INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS

Why Can’t We Be Friends?

Kashmiris expected a rare treat this summer: peace. But a controversial land deal has made the valley turn volatile once more.

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

When summer began in picturesque Kashmir this year, most residents of the once troubled Indian state expected a pleasant season. Since 2005, violence has dropped dramatically: insurgency-related deaths fell from 10 a day to hardly two a day this year. Merchants and businessmen were quick to take advantage of the calm. Hotels expecting a banner crop of tourists, spruced themselves up; shops stocked up on goods; and farmers expected a good apple crop.

Then it all fell apart. An innocuous government decree, issued on May 26, granting a modest swathe of protected forestland to a Hindu trust, threw a spark that set off mass protests of a sort not seen here since the early 1990s. After the land deal became public in early June, murmurs of protest began to rise. Since June 16, large groups of Hindus and Muslims have taken to the streets in successive days. An estimated 40 people have been killed and thousands arrested. Suddenly it seems, all the recent progress is at risk of being lost. "This is a mass movement," says Ashok Jaitley, a former top Kashmir administrator, of the protests. "We cannot wish it away."

The recent troubles started when Kashmir's Congress-led coalition government granted 99 acres of land to a Hindu trust, allowing it to build temporary shelters for the rush of pilgrims. (This year a record 500,000 made the trek.) Separatist groups pounced on the move, calling for protests against the land deal. Soon militant leaders, who had been lying low, were out on the streets of the state capital, Srinagar, organizing marches. As protests mounted, Manmohan Singh's Congress-led coalition in New Delhi dithered, apparently reluctant to antagonize the Hindus by reversing the deal. Worse still, panicky security forces opened fire on protestors, killing a separatist leader (among others) and adding fuel to the growing Kashmiri rage. After nearly three weeks of vacillating, the government revoked the land grant. This time Hindu groups took umbrage and began protests, blocking a highway that acts as the sole lifeline to Kashmir valley, and demanding that the land order be reinstated. The protests and counter-protests are continuing to hold the whole state ransom, as the Delhi government looks increasingly helpless.

© 2008

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
NEWSWEEK's 20/10
NEWSWEEK's 20/10

Our decade-in-review project recalls the highs and lows of the last 10 years.

Obama's Promises
Obama's Promises

Is the new president fulfilling his campaign pledges? Or falling short?

The Decade in 7 Minutes
The Decade in 7 Minutes

Video: A fast-paced review of the best and worst moments. Don't blink.

Accidental Celebrities
Accidental Celebrities

From Levi Johnston to Elian Gonzalez, these people never expected to be in the spotlight.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Lindt @ 09/26/2009 8:54:47 PM

    Extremely painful. If the Indian government decides to give greater autonomy to Kashmir as the media is reporting, we will create a new Pakistan. India as a whole is the only stabilizing factor in the subcontinent. Bangladesh, Nepal, Pakistan are on the brink of collapse...there will be total chaos and life will never be the same. I feel shocked by the fact that countries with no religious tolerance are UN members. This acceptability is the reason Muslims have not learnt to live with Christians, Hindus and Jews.

  • Posted By: simba1936 @ 08/24/2009 8:26:31 PM

    sbyuhofs, You can say that again ,that is the fault with India Govt, Congress must be thrown out .and any militant Hindu party must get into power in India if India has to survive. India has to learn from Russians ,Chines ans Israelis how to hit back at Muslim extremists.Wake up India .

  • Posted By: 12kris @ 08/17/2009 10:56:49 PM

    When India was partitioned, of the quarter of the whole population which was expected to move to Pakistan, only half of that really did. Why do you think it happened if India is ruling under the Swastika?

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse