Anatomy of a Tight Race

The convention is NOT in Minneapolis. It is in St. Paul.

Dunno. If Republicans have divorced themselves from the Party of Reagan[which many have not. GOP senators such as Coburn,DeMint,Graham,Hagel,McCain,and several others in the House including new rising freshman stars are textbook Reaganites. Indeed so are many moderate Democrats including Schyler,Tester,Webb,and Nelson[Ben], Democrats are veering to a leftwing which is the embodiement of post 1960s Marxist philosophies which brought ruin to their party in the age of Carter and which they are determined to revisit. Obviously,lack of ''decency''is not prohibited to ''Republican''attack wings alone. To demonstrate this,any viewer here need merely observe Olbermans rantings,and check out the vile garbage from HUFFINGTON and DAILY KOS [so putrid,that posts mocking WH spokesman Tony Snows cancer and subsequent death had to be removed],to FIREDOGLAKE,and MOVEON.
The Democrat Party is being hijacked by ideological partisans,no differant in their way than the days of Gingrich and DeLay when these represented the Right. McCain may not be able to count his mansions[which he personally does not own anyway],but he wants all Americans to live in one. Democrats ,on the other hand,demand a welfare state where success is either punished or deterred. The State will become the Great Leavener,exactly and precisely as dreamed of by Leon Trotsky,and V.I Lenin in their day.[One reason why enviros for instance ,are as successful as they are in garnering the support of Democrats to the point where reliance on foreign oil will become a daily burden that these will not have to sufffer. These do not give a damn about ''pristine'' anything. The goal to is cement state control over the life of the individual,and rake in money off the back of the proletariat while doing so,and feel good while they are about it,[thus evidencing no qualms about their own riches], equally no differant than the endless ''Five Year Plans'' of the old Soviet empire]. Thus it is of no suprise whatever that Marxists,Maoists,Trotskyists,communists of all shades,socialists of the South American and Euro stripe,even anarchists,race and social self-identifiers,flock beneath a Democrat Party banner. Americans increasingly see this,thus a worried Clift,seeing where all of these polls are going,pens the above screed in order to get her gulled minions to man the barricades.

love234america said: "I am tired of these people who call anyone not supporting Obama a racist. By my standards, they are racist as isn't it estimated that about 97% of the blacks are voting for Obama? "

The "favor" will be returned, tit-for-tat. Google for the "Bradley effect".
.

love234america said: "I am tired of these people who call anyone not supporting Obama a racist. By my standards, they are racist as isn't it estimated that about 97% of the blacks are voting for Obama? "

The "favor" will be returned, tit-for-tat. Google for the "Bradley effect".
.

What has happened to the Reagan Republicans???remember them???those who represented decency and respect for the human race, family values, and morals. Who are these new Republicans? Why have loyal republicans allow an ugly and unfamiliar decay and decadence an opportunity to destroy the once pride and sturdy foundation the Republican Party! The Republican Party is being reduced to the lowest level of a vile and contaminated type of politics! The Republican Party has chosen mockery over decency as the party continues to use slimy, disgusting and nauseous tactics to destroy those who disagree with them.

The new Republican Party has adapted the Rush Limbaugh mentality???how can anyone approve of someone that would suggest that John Edward???s wife talks too much and was unwilling to use her mouth to make her husband sexually happy! According to Rush, when that happens, it???s OK to have an affair. Is this an example of what members of New Republican Party stand for, approve of, and laugh at because you have to have a little humor in politics? Unfortunately and sadly, many respectable and honorable Republican senators, state representatives, and governors could be voted out of office because of the distasteful representation and image of a few bitter and deceitful political figures that???s trying to shape the New Republican Party.

I am but one voice, but can clearly state I really don???t care for the McCain-Rove, Bush or Rush Republicans, and will not vote the ticket until it is willing to return to the principles and ideology that once was the cornerstone of the Republican Party!

May God have mercy on us if people continue to allow the new Republican Party to replace what was once the ???Republican Party of the United States of America.????

The issue with Hillary supporters is this. The self annoied ONE, accused Hillary of playing Gender Card sheepishly, when the ONE will not even say he looks different than other democratic contenders on a primary debate. The ONE now using I do not look like other CARD. Also the empty suit, who blamed Hillary on populism when she announced Gas Tax Break funded by Big Oil for Americans, doling out populat $1000/ per peson; now flip flopping galore criticized Hillary on Iraq. That is the problem .. not sexism.. Empty suit funded his house with a criminal felon doling out tax breaks & celebrity and launched campaign from a terrorist house can only bring about bad change for America.. By the way what about the pledge by the opportuniist on taking public finance.. Those are the issues raised by Hillary supporters. Let Mr Change apologixe to Hillary for all these ans seek fogiveness if he is man enough.. First that should happen, if Hillary is on the ticket or not.. Then we think about voting.

As a voter who supported Clinton, I have no intention whatsoever of voting to Liar Obama. I detest the man. I do not believe anything that comes out of his mouth. And I am tired of these people who call anyone not supporting Obama a racist. By my standards, they are racist as isn't it estimated that about 97% of the blacks are voting for Obama? I care about the character and their stand on different issues, but never do I vote for a persons because of religion, race or sex.

Leave it to Clift, either the eternal Optimist or a brainwashed psychopath.

So let me get this straight busby,

There are Hillary Clinton suppoorters who want Hillary for president. But now that this is not possible, they do not want to listen to what Hillary has to say?

I think I can easily call these women SEXIST. Its obvious that they just want a woman as president, no matter what that women actually politically beleives. You Hillary supports do not like Hillary for her actions/policies, you like her because she is female. That is sexist.

So what you are saying is you really like Clinton for president, but you do not like what she stands for? That is the only logical reasoning behind likeing Clinton, and not voteing for who she supports.

Should I use the "Sexist card" on you? Seems like you want a woman president, and it doesn't matter what that women president wants, just that she is female is enough for you.