A Liberal’s Lament

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: jradmacher @ 08/28/2008 10:53:02 PM

    This headline is just stupid!

  • Posted By: momoof3 @ 08/28/2008 10:06:40 PM

    This is the most impressive article I have read this election season. Just what an average mom like me feels but is unable to articulate. I will read your magazine more often and seek out essays by this thought provoking author.

    Chris Matthews and Keith Olberman have been a great disappointment. They lack depth and neutrality. I can barely watch them anymore, and now that Rachel Maddow is going to take over the 9:00 PM spot, it will be even more of the same thing. Please reconsider.

    Sincerely,

    Maureen D. Carlough
    Fort Myers, FL

  • Posted By: pbgandhi @ 08/28/2008 9:57:42 PM

    I think it accurately dis plays a man who has no back bone underneath all that high and mighty about the world singing kumbaya......he is basically in the end a wimp. a pushover I'm sure the Russians will agree with when he takes office. I wanna see one thing happen from "tawdry" man. When Russia invades ukraine or Poland, moldova when he takes office next year I would so like to see our messiah of a president in aactiacrionaction
    action

  • Posted By: comyns @ 08/28/2008 9:34:37 PM

    Tawdry logic seems to be this writer's specialty. He describes as evasive Senator Obama's incredibly detailed discussion of Rezko with his home newspaper, condemns his refusal to make an utterly unnecessary snap judgment about the Georgia-Russia conflict rather than a more balanced statement followed by stronger condemnations, and makes a snap judgment about a man-Wright- he doesn't know.


    ,

  • Posted By: chillfour@yahoo.com @ 08/28/2008 9:01:55 PM

    Hopefully there will be enough black, white, hispanic, american indian, military, and any other voters to put Senator Obama over the top so we can have a decent President Obama instead of a corrupt republican who helped make all the problems we face.

  • Posted By: GoGeorge @ 08/28/2008 8:58:52 PM

    Obama President?
    Please.
    Shoeshine Boy Maybe.

  • Posted By: GoGeorge @ 08/28/2008 8:57:45 PM

    Obama Presidentt ?
    Please.
    Shoeshine Boy Maybe

  • Posted By: jmbelan @ 08/27/2008 6:39:17 PM

    This article is not brilliant. It is historically incoherent and displays an uncritical response to Bill Clinton that is shocking for an historian. Clinton lost both houses and left his party weaker than he found it. Yet, all Wilentz can do is blame the Supreme Court and Gore. Clinton only looks good in retrospect after Bush. If Gore had won, he would be viewed as a selfish and mediocre. How "formed" was Clinton in 92? HIs positions on virtually every foreign policy issue changed once in power--China, Bosnia, NAFTA, Kyoto. He botched health care so bad no one has touched it since but low oli prices and the growth China saved his butt. He destroyed Gingrich but only after allowing him to come to power. Carter was a better President because at least he tried to deal with reality but it was much less kind to him than it was to Clinton.

    • Posted By: stematwork @ 08/28/2008 3:58:31 PM

      don't forget, many of Clinton's most popular legislation (see: welfare reform) came as a result of pressure from Republicans. In addition, he rode the tech boom through it's apex and got off the ride right as the bubble was about to burst. this had nothing to do with him, positively or negatively, but it sure made him look good.

      • Posted By: pimpnamedslickback @ 08/28/2008 8:03:31 PM

        How about that? People still talk about the '90's, but it's 2008 now. Clinton was a decent prez, but most of the economic items that seem to be accredited to him were already in play when he came on board. Economy coming out of the '90-'91 recession, but most importantly, rise of e-commerce, dot-coms, cheaper computers, and the Internet (VP Gore's invention of course, LOL) pushed the economy ahead. I remember when the Sunday want ads had 67 pages of job ads, now it has 6. How is supporting the same old, same helping anyone in this country?

  • Posted By: pearsoncrz @ 08/27/2008 11:15:25 AM

    Sometimes you have to do research to find out where Obama really stands. His actions speak louder than his words. Check the fact check on Obama and Infanticide.

    • Posted By: pimpnamedslickback @ 08/28/2008 7:49:14 PM

      Infanticide--Obama is personally responsible for killing babies now? LOL. I don't believe McCain or Bush would come up with something so stupid.

  • Posted By: thehappyamerican @ 08/26/2008 10:44:19 PM

    History suggests this won't be easy! Bidens history suggests this may be impossible for Obama now! Biden, Feinstein,Schumer and Kennedy (before his illness) and top DEMS grabbed themselves a very junior Senator to make a puppet out of him, using his race to ensure he could be puppet-walked to the White House without too much criticism as he is a black American!
    This is racism in the extreme perpetrated by these senior Senators on the world stage, and shame on them!
    But they can't stop the show now and one of them had to jump down onto the stage in the spot light to play as the puppets faithfull side-kick!
    This ultra-liberal ticket is not a coincidence! There will be time ahead to dissect this arrangement. Nobody is going to like what is seen! Follow the strings and the money!

    • Posted By: pimpnamedslickback @ 08/28/2008 7:46:58 PM

      Here we go again. When a poster has nothing worth saying, they cry "RACE!" in a crowded movie theater! Last time I checked, ALL minority voters had to "puppet-walk" presidential candidates to the "White House without too much criticism" . Are you THAT scared? Half of him has YOUR roots! Blacks make up less than 12% of the US population. Subtract those who aren't of age, ineligible to vote, don't want to vote--you're down to the single digits. So it'll be black people's fault if Obama happened to win? PLEASE!!

    • Posted By: Keepinguponfacts123 @ 08/27/2008 7:53:40 PM

      You thought your comment was so good, you posted it twice. No whose the blowheart.

  • Posted By: wildlifeusa @ 08/28/2008 7:15:16 PM

    It is clear that republicans are not fit to govern! Their intellect is just too poor, and lets not talk about morals and ethics, they can't understand what these words mean.
    WE HAVE HAD ENOUGH!! OUT!!

  • Posted By: markci @ 08/28/2008 7:09:14 PM

    Obama has quite a challenge. On one hand, on a stage in front of 70,000 people he's going to be expected to give a soaring oratorical performance, not al Al Gore-like lecture. On the other, it's crucial that he gives enough policy detail to convince a public increasingly worried about their pocketbooks that he's not all charisma and hot air. It'll be interesting to see how he tries to thread that needle.

  • Posted By: birdie48 @ 08/28/2008 6:22:37 PM

    my question is this: how many times has mccain been president? how is he any more ready than anyone else? does the fact that his answer to the georgian crisis bordered on calling for some sort of military reaction not worry anyone else? his knee-jerk reaction to every foreign crisis seems to be send in the troops! john mccain is a soldier. that does not automatically make him a good president!

  • Posted By: daplane @ 08/28/2008 6:17:55 PM

    Wilentz, this is ridiculous. Does McCain have "substance"? No, of course not. Does he have a health care plan? A tax plan? An energy plan? No, again and again. He has ideology scribbled on paper. His "foreign policy" could be described the same way ??? perhaps you remember the phrase "rogue state rollback"? His answers to all criticisms are biographical. Perhaps you've heard: he was a POW, which apparently means it doesn't matter that his health care 'plan' would lead to fewer Americans having worse insurance coverage. Another news flash: he has 'personal honor' which apparently means it doesn't matter that a President McCain would have led us into a shooting war with Russia a few weeks ago. And yet Obama is the one who has to answer these ridiculous claims?

  • Posted By: slanglie @ 08/28/2008 6:06:39 PM

    I am a little surprised Newsweek is running a blatantly biased piece of reporting from a supposed Princeton professor, who has obviously not done his homework. Obama does not and never has shared the Carter campaign's willful distrust of Washington. Obama does denounce the government by imperialism, domestic and international, that Republicans have so effectively foisted on our country in their eight years of power. And Obama will work with congress on both sides of the aisle, as he started doing immediately upon his election to the Senate, to solve the many serious problems the American people are inheriting from the Republican administration. Obama actually is much closer to JFK in his native intelligence, pragmatic nature and above all, his proven ability to inspire.

    Newsweek, who is this Sean guy? A relative of your editor? Why would you run an article so biased, not to mention wrong on the facts, during a time when journalistic integrity is even more essential. than usual, when our country is in real peril?

  • Posted By: Weaner @ 08/28/2008 6:04:20 PM

    If any of you actually feel that Obama is closer to John Kennedy than Jimmy Carter in his politics, you all need to go back to junior high. Kennedy was a conservative Democrat; very centrist and moderate. To compare Obama to anyone except Carter is by no means a comparison but wishful thinking and blatant lack of knowledge of historical politics.

  • Posted By: Weaner @ 08/28/2008 6:03:55 PM

    If any of you actually feel that Obama is closer to John Kennedy than Jimmy Carter in his politics, you all need to go back to junior high. Kennedy was a conservative Democrat; very centrist and moderate. To compare Obama to anyone except Carter is by no means a comparison but wishful thinking and a blatant lack of knowledge of historical politics.

  • Posted By: mjbrown403 @ 08/28/2008 5:24:24 PM

    One would think a Princeton professor would take the time to do his homework, but it's much easier to repeat Republican talking points bouncing in the media's echo chamber. Obama has laid out "where he'd take the country" in countless, detailed position papers, speeches and interviews. If you don't know where he stands, it's because you're either not paying attention or being wilfully ignorant.

    If I had the guy as a professor, I'd ask Princeton for a refund on my $40,000 annual tuition.

  • Posted By: politicogirl @ 08/28/2008 4:43:36 PM

    Well, at least Senator Obama did not have to manufacture a crisis between Russia and Georgia in order to draw attention to his " expertise". These things happen I guess when your have a staff members paid $800,00 a year to lobby for Georgia. See CNN's interview with Putin. Though this may sound conspiratorial, can we really trust any Bush croney?

    • Posted By: libertyfirst @ 08/28/2008 4:54:24 PM

      Politiccogirl...So you think McCain had the whole Russia - Georgian conflict manufactured? And you arrive at this conclusion based on the Putin interview being plugged on CNN? And, somehow, all of that makes Obama look better? One need not to denegrate one candidate to simply defend or explain the positions, and policy proposals of another. Just what is the official Liberal take on what we should do about Russia's bullying of Georgia? What would Liberal Dems want us to do with radicalized Islamic fundementalism spreading to the West? What's the Liberal line on how to contain government spending? What are they? Calling McCain, Bush, or any other Republican or conservative names or posing ridiculous conspiracies does not answer these questions. Nor for that matter does endless puff pieces by Newsweek about Obama.

  • Posted By: ademeyer @ 08/28/2008 4:49:39 PM

    Sean Wilentz: and John McCain offers a continuation of the same policies you spend one, small, paragraph noting that have damaged our country . Try putting McCain's policies under a microscope - gas tax holiday anyone? Belligerent sabre rattling over Georgia real effective? Running a smear and attack campaign: winning strategy to unite country and lifft morale of minorities?

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse