Posted By: Sultan Ahmed @ 09/05/2008 8:10:12 PM
Comment: It is right to say
there is agreement
in between,
agreement between two persons,
on their role,played in the past not at present,
can be said with full criminalty.
As a minister,
in the cabnit of his own wife,
and broke all the records,
by committing corruptions and called Mr.10 pc,
illegal gratification was received by him,
from the small factory owners.
there were some items like gold etc,
on which commission was imposed as ten percent,
it was special tex had no concern with any covernment institution,
as a minister under the cover of prime minister,
and prime minister was his wife.
You can say agreement,
you cansay,
it is no agreement,
i describe it a conspiracy,
against the whole nation,
all the crime including heroin casehas been deleted,
and aquitted him all the charges,
he did nothing for the nation,
but going to become head of the islamic state,
there is no concept of such a man like him,
really a conspiracy has been hatched aginst the nation,
looking what is going on happened never think so.
It has been done for safe exit,
there was no way out for Musharraf,
every corner was occupied by the unconstitutional action,
as he did by declaring emergency on 3th November 2008.
Iftekhar choudhery had become a nightmare for him,
he came in the dreams and a brave general began crying for safe exit,
In the meanwile ,
ppp appeared as majority party,
so two criminal met eachother,
and succeed to save eachothers.
Loading Menu