Is Seeing Believing?

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: MoCuishle119 @ 08/17/2008 9:40:39 PM

    Hee, nowadays not only photojournalists are trustless. Those journalists with pens are trustless too. Remember those who often quote "unidentified" sources of words? Who are responsible to regular these journalists to ensure there "sources" are truely exsiting?

    And even those journalists with "Voice". Do ppl know that BBC has been fined many times becaused of their using "faked" audio interviews to mislead the audience?

  • Posted By: SPORTLOCK09 @ 08/15/2008 10:28:14 AM

    This article is hilarious. They actually think it's photojournalism that is losing it's credibility? lmao How about journalism itself, would seem to be the better wording. 9 times out of 10 you can look for the same story using different resources and you have 2 completely different stories. Biasedness biasedness biasedness is all the American public can count on anymore.

  • Posted By: snoopie @ 08/15/2008 10:21:34 AM

    You have got to be kidding... you guys actually took the Montauk Monster as anything other than a very funny hoax? Geez... no wonder this country is in the state that it is in.

  • Posted By: tagelejon @ 08/15/2008 7:22:59 AM

    Have you not notice what the Mega stars have been doing for ages:

    Madonna dyed her hair to make a Latin to a true blond, and
    Michael Jackson dyed his skin to a full-fledged white?

    And what about the huge breast of Dolly, isn't that fill with some
    synthetic material?

    And no one thing these are so peculiar as they, like anybody else,
    have the right to do what they like to raise the quality of their performance

    And what is your point to make such a bullshit talk here, with your false
    innocence and dignity?

    • Posted By: Yuseff @ 08/15/2008 9:33:13 AM

      I think Dolly's are real. She's been that big for decades, before the age of implants.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse