I’m Rubber, You’re Glue ...

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Davole @ 08/24/2008 7:24:31 PM

    Obama Misspeaks, Calls Biden 'The Next President'; Biden Calls Obama 'Barack America'
    August 23, 2008

    ABC News' Sara Just reports: Journalists who were awake until the wee hours waiting for confirmation that Sen. Joe Biden, D-Del., was indeed Barack Obama's running mate, cannot be blamed if their hearing is a little fuzzy today.

    But after today's Obama-Biden speeches to a massive crowd in Springfield, Ill., many reporters are rolling back the tape and asking each other, "Did he really say that?"

    When introducing his running mate, Obama said, "So let me introduce to you the next president - the next vice president of the US of America, Joe Biden."

    And then when it was Biden's turn to speak, the Delaware senator called the presumptive Democratic nominee "Barack America" instead of Barack Obama.

    "My friends, I don't have to tell you, this election year the choice is clear. One man stands ready to deliver change we desperately need. A man I???m proud to call my friend. A man who will be the next president of the United States, Barack America,??? Biden said, per ABC News' Sunlen Miller.

    • Posted By: systems88 @ 08/25/2008 5:39:17 PM

      Barry's funniest selection of gaffes took place in Virginia. He talked about BREATHALYZER in reference to asthma. His own daughter has asthma and has probably used a NEBULIZER. Check out the other ones while you're there. Not like the MSM ever mentions them.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eI5Eo9OMSgU&feature=related

    • Posted By: loriw @ 08/25/2008 1:42:07 AM

      And they said McCain is senile? Biden must be just as senile.
      And Obama...well he just had a little JUNIOR moment.

  • Posted By: Cazador1972 @ 08/23/2008 8:47:25 PM


    Well, I disagree with the over-simplifying of the reason why campaigns fail. Dukakis' tank moment is short had for his failed bid but he didn't lose because of that, he lost because George H. W. Bush attacked him and he didn't defend himself. Kerry (who should have known better) didn't lose because of the Swift Boaters, he lost because it took him two months to call them on it. In both cases people wondered, with good reason, how can a person defend this country when they are unwilling to defend their good names.

    Things stick or don't but to reduce a campaign to a single symbol works well for TV but is rarely the case in real life. Obama did well in choosing Biden, because as an attack dog he'll pound on McCain day in and day out, that's what people want to see, someone who will fight for them. Is it an accident that the most influential Democratic politician in the last 16 years won the White House twice because he never hesitated in taking off the gloves? Hardly.

    • Posted By: systems88 @ 08/25/2008 5:33:15 PM

      Did you see the two of them on stage together? Barry looked like the back up act. Biden looked much more presidential.

  • Posted By: Chaotician @ 08/24/2008 12:16:39 PM

    McSame: This pathetic old man has one virtue; he got shot down in another stupid war and survived his stay at the Hanoi Hilton for American pilots bombing a major population center! His learning: "you cannot trust the American people"; they must be kept ignorant of what's real going on in a chosen war, prevented from interfering with the Generals and the "leaders" so that a war can be properly "won", and the use of recycled Generals, Admirals, administration "spokesman" to "sell" the war at every turn is legitimate deception! This man thinks we should and could have ???won??? the Vietnam war, if we the people, had not chickened out; that we can have ???victory??? no matter how poorly defined in Iraq; that we can ???win??? the War on Terror??? if we kill ???them??? all; that surrounding and isolating Russia, China, North Korea, Iran, Syria, Venezuela, Cuba, Chad, etc. is the way to achieve world ???peace???!! This man supports Corporate annexation of our government, use of government to restrict ???free??? enterprise to the chosen owners of congress, use of government ???regulations??? and ???regulators??? to facilitate the looting of our treasury, our natural wealth, our parks and preserves, and all ???public??? resources! He actively installs judicial activists to promote the death oriented philosophies of the Evangelical movement and the most ???rabid??? reactionary preachers of lies, filth, and heresy! He is an apostate of Strauss; a fellow traveler with Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld, Cheney, Feith, Clarence Thomas, Bork, Kristol, Alan Keyes, Francis Fukuyama; Ashcroft; and William Galston to name a few! The Straussian ???noble Lie??? fist so well with their assumption of ???elite??? right to lead and be served by the lesser humans who actually ???own??? no houses!

    • Posted By: systems88 @ 08/25/2008 5:29:03 PM

      How old are you? You are a disgrace to all Americans saying: "This pathetic old man has one virtue; he got shot down in another stupid war and survived his stay at the Hanoi Hilton for American pilots bombing a major population center!" He was held in captivity and tortured for SIX years. What you have said is completely ignorant and reflects highly on your supposed man above the fray candidate. Have you served this country? Barry hasn't. He didn't even have the time to visit out injured and maimed troops. Why don't you post something Barry has done? Because this is all you have?

  • Posted By: Zombiehero @ 08/24/2008 7:30:40 AM

    Biden has accepted $5,133,072 in contributions from lawyers and lobbyists since 2003. Obama does not accept contributions from federally registered lobbyists.

    And he has one other weakness that hasn't received much attention to date. One of Biden's sons, Hunter, is a registered Washington lobbyist in a year in which Obama has been excoriating lobbyists and the culture of corruption in Washington. The younger Biden is a name partner at the firm Oldaker, Biden & Belair, LLP, and seems to have specialized in lobbying for just the kind of earmark spending by Congress that Obama has vowed to slash. Republican insiders say the party is likely to make an issue of Biden???s family lobbying ties.

    Also expect to hear more about Biden???s close ties with credit card companies. His largest contributor (based on total contributions by employees) over the past five years has been MBNA, the Delaware-based bank aquired in 2005 by Bank of America than until then was the world's largest independent credit card issuer and a major supporter of the 2005 bankruptcy bill that Biden crossed the aisle to support.
    http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0808/12735.html

    • Posted By: Zombiehero @ 08/24/2008 7:35:01 AM

      Take a look at the top five industries that donate to Biden as well:

      * Lawyers/law firms
      * Real estate
      * Retired
      * Securities & investment
      * Miscellaneous finance

      Didn't Obama say something about how lobbyist money has no place in "His" Party?

      • Posted By: Davole @ 08/24/2008 3:35:15 PM

        Zombiehero -

        Don't forget the numerous teachers' unions that support Obama - now how many special interest individuals would that entail?

        • Posted By: Zombiehero @ 08/24/2008 3:37:57 PM

          Well you know the Audacity of Hypocrisy that is the Obama campaign. Most Obama supporters refuse to accept reality if it slapped them in the face.

          • Posted By: systems88 @ 08/25/2008 5:21:27 PM

            Because they're too busy trying to slap the posters who know the truth about Barry.

      • Posted By: barrypropaganda @ 08/25/2008 2:46:51 PM

        yeah just like he said "no old washington politics" and then hires on the sixth most senior member of the senate. somebody who has been in washignton longer than bush, chaney, McCain or either of the Clintons. biden has a bigger mouth than President Clinton and has said more damaging things about barry and more complimentary things about McCain than Sen Clinton ever did.

  • Posted By: Red Meat Democrat @ 08/24/2008 11:03:23 AM

    I have to agree with some of the posts here that Newsweek has lost all journalistic integrity and any hint of fairness. Sad that it had to come to this. As far as McCain and his houses, well I can't fault a guy for having the good sense to marry a beautiful rich young woman.

    • Posted By: Zombiehero @ 08/24/2008 2:17:35 PM

      According to Politico...all the houses are owned by Cindy anyway...so really Obama is attacking McCain's wife....didn't Obama say wives were off limits? Or has that "changed" now too?

      • Posted By: systems88 @ 08/25/2008 5:18:56 PM

        The DNC/MSM attacked Sen Clinton relentlessly...like they still are...but they are crucifying people for saying anything about Michelle. Why the double standard? White guilt.

      • Posted By: Davole @ 08/24/2008 3:05:09 PM

        Zombiehero -

        Despite whatever Obama may have said, what he really meant is that HIS WIFE is off limits!

        And that will probably be his lone consistency!

        • Posted By: loriw @ 08/25/2008 2:05:13 AM

          Didn't Michelle hold a position of hospital administrator? I wonder what her hospital's policy and procedure was on late term abortions and their "handling" of infants born alive after a failed abortion. I'm talking about the time period during which her husband was voting against legislation that could have given these babies some medical care. Did she share her husbands views on promoting infanticide?

          • Posted By: systems88 @ 08/25/2008 5:05:37 PM

            Mrs Barry's job was to turn uninsured patients away from the ER so University of Chicago could pay her bump in salary after barry became Senator.

        • Posted By: Zombiehero @ 08/24/2008 3:16:11 PM

          Obama knows that Michelle is a wild card that can really hurt him nationally. Have you noticed that she hasn't said much lately? I wonder why?

          • Posted By: raddave @ 08/24/2008 5:22:08 PM

            Because maybe she is tired of *** like you attaking her every time she opens her mouth.

            • Posted By: Zombiehero @ 08/24/2008 6:22:42 PM

              Maybe if she'd say something good instead of condescending and angry remarks, we wouldn't bash her for her gaffes....but no she has to say crap like "first time in my life." Try to do some of your own research for once...stop being a sheep.

          • Posted By: pearsoncrz @ 08/24/2008 6:12:06 PM

            Her thesis promotes voluntary segregation based on race as somehow better for blacks.

      • Posted By: raddave @ 08/24/2008 5:21:13 PM

        All of the houses are not owned by Cindy, and you are grasping at straws to make this an attack on her, she was not asked how many homes they own and couldn't remember, it was John McCain who could not remember.

        • Posted By: Zombiehero @ 08/24/2008 6:20:39 PM

          GO to politico and read for yourself...or are you accusing politico of lying?
          http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0808/12700.html
          "how many houses he and his wife, Cindy, own. Sen. McCain himself does not own any of the properties. They're all owned by Cindy McCain, her dependent children and the trusts and companies they control."

          Seriously learn to do some research on your own, don't just parrot whatever Obama tells you to parrot.

        • Posted By: pearsoncrz @ 08/24/2008 6:10:51 PM

          You are parroting the talking point -- go check out the video yourself, he didn't forget anything. McCain realized it was a trick question. The dems already had the ad ready to air and just wanted some film of McCain answering the question. It didn't matter what his answer was, they were going to misconstrue it.

  • Posted By: Zombiehero @ 08/24/2008 2:37:56 PM

    I wonder if Mr. Alter reads these comments? Does he care that a lot of people see him as nothing more that an Obama Propaganda tool? Does he care that he lost all journalistic credibility?

    • Posted By: loriw @ 08/25/2008 1:48:33 AM

      Zombiehero, I think they are being told to write pro-Obama propaganda because the Obama campaign has dropped a HUGE amount of money on Newsweek for advertising and you know that Newsweek would not piss off someone that is giving them that kind of advertising revenue. Sad thing is after Newsweek has sold out their credibility the "chosen one" will lose and Newsweek will be left in the ashes of the reputation that the burned on the alter of the almighty dollar.

      • Posted By: systems88 @ 08/25/2008 4:55:31 PM

        CNN was advertising on Barry's official website. Conflict of interest?

    • Posted By: systems88 @ 08/25/2008 4:46:43 PM

      No, he clearly doesn't. But he keeps providing plenty of evidence of MSM bias.

    • Posted By: raddave @ 08/24/2008 5:12:33 PM

      Only you right wingers feel that way because Alter will not kiss McCain's ass.

  • Posted By: topcat2001 @ 08/24/2008 1:53:22 PM

    Americans like Lori make me fu*king sick. If you want to help third world countries stop bombing us so you can win elections and stop propping up dictators so you can feed your oil addiction which is worse than that of any junkies I have seen in third world shacks.
    And you hypocrites want Obama to send money to an unknown family member who wants nothing but to stand on his own legs.
    I have to go puke now.

    • Posted By: systems88 @ 08/25/2008 4:48:58 PM

      What do you know about Barry's family in Kenya? Are you aware that Barry promised to send them money for their orphanage and school and never did? Why don't you do a little googling after you get done puking?

