DeAgostini-Getty Images

Is There a Surgical Cure for Diabetes?

A controversial doctor says yes; his critics say 'bull----.'

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

Diabetes is one of the oldest known diseases of the western world—diagnosed by Hippocrates, and named 300 years before the fall of Rome—but its cause was unknown for centuries until a surgeon stumbled upon it in 1889 with the help of a few unlucky dogs. Oskar Minkowski was curious about the pancreas; neither he nor anyone else knew what its function was. So he removed the organ from several dogs, who promptly after developed diabetes and died. By accident, Minkowski had discovered one of the functions of the organ: regulating insulin levels.

In the decades since, doctors have learned a great deal more about diabetes and its most common form, type 2 diabetes; what it is (the body not producing enough insulin or the cells ignoring the insulin produced) and how to control it (with drugs, up to a point). But there's still a lot they don't understand. So it's a little startling to listen to Francesco Rubino, a surgeon at New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, talk about the disease. He thinks he's found one of the root causes and, he says, it isn't necessarily in the pancreas. He also thinks he's found a cure, which happens to be his specialty: gastric bypass surgery. Is he crazy?  An opportunist perhaps, seeking to boost his business? Or is he Minkowski's heir, a surgeon whose unexpected findings could forever change the way we think about this common illness?

The exact cause of type 2 diabetes is still unknown. Many doctors subscribe to the "lipocentric hypothesis," which pins the blame on extra pounds. Even if the body makes lots of insulin to process or store blood sugars, the theory goes, the extra weight overwhelms it. "The fat in your belly is very insulin-resistant," says George Fielding, a bariatric surgeon at New York University. "So as that fat increases, the insulin in the body just isn't strong enough to work against it, and the person gets diabetes." That explanation, however, doesn't work for everyone, because it fails to account for the 20 percent of type 2 diabetes patients who aren't overweight. "They're very active, and they eat properly," says Paul Robertson, a prominent diabetes researcher in Seattle. As for what could be causing the illness in those cases, says Robertson, "we're left scratching our heads."

Rubino started pondering this problem in 1999, when he was a young surgeon doing gastric bypass for patients who needed it solely for the purpose of weight loss. He was aware of the operation's secondary effects: "It had the most powerful anti-diabetic effect I'd ever seen," he says. But something didn't make sense. His diabetic patients were being cured of diabetes in the first few weeks after their gastric-bypass operations, before the surgery could lead to substantial weight loss. They were still carrying around their insulin-resistant fat even as their insulin began to work.

Rubino recalled a series of experimental stomach and intestine operations from the 1940s that had cured humans of ulcers and gastric cancers, and, as a side benefit, of diabetes, too. He also knew that the gastrointestinal tract produces, among other things, at least two hormones called "incretins" involved in diabetes. So Rubino wondered whether some part of the digestive system might be malfunctioning and causing diabetes, and whether he could cure the disease simply by removing that part. First, he tried out his theory in hundreds of rats. In one experiment, he rerouted the upper part of the small intestine of animals that were diabetic (but not obese) so that food did not enter that part of the gut. Sure enough, those rats were cured of diabetes. Next, he compared gastric bypass in obese rats with a "draconian diet" to see whether the operation's effect on diabetes was solely linked to the animals' weight loss. "The operation was more powerful than the diet," he says. Finally, he did a similar comparison between surgery and insulin-boosting meds. Again, the operation won out. He published his results in 2004, and shortly thereafter, doctors around the world took the idea and ran with it. They started a number of human clinical trials in thin patients; trials that are ongoing today. Rubino, for his part, kept operating on his overweight patients with traditional bypass surgery, and in the process, curing them of diabetes.

Rubino's theory and operation are controversial, to put it mildly. "When I first started this research [nine years ago]," he says, "a colleague told me someone was going to want to kill me." Most doctors remain convinced that the cause of diabetes is not in the gut but in the fat that surrounds it. "Getting rid of that excess fat" is and has always been the key to treating diabetes, says Roger Unger, a leading diabetes expert at UT Southwestern Medical Center.

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution

Using emotion to convince people to change.

Heaven Can Wait
Heaven Can Wait

A new book promises proof of eternal life.

The World's Biggest Foods
The World's Biggest Foods

Monster edibles from around America.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: weathered @ 12/20/2008 3:00:13 PM

    Gastric bypass may cure your diabetes, but you're signing yourself up for a laundry list of other health problems. Find another alternative.

  • Posted By: CluelessAmericans @ 11/27/2008 12:57:49 AM

    This article actually CLEARLY refers to Type 2 diabetes (the preventable kind related to obesity and poor diet). Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease (an immune system disease). There is no information here that will help Type 1 diabetes. You'd have to completely reset a person's immune system and regrow a new pancreas. That is not what this article describes. Type 1 diabetes has nothing to do with the "diabetes" you read about in the media or the form your grandma has. As for the 20% of thin "Type 2 diabetics", there is good reason to think that 15% of those people really have late/slow onset misdiagnosed TYPE 1 diabetes, and/or MODY a rare form of genetic diabetes.

  • Posted By: dloglisci @ 09/10/2008 9:58:29 AM

    I believe the title IS misleading because there's a huge difference between Type I andType II and, unfortunately, I don't think this potential cure applies to Type I diabetes. In any event, Puppyluv should explain to his/her relatives that, regardless of whether this doctor is correct about the cause of Type II diabetes, it is firmly established that Type I diabetes has nothing to do with being overweight and is not caused by anything a person does or fails to do. It's an autoimmune disease that attacks the insulin-producing cells in the pancreas so that no insulin is produced. In fact, my daughter was diagnosed with Type I when she was 7 years old and she has never been even remotely overweight (not an ounce of fat anywhere, including in the belly). Puppyluv should either set her inorant relatives straight or stop caring about what they think or say. It's hard enough to deal with diabetes without having to deal with rude, insensitive and ignorant people.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now