If one goes to Obama's website, you'll find plenty of substance and policy detail. It's McCain who is running on fear, low-ball political gamesmanship and his bio, i.e. I am a POW, therefore I am infallible.
If one goes to Obama's website, you'll find plenty of substance and policy detail. It's McCain who is running on fear, low-ball political gamesmanship and his bio, i.e. I am a POW, therefore I am infallible.
I think everyone is far too concerned with who the President is and not nearly concerned enough about who their local representative and state senators are. They are the ones far more likely to affect your everyday life. The president is a far off figurehead who has really little to do with anything other than whether or not they believe in abortion rights or not, which honestly gets way, way too much press. For crying out loud, when do most Americans ever have an abort/not abort decision to make? We have more pressing issues folks.
Wilentz support for the older and more traditional wing of the Democratic (insert Hillary/Bill) party is obvious in his glowing assesment of the Clinton presidency. The crux of his article is this; in order to win you must forgo all bipartisan politics and find a new definition of the old New Deal. He grafts his arguement onto an unpopular Carter presidency just as future right leaning historians will graft ideas and candidates they do not like onto Bush II. In truth, in order to survive, the Democratic party must increase it's influence into areas like the Northwest, areas of traditional libertarianism and late Republicanism. That involves less ideology and more inclusion. Sound like a message you have heard before? Obama is neither stupid nor destined to fail due to his Carteresque "niceness" He seeks to re-invent the party (as Bill did in the 90's) and get it growing.
Who wrote this piece,,,karl rove? This is an obvious McCain plant posing as a "liberal". Wonder how much the campaign paid Newsweek to print this one?
nice fiction. Long on talk, low on analysis coming from research. ook at the economic plans, for example, which do three things: reduce taxes for a broad band of middle income earners, and raise taxes to Clinton levels; invest in national infrastructure in a more or less classic public goods way; and take aim at tax and trade policies which reward the export of jobs and capital to rising competitors. It's just palin smarter--ask Bob Reich and Bob Rubin--than McCain, but it's not classiclly liiberal. Nor does linking U.S. leadership to strong diplomacy and strong military seem to keep Obama from a pretty hawkish approach to Afghanistan, and a pretty interventionkist attitude toward Pakistani terrorist refuges. He's been out front on nuclear non proliferation, which McCain's "slap leather" approach will make more difficult and dangerous. I think Obama is weakest on exactly the same issue McCain is weakest: coming to terms with the structural problem of running a federal budget that keeps two long term wars off budget, pursues tax cuts while deficit spending is rising to about twenty percent of the Federal budget now, and will take off exponentially once the medical benefits due and payable to boomers take force. I believe that Obama knows these problems, and also knows the political impossibility of solving them in campaign mode. I think we have learned all we need to know about McCain when his health adviser tells us that there are no uninsured Americans, because everyone can go to emergency rooms, and that therefore, the U.S. Census Bureau should no longer track this statistic. Sounds like problem solved? Only if you accept the hospital charges to the insured , which range from 250 to almost 700 percent of the actual hospital expenses. For Newsweek: your editors should look more closely at your contributors,and determine that their pieces are grounded in all the available facts, and not just the ones convenient to a faulty and highly partisan argument. A disappointing and uninformative piece of writing.
Thanks for your analysis and lament. Very educational. I wonder why there is question about Obama's 'brand of liberalism." He clearly is a liberal pragmatist and believes in some role in federal government as opposed to the 'hands off conservative approach' which has spelt disaster in the last 4 years. I also wonder why people call him an empty suit. Obama is very accomplished and intelligent even if he has work to do to connect with the working class. Ideological robots like McCain who have served our country nonetheless deserve due acknowledgement. It is time to end this blood-letting..
Why should anyone with any brains admire this empty suit Obama? Oh excuse me, Wilentz is talking about the liberal intelligentsia. Sort of an oxymoron! Left wing loonies; they don't believe in logic! Same with much of the liberal press. Birds of a feather flock together. They can all cry in November when the empty suit loses to McFart!
Wilentz, you are a nincompoop. As a historian you should be responsible to actual facts. Please apologize for this article and write a new one telling the truth
Obama and substance? He cannot add what he does not have. Good to see you wake up to the fact that he is an empty suit. Millions of us have been saying that for months.
I hear that term all the time "empty suite". does that mean that McCain is a genuis?
Here's Obama's substance:
Barack Obama angered fellow Democrats in the Illinois Senate when he voted to strip millions of dollars from a child welfare office on Chicago's West Side. But Obama had a ready explanation: He goofed. "I was not aware that I had voted no," he said that day in June 2002, asking that the record be changed to reflect that he "intended to vote yes."
On March 19, 1997, Obama announced he had fumbled an election-reform vote the day before, on a measure that passed 51 to 6: "I was trying to vote yes on this, and I was recorded as a no," he said.
On March 20, 1997, Obama voted "present" on a key telecommunications vote.
HEY CWA members, WAKE UP and smell the TRUTH ABOUT OBAMA.
He stood on March 11, 1999, to take back his vote against legislation to end good-behavior credits for certain felons in county jails. "I pressed the wrong button on that," he said.
He was the lone dissenter on Feb. 24, 2000, against 57 yeas for a ban on human cloning. "I pressed the wrong button by accident," he said.
On Nov. 14, 1997, he backed legislation to permit riverboat casinos to operate even when the boats were dockside. The measure, pushed by the gambling industry and fought by church groups whose support Obama was seeking, passed with two "yeas" to spare -- including Obama's. He wasn't exactly up front with his constituency, telling a church group on a 1998 campaign questionnaire that he was "undecided" about whether he backed an expansion of riverboat gambling. The senator who led the opposition to the gambling measure, Republican Todd Sieben, said "He was obviously paying attention to this vote. It was a major, major issue in the state, and it was a long debate," Sieben said. "The inadvertent 'Oops, I missed the switch' -- I'd be kind of skeptical of that."
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-obamavotes24jan24,0,4956975,full.story?coll=la-home-center
"The one area where [Rezko] did have a political interest in Springfield that emerged - this is all pre-Blagojevich - was gaming. He was one of the minority investors in Rosemont. That's one area where he could have asked me for favors, but did not, partly because I was clearly on record as being opposed. I was a gaming opponent as [Sun-Times Springfield Bureau Chief] Dave McKinney will recall." - Obama
http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/obama/844597,transcript031508.article
With all your posts, on several different articles , one might thing that you are perhaps working for the McCain campaign. How much are you getting paid?
Here's an Obama Tale, sad but true. Obama has lambasted lobbyists and moneyed interests who "have turned our government into a game only they can afford to play."
"It's an entire culture in Washington -- some of it legal, some of it not," the Democratic hopeful told a New York crowd in June. But last year Obama introduced nine separate bills exempting foreign chemical company Nufarm from import fees on a range of chemical ingredients it uses in the manufacture of pesticides and herbicides.
Nufarm wasn't the only beneficiary of Obama's efforts to reduce customs fees and duties. In early May of 2006, two Washington lobbyists registered to work on behalf of Astellas Pharma, a Japanese-owned drug company which also has offices in Illinois.
Together, Obama's obscure measures -- known as tariff suspensions -- steered more than $12 million away from federal coffers, according to government estimates.
While legal, Obama's bills on behalf of Nufarm and other companies are part of the special treatment machine Washington rolls out for special interests, say good-government watchdogs. With a dozen tariff suspension bills to his name, Obama stands out as the most prolific of any presidential hopeful on the topic. Sen. John McCain introduced none.
"If you have a company...there's a whole factory set up to help you get these suspensions," said Steve Ellis, president of the Washington, D.C.-based watchdog group Taxpayers for Common Sense. "It's a pay-to-play system you have to rev up and work." Hire the right lobbyist, pay the right fee, and you can save millions, he explained.
Some say the tariff suspension process isn't how Washington should operate.
In his speeches, Sen. Obama seems to agree: "We need a president who sees government not as a tool to enrich well-connected friends and high-priced lobbyists, but as the defender of fairness and opportunity for every American," the candidate said in his June speech. "That's the kind of president I intend to be."
But his actions speak louder than his words.
Junker defended tariff suspensions as good for American businesses. "It's nothing to be embarrassed, ashamed or suspicious of," he said.
justifying the breaks for Nufarm to import a chemical known as 2,4 D and other ingredients by claiming they would "eliminate these unnecessary and avoidable...costs to [Nufarm's] consumers."
But the company's financial reports, issued just two months after Obama introduced Nufarm's numerous tariff-lifting bills, indicate Nurarm was making more money than ever before in North America because it had increased its prices on its U.S. and Canadian customers, predominantly farmers, in particular on "phenoxy herbicides," a family which includes 2,4 D.
Economics aside, some medical researchers have purported to find a link between high exposure to the chemical and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, a type of cancer.
http://blogs.abcnews.co
You reference a blogger on ABC news. That's your source? Get real! You need something better than that.
NO BOUNCE FOR OBAMA EVEN AFTER THE MICHELLE AND CLINTON SPEECHES! HMMM COULD IT BE THAT EVERYONE SAW THAT MICHELLE'S WAS A SCRIPT AND THAT CLINTON BARELY ENDORSED OBAMA (NEVER SAYING HE WAS READY TO LEAD THIS COUNTRY OR THAT SHE THOUGHT HE WAS!) WITH GOOD OLE BILL SPEAKING TONITE THERE WON'T BE A BOUNCE IN THE FUTURE EITHER! BILL CLINTON WILL NOT LET ANYONE TELL HIM WHAT HE WILL SAY IN A SPEECH AND YOU COULD BET HE WILL SAY WHAT THE OBAMA CAMP DON'T WANT YOU TO HEAR (ITS PART OF THE CLINTON PLAN!)
Your on this site too! You keep saying the same things over, and over and over again. So I guess in your smalll mind it must be true. Karl Rove would be proud of you!
Too all who would have voted for Hillary but not Obama, you deserve the mess we will be in. I hope your bitterness will keep you warm. I don't know a single Obama supporter who would not have voted for Hillary and you people are completely irresponsible. Immature children. Obama is no less prepared to be President than Bill Clinton was and he will be a much better President than Clinton because he has convictions where as Clinton only had ambitions. Would you all speak so disrespectfully of a white male. I doubt it. Scream race baiting all you want but
History suggests this won't be easy! Bidens history suggests this may be impossible for Obama now! Biden, Feinstein,Schumer and Kennedy (before his illness) and top DEMS grabbed themselves a very junior Senator to make a puppet out of him, using his race to ensure he could be puppet-walked to the White House without too much criticism as he is a black American!
This is racism in the extreme perpetrated by these senior Senators on the world stage, and shame on them!
But they can't stop the show now and one of them had to jump down onto the stage in the spot light to play as the puppets faithfull side-kick!
This ultra-liberal ticket is not a coincidence! There will be time ahead to dissect this arrangement. Nobody is going to like what is seen! Follow the strings and the money!
Brilliant article. It sharply focuses on what is wrong with Obama -- he is all style and little substance.
Brilliant article. It sharply focuses on what is wrong with Obama -- he is all style and little substance.
I am cracking up here...Obama down 2 points in the middle of his convention! Too funny...couldn' happen to a more deserving egomaniac.
Hmm...these persnickety Guardians of Propriety are quite impressive. Where are their probing investigations of McCain's keating Five Savings and Loans dealings? How about the free rides he gets on Anheuser-Busch corporate jets? Or the nest egg he received from A-B for his 1st campaign, and the next, and the next...? Oh, you whine don't pick on a war hero. How about his mentor George W. Bush? Did he get a multi-million dollar land swap deal to pony up the change to buy the Texas rangers.
Oh, that's right...You don't care about corruption in government (when it is done by Republicans). You just need an attack ad taking point against Obama. You have zero credibility.
Here's Obama's substance:
Q: In November 2006, we asked you if Rezko or his company solicit your support on any matter involving state or federal government. And you said no, I've never been asked to do anything to advance his business interests.
A: That's correct.
Q: However, we later learned that you wrote a letter on Oct. 28, 1998, to city and state housing officials urging them to fund a senior-citizen building that Rezko was developing with your former boss, Allison Davis - a deal that paid them $855,000 in development fees. All of which raises for us a couple of questions.
A: Before you ask the questions, he did not solicit that from me. I think his own counsel has indicated that he did not make the request for that letter. That was a project, it may have ended up coming from the alderman's office because I think they wrote the exact same form letter. This was a project that was well-regarded in the community, has done well, and was supported on its own merits, and it was essentially a form letter of the sort that I did all time. And that I wasn't, by the way, aware of.
Q: You weren't aware that he was associated with the project?
A: I wasn't even aware that we wrote the letter. The answer that I gave at the time was accurate as far as I knew.
Q: As you know, what it appears to be is endorsing the project of a client of your law firm and a campaign contributor in your official capacity as an
Illinois state senator.
A: I recall the story that you wrote together. And as I said before, this is not a letter he solicited. I don't know who solicited the letter. I had a single district director. These are letters of the sort that we did all the time. We would find out if a project was worthy. This was one of many form letters, or letters of recommendation we would send out constantly for all sorts of projects. And my understanding is that our letter was just one of many. And I wasn't a decision maker in any of this process.
BUT HE SIGNED THE LETTER - HE WAS IN CHARGE OF HIS OFFICE - OR IS THIS AN EXAMPLE OF THE WAY HE WOULD RUN THE WHITE HOUSE?
Here's Obama's substance:
Even though Illinois ethics disclosure forms are designed to reveal possible financial conflicts by lawmakers, on disclosure forms for 2001 and 2002, Obama did not specify that a Blackwell company involved (EKI) provided him with the bulk of the private-sector compensation he received. Instead, as was his custom, he attached a multi-page list of all the law firm's clients, which included EKI among hundreds. Illinois law does not require more specific disclosure.
Stanley Brand, a Washington lawyer who counsels members of Congress and others on ethics rules, said he would have advised a lawmaker in Obama's circumstances to separately disclose such a singularly important client and not simply include it on a list of hundreds of firm clients, even if the law does not explicitly require it. "I would say you should disclose that to protect and insulate yourself against the charge that you are concealing it," Brand said.
Obama's tax returns show that he made no money from his law practice in 2000, the year of his unsuccessful run for a congressional seat. But that changed in 2001, when Obama reported $98,158 income for providing legal services. Of that, $80,000 was from Blackwell's company.
In 2002, the state senator reported $34,491 from legal services and speeches. Of that, $32,000 came from the EKI legal assignment, which ended in April 2002 by mutual agreement, as Obama ceased the practice of law and looked ahead to the possibility of running for the U.S. Senate. .
Obama's spokesman said that listing all clients was appropriate and that doing so allowed the public to see any and all potential conflicts for Obama and his law firm colleagues. "He was especially mindful of this responsibility as a leader of ethics reform," said Gibbs, his chief campaign spokesman.
A few months after receiving his final payment from Blackwell's company, EKI, Obama sent a request on state Senate letterhead urging Illinois officials to provide a $50,000 tourism promotion grant to another Blackwell company, Killerspin.
Though Obama's formal efforts consisted of writing a letter and a proclamation, the nitty-gritty of obtaining state grants fell to a former state Senate and campaign aide to Obama, Dan Shomon.
Shomon, working part time for Obama's campaign and for Killerspin, helped prepare Killerspin's initial grant application in 2002. Still working part time with Obama, Shomon helped Killerspin secure a $200,000 grant for its 2003 tournament and a $100,000 grant for its 2004 tournament.
Nice return on Blackwell's "investment" in Obama. So much for Obama's sense of ethics and transparency.
Interestingly, Obama also misrepresented the sources of his income during this period in his interview with the Sun Times reporters:
Q: You're managing partner said you didn't leave the firm until you went to the U.S. Senate.
A: I stopped working at the firm as an associate when I went to the state senate in 1997, I became "of counsel" and for probably sporadically in the subsequent years would do some work over the summers with the firm or when I wasn't either in Springfield or teaching at the University of Chicago. I think it's fair to say that just about all the work that I billed had to do with litigation on civil rights cases and appellate work so it was entirely
separate form all the transactional [real estate/ neighborhood redevelopment] work that was done.
Enter comments if any for reporting abuse
Discuss