    • Posted By: loriw @ 08/25/2008 1:54:10 AM

      Your accusations of me are totally unfounded.

      And your post makes no sense.

  • Posted By: Perusing-through @ 08/25/2008 4:24:59 AM

    WHY IS IT A SURPRISE THAT ROUGHLY 30% OF HILLARY'S VOTERS IS GOING WITH McCAIN?

    This should not be a surprise. Exit polls taken after numerous democratic primaries showed 10%-to-20% of those voting for Hillary, said they would never vote for a Black man as POTUS. These are not my words. These are the responses given to exit pollers as they queried voters exiting the polls. It is only logical that if 15% of her voters freely acknowledged Obama's race as the reason they voted for Hillary, then you can safely assume a matching 15% felt the same but did not publicly admit it. In addition, 10%-to-30% of Hillary's voters were primarily GOP crossover voters and Reagan Democrats, that acknowledge to polling people that they were planning to vote GOP in November no matter what.

    With these two facts unhidden and publicly available, why is it a surprise that nearly 30% of Hillary's voters are supporting McCain? Duh?

    With 20%-to-30% of Hillary's voters acknowledging during the primary they never planned to vote Democratic in November's General Elections, is it not disingenuous for Hillary to claim she has 18-million cracks in the ceiling. Really? With 20%-to-30% never planning to vote for Hillary in November? Is it really 18-million "sincere Hillary supporters", or is 18-million minus 3.6-million crossover voters causing havoc in the democratic primary?

    • Posted By: pearsoncrz @ 08/25/2008 11:03:52 AM

      Wrong on the cross over voters for Hillary, it was Obama who was wooing the republicans back in 2007, getting them to change their registrations so they could vote to defeat HRC. No surprise that they returned to the republican fold since Obama only asked them to be democrats for a day.

      I'm going to be a republican for a day, because I won't vote for a man who admits using cocaine for years.

      • Posted By: raddave @ 08/25/2008 3:19:38 PM

        Actually it was Rush Limbaugh who invited people to become democrats for a day to vote for the weaker candidate, Hillary Clinton.

        • Posted By: systems88 @ 08/25/2008 4:43:29 PM

          And where is the proof they did? You can't say either way.

        • Posted By: Rocky2001 @ 08/25/2008 3:59:55 PM

          Weaker??? BaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaWaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaHaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!

    • Posted By: systems88 @ 08/25/2008 4:42:39 PM

      You may want to peruse through those polls again and report them factually. You may also want to read the polling results that showed more Americans were uncomfortable with a woman as president than a black man. So nice try.

    • Posted By: barrypropaganda @ 08/25/2008 12:12:09 PM

      QUOTE THE POLLS.

  • Posted By: S.Damon @ 08/25/2008 9:01:30 AM

    Sean actually makes some sense here. The media is always looking for that ???sticky??? moment to either catapult or sink a politician. We as Americans need to do our own research and figure out which candidate is best for us. The numbers are what they are???.just numbers and are not an accurate depiction of who Americans will REALLY vote for.

    Here???s a hypothetical question: You are in a voting both, the ballot outlines the policies of Candidate 1 & Candidate 2. No mention of age, race, color, party affiliation or wealth. Who would you vote for? Probably the one that has your best interest in mind???Right? So why can???t we just close our eyes and take this approach with this upcoming election??? It might sound naive, but a person can dream. :)

    We as Americans need to vote for the best candidate to lead this country back to prominence and take care of home first. Regardless of their race, creed or color.

    • Posted By: systems88 @ 08/25/2008 4:40:55 PM

      What you outline is an absolute impossibility.

  • Posted By: Jjc2008 @ 08/25/2008 10:23:50 AM

    What difference does it make Mr. Alter. As long as we don't have the chance to vote for that horrid woman that you and your fellow journalists destroyed with your sexism, your personal bias, it's win-win for you. I write with disgust as a long time democrat who has no party any more; who has no fourth estate to go to for truth and protection of democracy.
    Nothing will change no matter who is elected because the system is gamed. The men like you and your peers have kept us out. Enjoy what you have created.

    • Posted By: barrypropaganda @ 08/25/2008 2:26:57 PM

      the Primary is forever illegitimate. negotiations took place behind closed doors. period. what if the positions were reversed? would the MSM be saying barry isnt trying hard enough? laughable. would barry get a complete roll call? would he have been asked to give up his delegates? would he have been told for months to get out already? would his black voters be called bitter and racist and ragged at to just get over it? would barry be blamed for their protesting? would barry have been forced and publicly bashed for not "conceeding" on the night of his last primary? would he have been told that Sen Clinton won even though he got the most votes cast for him? would he have been expected to campaign for him before he became the nominee? and when he did would the MSM be coming straight out and challenging his efforts? would he have been forced to suspend his campaign before the convention? and the MSM wonders why Clinton supporters are angry? all they have to do is interchange the names and see what would happen. this is a complete and utter fraud--as is barry. the American people will not have nominated barry. the DNC/super delegates will be coronating him. barry has the MSM/DNC campaigning for him and trying to destroy the Clintons in the same breath and barrys tied with bush 3. why? it's not the Sen Clinton bitter estrogen-filled feminazis. its the longtime (meaning most likely to vote) democrats who have watched barry the fraud and the MSM/DNC totally disrespect President Cllinton and his legacy.

      • Posted By: systems88 @ 08/25/2008 4:40:05 PM

        If it's not the angry or BITTER (the only word the botlets can come up with) Clinton supporters, it's because people are racists. It can't possibly be because he's a fraud and real people can spot a fraud. Did you hear Barry try out Sen Clinton's speech. He said I will get up every morning and work for you. Even Barry couldn't pull that off. He gets up in the morning thinking about how to inflate his ego. Period.

  • Posted By: Davole @ 08/25/2008 12:21:03 PM

    Obama camp downplays Clinton backers at convention
    MyWay by Darlene Superville Aug 25, 2008

    DENVER (AP) - Barack Obama's campaign dismissed concerns about the impact of die-hard supporters of Hillary Rodham Clinton on the choreographed show of unity Democrats were opening Monday at their nominating convention.

    Opening night at the Pepsi Center, the main venue for the four-day Democratic National Convention, aimed to tell the Illinois senator's personal story to the millions of voters nationwide who will begin tuning in to the presidential campaign. Obama's wife, Michelle, was the evening's keynote speaker.

    An emotional highlight was expected to come with a video tribute to Sen. Edward M. Kennedy. The liberal stalwart was diagnosed in May with a malignant brain tumor and has had surgery and a six-week course of chemotherapy and radiation.

    Behind the scenes, however, polls showing significant Clinton support still being denied to Obama and pro-Clinton demonstrations at offsite venues were creating a different kind of anticipation. Clinton has backed Obama and was scheduled to speak Tuesday night.

    "There are a lot of delegates here who had passionate choices in an extended primary season," Obama spokesman Robert Gibbs told "Today" on NBC. "We feel confidant that if we can demonstrate a record of change, a record of vision ... a team of Barack Obama and Joe Biden can convince Democrats, Republicans and independents to support a ticket of change in November."

    Republican candidate John McCain tried to widen any schism remaining between primary-season rivals with a TV ad featuring a Clinton supporter who now backs McCain over Obama.

    "She had the experience and judgment to be president," says Debra Bartoshevich, identified by the McCain campaign as a former Clinton delegate. Of McCain, she says: "I respect his maverick and independent streak, and now he's the one with the experience and judgment. A lot of Democrats will vote McCain. It's OK, really!"

    • Posted By: systems88 @ 08/25/2008 4:34:20 PM

      They haven't even taken into account the Sen Clinton supporters who are going to write her in on the ballot.

  • Posted By: barrypropaganda @ 08/25/2008 2:06:27 PM

    JONNY ALTERED REALITY:

    I just saw you on ABRAMS talking about "Hillary" supporters. You dont have a clue. None of you do. Sen Clinton supporters arent angry because its supposed to be her party. Hillary people arent having a second wave of bad feeling about barry. why do the numbers keep increasing? its the first wave being joined by others including once barrybots.

    THEY FEEL IT WAS TAKEN FROM HER AND THEY DESERVED IT. THEYRE VERY BITTER. you bots sure love this word dont you? every time you say it it harkens back to barrys ragging about the votes who can see right through his fraud. so carry on about the bitter feminazis. Youve talked to them jonny? why now? theyve been talking to you in every one of your articles and you didnt listen then. they thought it would be the funnest part of their summer? do you know how utterly ridiculous that is? it goes well beyond that and the more you continue to dis her Sen/Mr Clinton the more that number will go up like it has. For all your supposed knowledge you seem to forgotten that Mr Bill is the only dem whos won since '80. Not even Gore could win without Mr Bill campaigning--DONNA BRAZILE being the political genius she isnt.


    Youre even more clueless when you started talking about VP. Yes Sen Clinton should have been vetted. Stop your crap about UNCONFIRMED reports that Sen Clinton didnt want to be vetted. Thats a lie and you know it. Your integrity--whatever you may have once possessed is COMPLETELY GONE. Clinton supporters knew that she wouldnt be caught dead on barrys ticket. She knows hes a fraud and he knows it too. It was clear once barry gave caroline kennedy the job and then pissed on when he hired solis doyle. get a grip. Sen Clinton supporters arent mesmerized cult members. They see whats going on and how the MSM/DNC has orchestrated barrys nomination.

    funny thing is with all the help from the MSM/DNC barrys tied with McCain.

    THIS SHOWS YOUR ABSOLUTE IDIOCY: You said they met at PELOSIs house. They met at SEN DIANE FEINSTEINs. You call yourself a journalist? ABSOLUTELY PATHETIC.

    Then you go on to say that barry didnt dis her all based on UNCONFIRMED REPORTS THAT ONLY NOW CAME TO LIGHT after SEN CLINTON supporters spoke out. Utter BS. had that truly been the case barry would have released the info immediately.

    Heres a clue: ITS NOT UP TO SEN CLINTON TO GET HER SUPPORTERS TO VOTE FOR BARRY. SHES DOING ALL SHE CAN AND HAS BEEN CAMPAIGNING FOR HIM--SOMETHING NO OTHER RUNNER UP HAS DONE BEFORE THE CONVENTION. Ted Kennedy? STOP SAYING SHES DOING IT HALF-HEARTEDLY AS IT IS PISSING OFF EVEN MORE PEOPLE. ITS BARRYS JOB AND BARRYS ALONE AND HE HASNT TRIED IN THE LEAST. HE HAS GONE OUT OF HIS WAY TO ALIENATE HER SUPPORTERS--EXHIBIT A: SOLIS DOYLE.

    Keep it up jonny. YOU ALONE ARE A BIG REASON CLINTON SUPPORTERS ARENT COMING AROUND. IF YOU WANT TO FULFILL YOUR 2006 PROPHECY YOU BETTER SHUT UP OR GET A CLUE.

    • Posted By: barrypropaganda @ 08/25/2008 2:09:10 PM

      DISCLOSURE: (Something you might try jonny)

      I am not a Clinton/McCain voter. I am interested only in exposing the pro-obama MSM bias.

      • Posted By: systems88 @ 08/25/2008 4:33:12 PM

        I second. Alter doesn't care what his readers think and I don't for a minute believe he talked to any Clinton supporters. He is the most in the tank for barry. And as long as they all keep calling her "Hillary" they aren't going to be won over and Barry will be Barry.

      • Posted By: AskPlus @ 08/25/2008 3:03:34 PM

        Therefore you are a Clinton/McCain voter attempting to take votes away from Obama by proxy-smear.

        • Posted By: barrypropaganda @ 08/25/2008 3:09:30 PM

          can't you read?

          • Posted By: deebee1222 @ 08/25/2008 4:02:19 PM

            Wow, this reads as bad as what the Bush haters say about him. Talk about bitter. Sheesh!

  • Posted By: systems88 @ 08/25/2008 4:28:32 PM

    ALTER--It is the economy, stupid. So why are they making President Clinton talk about Barry?

  • Posted By: yola @ 08/24/2008 1:05:03 PM

    Every family has skeletons in their closets, so lets not judge Obama for his half brother or sisters. His father chose to abandon him and go back to his country and marry and have more children and Obama's mother raised him. I would like to know about Ms. McCain half sister if they are going to question Obama.

    • Posted By: pearsoncrz @ 08/24/2008 6:08:37 PM

      What charity has Obama given his own money, not the Rezko tainted money, his own hard earned cash?

      • Posted By: barrypropaganda @ 08/25/2008 3:22:24 PM

        2000-2004 ~ 1% joint income to charity
        2005 ~ 5%
        2006 ~ 6%
        2007 5.7%

        $26,270 of it to wright's Trinity United Church of Christ.

        http://philanthropy.com/news/updates/4418/barack-and-michele-obama-donated-57-of-income-to-charity-in-2007


    • Posted By: loriw @ 08/25/2008 1:58:40 AM

      No one here that I have read has bashed Obama's half brother or sister. The are wondering why Obama who quotes the Bible "whatever you do for the least of my brothers...." and then doesn't even help his own family, his own blood.
      Ms. McCain is NOT running for POTUS or quoting the Bible out of one side of her mouth while insulting those of us that believe and live what the Bible says.

  • Posted By: cferns1530 @ 08/24/2008 11:06:16 AM

    Alter never fails to impress. Those who disagree can find something because this section is called VOICES. If Alter's voice say this then heed or find a conservative bulletin.

    • Posted By: barrypropaganda @ 08/25/2008 2:54:48 PM

      the MSM is supposed to be unbiased reporting. JONNY ALTER has never one come out and said he is pro-obama nor has any of the NEWSWEEK staff. that is journalistic corruption aka propaganda.

  • Posted By: gommy goomy @ 08/24/2008 7:46:24 AM

    I'm curios, Johnny. How many of those houses did the McCains purchase with the help of some SCUMBALL, SLUM LORD CROOK, who's waiting in the docks, to be sentenced to heavy JAIL TIME? And how many MILLION DOLLAR MANSIONS do they own, as their HALF BROTHER lives in a SHACK on under $1 a MONTH? THAT'S the question. But, of course, you'll NEVER ask it. Do something with your stupid hair. Idiot.

    • Posted By: Mimi13 @ 08/24/2008 7:15:01 PM

      The only "help" the Obamas got to purchase their single home was in securing a buyer for the adjacent vacant property, which that buyer, Mrs. Rezuk, later sold at a hefty profit.

      And while the Obamas one only one home, Cindy McCain owns seven, eight or ten (depending upon who's counting and what's counted) and possesses a $100 million fortune and she completly ignores and fails to even recognize who own two sisters. They're not far away on another contenent. One is living in Pheonix. Cindy Lou can't be bothered.

      "Yesterday, after Italian Vanity Fair dredged up Barack Obama's destitute, estranged brother, George Hussein Onyango Obama, in a shack in Nairobi, we wondered if the McCain campaign would use it against the moneyed Democratic candidate. It seems someone on the Obama campaign might have thought the same thing, because yesterday came the news that there were not one but two unacknowledged siblings on the McCain side. Kathleen Hensley Portalski, of Phoenix, told NPR she's bummed that Cindy's been going around calling herself the "only child" of beer baron Jim Hensley when she knows full well her dad had another child, namely Portalski, before he met Cindy's mom. That Kathleen, a slightly fatter dead-ringer for Cindy, got a mere $10,000 from her dad's will when Cindy got millions also stings a little bit, but Portalski says at this point she just wants to be recognized. "It's terribly painful," Portalski said of McCain's repeated "only child" claims. "It is as if she is the 'real' daughter. I am also a real daughter." Ouch. Furthermore, Cindy McCain's mother had another daughter, Dixie Burd, when she met Jim Hensley, but no one knows what happened to her, and Cindy McCain is not about to explain things. "Mrs. McCain was raised as the only child of Jim and Marguerite Hensley, and there was no familiar relationship with any other sibling," the McCain campaign said in response to the kerfuffle. Wow, she didn't even acknowledge them in the statement? That's pretty cold." New York magazine.
      .

      • Posted By: barrypropaganda @ 08/25/2008 2:43:00 PM

        MIMI 13

        "The only "help" the Obamas got to purchase their single home was in securing a buyer for the adjacent vacant property, which that buyer, Mrs. Rezuk, later sold at a hefty profit."

        Stick to McCain bashing. Her name is RITA REZKO, wife of syrian born, convicted felon and former barry campaign finance advisor, TONY REZKO. And it was not later sold at a "hefty profit". Since you are so well-informed: who bought the lot?

        it's amazing how you bots are completely clueless and yet continue to blog for barry. how much are you getting paid? not a single one of you has any concept of facts - but you have no problem bashing barry's opponents and posters.

        CHANGE WE CAN BELIEVE IN!!!

  • Posted By: ppedjr @ 08/25/2008 12:58:50 PM

    But we especially mention Alter???s eight-year-old column because of that passage from his new piece. ???Al Gore never actually said, ???I invented the Internet,?????? Alter writes this week???eight years after he wrote the column which threw that claim into an unholy stew about Gore???s ???fibbing??? and ???lying.??? It was easy to be a Republican then, with people like Alter playing that game. Sorry, but Republicans didn???t have to ???play the game with genius, courage, creativity,??? as Kinsley pretends. They just had to peddle their bull-roar???and then watch the Alters recite.
    http://dailyhowler.com/

  • Posted By: Davole @ 08/25/2008 12:02:05 PM

    Poll for White House Tied
    by Paul Steinhauser CNN Deputy Political Director

    DENVER, Colorado (CNN) -- It's a dead heat in the race for the White House.
    The first national poll conducted after Barack Obama publicly named Joe Biden as his running mate suggests that the battle for the presidency between the Illinois senator and John McCain is all tied up.

    In a new CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll released Sunday night, 47 percent of those questioned are backing Obama, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominees, with an equal amount supporting his Republican opponent, McCain.

    "This looks like a step backward for Obama, who had a 51 to 44 percent advantage last month," said CNN Polling Director Keating Holland. "Even last week, just before his choice of Joe Biden as his running mate became known, most polls tended to show Obama with a single-digit advantage over McCain."

    So what's the difference now?

    It may be supporters of Hillary Clinton, who still would prefer the New York senator and former first lady as the Democratic Party's presidential nominee.

    Sixty-six percent of Clinton supporters -- registered Democrats who want Clinton as the nominee -- are now backing Obama. That's down from 75 percent in the end of June. Twenty-seven percent of them now say they'll support McCain, up from 16 percent in late June.

    "The number of Clinton Democrats who say they would vote for McCain has gone up 11 points since June, enough to account for most, although not all, of the support McCain has gained in that time," Holland said

  • Posted By: Mistahtom @ 08/25/2008 11:38:48 AM

    Gore's "I invented the internet" quote was so taken out of context that you could have used it to claim that he murdered Jimmy Hoffa or kidnapped the Lindberg baby. Gore said "I've traveled to every part of this country during the last six years. During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet. I took the initiative in moving forward a whole range of initiatives that have proven to be important to our country's economic growth and environmental protection, improvements in our educational system. Too bad the MSM were the only news outlets at that time. The myth of his quote would have been debunked before it really became a phony issue.

  • Posted By: dunnhaupt @ 08/25/2008 8:20:31 AM

    It was not owning seven houses, it was his senior moment of not remembering how many, that mattered. It is scary to think of such a forgetful doddering senior citizen sitting at that Oval Office desk, trying to remember all the thousands of details, dates, and names that come to him from all over the world on a daily basis. There will be no more little crib sheets and teleprompters to help him.

    • Posted By: pearsoncrz @ 08/25/2008 11:00:57 AM

      It wasn't that he didn't remember, it was a trick question, obviously a plant, and he was smart to mention the condos (which are neither houses nor homes) and then simply say, "I'll get back to you" rather than ask for clarification of a question which really is not relevant to the election.

      Most senators have multiple residences as a necessity for serving their constituents.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse