Anatomy of a Tight Race

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Dennis in Denver @ 08/22/2008 6:16:03 PM

    The more people learn about EgObama, the more they are ready to elect him to be Katie Couric's replacement on the CBS Evening News as a talking head. While he will win that race, McCain will be our next president. The "smoke and mirrors" EgObama campaign is being "smoked" out as voters learn more and more disturbing things about EgObama.

    • Posted By: lvbartman @ 08/23/2008 12:51:51 AM

      Take your oh-so-clever name calling to the schoolyard with the rest of the 6 year olds, whose maturity level you reflect so well.

    • Posted By: raddave @ 08/22/2008 7:28:12 PM

      You mean more distorted things.

  • Posted By: busby @ 08/22/2008 1:37:57 PM

    Eleanor, for those of us former Clinton supporters who have already made up our minds, I find the democratic attitude that we will all see "the light" after the Clintons speak is insulting. We're not morons, we have brains, and for whatever reasons, we have decided for whom we are going to vote. And although most of us have high regard for the Clinton's service, that does not mean that we will do as we are told like a bunch of lemmings. So keep your hopes high for your candidate but don't count on us.

    • Posted By: Lightseeker @ 08/22/2008 2:48:01 PM

      I am another former Clinton supporter who has no intention on voting for Obama -- I've even changed my party affiliation from Democrat to Independent, as has my sister and sister-in-law. We are out there and will not be taken for granted. The Democrats have lost it this year if they think we will march lockstep behind the Obama train -- there is NOTHING there -- on WORDS of CHANGE and HOPE.

      • Posted By: Former Texas Democrat @ 08/22/2008 3:49:28 PM

        It's the Democrats who voted for Obama and the media who endorsed their fake crown prince who are the true IDIOTS! We, Hillary supporters, know that a slick, inexperienced, arrogant couple pretending to care about the Americans knew too well. I,too,have changed my party affiliation-and I have no trouble voting for McCain-I love his wife!
        Former Texas Democrat.

        • Posted By: Yes we can2 @ 08/23/2008 12:45:13 AM

          These idiots are not democrats they are republican waste-whether they know it or not.

        • Posted By: Banzai @ 08/22/2008 5:47:09 PM

          As a Former Texas Republican who changed party affiliation specifically to vote for Sen Obama--and who will vote for him in Nov I have to say that it's bemusing to see alleged Democrats who basically say "well, I agree with 90% of his policy positions and almost none of McCain's but I'm mad as hell at (Obama)(the DNC)(the media) and will vote McCain just to spite them all!"

          It may be you are what you say you are...it may be you are "Operation Chaos" drones cheerfully seeding disunity among the opposition. But if you are what you say you are, your position is, well, baffling.

          Feel free to vote the way you want to. There's no law against people using sheer spite or anger to dictate their voting choices. But as a 25-year (and currently serving) veteran, we have to pick our battles and set priorities. Sen McCain's belligerant threat to continue (and even accelerate) President Bush's omnidirectional hostile "diplomacy" is a ticket to bloody disaster (we can't do squat about Georgia right now because our military is very much otherwise occupied). I don't agree with Sen Obama on everything, but I agree with him on enough to make him my choice. Even if I thought he was weak and being played by his handlers (which I manifestly do not), it would be self-defeating to vote against a candidate you almost entirely agree with out of spite.

    • Posted By: kas_wolf @ 08/22/2008 3:33:42 PM

      While I am conservative in political approach; I would favor Hillary over Obama. Obama is a travesty - a man with such high hubris that he is ready for the CEO spot after 6 months as the Admin.....

      Arrogance personified.

  • Posted By: allisongayle @ 08/22/2008 3:33:36 PM

    Dear Ms Clift, In recent weeks, it is apparent that Senator McCain has found a message that resonates and he's now found the discipline to stay on that message. Obama has not found a good enough response that reflects his "change" brand. The only good responses he has are the tried and true democrat/liberal vs. republican/conservative responses of the past. Obama has painted himself in a box because he hasn't figured out how to use these tried and true responses without compromising his "change" brand. Now that he's had to disclose his policy positions, it is obvious we're finding that his policies are not as bold and as challenging as his ability to delivery a speech. He's finding that the American electorate are thoughtful and deliberate when choosing their president, and that his eloquent generalities that can ignite a friendly crowd, don't necessarily translate to votes.

