INTERNATIONAL

A New Ice Age?

The West's weak response to Russian aggression is triggering concerns about a new cold war.

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Glenno @ 10/01/2008 1:19:31 AM

    I know how we can punish the Russians for defending themselves... We can break previous agreements with them and expand NATO up to their borders, then we can bomb and dismember their friends like Serbia. We can build pipelines going around Russia. We can reduce Russian influence by not giving citizenship or voting rights to Russian minorities in the Baltics. How about breaking international law and ignoring Russia by declearing independence for Kosovo? Then we can undermine manipulate elections through "supporting the democratic process" and stage colour coded revolutions in Ukraine and Georgia and turn their friends against them. Next step we could of course undermine democracy by pushing NATO on Ukraine even though 2/3 dont want it in Ukraine. Or how about arming and training the satelite state Georgia to attack Russia and slaughter Russians citizens in their sleep? After this is done we can let our free unbias western media air videos of Czechoslovakia in 1968 and other ridiculous comparisons instead of reporting the facts. Well, as this is what we are doing to Russia when they are our "friend", we seem to have run out ways to punish them. Or maybe we should keep following Brzezinski's strategy to break Russia into 3 smaller states so they can be contained? I really hate it when Russia doesnt follow our gameplan, it is obvious that they do not share our values of democracy, peace and freedom

  • Posted By: MrLatvia @ 09/05/2008 8:46:07 PM

    What everyone seems to forget is that Russia (whether it's called The Soviet Union, the USSR, Czarist Russia or the Gulag Republics of PooTinstan) IS and always has been a Terrorist Nation - in the 20th century it was the leading Terrorist State on the planet... remember?
    As I've said all along, Bush attacked the wrong area of the world with Weapons of Mass Destruction - duh - look who's sitting on a pile of them right next door to Europe. The 3 Stooges (Chairman Poo Tin, Dim Medvedev and a plaster-cast statue of Stalin) took on Georgia because it only has an army of 37,000 (compared to Russia's 1.1 million). Georgia is also a key in the Caucasus region - the roots of Europe... like the Chechens, the ancient Colchis & Iberian kingdoms influenced all the primary roots of European civilization. Anyway, Stalin's plan when he was a ???commissioner of the minorities??? way back in the 1920s was to eliminate ALL the tribes of Europe & replace them with Homo Sovieticus. Ya know what I mean? It's astounding that since the second Russian occupation of Chechnya (which Chairman Poo Tin ordered in 2000) the Russians still have been unable to eliminate (& conquer) those tough mountain peoples. Ingushetia (a captive nation inside Russia) has asked for help to "liberate" it from Russia - is that a hint to the EU or NATO? Or maybe Estonia, Latvia & Lithuania should become Nuclear Powers and ???liberate??? the oppressed minorities inside the federation? Did Russia open the doors (unknowingly?) to "liberating" its own captive nations by recognizing the so-called ???independence??? of Abhkazia & South Ossetia and creating "buffer zones" inside sovereign Georgia? Or is that a trap? No one has been allowed into the newly "independent" zones of occupation under complete Chairman Poo Tin control??? what is going on there? Are the army hordes being massed there for a total onslaught on Europe??? Paris??? Berlin??? Rome??? will the veterans of the Chechen genocide be allowed to rape, plunder & ravage the Continent? I mean, where else can they go? Iran? China? Let's see what kind of "buffer zones" the Chinese will carve out of Siberia... come on European Union or NATO even - get your act together and "liberate" Yakutia or Ingushetia or Chechnya or one of the other captive nations. Question the legitimacy of this rule by those 3 Stooges. Genocide is at your doorstep Europe - so what are ya gonna do about it?

  • Posted By: Emilda @ 08/25/2008 3:36:25 PM

    An interesting suggestion from Steve Levine. The Russians have a big weakness. Bush, Obama and McCain should keep in mind Russia's Achilles Heel as they deal with Putin and Medvedev. Levine knows this area, having covered wars in Chechnya, Abkhazia, South Ossetia, Nagorno-Karabakh, Tajikistan as well as the Soviet-Afghan war: http://oilandglory.com/2008/08/russias-achilles-heel.html

    • Posted By: System7 @ 08/26/2008 10:44:19 PM

      Russia and the West are interdependent. The USA attacked Iraq, and the oil price became twice greater in
      some time. The oil price became twice greater, and it is harder for Americans to pay for their houses
      that were bought by hypothec. What will happen if you don't let Russia pump its energy to the West? I
      think the oil price will become twice greater slowly again. In such a way, the West can throw hundreds of
      Americans out of their houses. Dear Emilda, have you probably bought some stocks of oil companies and try to heat the situation to take profit? Let's build peace.

  • Posted By: System7 @ 08/25/2008 7:29:41 AM

    Let's build peace. An ice age is better than a war age.

  • Posted By: tobalito49 @ 08/22/2008 4:14:32 PM

    The author declares a "reality" "that the West lacks the capacity to contain Russia in the way that it did for nearly two decades after the end of the cold war, and the invasion of Georgia signals a new era, one in which authoritarian regimes can brazenly buck the international system." The is a "reality" for several tough reasions: because the West [Europe, the US and Canada] refuse to unite as one fist militarily and put them in Georgia now. BusyJr is a limp and lame ducky and so is NATO. Secondly, power elites like BP, Exxon-Mobil, Chevron, AMOCO, continues to control the 20th century oil profiteering regime that renders foreign policy impotent. As long as the US leaves the strategic national resource of US oil in the hands of robber barons controlling energy and environmental policy instead of nationalizing it as the strategic resource it is, this will be a message that the West has not yet understood the 21st century challenge of building a new energy economy---challenging but absolutely strategically critical. And the US public should riot in front of the truly Soviet Embassy in Washington and crush the old line thinkers in the Banking Party: the Republican.

    • Posted By: Braes @ 08/23/2008 2:49:31 PM

      The country-club Bushtards are a threat to life as we know it.

  • Posted By: Biggi123 @ 08/22/2008 12:14:22 PM

    Russia has no provided us with what looks like a begining to a New Cold War... They have been extreme aggression towards Georgia and have it has made repeated threats to the US and It's European allies...

  • Posted By: Biggi123 @ 08/22/2008 12:09:45 PM

    Russia has now provided us with what looks like begining to a New Cold War... They are showering us and some of our European allies with threats...

  • Posted By: gopsux.com @ 08/19/2008 9:40:42 PM

    AFter the fall of the iron curtain in the early 90's the neo-cons go to Russian and destroy their economy with their greasy fingered economics. When their economic theories fail they run away without taking any of the responsibility. Then they set their sights on Iraq and completely destroy that country for the next 50 years. when it doesn't work they run away leaving the US taxpayer to foot the bill and let the pentagon clean up their mess. Now they are trying to get their greasy fingers in Georgia and Iran. Once again they run away like they always have since the Reagan era when things don't work out.

    I think it's fair to say the neo-cons are the world's worst enemy ,and it's time we hold them for high crimes and treason.

    • Posted By: Braes @ 08/22/2008 9:31:57 AM

      Frankly now, I want re-education camps for people with W stickers on their SUV's. Maybe we can host it at GITMO for them.

  • Posted By: valadezaj @ 08/19/2008 7:48:13 PM

    All the Russians need to do is sit back and wait until Obama becomes president. Then the US will surrender without firing a shot. Everyone better start brushing up on your Russian. :)

    • Posted By: sergem @ 08/19/2008 9:35:53 PM

      We have to admit that Russia is behind the US and NATO technologically. Although they have some advanced military hardware, Russia's army relies more on manpower than on technology. From Russian sources (http://www.izvestia.ru/armia2/article3119626/) - they complain that it was not an easy task to fight Georgia because:
      tanks didn't have night vision equipment;
      Georgia had recognizance drones (Israeli made) and Russia didn't;
      Russian GPS system (deployment started in late 1980's) didn't work.
      Russia has limited capabilities to fight conventional war but it doesn't really matter as long as they have WMD.

      • Posted By: Akmatic @ 08/20/2008 8:59:12 AM

        The Russians rolled into Georgia with the same Garbage equipment they were using when they went into Afghanistan so many years ago. Attacking small sovereign countries with overwhelming numbers is the only thing it's really good for due to their equipment being outdated and their soldiers being undisciplined and significantly under trained compared to American forces.

        They know they can't engage NATO or the US troops based in Germany in a heads up ground war b/c they would be crushed. From here on out, all you'll be seeing is empty nuclear threats b/c their army is all bark and no bite against a true modern army.

        • Posted By: Braes @ 08/22/2008 9:30:45 AM

          Ivan has mass. Ivan has depth. Ivan has 30,000,000 men fit for National Service. Ivan does not have a modern military, battlefield thinkers, a credible Air component, Air Staff, Logistics mastery, theories of manouver, etc.
          Ivan does High-diddle-diddle, run up the middle. He can easily eat Poland, or the Baltic states, on a day or time of his choosing. The Ukraine can be served up hot or cold. Ivan also has one heck of a lot of cheap good missiles. If he sticks them in our backyard, like in Venezuela, Cuba or Nicaragua... our Polish missile site will seem a poor trade for Houston, Little Rock, Shreveport, Tampa, or any other place Ivan drops a nuke on.
          Bush is an imbecile and does not know how much whoop-(expletive) he has opened up. I doubt he really cares either.

      • Posted By: Omaar @ 08/20/2008 12:42:52 PM

        BEHIND ON MILITARY TECHNOLOLGY...HA !!!

        RUSSIA IS LAUGHING AT US...WE'RE THE ONES WITH ONGOING WARS IN AFGHANISTAN AND IRAQ, WITH ALL OUR MODERN MILITARY TECHNOLOGY, WHY ARE WE STILL THERE AND THE CARNAGE CONTINUES..HUH

        RUSSIA COUL'VE FED US FILM OF THEIR DEFEAT IN AFGHANISTAN, WITH ALL OUR MILITARY, AN CUTTING EDGE TECHNOLOGY, WHY ARE WE NOT FIGHTING IN RUSSIA'S BACKYARD AND STEAMROLLING THEM INTO DEFEAT..HUH

        WE KNOW BETTER....RUSSIA HAS ONE OF THE LARGESTOF STOCKPILE MISSILES IN THE WORLD.

        YOU SIDELINE CHEERLEADING SISSY'S KEEP BELIEVING THOSE STAR WARS MOVIES, INDEPENDENT DAY WITH WILL SMITH AND JEFF GOLDBLUM...

        THE REST OF US, KNOW BETTER.

        TECHNOLGY, LARGE MILITARY NUMBERS IN BOTH IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN AND THEY STILL CONTINUE TO FIGHT BACK AND THEY STILL WON'T RUN FOR (5 YRS.)

        OH YEAH, WE'RE SUPERIOR TO THOSE 2 COUNTRIES...PUH-LEASE !!!

        SPARE ME AND THE FREE WORLD, YOUR BLIND, NAIEVE AND NARROW MINDED OPINIONS ON HOW SOPHISTICATED AND ADVANCED OUR MILITARY IS, TO THE FREE WORLD.

        NOW THROW IN CHINA, AFTER THE OLYMPICS, WE'LL HERE FROM HU JIN TAO, WHO CONFERRING WITH PUTIN AND MEDVEDEV, DAILY.

        • Posted By: Akmatic @ 08/20/2008 1:15:08 PM

          Because Iraq and Afghanistan are traditional wars or anything even remotely similar to a European theater of war between large standing armies?


  • Posted By: Glenno @ 08/21/2008 7:47:06 PM

    Conspiracy theory? Just do a simple google search and read that the US gave Ukraine about 100million to assist the "democratic process", all which went to the opposition. Interfering in other countries elections and buying another government is called a coup. Why has the US in the last years put so much pressure on Europe not to critisise the corrupt mafia regime of Georgia? why has US finded and trained most of the Georgian army?
    What Russia is doing now is brilliant, asserting its power in the region and saying to both Europe and Israel: We want partnership and friendship, we can either be your best friend or your worst enemy, it depends on if you will continue your crusade with the US on the encirclement, isolation and aggression against Russia.

    • Posted By: Braes @ 08/22/2008 9:18:12 AM

      Glenno,
      The problem is that there are monied interests that need the division to prosper. The new cold war has a far deeper economic issue, arms sales. Both Russia and the United States stand to sell significantly larger quantities of weapons ordinance and such, with a polarized world. This frankly will be better for Russia economically than the United States, but these people don't care, they'll take the increased margins and be happy.
      On the GOP side of this, Johnny MaC has really benefitted from this. It has made our Brezhnev look relevant. It has stopped the Obama campaign dead in it's tracks. Most Americans still really have no freakin idea that we are in a war of Proxies in the former Soviet Union.

  • Posted By: BrownFoxNine @ 08/21/2008 9:12:48 AM

    LOL, With Dictator Bush at the helm, I think we are looking at WW III real soon.

    RD
    www.decrypt.net.tc

    • Posted By: Braes @ 08/22/2008 9:12:22 AM

      They'll do whatever they think makes them or their masters money.

  • Posted By: nolovlost @ 08/20/2008 6:09:01 PM

    This is just what the doctor ordered for McBush...didn't someone say we needed another war for McBush to win...If the media would report more and investigate more on what McBush and his hengemen did in Georgia to make them believe we would back them ...The presidency will be owned by the Republican Party their will be no more President it will become a corporation run by CROOKS....

    • Posted By: Braes @ 08/22/2008 9:11:22 AM

      The media needs a race. The GOP knows this. They know they can just about do as they please with immunity and pardons awaiting. Jonny Macmelanoma is going to hand off the presidency to the appointed heir and do as the Shrub family mafia dictate. Most media monkeys are still competing with the Ailes mindset at Fox, as a business model, and not with the charge they have as journalists with a free press to shine light on the dark places.

  • Posted By: Texas-conservative @ 08/20/2008 1:19:22 PM

    Here's some recent histy in Georgia, for those who are interested.

    It's just wikipedia, but this is pretty accurate from what I've been able to tell from further research. The figures vary, but the ones cited here are a good average from the other estimates I have seen.

    On April 9, 1991, shortly before the collapse of the USSR, Georgia declared independence. On May 26, 1991, Zviad Gamsakhurdia was elected as a first President of independent Georgia. However, he was soon deposed in a bloody coup d'état, from December 22, 1991 to January 6, 1992. The coup was instigated by part of the National Guards and a paramilitary organization called "Mkhedrioni". The country became embroiled in a bitter civil war which lasted almost until 1995. Eduard Shevardnadze returned to Georgia in 1992 and joined the leaders of the coup ??? Kitovani and Ioseliani ??? to head a triumvirate called the "State Council".

    In 1995, Shevardnadze was officially elected as a president of Georgia. At the same time, two regions of Georgia, Abkhazia and South Ossetia, quickly became embroiled in disputes with local separatists that led to widespread inter-ethnic violence and wars. Supported by Russia, Abkhazia and South Ossetia achieved de facto independence from Georgia. More than 250,000 Georgians were ethnically cleansed from Abkhazia by Abkhaz separatists and North Caucasians volunteers (including Chechens) in 1992-1993. More than 25,000 Georgians were expelled from Tskhinvali as well, and many Ossetian families were forced to abandon their homes in the Borjomi region and move to Russia.

    Of course, this is occurring 70 years after Stalin's red army took power and overthrew the Georgian government in the early 20th century.
    Basically, the two regions want independence from Georgia, and Russia supports their separatist goals. That's like if California wanted independence from the US and Mexico supported the separatists. Wouldn't the US attempt to defeat the separatists in order to retain our sovereignty?

    • Posted By: Braes @ 08/20/2008 10:42:08 PM

      The relevant recent history is that Georgia shot up an Apartment Block with MLRS and killed people to start a war. They lost that war too. Repeatedly losing things in wars is not a smart way to pursue territorial integrity.
      I wish Texas would ask for Independence from the United States. We would not fight you. Your bumper sticker slogan-world "Texas, it's like a whole other country" could have more than it's ring of truth.

      • Posted By: Texas-conservative @ 08/21/2008 11:43:15 AM

        You certainly are hostile, Braes. My comments have basically been saying that we shouldn't all just assume America is to blame for this conflict between Geirgia and Russia. They each have their own interests in that region that don't take into account what America's strategic goals are.

        Furthermore, suggesting that Texas ask for independence shows your immaturity. Last I checked, Texans are Americans. You don't like Texas because we are not predominantly liberal or something? Or because we are intelligent and can observe world events without blaming Bush/Chaney/Condi.
        I'll be the first to admit they have made their share of mistakes, but sheesh, they aren't God, so they don't have a hand in every single thing. Other countries act in their own self-interest, whether successfully or unseccuessfully, right or wrong, just like we do.

        • Posted By: Braes @ 08/22/2008 9:06:34 AM

          No you Texan, I am from the American South, and Hate Texas, Texans and generally Bush Republicans. People like you making excuses for these criminals should go with them to their reward. People with your Neo Con mindset have destroyed our reputation, emptied our treasury, bled our military white, and left a legacy of debt, dissolution, and death.

  • Posted By: Glenno @ 08/19/2008 6:24:16 PM

    You wonder what Russia is thinking? They are thinking that the cold war never ended for the Americans. America has surrounded Russia with NATO, built US army bases along their borders soon to be supported with a missile defence system that can destroy Russia. With US puppet states commiting genocide against Russia, it is obvious what the intentions are. With US on Russias borders this is the last chance to protect their borders and re-structure & increase their nuclear arsenal to be able to retaliate against US attack. I think they should build their own rocket shield on Cuba to create some balance, set up a defence alliance with China. How did Russia plan and provoke Georgia to start a massive rocket attack on the Osettian cities to slaughter 2000 civilians in their sleep. As America has decleared war on almost the whole world finding new allies should not be too hard. Europeans should support Russia, if US wants to start ww3 I hope the war and casualities are brought to their country instead of on European soil.

    • Posted By: Big_House @ 08/19/2008 9:03:16 PM

      Russia and China already has one.... The details are always hidden... India would back Russia and China as well against "NATOUS"!

      http://archives.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/europe/07/16/missile.treaty/index.html

      http://www.iht.com/articles/2001/08/06/edbruce_ed2_.php

      http://www.radioaustralia.net.au/programguide/stories/200708/s2005128.htm

      http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=5605

      http://www.merinews.com/catFull.jsp?articleID=127244

      -DJ???. Los Angeles???.






      • Posted By: Yelyena @ 08/21/2008 4:39:14 AM

        Gays i so sorry we all are building NATOUS instead of building friendship :((

        • Posted By: Braes @ 08/21/2008 8:59:07 AM

          Me too, this hopefullly wont spin out of control into worse. Frankly, Russia needs to protect herself from these people. Bush has shown an unrestrained blood-lust and an evil desire toward confllict as a part of decisionmaking. He sees destruction as a necessary event for growth or change.

          • Posted By: Yelyena @ 08/22/2008 9:04:41 AM

            Thank you for encourages, Braes.

  • Posted By: summer4077 @ 08/21/2008 3:40:23 PM

    Isn't Russia/Georgia the same as US/Iraq? Where do we get off casting any judgment?

  • Posted By: Yelyena @ 08/20/2008 3:37:25 AM

    Guys, i've just spoken to gorgian girl. She is Russia citizen now.We are collegs. She said there was still shooting in Gorgia. She said she got info rigth from Gorgia. She said Gorgia had suffered much. And still is suffering.

    • Posted By: ljguard @ 08/21/2008 2:42:52 PM

      I think all of you are missing the real point here. The United States is no longer the SUPER POWER it once was. We have lost so much respect from the entire world that the few friendly nations we can count on are less than the fingers on one hand. Even our brother's to the north think we have lost our minds

  • Posted By: irwind @ 08/19/2008 6:24:24 PM

    The U.S. ane its EU cronies, carries minimal weight in the world. The U.S. will bring the whole world to ruination with its drive to global dominance. The French learned the sorry proce today in Afghssnistan for their blind allegiance to the U.S. Just so many times you can poke the bear with encroachments in its sphere of influence. What would happen if Russia wanted to put missiles in Mexico. One day the American's will see the sorry truth, that there's a heavy price for empire.

    • Posted By: VirginiaMac @ 08/19/2008 7:37:06 PM

      Please support your assertions with something more than hyperbole. Your opening line ???The U.S. ane (sic) its EU cronies, carries minimal weight in the world??? is about the most deluded comment that could have possibly been made! What kind of bizarro world do you live in? America???s interests have certainly been challenged in the Georgia crisis, but Russia acting in Russian interests should not be a surprise, and as Russia reasserts herself as a Great Power, I expect there will be plenty more areas of conflict!

      • Posted By: Braes @ 08/20/2008 11:40:48 AM

        The challenge is that the stupid idiot we left guarding 3 pipelines, Saakashvili, got suckered into a shooting war he could not win. What an unstable idiot. He risked all of the oil to get a war he couldn't win with an enemy that is always right next door and will be there forever. Instead of doubling-down on stupid, or claiming we are all now Georgians to appease a campaign lobbyist, maybe we should not have let this happen. You know he had to ask. Since Shrub43 was out of town, and Condi was off vacationing, what did Cheney say when he got the call from Saak? Go on ahead and get the project started? Start the October-suprise early?
        Republicans have run the National Security boogieman at the Democrats since 1960, and since they have cried wolf and terror coded us into no longer believing them at all on their conflated oil-islamophobia wars, they needed the Russian boogieman now more than ever. A GOP big-wig stated McCain would win with a war, has Georgia's registered loobyist writing his foreign policy... just too much circumstance to be circumstantial. The GOP thrives on fear, and has always appealed to baser elements of discourse. Atwater/Rove/Bush family. Going back to granddaddy and the "Businessmens Plot" against FDR, trading with the German enemy, etc... they have never missed an opportunity to do the families business with the means of the state, or against them.
        (And to think these sort had the audacity with such a pedigree of treason, to have impeached Clinton over folly.)

        • Posted By: Texas-conservative @ 08/20/2008 1:05:04 PM

          Saakashvili was elected president by a majority of his fellow Georgian citizens during the rose revolution where the citizens decided they wanted Georgia to be free of Russia's influence/domination...like many other former soviet countries have done after having been brutally conquerrred by Stalin/Lenin and the Soviet empire.

          • Posted By: Braes @ 08/20/2008 10:36:17 PM

            Oh like elections make a Democracy, or an ally. Like elections are clean and fair, and an antibiotic for all social ills. 1. I don't trust the color revolutions to have been anything other than CIA projects. 2. I don't expect shills for administration policy to get the damger of jerking around in Ivan's backyard, after all, you usually send others kids off to die.
            Mr Elected started a war. If you want to go save Mr. Elected you can book a Lufthansa flight and get connections to Tblisi. Ivan will eat you. Ivan is going to eat Saakashvili. Condi will whimper in the U.N. about Russian agression.
            Maybe if she had been worth a crap she could have acted to head off any of the failures that have beset this administration. Like the project here in Georgia. It sure looks like a stage managed event for your boy Johnny MaC.
            As for the Bush family on the whole, scum. Since you can find Wiki, look up Business Plot. It runs in their blood.

            • Posted By: Texas-conservative @ 08/21/2008 12:25:32 PM

              I looked Business Plot up and it says a BBC documentary says Prescott may have been involved.
              I see you are very much into conspiracy theories.
              1. color revolutions as CIA projects (incidentally, we do have an interest in converting cold war enemies into allies)
              2. Business Plot (the last sentence in the entire wikipedia article added the Prescott information. For all I know, you added that yourself. Your anti-bush rhetoric rather than addressing facts could certainly lead one to believe such)
              3. Georgia's recent actions were to get McCain elected (absurd)

              Do you wear a tin foil hat?

  • Posted By: Texas-conservative @ 08/19/2008 5:33:54 PM

    It's amazing to me how many comments blame America for this conflict. Perhaps Russia was acting in its own self-interest. They objected to the oil pipe-line that traverses Georgia because they don't receive any revenue. Putin himself said the greatest tragedy of the 20th century was the break-up of the Soviet Union.
    Were the Russians building up troops near S.O.?
    The 2 breakaway regions of Georgia are internationally recognized to be part of Georgia, not part of Russia and not independent. Why do the Georgian citizen's have Russian citizenship? Could it be so that the Russians have an excuse to invade Georgia in their so-called "defense"?
    Was Georgia trying to prevent a region of their country from building closer ties and gaining support from Russia and separating?
    Would we be saying the same thing if Pakistan were to send in forces to the northern frontier to battle the taliban, who also vie for a change in government?

    While it is possible that America could have some level of responsibiltiy (we are trying to create and support our allies/making allies out of cold war enemies), what amazes me is that so many here want to blame America for everything bad that happens in the world. There are other leaders and poeple who have their own strategic goals and timeline for accomplishing them. They couldn't care less about Bush or liberty.

    • Posted By: Braes @ 08/20/2008 11:12:42 AM

      Waving the flag, or bloody shirt, is easy. Figuring out why is rough. The United States let their client start a war. Details matter. Georgia or proxies also set off a bomb on the beach in the Sochi area on the night the Olympics started. That was an attack inside Russia proper. I have seen the pictures, very gruesome, and I and gruesome are old buddies.
      Now, if some adversarial nation parked in one of my great lakes, and began a military misadventure in Milwaukee and Chicago... Texans would be heading up there to kill all of the invaders, most of the Canadians, and anyone without a Confederate sticker or flag identifying them as friendly to the cause. (Kind of like S. Ossetian irregulars... until the Russian 58th sobered up and found the keys to all the armor up the road...)
      Ivan had those troops up the road because a couple of wars were fought there against Chechen seperatists, who rearmed through the Pankisi george, which leads to their Kist cousins in Georgia. (Not our Georgia that has Atlanta there young Sherman... this is their Georgia, was their Georgia, and going to be theirs...) So Ivan has had a numbered Army goup in the neighborhood for almost 20 years now just to keep a lid on what we have been jerking around in.
      So, Blame America First? No. But when we do manage to completely blow it, and obviously make a naked play in an oil rich area risking half of Europes energy for some marginal political gain, people are going to call you on it. The first Republican president said you can't fool all of the people all of the time. You can't steal all of the oil either. Or threaten everyone with nukes or missiles, etc.
      It's not just possible that America had a hand in this, we have been driving it. You just don't get it.

      • Posted By: Texas-conservative @ 08/20/2008 12:32:26 PM

        Braes, it's always amusing to read conspiracy theories. Where you mostly lose credibility is your anti-republican (McCain) speculation in your respinse to Ilia above and your belief that we are stealing oil.
        Where is all this oil that we've stolen? The liberal media and marxist politicians in congress succeed too often in their use of false propaganda for political gain.

        By the way, in Texas, where I have lived for all 39 years of my life, I've probably seen a dozen confederate flags in my life. So if that was a "southern" jab, it came across as ignorance.

        • Posted By: Braes @ 08/20/2008 10:16:05 PM

          Ok so you have lousy eyesight, and like Oil. The Black and Caspian Sea basins are full of oil and Georgia sits between them. Oil. You know, the kind Bushies invade people to take under false pretenses. (Iraq)
          And yes, we are stuck with oil for a while.
          Marxists in Congress? No, Fascists in the executive branch.

          • Posted By: Texas-conservative @ 08/21/2008 12:00:17 PM

            Let's see, Facists are authoritarian, oppose laissez-faire capitalism, oppose globalism in favor of nationalism. Fascism also operated from a Social Darwinist view of human relations. Their aim was to promote "superior" individuals and weed out the weak.

            I for one am neither marxist or fascist. I believe in limited government as defined by the Constitution, lower taxes, and a free market capitalist economy with minimal subsidizing or bailing out (which unfortunately has been happening all to often lately).

    • Posted By: Daekler @ 08/20/2008 2:30:18 PM

      Why do we (the U.S.A.) have this quixotic notion that it's our duty to spread freedom to the rest of the world? Moreover, why do we feign indignant when Russia calls what we're doing for what it is - western imperialism. We are making our industrial defense complex very happy while making the world a much more dangerous place to live. I really wished that after the debacle in Iraq, Bush would've been smart enough to into the night...quietly.

    • Posted By: ilia25 @ 08/19/2008 5:50:26 PM

      "Would we be saying the same thing if Pakistan were to send in forces to the northern frontier to battle the taliban, who also vie for a change in government?" -- no, it would not.

      South Ossetians never tried to change the government on Georgia, nor they tried to terrorize people in a neighbouring country.
      Instead, South Ossetia declared its independence from Georgia 20 years ago and since then it was effectively independent. Georgians had no business trying to convince them otherwise with tanks and heavy artillery.

  • Posted By: manoflamancha @ 08/21/2008 9:28:07 AM

    This article was one of the worst I've ever read... How can Russia be 'aggressively' 'invading' Georgia when it was Georgia who aggressively invaded Russia. It's articles like these which are poorly researched and only seek to inflame the American populace. What cause does America have with Georgia? Why is humanitarian aid being flown in by Air Force Jets and Naval ships? Why is America so quick to instigate war on Russia? (We were the ones who supplied and trained the Georgian Army prior to the invasion of Russia.)

    This writer's response to the Georgia-Russia conflict expresses the same attitude and thinking that got us in Iraq - a country we got involved with without clear cause for instigating conflict!

    This article is more nationalistic warmongering than serious journalism. Next time, don't instigate and provide a balanced approach rather than your own political opinions dressed in the charade of journalism.

  • Posted By: Daekler @ 08/20/2008 2:23:15 PM

    Not to sound like a conspiracy theorist, but I'm sure the news regarding the U.S.-Russian stand-off is just great news to the vast "Inductrial Defense Complex"...

    • Posted By: Braes @ 08/21/2008 9:10:19 AM

      It's not a conspiray there, but a biproduct. The conspiracy is in the control of the worlds oil, I believe. The strategic goal is economic control of energy assets. I am going to laugh if Russia spanks those pipelines then follows by denominating all energy trades in Russia in Euros. That will collapse the current market schema and end US hegemony, which can only operate with the U.S. dollar control.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse