking up some crappy little country somewhere to show that we mean business. That's just what Russia did.
    Also, Hirsh forgets to mention Russia's big 9/11 - the Nazi invasion of 1941 which took the lives of millions of Russians. (1/3 of the population Leningrad starved to death.) If we keep remembering the lessons of 9/11, shouldn't Russians be entitled to the same memories of June 22, 1941? (Granted the Soviet-Natzi friendship pact of 1939 gave Hitler an engraved invitation, so did Stalin's purge which decimated the Soviet Army of all its best generals - but like the U.S., Russia often fails to acknowledge "inconvenient truths."
    With Hirsh's article in mind. Obama's approach makes far more sense than McCain's. Months before the invasion Obama warned of potential trouble spots like South Ossetia and advocated immediate high-level negotiation. Had Obama been president, perhaps the current tragedy might have been averted. Obama believes in proactive diplomacy - anticipating problems and de-fusing them - rather than reacting - like Bush and McCain. That;s the real key to an effective defense strategy.
    The other Obama specialty is his emphasis on Green Power (Check out his website) It's not as bold as Gore's 10 year plan - which I hope he adopts, but it's really the key to our ability to negotiate with Russia and Iran. Right now Russia can call the shots because it provides the EU with 33% of its oil and 40% of its natural gas. (There really frightening environmental issues connected with Russia's oil exploration, but that's another topic.) Our best bargaining chip will occur when we can tell the Russians (or Iranians) to keep their crude.

    P.S. Newsweek;s of fact checkers pointed out that it will take 22 years for off-shore oil to reach the market. We're better off with Gore's 10 year plan to get rid of oil altogether.

  • Posted By: ilia25 @ 08/13/2008 10:51:48 PM

    US leaders are really shortsighted. At the time when they really need Russian help with dealing with Iran and other real issues, they are bashing Russia for doing the right thing -- repelling the Georgian aggression in South Ossetia!

    I thought Iraq was a lesson enough for them to be guided by logic and facts, instead of fear and old stereotypes. Russia is NOT going to take over Georgia and depose that mental Saakashvili by force!,, It is a 2 trillion fast growing economy, they depend on good relations with West and they don't need this crap!..

    • Posted By: LeoDeo @ 08/14/2008 1:25:31 AM

      Who's shortsighted? where do you live again? we're a nation of idiots, governed by idiots, with the rich pulling us by the ears forward from 19th to 20th , and now the 21st century. We got one idiot going out of office and two potential morons coming in - "Today we're all Georgians....from Atlanta!" , and Osama the "Let's just talk it over in a sandbox and hold hands". Our nation is so overextended militarily, gas prices are so high ( relatively) that reporterguy above me probably bikes his way to work, and our rich donkeys who've been pulling us ahead, stumbled. ...Nah we're not shortsighted...we got a leadership of morons, whos only weapon right now is a megaphone - "We demand Russia pull back...or we're gonna keep demanding , and demanding and demanding..and then we'll tell on them " pathetic.

      • Posted By: SPORTLOCK09 @ 08/14/2008 12:34:48 PM

        Couldn't agree with you more. Just add "very" too pathetic and you nailed it.

  • Posted By: ajaxtheleast @ 08/14/2008 10:37:20 AM

    Condoleeza Rice and her "dilpomatic entourage" is to meet Saakashvili in Georgia.

    That is, when they can move enough people out of Georgia to make room for them
    to fit in whats left of Georgia.

    CONDI:,,,,HI !!,,,,,,HOW'S IT GOING, MIKE ?

    • Posted By: SPORTLOCK09 @ 08/14/2008 12:10:57 PM

      That was very.....tasteless of you.

  • Posted By: SPORTLOCK09 @ 08/14/2008 12:05:43 PM

    Quick Senator Obama, Give the Russians and the Geogians a speech to make them feel all warm and fuzzy!!!!!!!!!

  • Posted By: Observer5 @ 08/14/2008 3:40:36 AM

    What!?
    Shvili himself told that he is "retaking" S.Ossetia as fulfilling his election promise.
    All American media started their Breaking News last Friday by the words:
    Georgia retakes S. Ossetia.
    Therefore, it is Shvili who started it and not Russia.
    Two wars is not enough to enjoy and delighten for stupid Americans; they must be reminded that 3 is a lucky number and thus the third war is just necessary.
    I hope that McCain is finished by this, not helped.
    As to Obama - he too said noisy words to be inline, but nobody seriously thinks that he is as crazy to break precious relations with Russia for the sake of some Georgia.
    Besides - its pres, Shvili, is good for Nurnberg trial.

  • Posted By: Glenno @ 08/14/2008 2:10:47 AM

    It is not correct to call this "paranoia" from Russia. This has been build up for a long time and it ended in a US sponsored ethnic cleansing in Ossieta by pouring money into the Georgian army the last 4 year and giving CIA a almost limitless budget there.
    Since the cold war the US has expanded NATO closer and closer to Russias borders, assisted breaking up Yugoslavia to create dependent states and bomb Serbia into submission. The coups in Ukraine and Georgia (with colorful names) where the US has manipulated elections and media to gain control and create satelite states with anti-Russian government which we aparently call democratic. American attempt to create control and dominance in Eurasia is of great concern and with a rocket shield to gain first strike capabilities Russia has the right to feel "paranoid". Putin asked in Munic why the US was placing army bases along their borders and encirceling them. The US tactics have been to demonize, isolate, weaken and humiliate Russia. Russia has learned that the cold war never ended for the US and taking up weapons is the only option left now that the greatest threat is standing at their borders, very similar to what happened over 60 years ago. It is also worth to note that the US "aid" to Georgia now consist of war ships and war planes... United States have moved far beyond attacking sovereign states, changing regimes, breaking international law on daily basis, having torture at Guatanamo, placing terrorist organisations like the KLA inpower, the US has also moved into ethnic cleansing. Calling the Russian intervention a crime and bringing war to European soil should make Europe re-evaluate their relationship with the US, not Russia

  • Posted By: Glenno @ 08/14/2008 2:07:57 AM

    It is not correct to call this "paranoia" from Russia. This has been build up for a long time and it ended in a US sponsored ethnic cleansing in Ossieta by pouring money into the Georgian army the last 4 year and giving CIA a almost limitless budget there.
    Since the cold war the US has expanded NATO closer and closer to Russias borders, assisted breaking up Yugoslavia to create dependent states and bomb Serbia into submission. The coups in Ukraine and Georgia (with colorful names) where the US has manipulated elections and media to gain control and create satelite stateswith anti-Russian government which we aparently call democratic. With a rocket shield to gain first strike capabilities Russia has the right to feel "paranoid". Putin asked in Munic why the US was placing army bases along their borders and encirceling them. The US tactics have been to demonize, isolate, weaken and humiliate Russia. Russia has learned that the cold war never ended for the US and taking up weapons is the only option left now that the greatest threat is standing at their borders, very similar to what happened over 60 years ago. It is also worth to note that the US "aid" to Georgia now consist of war ships and war planes... United States have moved far beyond attacking sovereign states, changing regimes, breaking international law on daily basis, having torture at Guatanamo, placing terrorist organisations like the KLA inpower, the US has also moved into ethnic cleansing. Calling the Russian intervention a crime and bringing war to European soil should make Europe re-evaluate their relationship with the US, not Russia

    Glenn, Norway

  • Posted By: Freedommonger @ 08/13/2008 7:51:52 PM

    Mr. Hirsh, in his unusually objective commentary (for an American), looks at the "big picture" but fails to address the issue of freedom. The kind of freedom that the Neocon crazies want for some, but deny others. Why does Georgia have the right to be "free" of Russia, while the Ossetians and Abkhaz don't have the right to be "free" of fascist Georgia? In order to understand why the Ossetians and Abkhaz don't want to be part of Georgia, all one has to do is look at how the Georgians treat their two other minorieis: The Armenian and the Azeris. That will explain it all.
    Here's a suggestion for Americans who oppose Ossetians right to be independent or join Russia! If Georgia is such a great country (democratic, freedom-loving, and other idiotic nonesense being spread by the Bush regime), why does not the USA become part of Georgia? That would be fair.
    Otherwise, let the Ossets and the Abkhaz decide for themselves.

    • Posted By: LeoDeo @ 08/14/2008 1:45:22 AM

      Nah that would put our foreign policy for the past 110 years under a sobriety test...we'd never want to do that. We as a whiny country do whatever pleases us , by might and sheer arrogance. And naturally we get really really really pissed off when other countries dont do what we want. Doing what's best for us is naturally a logical choice, doing it the way we're doing it now is not the brightest.

    • Posted By: jblackwell88 @ 08/13/2008 9:18:41 PM

      The sad thing is, that making sound arguments like this will not prevail against the existing world order. Even Obama has voiced support for the Georgians, so... so much for his insight. Nothing new to see here.

  • Posted By: kdo123 @ 08/13/2008 10:20:22 PM

    Putin's invasion of Russia??? Why does everyone keep forgetting that Georgia started this mess??? This was not an invasion, this was a response to the clear and brutal violation of the peace treaty.

  • Posted By: ARGOS-PANOPTES @ 08/13/2008 3:00:33 PM

    To CollosalDreams: "Putin knows exactly what he is doing. He is sneaky, patient, ambitious, and dangerous. His ambitions need to be contained." here's back at you... Bush HAS NO IDEA what he is doing. BUT he is sneaky, IMpatient, ambitious, and dangerous. His ambitions need to be contained.

    Tell me again the reasons "BRUTSH" invaded Iraq, besides its self interests, so where is the difference here

    • Posted By: PresidentSupporter @ 08/13/2008 4:32:26 PM

      Bush is a heckuva lot smater than you, fool. Stop listening to the liberal media garbage and understand we invaded Iraq to take out "Hitler No. 2".

      If you know how to run things so well, why aren't you the President?

      • Posted By: jblackwell88 @ 08/13/2008 9:28:59 PM

        So what you're saying is, Saddam had taken over the entire middle east with his imaginary chemical, biological and nuclear weapons, and that this scenario justified the killing of more people than he'd or his sons would have ever killed in their CAREER. There is a reason the world is as screwed up and violent as it is, and people like YOU are exactly the cause of it.

  • Posted By: Questions2 @ 08/13/2008 7:44:55 PM

    Proposition: Russia???s objective is to rule the world.
    Proof: Russia seeks to restore itself to Soviet Union size by the admission of Russian leadership (calling the fall of the Soviet Union the greatest catastrophe in the 20th century, promising to protect its interests in any country by any means, including military). Russia, like other countries and people, prefers more to less. If given the choice between the Soviet Union territory and that plus one other territory Russia will choose the second option. In a choice between Soviet Union plus one and Soviet Union plus two countries again the second choice is made. Iterating this argument we get that Russia would most prefer to rule the entire world.

    • Posted By: jblackwell88 @ 08/13/2008 8:53:01 PM

      Some might argue that this is our objective as well. Given our activities since the "end" of the Cold War, there is plenty of evidence to support that.

  • Posted By: Freedommonger @ 08/13/2008 7:51:38 PM

    Mr. Hirsh, in his unusually objective commentary (for an American), looks at the "big picture" but fails to address the issue of freedom. The kind of freedom that the Neocon crazies want for some, but deny others. Why does Georgia have the right to be "free" of Russia, while the Ossetians and Abkhaz don't have the right to be "free" of fascist Georgia? In order to understand why the Ossetians and Abkhaz don't want to be part of Georgia, all one has to do is look at how the Georgians treat their two other minorieis: The Armenian and the Azeris. That will explain it all.
    Here's a suggestion for Americans who oppose Ossetians right to be independent or join Russia! If Georgia is such a great country (democratic, freedom-loving, and other idiotic nonesense being spread by the Bush regime), why does not the USA become part of Georgia? That would be fair.
    Otherwise, let the Ossets and the Abkhaz decide for themselves.

  • Posted By: Questions2 @ 08/13/2008 7:45:06 PM

    Russia has agreed to both sides withdrawing their armies only because it has no intention of pulling its forces out. It sees an opportunity to make Georgia disarm unilaterally. Russia will claim that its army in Georgia is peacekeepers, policemen or voluntary militia of the South Ossetians and keep it in. The only way to ensure that both sides withdraw their armies is to send in an international peacekeeping force, no member of which is from Russia, Georgia or any group in Caucasus. That force should have the arms and authority to enforce withdrawal of armies.
    Georgia was the lightning rod for Eastern Europe. Russia focused its economic, propagandistic and military bullying on Georgia, lightening the pressure on countries of Eastern Europe. In the 1990s Russian military planes were flying over the Baltic states and Russia imposing trade sanctions on them. After the Rose Revolution in Georgia this activity shifted there. Now that the lightning rod is broken Eastern European countries should expect a lot more economic and military trouble from Russia.
    An old anecdote from the post-communist countries: An American, a German and a Russian are boasting in a bar. The American says: ???On my farm I drive a Ford, when I go to work I drive a Lincoln and when I go abroad I drive a Cadillac.??? The German answers: ???When I am at home, I drive a Volkswagen, at work I drive a Mercedes and in other countries I drive a BMW.??? The Russian says: ???I drive a Zhaporozhets at home and a tractor at work.??? ???And when you go to another country???? the others ask. ???When I go to another country I drive a tank,??? the Russian answers.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse