Why Can’t We Be Friends?
Kashmiris expected a rare treat this summer: peace. But a controversial land deal has made the valley turn volatile once more.
When summer began in picturesque Kashmir this year, most residents of the once troubled Indian state expected a pleasant season. Since 2005, violence has dropped dramatically: insurgency-related deaths fell from 10 a day to hardly two a day this year. Merchants and businessmen were quick to take advantage of the calm. Hotels expecting a banner crop of tourists, spruced themselves up; shops stocked up on goods; and farmers expected a good apple crop.
Then it all fell apart. An innocuous government decree, issued on May 26, granting a modest swathe of protected forestland to a Hindu trust, threw a spark that set off mass protests of a sort not seen here since the early 1990s. After the land deal became public in early June, murmurs of protest began to rise. Since June 16, large groups of Hindus and Muslims have taken to the streets in successive days. An estimated 40 people have been killed and thousands arrested. Suddenly it seems, all the recent progress is at risk of being lost. "This is a mass movement," says Ashok Jaitley, a former top Kashmir administrator, of the protests. "We cannot wish it away."
The recent troubles started when Kashmir's Congress-led coalition government granted 99 acres of land to a Hindu trust, allowing it to build temporary shelters for the rush of pilgrims. (This year a record 500,000 made the trek.) Separatist groups pounced on the move, calling for protests against the land deal. Soon militant leaders, who had been lying low, were out on the streets of the state capital, Srinagar, organizing marches. As protests mounted, Manmohan Singh's Congress-led coalition in New Delhi dithered, apparently reluctant to antagonize the Hindus by reversing the deal. Worse still, panicky security forces opened fire on protestors, killing a separatist leader (among others) and adding fuel to the growing Kashmiri rage. After nearly three weeks of vacillating, the government revoked the land grant. This time Hindu groups took umbrage and began protests, blocking a highway that acts as the sole lifeline to Kashmir valley, and demanding that the land order be reinstated. The protests and counter-protests are continuing to hold the whole state ransom, as the Delhi government looks increasingly helpless.
© 2008


Loading Menu
Member Comments
Posted By: prasadk67 @ 08/25/2008 6:30:08 AM
Comment: Sure, Mr. Ahmed, and so do the Balochs, don't they? Lets have Balochistan its freedom too.
Posted By: prasadk67 @ 08/25/2008 6:27:58 AM
Comment: A word of caution to people who want to 'crush the Kashmiris' and another word of caution to those who want to support secession from India. All of us have skeletons in our backyards - Pakistan has Balochistan (the entire NWFP infact) & China has Tibet. Any one asking for a 'plebiscite' needs to realize that the UN resolutions of 1949 call for a unconditional pull out of the armies of BOTH Pakistan and India from the entire Kashmir, not just the Indian portion. (People do not realize that Pakistan occupies nearly half of Kashmir too. ) So lets forget solutions that are not going to work. Those Kashmiris who want secession and Pakistan need to accept the existing Line of Control as the permanent border, and get secession out of their heads, once and forever. Once that happens, Kashmir can actually partake in the economic boom that is happening in the rest of India. And they will be happy for it.
Posted By: skeptikos @ 08/25/2008 6:02:32 AM
Comment: India has tolerated the Kashmiris so far. Government of India's approach has always been to pamper and pacify these seperatists. Kashmiris should understand that India cannot allow Kashmir to secede because of security reasons. It is very much a part of India and it will remain a part of India. Now the Government of India is dealing with the situation properly. How long it will continue is to be seen. With an election just round the corner and the present position of the Government being quite rickety it will loose steam and start its usual willy nilly approach. A weak-kneed government will never be able to achieve anything. Demand for a seperate state should be considered treason and dealt with accordingly.