    • Posted By: Morgo @ 08/22/2008 3:37:32 PM

      The only thing Obama ever changed in Illinois were Mayor Daley's soiled shorts. A complete fraud.

      • Posted By: Yes we can2 @ 08/23/2008 12:27:52 AM

        Typical low information smear, fear, hater. Life must be miserable for you. Try getting out in the sunshine a little bit. Try having a little sex and don't forget your meds..

      • Posted By: ihavehadit @ 08/22/2008 8:06:37 PM

        Making comments like this says more about your character than it does Mr. Obama.
        What it says is that you are classless, uncouthed and without dignigy and honor.

      • Posted By: kas_wolf @ 08/22/2008 3:40:13 PM

        No - not 100% true - he changed his opinion whenever the wind of popular opinion changed.

        • Posted By: Morgo @ 08/22/2008 3:42:28 PM

          Um...ah...um...ah...that's....um...nuanced...um...ah...um.

  • Posted By: Lightseeker @ 08/22/2008 2:48:35 PM

    I am another former Clinton supporter who has no intention on voting for Obama -- I've even changed my party affiliation from Democrat to Independent, as has my sister and sister-in-law. We are out there and will not be taken for granted. The Democrats have lost it this year if they think we will march lockstep behind the Obama train -- there is NOTHING there -- only WORDS of CHANGE and HOPE.

    • Posted By: ihavehadit @ 08/22/2008 6:35:02 PM

      Bitter much?
      Grow up.

      • Posted By: poodlemom @ 08/22/2008 11:57:40 PM

        Words of change and hope, God that is a horrible thought! I hope you don't care if your daughters or grandaughters may lose their "choice" regarding abortions if by chance they are raped because with McCain the Supreme court will change and with men like Thomas and Scalia a woman's choice will be gone.

    • Posted By: sharont@springisd.org @ 08/22/2008 5:56:52 PM

      I am another Hillary supporter who WILL NOT vote for Obama. Obama is an egomaniac who would never have considered her for the VP spot, although it was his only hope of winning.........she would have overshadowed him and that wouldn't have worked for him. If he had 1/2 a brain, he would have taken the position of VP to her nomination, it would have been a winning ticket, and he would have had a greater chance of the presidency. Once again, his ego continues to get the better of him. No way would I vote for him...........the media cheated Hillary out of the nomination. The Democratic party gets to suffer for their (the media's) stupidity, and the fact that he's black made it impossible for them to undo the horrific mess.........there will be a change alright, and it will be a change to McCain. He'll get my vote.

  • Posted By: callmehandy64 @ 08/22/2008 7:08:45 PM

    It's strange to see that NO ONE here sees just how similar Obama and McCain are. They are both rich, both in love with power, both puppets of huge corporations. I want a real leader that actually represents the people of this country and not just it's big business! Nader is the man for the job and he is pulling 6% with absolutely no coverage. That alone should be making people wake up.

    • Posted By: poodlemom @ 08/22/2008 11:51:13 PM

      Yes, Senator Obama made money with his books which he paid back his and Michelle's college loans and with the rest he bought a house. In one report I read that Obama was worth around $750,000 hardly wealthy in McCain's eyes. Please remember that McCain's campaign is loaded with neocons who would love to attack Iran so people wake up, we know how wrong the neocons were about Iraq.

    • Posted By: thehappyamerican @ 08/22/2008 8:51:28 PM

      Obama and McCain are the same in that the news media picked them. This is going to be exactly the DNC and RNC candidates the news media wanted to see contesting each other. And in exchange the mainstream news lost it's credibility.. but small lose! And they may lose their dream for an Obama victory, too.

  • Posted By: bluegrass101 @ 08/22/2008 11:50:23 PM

    I really like Andrea Mitchell, she is special. Did anyone ever notice how much Joe Scarborough looks like her , just visualuize Joe with with a short blond wig.

  • Posted By: maramara @ 08/22/2008 11:32:43 PM

    I will vote for the person who will put more money in my pocket and that person is the Democratic ticket. I will not vote for the person who wants the rich to become richer and the mainstream to die in poverty. I now see why Mccain wants to give tax breaks to the rich because he is a very rich man. The tax breaks will not only benefit the lobbyist running his campaign but will also benefit him and Cindy and the club of billionaires. John Mccain, I will vote for the other guys

  • Posted By: Karenn1 @ 08/22/2008 11:32:20 PM

    Republican say it's a tight race. Tihis make easier to drop votes on election night.It's harder to add votes.So Diebold machines will do the rest.Big Corp.can't afford to lose the battle to make American worker serf.Religion help this cause.

  • Posted By: cltoriola @ 08/22/2008 5:13:41 PM

    barack hussein obama, by the time the dem convention is over, he obama will be down by thirty points. there is no way this dude will beat john mcCain. i don't like mcCain, but i will vote for him (mcCain)come november 4th. america will be safe under mcCain's watch, i have no doubts.

    • Posted By: raddave @ 08/22/2008 7:42:50 PM

      Keeping us in Iraq even if the Iraqi government wants us out. War with Iran and possibly Russia, yeah I can see your point on how McCain will keep us safe. Kinda like Bush kept us safe on 9/11

      • Posted By: Jmon @ 08/22/2008 11:03:25 PM

        The one thing you cannot bash Bush on is national security. Because the ineffectual Bill Clinton failed to lift a finger to stop the growing threat of Al-Queda because he was getting a laid, 9/11 occured. Bush has prevented another catastrophe with his policies. I will vote for McCain instead of the liberal wuss Barack Obama.

        • Posted By: raddave @ 08/22/2008 11:13:36 PM

          It is typical of you repugnants to try to blame 9/11 on Clinton, but he was out of office for 8 months when it happened and Bush got plenty of warnnings it was going to happen, but didn't do anything. You say that he has prevented another attack, but where is the proof? You repugs forget that it was eight years between the two attacks in New York because terrorists take their time and wait for an opportunity to strike.

    • Posted By: ihavehadit @ 08/22/2008 7:57:07 PM

      That's right keep repeating his middle name, and maybe eventually we'll all be hypnotized. Give me a break, what difference does his middle name make? GROW UP!!!!!

  • Posted By: ivote2 @ 08/22/2008 10:38:55 PM

    ADVANCE COPY NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNTIL SATURDAY 10 A.M.
    Barack Obama announced today that he will not choose a running mate. In An advance copy of the text of his non-announcement announcement speech obtained by this source, Obama will say, "After serious consideration, I have decided that I can not choose between my many good friends. . . The constitution does not require that I choose a Vice President. . . and this is a decision that really is above my pay-grade. Therefore, I have decided to let delegates to the Convention make this selection for me.

    • Posted By: THEBESTCANDIDATE @ 08/22/2008 11:04:48 PM

      ivote2....What you wrote will never happen!! The BEST Candidate will rise to the TOP!! and that's Senator McCain!! GOD HELP US FROM OURSELVES!! Senator Obama's VP pick will be Biden whosaid the Presodency is NOT on the job training position, and who also said How prod Senator Biden and Honored he would be to run against John McCain, and how PROUD Senator Biden would be to run WITH Senator mCcAIN!!!! hE SAID IT not i...god bless usa!!!

      • Posted By: raddave @ 08/22/2008 11:07:26 PM

        The best candidate fr dog catcher maybe, but not for President

  • Posted By: macasheville @ 08/22/2008 4:51:57 PM

    During the Saddleback forum, McCain avoided imploding only by getting the questions in advance. Even so, his answers were simplistic, rigid, and rehearsed. Obama, on the other hand, was thoughtful, spontaneous and authentic.

    The GOP creates a very low bar of expectations for McCain's performance so that he'll be sure to surprise people. Do we really want ANOTHER president who requires such low expectations in order to appear to "succeed"??

    • Posted By: Jmon @ 08/22/2008 11:06:45 PM

      "That question is above my pay grade" Oh yeah very thoughtful and eloquent. He didn't give his honest opinion on aboration because he needs to appear to be both pro-life and pro-choice. I wonder what George Orwell would think about that. At least McCain had the stones to give a straight answer.

    • Posted By: Rational Poster @ 08/22/2008 5:42:04 PM

      I guess it is all about your biases on what you saw. I saw a confident and seasoned McCain and an inexperienced and cautious Obama wanting to pick the right words to appeal to the center while not offending his base. Regardless, this is only style points.

      I thought Saddleback clearly showed the difference in their position on issues.

      • Posted By: Gobama! @ 08/22/2008 5:58:56 PM

        Yes, it clearly showed Obama giving thoughtful, truthful answers and McCain giving canned speaking points and glib remarks.

    • Posted By: allisongayle @ 08/22/2008 5:02:53 PM

      Do you have proof that McCain had the questions beforehand, or are you just trying to spread lies? From what I saw, the answers given were clearly a reflection of life experiences. Senator McCain has had more life experiences to draw upon to know his answers. Senator Obama hasn't had as many, and had to think out loud for his responses.

      • Posted By: TwentyFirstCenturyAmerican @ 08/22/2008 5:48:41 PM

        Yes, the way McCain answered the three part question on teachers even before the pastor completed the first sentence, it was clear he knew the questions, at least some if not all, before hand. Further, in spite of repeated requests by the pastor, answers to most questions were stump speeches. If you resort to political pandering in response to questions on a faith forum, isn't your faith questionable? McCain's pandering is evident when he suggested David Petraeus name in response to the question on the 3 wise people he likes to seek political advice from. No doubt Petraeus is a respected war hero with great military strategy, but do you seek his advice on things like whether you need to go for war against a country or whether you need to build a rapport with your European allies, etc.? Obama's answers were based on deep analysis and consequently took a longer time. McCain's answers were, on the other hand, shallow and hence were quick. For example, on the question on the action one need to take on evil, McCain could think only of the obvious and suggested Bin Landen's name and started pandering. Obama talked about both obvious and subtle forms of evil and gave examples from both within USA and outside. He also took a moralistic standpoint when he told that we need to confront evil with humility because we could tend to perpetrate evil in the name of fighting it. Obama is more of an intellectual whereas McCain is rather pedestrian. Unfortunately, however, the panderers generally impress the general masses who outnumber the intellectuals, and hence McCain may have an advantage there. But that is a different matter.

  • Posted By: Natalie Rosen @ 08/22/2008 10:30:55 PM

    Yes, the slime will sling slime that is for sure. We need to be strong, and get that vote out EVERYWHERE, in every hamlet, in every town, in every city in EVERY corner of this country. Change this country finally, finally finally our national nightmare COULD be over. We need to want it, we need to pursue it we need to be tenacious and NEVER give in to the Bush, McCain Romney lies. Remember the lies and never forget never.

  • Posted By: valwayne @ 08/22/2008 5:23:35 PM

    Since I'm making a comment on a "Newsweek, Eleanor Clift" article I will start out with "All hail The OBAMA" ,The ONE we've been waiting for" My second is an observation to the Super Delegate to avoid the train wreck and nominate Hillary at the convention. My next observation is in regard to the comment that McCain has gone negative....making fun of "The Obama's" celebrity and the fact that he blames working Americans for the energy crisis, and probably global warming, because the don't keep their tire inflated, is not really what I would consider very negative, especially when you consider "The Obama" trotting out the race card. Just because it blew up in his face after using it so much against Hillary doesn't mean it wasn't a sewer campaign tactic. As for Eleanor's observation that 90 minutes with the Obama on stage with McCain will be good for "The Obama" well Saddleback was close and McCain came out great and "The Obama' came out with "That's above my pay grade" So we'll see. And so not to offend anyone's religious sensibilities let me sign of with....."All Praise to the Obama, The ONE You've been waiting for"

    • Posted By: Yes we can2 @ 08/22/2008 10:06:50 PM

      Grow up. Clinton will not be the nominee. If you are still suffering two months after Clinton lost because she ran a flawed campaign then you are either a Republican plant or a masochist.. Just imagine how miserable you are going to feel for the NEXT FOUR YEARS when Senator Obama wins in November.

      Good Luck with that!!

  • Posted By: bluegrass101 @ 08/22/2008 10:01:23 PM

    All of you INDEPENDENTS,please listen up!!!! The Repub's hate losing Power more than Satan did. Get ready for the worst smear tactics then ever befor.e Just be aware of their Hate, Prejudice and Karl Rove . The Conservatives and Neo-Con's despise everything that stand in their way. Just compare Obamas keen intelligence to McCains and his close family ties. Vote accordingly. The Knuckle Draggers are coming.

  • Posted By: bluegrass101 @ 08/22/2008 9:50:58 PM

    If some of you think that experience only is the criteria just remember Nixon, Bush#1 and now Bush #2and you will see the fallacy of that argument

  • Posted By: John Marshall @ 08/22/2008 9:27:24 PM

    You write:

    "Mark Siegel, a former executive director of the Democratic National Committee, predicts Obama will win the election by 8 points with 350 electoral votes. "Write it down," he commanded as I gasped in disbelief."

    Obama's credibility has been shattered by his own words. He is a gaffe machine. He has made more gaffes, and more pungent gaffes, than all other Democratic nominees since Adlai Stevenson. He might win. But he has demonstrated that he faces a really lengthy learning curve before he can hold the reins of the presidency.




  • Posted By: Sojourner-PA @ 08/22/2008 6:30:53 PM

    "..It's an article of faith in the Obama campaign that standing side-by-side with McCain for 90 minutes will be the great leveler, the image that could seal the deal for Obama just as it did for Ronald Reagan in 1980." What kind of crap is that? McCain had challenged Obama to a string of town-hall debates, which Obama agreed to and later changed his mind (surprise). With no teleprompter, Obama will look Bushlike.


    • Posted By: Alpha1 @ 08/22/2008 9:10:10 PM

      Please keep it real, McCain can't even read from a teleprompter (watch all of his TV coverages). You don't have to like Obama and sure don't have to vote for him, but if you think that McCain is a better speaker, then we know you have not watch not one speach or debut. Lastly, McCain is not a Ronald Reagan in 1980 or NOW....

    • Posted By: raddave @ 08/22/2008 7:18:53 PM

      Have you heard McCain speak? He gives the same scripted answers to the questions he is asked. The debates should not have happened yet, since neither one are the official nominee of their party. Don't worry, McCain will get his chance to have his ass handed to him between now and November.

  • Posted By: rex range @ 08/22/2008 8:15:40 PM

    I like 'em both. Whichever one wins, we'll be getting a president we can all be proud of. That wouldn't have happened if the Machine had gotten its wish. I don't know who I want more badly to win: John, to shut up all of the shameless age discriminators in the media and the general public; or Barack, to once and for all wipe the Machine and its wild-eyed, fanatical, totalitarian followers and political assassins off the map. Maybe we can elect one president and he will choose the other one for a high-ranking cabinet position, in one fell swoop peeing on all of the loathsome creatures listed above.

  • Posted By: AsperGirl @ 08/22/2008 7:42:33 PM

    "McCain is a far more plausible candidate at summer's end in part because he has sanctioned a sharply negative campaign against Obama."

    This is wishful thinking, Ms Clift.

  • Posted By: bmacmill @ 08/22/2008 7:22:53 PM

    Eleanor,
    This was a very astute article, particularly the last paragraph. The ground game is indeed key. I wonder who will prove to be the better quarterback? My non-partisan money in on Obama. - he's the one with the organizations in Georgie and Alaska and Iowa etc.If McCain's going to win this one it'll have to be through the airwaves ...


Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse