Pushing Russia’s Buttons

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Questions2 @ 08/13/2008 7:44:41 PM

    The method Russia seems to be using in gaining its objective of restoring the Soviet Union is to separate a piece from another country and then move in its ???piecekeepers??? to keep that piece for itself.
    In conclusion, the international community should make plans for reacting to the next Russian attack on its neighbour. The present reaction is inadequate since Russian forces are still moving deeper into Georgia. The next attack will come since the invasion of Georgia is premeditated and part of a bigger plan (Robert Kagan???s Aug. 11 article in The Washington Post). There are also plenty of ???frozen conflict??? opportunities that Russia can warm up ??? Nagorno-Karabakh in Azerbaijan, Eastern Ukraine that is mainly Russian-speaking, Transdniestria in Moldova, the Russian enclave of Kaliningrad between Poland and Lithuania (access rights for example), the mainly Russian-speaking Ida-Virumaa region of Estonia.

  • Posted By: Omaar @ 08/13/2008 3:30:42 PM

    Source: www.cnn.com The Political Ticker

    http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/08/13/georgian-president-to-mccain-move-from-words-to-deeds/

    Americans are making it known that they Will Not lay down American Flesh,Blood, Bone and Spirit for a Antagonistic Sakashvilli (Georgian) Nation.

    Georgian president to McCain: Move 'from Words to Deeds'

    This Maniac wants to End Life as we know it, by having America use Military Might against a Nation with the largest Stockpile of Nuclear Weapons on Planet earth and that wopuld also include China, because they are going to Side with Russia, you gotta be Kidding Me !!

    Obama's Logic is looking Better Everyday and John McCain has been called out by his "Maniac Friend" Sakashvilli as if Mccain is President !!

    condoleeza Rice has Admitted that Georgia started this Conflict, yet tries to say, Russia's response is Too Extreme !

    What if Canada tried to Invade America or Worse, if Mexico tried to claim California or Texas as Theirs, we would do the same Exact Thing, if not WORSE, just look at iraq and they had nothing to do with (911) and we're Devestating that Country !! What do you think, we would do if Canada tried to claim Alaska, New York or North Dakota ...Hmmmm

    08:50 AM ET

    From CNN Political Producer Peter Hamby



    Watch the entire interview with President Saakashvili.

    (CNN) ??? Georgian president Mikheil Saakashvili on Wednesday called for John McCain and other American leaders to do more for Georgia in their response to the conflict in his country.

    Big Note: ???Yesterday, I heard Sen. McCain say, ???We are all Georgians now,?????? Saakashvili said on CNN???s American Morning. ???Well, very nice, you know, very cheering for us to hear that, but OK, it???s time to pass from this. From words to deeds.???

    McCain told a crowd in Pennsylvania yesterday that he had called Saakashvili to express solidarity with the people of Georgia, saying: ???Today, we are all Georgians.???

    Note: McCain???s foreign policy adviser Randy Scheunemann (Big Lobbyist for Georgia) told reporters on the campaign plane Tuesday that McCain???s remark ???obviously meant a lot to Saakashvili personally, but more importantly the message it conveyed to the Georgian people in this really, time of unprecedented national emergency.??? Scheunemann said McCain and Saakashvili are friends who have speaking daily throughout the crisis.


    But Saakashvili said action is more important than rhetoric in the face of ???brutal??? and ???deliberate??? Russian violence. He urged the United States to take the lead in installing an international peacekeeping force.

    ???We should realize what is at stake here for Americans,??? he said. ???America is losing the whole region.???

    ???What Americans should do know, first of all, clearly make known their intentions,??? he said.


    • Posted By: Braes @ 08/13/2008 7:43:05 PM

      McCain is a senile tweak case who has foreign lobbyists for Georgia that will get us in a wide war in asia and europe. A crazy sick old man. Sad.

  • Posted By: wyomingite @ 08/13/2008 4:07:28 PM

    Let's face it. Between Putin (along with puppet Medvedev) and Sakashvili, it's difficult to pick a good guy and a bad guy as we Americans love to do. This isn't college football, it's international relations and is complex. McCain should watch his step here. (i.e. "We are all Georgians") What an idiot. We should side with the civilians on both sides and focus on the humanitarian aspect of this conflict. Sending Condi is the right move, although Bush should shut his mouth on the issue. (and shouldn't talk about anything other than baseball and riding-lawnmowers) Condi, despite her flaws, is undeniably an expert on the former Soviet-bloc. Let her work her magic and stop talking to the press, especially if you're running for president.

    • Posted By: Braes @ 08/13/2008 7:39:41 PM

      Condi makes me barf. What a waste of oxygen. Just what has she done for our prestige, diplomacy or foreign policy that is positive? Don Trump called her the worst broker in history. Useless.

  • Posted By: Brian Y. @ 08/13/2008 5:49:37 PM

    The west's disregard of Russia's well founded xenophobia (20 million dead and millions of square miles destroyed) led to what we see today. All of the old Cold Warriors who watched the wall come down were intoxicated with the thought of former adversary states becoming partners. Those former adversary states expected us to back them unconditionally and completely and in fact backed us without question (former Soviet satellites have been the biggest supporters of the Iraqi coalition). But in our intoxication we literally relegated a still very powerful and increasingly insecure Russia to an inaccurately inferior postion and reveled in her struggles. This strengthened the hand of ultra nationalists like Putin. The problem with forcing a potential adversary (particularly an insecure one) into a corner is that you leave that adversary no flexibility to stand down from their bellicosity without an unacceptable loss of face in front of their own people. Imagine the Soviet Union backing the establishment of pro-Soviet communist regimes in Mexico and Canada (look at how obsessed we've been with the one they did establish in Cuba), would we have not reacted? Putin has timed his action perfectly and now we see the limits of our own ability to affect the situation. It will take innovative thinking and a willingness to compromise the "absolute belief" that everyone wants to be an Amercian but perhaps we may be able to stabilze the situation.

    • Posted By: jblackwell88 @ 08/13/2008 6:15:53 PM

      We'll have to see whether democracy actually takes in Iraq, or whether they choose Shariah law when we leave. Otherwise Americans ( especially those who do not read much ) will not come around on this idea that democracy can be exported at gunpoint.

      I've always been of the opinion that if social conditions are not such that the people are ready to fight and die seizing their own freedom, and in such numbers to preserve that freedom on an ongoing basis ( as in the case of the American Revolution ) then democracy will not take, even if we "gift" them with it through force. In reality, I believe we export democracy as a way of creating a weak state that is susceptible to western influence ( money ) and too impotent to do anything about its cannibalization at the hands of western corporations. This is not a case against democracy, but maybe one for protectionism. The USA suffers from this dynamic currently at the hands of China. Somehow I think if France decided to stop trading with us, we'd be in there tomorrow "liberating" them. Gunboat diplomacy. We opened Japanese ports with our navy back in the day. We do the same thing now in Iraq. Same **** different wrapper.

  • Posted By: jblackwell88 @ 08/13/2008 5:55:24 PM

    Well of course. The United States for decades has armed one side or another of a dozen conflicts around the globe, and most of these blow up on our faces. The reason we have a problem with Iran today is because of the Islamic Revolution - a reaction to the U.S. installed Shah. The reason we're in Iraq was to overthrow Saddam Hussein, a puppet we created to oppose the Iranians. The reason we're in the war on terror is to contain Osama Bin Laden, a man we trained to fight the Soviets in Afghanistan. Someone needs to step back and ask whether what we do in the world - i.e. having our CIA engineer political results, is working. Now here we are in Georgia, having armed, trained and encouraged this buffoon Saakashvili, who decided he'd shell civilians in a surprise attack, and throw grenades into basements full of children in the morning hours before the Olympics. And no doubt American weapons were used to start this genocide. How can any reasonable person say that we did not ENABLE this to happen? Isn't it time we re-evaluated our policies regarding foreign meddling? From what I can see we've done nothing but create new enemies in the world, cause untold thousands of deaths, saddle three generations of US taxpayers with the cost of rebuilding countries we should have never been in. All the while we keep telling ourselves "its normal" for us to have 700 military bases around the world in over 100 different countries and we refuse to deal with the fact we're being lied to by our leaders about why we're there and what we're doing. We're in Georgia now because of the PIPELINE and because we want to poke Russia in the eye. If it had anything to do with moral considerations, we'd be backing the South Ossetians for independence. Isn't freedom for everybody? Or is it only appropriate for problematic states we have an interest cannibalizing, or tearing it from someone else's economic sphere?

  • Posted By: Sickrat @ 08/13/2008 5:54:14 PM

    Some questions to Russia-bashers:
    1. Do you suggest that Georgia's sneak Olympic night attack on a sleepy town full of Russian civilians never happened? Do you suggest that Russian casualties, civilian and military, were anything but substantial that night? I've seen no news outlet to deny that; not even Mikheil Saakashvili, despite his record of chain lying, denied it, as far as I see from Western MSM.
    2. Do you suggest any self-respecting country would not come to the aid of its nationals? How many Russians have to die before it is OK to send in the cavalry?
    3. How come you deem Russia's response disproportionate given the official Georgian body count of 175 dead?
    4. Would you call a Georgian president ostensibly re-elected on a 52% vote a 'democratically elected leader' despite well-documented electoral fraud? Would you believe Texas voting 90% Obama, the way some Armenian-populated regions 'voted' for Saakashvili, although ethnic Armenians hate his guts?

  • Posted By: JohnUmana @ 08/13/2008 5:02:06 PM

    Where are you, President Bush and Senator McCain? Why, Messrs. Bush/McCain, did you allow this situation to develop with Russia brutally attacking a U.S. ally and bombing civilian targets while our President partied with Putin at the Olympics? Now we hear tough words from the two of you. Yet it was apparent since the Rose revolution in 2004 that this area was a tinderbox and needed to be watched closely -- meaning before Russia attacked Georgia. Is this the way to spread democracy, by abandoning a U.S. ally while celebrating with Putin in Beijing? Even today after the cease fire was made, Russian tanks and paramilitaries nonetheless rolled into the Georgian city of Gori violating the truce. "Yesterday, I heard Sen. McCain say, "We are all Georgians now,"" Georgian president Saakashvili said on CNN"s American Morning. "Well, very nice, you know, very cheering for us to hear that, but OK, it"s time to pass from ... words to deeds." Georgia has been an area to watch carefully especially after the Rose Revolution brought pro-Western President Mikhail Saakashvili to power in 2004. How could you miss this? Moscow has strongly opposed Georgia's efforts to become part of NATO. How could you two men not know this? While our president partied with Putin, you allowed Russia to attack a U.S. ally, which was close to becoming a member of NATO, under cover of Olympic festivities. Senator, is this the "experience" that you believe qualifies you to be President?

  • Posted By: JohnUmana @ 08/13/2008 4:59:56 PM

    Where are you, President Bush and Senator McCain? Why, Bush/McCain, did you allow this situation to develop with Russia brutally attacking a U.S. ally and bombing civilian targets while our President partied with Putin at the Olympics? Now we hear tough words from the two of you. Yet it was apparent since the Rose revolution in 2004 that this area was a tinderbox and needed to be watched closely -- meaning before Russia/Putin invaded Georgia. Is this the way to spread democracy, by abandoning a U.S. ally while celebrating with Putin in Beijing? Even today after the cease fire was made, Russian tanks and paramilitaries nonetheless rolled into the Georgian city of Gori violating the truce. "Yesterday, I heard Sen. McCain say, "We are all Georgians now,"" Georgian president Saakashvili said on CNN"s American Morning. "Well, very nice, you know, very cheering for us to hear that, but OK, it"s time to pass from ... words to deeds." Georgia has been an area to watch carefully especially after the Rose Revolution brought pro-Western President Mikhail Saakashvili to power in 2004. How could you miss this? Moscow has strongly opposed Georgia's efforts to become part of NATO. How did you two men not know this? While our president partied with Putin, you allowed Russia to attack a U.S. ally, which was close to becoming a member of NATO, under cover of Olympic festivities. Senator, is this the kind of "experience" that you say qualifies you to be President?

  • Posted By: Loden Green @ 08/13/2008 4:56:33 PM

    I'm not worried. "Jingo John" McCain will slap those Russians down once he gets in office. Nuke'em, John.

  • Posted By: nawawimohamad @ 08/13/2008 6:18:42 AM

    The conflict in Georgia and around the rest of the world are all due to the US. The US convinced that it is the sole so-called 'superpower' thought it can do anything in this world as it likes and becoming more and more big-headed as if other nations are weak and their citizens are not human. Russia has responded. Come on, the US is the problem and the cancer afflicting the world. Dear Americans, wake up and get treatment before it is too late.

    • Posted By: PresidentSupporter @ 08/13/2008 4:28:33 PM

      Sure, and the US is to blame for world hunger, AIDS in Africa and every other damn thing you want to pin on it. The world is just a poor blameless place under attack by the evil US empire. Poor little world. Get a life dude.

    • Posted By: onepoker @ 08/13/2008 10:02:20 AM

      f*ck You. We had nothing to do with this.

    • Posted By: metzlerd @ 08/13/2008 6:39:45 AM

      I don't think the U.S. leaders are without some blame here, but you can't put all the blame on the U.S. Russia invaded Georgia. Georgia sent its military into disputed territories. Those are the facts. Those people can't excuse themselves by blaming the U.S. All countries in the West need to look inwards to find what they could have done differently. That does not excuse Russia or Georgia.

  • Posted By: gtwntx @ 08/12/2008 11:44:07 AM

    Hey Michael Hirsch, I bet you are one of those that blames the US of A for the 911 attacks, also. What a shame we can't take you and others of the same persuasion and ship you to Russia where you belong.

    • Posted By: langs13 @ 08/13/2008 6:58:20 AM

      We won't blame the US. We Blame Republicans. You supported Bin Laden. you gave Saddam wepons and turned a blind eye as he massacred his enemies. Bush gave the Taliban over a 100 million dollars.
      Bush was in talks with the Taliban about oil pipe line going through Afghanastan. When the deal went bad. Boom 9/11.
      Which political party in America considers the Suadis our friends. GOP.
      Who has family ties to the Bin Ladens. Bush.

      With firends like the Republicans America will alwys have enemies.

      So if you wnat to call a Republican an American I guess you can say Hirch is blaming Ameircans.

      i would argue the GOP are not our frineds and are actaully America's biggest enemy.

      The terrorist supporting party.

      • Posted By: PresidentSupporter @ 08/13/2008 4:21:43 PM

        You need to lay off the X Files and get a grip on reality. What a paranoid bunch of rambling nonsense you posted!

  • Posted By: LeoDeo @ 08/13/2008 4:13:24 PM

    We are all Iraqis, Chinese, Georgians, Americans, and them Micronesians too

  • Posted By: LeoDeo @ 08/13/2008 4:11:41 PM

    Suckmyshwili told little Ossetia to saakashvili , but Mother Russia , Cut his Saakashvili in half. Saakashvilis daddy Bushy Bush told Mother Russia not to cut his sons Saakashvili off or he'd tell the world what kind of a Bitch she is. But Bushy Bush knows that without Mother Russia , he can't protect his behind from Armageddon from Iran.

    China doesn't care it's got Olympics on the air.

  • Posted By: Omaar @ 08/13/2008 3:09:09 PM

    Source: www.reuters.com

    Sakashvilli is a Napoleonic Maniac and is getting what he Desrves and the Georgian Nation, should Oust him !!

    No American, should Lay down their Flesh, Bone, Blood and Spirit, for sakashvilli or his Ambitious Regime, that set this whole Fiasco up, in the 1st place. Sakashvilli started this Strife, let him deal with the Consequences of his Actions !!!

    Sakashvilli: Miscalculated what he Thought, America would do for him. He tried to get us involved in a Big Mess, knowing all the Issues America was confronting, Iraq, Afghanistan, Our World Standing, Domestic issues and so on. America should Realize now, that Sakashvilli is a Loose Canon, a Devious and Overly Ambitous Man, that will do Anything, for his own Political Ascention, above all else. No American should lay down their Lives for that Ruler or his People. It was "Unthinkable" that the Sakashvilli and his Georgian Nation thought that they could (Retake Osettia) with Russian Peace Keepers already established in Osettia , an with Reinforcements at it's very call !!!

    Despite warnings by President George W. Bush for Russia to "Reverse the Course it appears to be on" and withdraw its Troops to avert a "Dramatic and Brutal Escalation" of Violence," U.S. military intervention in the small former Soviet republic is nearly unthinkable, analysts said on Monday.

    There also is little Washington can do diplomatically to restrain the Russians, according to foreign policy experts.

    "Let me say at this point that there are no good solutions. Either we have to try to remove them (the Russians) by force or accept a humiliating defeat," said Dimitri Simes, founding president of the Nixon Center in Washington.

    "It is not a happy situation, and we did not have to have this situation, and I think the (Bush) Administration has Considerable Responsibility for that."

    Georgian forces entered separatist South Ossetia last week, trying to retake the pro-Russian enclave that broke away in the 1990s. Moscow, which supports South Ossetia's independence, responded by sending its troops into Georgia proper.

    Georgia has appealed for international intervention and pulled its battered forces back to defend the capital, Tbilisi, as Russian troops pushed deeper into its territory, ignoring Western pleas to halt.

    Big Note: Simes said U.S. encouragement of Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili, one of Washington's staunchest allies, may have led him to believe he could Get Away With Military Action to (Take Back Control of South Osettia)


  • Posted By: Omaar @ 08/13/2008 3:02:23 PM


    Source: www.reuters.com

    Titled: US has very Few Options


    The Bush administration has pushed hard for Georgia to join NATO, against European misgivings and Russian fury at the idea.

    Big Note: "Saakashvili was discouraged from attacking Russian troops in South Ossetia but he clearly never was told point blank 'If you do it, you are on your own,'" said Moscow-born Simes, who was an informal adviser to President Richard Nixon.

    'SAKASHVILLI'S, MISCALCULATION' !!!

    Charles Kupchan of the Council on Foreign Relations, agreed that U.S. encouragement may have made Saakashvili "miscalculate" and send Georgian troops into South Ossetia.

    "I think in many respects Saakashvili got too close to the United States and the United States got too close to Saakashvili," Kupchan said. "It made him overreach, it made him feel at the end of the day that the West would come to his assistance if he got into trouble."

    Bush told Russia on Monday to reverse course or risk jeopardizing relations with the United States.

    But Washington has limited leverage over Moscow after years of strained relations on a range of issues from Iraq to the United States' insistence on placing missile defenses in Europe, the analysts said.

    The next U.S. president will inherit that chilly relationship. Both presidential candidates -- Republican John McCain and Democrat Barack Obama -- have called for diplomacy to resolve the conflict over Georgia's breakaway regions.

    "When you have very thin relations, it doesn't give you a lot of diplomatic tools," said Steven Pifer, a former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine who is now a visiting fellow at the Brookings Institution. "There are not a lot of things in terms of U.S.-Russian cooperation that we can threaten to stop, that the Russians care about."


  • Posted By: Omaar @ 08/13/2008 3:00:44 PM

    Source: www.thehuffingtonpost.com

    The Russian ambassador to the United Nations, Vitaly Churkin told CNN his country is seeking details on what started the fighting.

    "We do not want to believe that the United States has given a green light to this adventurous act," he said. "But our American colleagues are telling us that they're investigating now what may have happened in the channels of communication for Mr. Saakashvili to have behaved in such a "RECKLESS MANNER."

    President Bush, one day earlier, had called the Russian invasion unacceptable, and on Tuesday the Russian president assailed the West for supporting Georgia. "International law doesn't envision double standards," Medvedev said.

    U.S. officials were focused on confirming a cease-fire and attending to Georgia's urgent humanitarian needs.

    "The Russians need to stop their military operations as they have apparently said that they will, but those military operations really do now need to stop because calm needs to be restored," Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said.

    A U.S. senior defense official in Washington said the U.S. has decided to dump a major NATO naval exercise with Russia that was scheduled to begin Friday.

    Georgia, which is pushing for NATO membership, borders the Black Sea between Turkey and Russia and was ruled by Moscow for most of the two centuries preceding the 1991 breakup of the Soviet Union.

    South Ossetia and Abkhazia have run their own affairs without international recognition since fighting to split from Georgia in the early 1990s. Both separatist provinces are backed by Russia, which appears open to absorbing them.

    Medvedev said Georgia must allow the provinces to decide whether they want to remain part of Georgia.

    "Ossetians and Abkhaz must respond to that question taking their history into account, including what happened in the past few days," Medvedev said grimly.

    Medvedev said Russian peacekeepers would stay in both provinces, even as Saakashvili said his government will officially designate them as occupying forces.

    In Tbilisi, U.S. Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Matthew Bryza declined to say whether the U.S. would provide military support if Russia expands its assault.

    Georgia sits on a strategic oil pipeline carrying Caspian crude to Western markets and bypassing Russia. The British oil company BP shut down one of three Georgian pipelines, saying it was a precaution.


  • Posted By: JoanR @ 08/13/2008 9:54:45 AM

    The message is quite clear. Putin has no intention of voluntarily ceding his personal power and Russian Imperialism is back on the table. So be it.Lets recognize that the Cold War has restarted and act accordingly. The US can start by giving material assistance to the separatist groups in Russia itself, since the Russians are so fond of separatism, they certainly won't mind.Next we can both work on alternative energy AND drill so as to devalue Putin's only asset.The Russian government has never diversified and remains an economic basket case depencddependent on high oil prices.

    • Posted By: C. MacLean @ 08/13/2008 10:40:29 AM

      It isn't Russian Imperialism that is back, it's U.S. Imperialism. If the Cold War has re-started, it is because we started it, not the Russians. They are acting accordingly, and predictably - did we really think we could put missles in Poland and NOT have the Russians react? Typical American arrogance and hubris - we reap what we sow.

      And we have absolutely no moral high ground here - WE invaded Iraq, for no legitimate reason, and the Russians and the rest of the world has been unhappy with us ever since. We don't get to chastize Russia for invading Georgia.

      Just as in the 30's, when the biggest capitalist economy was on its knees due to gross mismanagement, the rest of the world got restless and hungry. Once again we are in an economic spin, and the rest of the world is getting antsy.

      If we truly want to remain a super power, we need to take care of business at home. Other countries don't behave so boldly when the perceive us as strong, but when the perceive us as being in domestic turmoil, we invite this kind of behavior. (Strike now, while the US is preoccupied, and maybe they won't notice).

      And lest we forget, the Japanese bombed us at Pearl Harbor because we put an embargo on their oil; they couldn't get the oil they needed to run their country. We are in Iraq because of oil, and Europe is nervous about Russia in part because they are depending on Russian oil.

      ITS THE OIL, STUPID!!!!! Forget drilling; more oil will not help us stabilize the future. We need alternative energy, and we need it now.

      • Posted By: Omaar @ 08/13/2008 2:55:11 PM

        You are 90% Right in your Assessment.

        But Nigeria, Angola, Libya and other African Countries supply Us with Oil & Big Oil Corporations, have gotten away Ignoring the African Plight, while Profiting off their Misery, that has to and is going to Change Soon.

        The USA, for now has gotten away with using Africa by Exploitation and Profiteering of Africa's Natural Resources (Oil, Diamonds & Rubber Trees) in particular and Corrupt So Called African Leaders, but the Chinese and Russians are in Africa, Especially the (Chinese) and they are putting MONEY and ACTION berhind their Ambitions opposed to the USA.

        America & Europe has Ignored Africa, which would be a Great Ally to have in the Coming Years, but they treat the Continent like NOTHING....

        Note: China in particular is going to Improve the Economic Infrastructure & Conditions of Africa in Times to come and when the World SEES the Improvements and Progression of Africa, as you now SEE what has happened in China...

        America will have No Answers or Europe, for what they hav'nt Accomplished in Africa.

        As Big & Rich as that Continent is in Discovered and Undiscovered Resources and we have yet to Fully Explore or Discover all the Natural and Historical Resources the African Continent has to Offer, China in particular will be the Beneficiaries, because America and Europe, Exploited and Allowed and Accepted all this Corrupt African Leader's and their Overlording Tyranny for YEARS, while they MADE GREAT PROFITS from Africa's Abundance in Natural Resources..

        America, Canada, Europe, Australia, New Zealand and all other European Nations that have Profited from Africa's Misery, will REGRET IT IN THE FUTURE.

        EVERYTHING HAPPENS IN CYCLES, PHASES AND DIFFERENT STAGES, EVERYTHING IS CYCLICAL, THAT IS WHY AMERICA AND EUROPE SHOULD HELP REBUILD AFRICA AND MAINTAIN A MILITARY PRESENCE THERE LIKE IN JAPAN AND KOREA, STILL PROFIT, BUT A GOOD PORTION MUST GO TO THE AFRICAN INFRASTRUCTURE AND INVESTMENT IN AFRICA'S FUTURE OR ANOTHER SUPER POWER WILL DO IT, FOR YOU AND THIER ALLEGIANCE WILL BE TO THAT COUNTRY OPPOSED TO THE USA & EUROPE.

        EVERYTHING HAPPENS IN CYCLES, PHASES AND STAGES....EVERYTHING, THE NATIONS THAT ARE ON TOP NOW, WILL NOT BE IN THE FUTURE, WITHOUT WISE, SOUND AND COMMITED INVESTMENT.

      • Posted By: JoanR @ 08/13/2008 12:54:21 PM

        If you insist on using historical analogy learn some history. The oil Embargo on Japan came after its peace loving military government invaded and occupied China while the League of Nations harrumphed and did nothing.As for the Iraq comparison, only the very ignorant or morally blind are able to put a genocidal dictator and his crime family on the smae basis as a democratically elected government.So I will leave that to you

        • Posted By: C. MacLean @ 08/13/2008 1:11:41 PM

          That must make us ignorant or morally blind, since we have managed to ignore every recent African genocidal dictator, but felt it necessary to invade Iraq. Could it be that, except for Nigeria, Africa has no oil, so we don't care?

          We pick and choose who we invade, who we embargo, and who we ignore, based on our own interests, not on any high moral ground. We have no business chastizing Russia when they act based on their self-interests, particularly when we are part of their problem in the first place.

          I stand by my original premise: Russia is no more facist or imperialistic than we are. If we wish to avoid collision with Russia - a big 'if'' - the Cheneys and McCains would love it if we were back in the Cold War - we need to clean up our own house first.

  • Posted By: GoRight @ 08/13/2008 2:32:50 PM

    I'm positive that Michael also is on the smae rhetoric bandwagon that we provoked OBL to bomb the Towers. Please do everyone a favor and leave America and go live in Russia, Cuba or anywhere else that suits you better. And take Pelosi with you.

  • Posted By: CollosalDreams @ 08/13/2008 1:37:18 PM

    Oh please Michael Hirsh has written in almost every one of his articles about foreign policy that we shouldn't have made waves or we should essentially hide under a rock. He is completely unrealistic. If America did that you think this wouldn't have happened? Russia would have taken more countries by now. Russia has been displaying aggressive behavior for years and using the 'American Threat' as propaganda to unite the Russian people. It's a typical communist strategy. Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez has been doing the same thing. Hugo has said numerous times the US is ready to invade his country and will happen any moment. He???s got the people ready for war. We don't even have enough armament down there to take over a small town. Putin knows exactly what he is doing. He is sneaky, patient, ambitious, and dangerous. His ambitions need to be contained.

  • Posted By: teco_ea @ 08/13/2008 11:56:32 AM

    The parallel between Georgia and Taiwan is all too aptly drawn, and it brings to light an additional point of caution: while the US may do well to take a less antagonistic tone towards Russia, backing down entirely would send entirely the wrong message to other rising powers, namely China. If Russia is allowed to feel it can get away with attacking and then withdrawing from a sovereign, democratic nation just to prove a point, what???s to stop China from feeling it can use the same tactic to assert its clout by attacking Taiwan?

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse