A Personality Referendum

All of this BS and name calling and emotional garbage trying to justify a position should become obvious as being meaningless rationalizations and literally desperate attempts to qualify a biased opinion when the debates start and the real issues, personality and character of each candidate becomes apparent. Hopefully people will be objective and rational enough to see and understand the truth.

I think that many of Obama's supporters began supporting him when they knew nothing about him, and now that they've invested so much of themselves in the "change" he pretended to represent, there is just no turning back for them. No, they will not let information which does not support their image of this man intrude upon their dreams. I blame Obama for this, more than his supporters. He knew he was perpetrating a terrible hoax on the voters of this country from the start. He knew the kinds of ruthless tactics he had used from the beginning to jumpstart his political career. He knew about his dubious associations and how they flew in the face of his calls for "change" and "unification." He knew about the racist theology to which he subscribed for 20 years, and how destructive such ideas are to the progress of race relations in this country. No, I do not place primary blame for our current unfortunate situation on his supporters; I place it squarely on Obama, who has shown an almost criminal lack of concern about the damage his tactics have done not only to the Democratic Party, but more importantly, to relations between the races about which, ironically, he professes to care so much.

Reading this stuff is like reading a table of contents at a cesspool. Everyone seems to love the negatives and rationalizing their value. If people vote based on this crap then we deserve no better than Bush-Cheney.

The sheen is finally coming off, now the electorate is looking for real substance, no more rock star mania.
The problem with many undicided votes is both candidates seens so dull and has little to offer with respect to 'bread and butter' issues.
Obama supporters have being antagonizing Hillary supporters to the extreme, this definitely is not good for party unity. And as can be seen from the latest polls Obama needs every single vote possible in order to defeat McCain in November.
Whereas the candidates may feel that by obtaining their party nomination ,it is all now easy sailing, I want to bring them back to realty - the 'game' is now begining.

interesting. Who needs Corsi when you have BAIPA?[The Born Alive Infants Protection Act.Illinois State Legislature,2003]. Those who are just now figuring out that BAIPA is not a Slavic soft drink,are now discussing why ''pro-choicers' ',feel that even babies delivered post-birth are not worthy of medical protection.
This is a real problem for Obama,since he helped create it. McCain gets nailed by the evangelical wing for his position on abortion,yet we will remind the audience[as helpfully provided by NEWSWEAK ],that he hews to the ROE decision.
Yet where in that USSC decision does it mention anything about removing a healthy first-fetus,then baby,from an equally healthy mother and then killing it OUTSIDE of the womb? And then botching even this? Even the barbaric argument of ''dilation and extraction''[DxX] does not apply here.
It is incredible that Democrats,most forcefully,Obama,while still a state senator,would believe that no protections for life exist OUTSIDE of the womb in an immediate post-birth condition. Hence the eerie quiet eminating from his side while the conservatives temporarily chuck Corsis book,and go on the offensive against Obama in this critical area.
It is due to the fact that history accurately records not only Obamas votes regarding BAIPA,but his own remarks made on the floor of the state legsiature [backing the ACLU,which has cowardly refused to enter into a REAL 'civil liberty'',this being,the right to own lawfully-recognized handguns in the District of Columbia,the very center of the USSC HELLER decision],which blocked a condition that ROE did not allow. This being,the killing of an infant beyond the Third Trimester,in a medical event which did not see danger to the health of the mother or pre-birth fetus in any form,either 'mental'' nor physical. Even liberals,who point to Ted Kennedy and Hillary Clintons support of such a protective bill in the US Senate[where Obama STILL voted ''nay''], now say that ''the conservatives will have a field-day over this one'',as the pro-lifers have indeed,now found Obamas ''smoking gun''. The Catholics which Obama has been trying to woo are now arraying themselves against Obama,most recently,in a devastating piece in yesterdays Catholic News Agency[:Evidence Shows Obama Misrepresents His Opposition To BAIPA'']

Damned straight.

The Born Alive Infants Protection Act [BAIPA],
www.ilga/gov/protection/fulltext/asp.

The American Thinker,Apr.18,2008:''When Will We Admit The Truth About Barack Obama ?''

Bringing up family law suits, Howard Dean calling the Republicans the 'white' party, 'Swiftboat' authors again active, McCain first saying his low class attacks are 'just humorous' and then condoning them by saying 'I'm not going to address that', what happened to the class that both candidates said their campaigns would maintain? One starts it and the other follows. Aren't there enough issues and positions to dwell on or do they simply want all of the garbage to just cloud over what is important? No sense blaming one over the other, lets just give credit to anyone that gets it back on track. They could start by denouncing the classless attacks being done on their behalf. After eight years with Bush it sure would be nice to have a President with some class for a change!