SPONSORED BY:

Oral Exam

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

Obama's speech itself, on the other hand, was even better on TV than in person. I thought the it was terrific, presidential, strong, strong, passionate.

For three decades, every Democratic presidential nominee has mounted the stage and told the country, "Don't worry, I'm not like the other Democrats." In polls Obama runs markedly behind the generic Democratic brand. He stood up and said, "Don't worry—I am like other Democrats."  In passages it was far more explicit about the role of government than Democrats usually allow themselves to be. He did so by talking in values terms, about rewarding work and government's mutual responsibility.

He of course did what I had hoped he would do, by setting out a specific policy agenda.  He said we would not make "small plans," borrowing from on of my favorite quotes—from Daniel Burnham, the famous Chicago architect, "Make no small plans. They will fail to stir humanity's blood, and will not be built anyway."  In other speeches, when he turns to policy, he can sound like he's reading talking points. Not tonight.  He invested the policy talk with real passion.  He slyly used a Martin Luther King, Jr. riff, announcing "now is the time!" as he unveiled tax cuts and energy policies.

The other striking thing is how hard he went after John McCain and the Republicans. He was fierce. He shouted "enough!"  When he declared, "John McCain wants to follow Osama Bin Laden to the gates of hell, but he won't even follow him to the cave where he lives," he seemed genuinely angry. "We need a president who can face the threats of the future, not keep grasping at the ideas of the past." But I didn't think that he seemed shrill, even on television. It reminded me, actually, of old footage of Reagan. In 1980, Reagan was far from the grandfatherly figure we remember. He was the candidate of backlash, and in some ways, Obama is too.

Some things could have been done better. It went on a little long (of course, I worked on those Bill Clinton speeches, so who am I to complain?). He was so eager to show he understood other people's problems that he kept inserting them into passages that didn't need it, such as the end. There was no attempt to give his program a moniker.

But in all, it was a very, very effective political speech, with flashes of real eloquence all through and a breathtaking finish evoking King's speech. A friend joked, "For the first time in my adult life, I am proud of my country"—but it's hard to think of a speech that made listeners prouder.

Joe Biden and Bill Clinton:
Posted at 11:50  p.m. ET Aug 27


MICHAEL GERSON

On Monday, Barack Obama claimed that his convention speech will be "more workmanlike" and not have "a lot of high rhetoric"—but that will not be good enough. His dramatic stadium setting and historic nomination require an ambitious, memorable speech, which reasserts his themes of unity and national healing, reassures Americans questioning his qualifications, and defines a cause larger than his own biography, ambition and destiny.

MICHAEL WALDMAN

As the first nominee since Reagan to triumph largely due to "The Speech," Obama faces Rockies-high expectations. It's time for him to focus on a clear agenda — what is his vision of the role of government, the state of the economy, America's place in the world? Senator, don't tell us your story, tell us our story.

Big Speeches from Bill Clinton and Joe Biden
Posted at 12:30  a.m. ET Aug 28

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Visions of a Decade
Visions of a Decade

From 2000-2009, one photo per month.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Sex Scandals of the 2000s
Sex Scandals of the 2000s

From John Edwards to Mark Sanford, the decade's memorable affairs.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Ranger-Suasponte @ 09/05/2008 10:28:56 PM

    ABOUT SARAH PALIN:

    http://webpages.charter.net/suasponte/

    If you really want to know Sarah Palin's history (in detail) this is a "must read". It was written by Anne Kilkenny, a resident of Wasilla, Alaska.

  • Posted By: observer101 @ 09/02/2008 12:38:26 PM

    Oh yes you are right we are OCCUPYING the world...In a way that should make Dems happy because the (occupied countries) would just be something that could easily be pork barreled or taxed all to hell...Dems love doing that, but use a little bit of the money they are pushing for to put on the budget title...example; "School budget proposal" thats the type of header on a dem sponsored bill...1% of budget would actually go on schools, 89% on bullshit spending that benefits dems/libs, scams, legal issues, hookers, more scams, trips to greener earth conventions on high polution emitting airlines, buying said aircrafts, painting and detailing said aircraft to particular dems tastes, printing books to counter the scams involved in, "I hate Bush for beating us out of 2 elections" literature, invest in fronts to help various dem campaigns for the next election. 8% on promoting reasons to tax us and give themselves pay raises. 1% on materials to get the U.S. citizens to shun their troops for their faithful sevice..Thats the jist of a Democrat sponsered bill..But remember, just because it has the words school, health, G.I. bill, or any other inticing words across the top it doesnt make it a sound bill, or economic plan...read the dem fine print and youll see stuff like funds to paint a fish on the side of airlines, or over $200,000 to teach college kids to watch t.v. (true)..Gems like these are what McCain vetoed, not the G.I. bill itself as others want you to believe..He vetoed it because of the rampant unneccesary spending that the dems LOVE to slip into these bills that have nothing to do with the actual bill itself...P.S. the above percentages were used as an example of the ridiculousness of a dem sponsered bill. So in the end dems should love it if we occupy and stay in our invaded countries...Even though thats not going to be the case in Iraq...Sorry dems!

  • Posted By: dick kay @ 08/29/2008 6:51:01 PM

    AMMA:

    "And even after Hillary spent money she did not have to discredit him, he still treats her with respect."

    HOW? One example please.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now
 
 
COVER STORY
On His Own

Cerebral and cool, Obama is also steely, and his strength comes from the absence of a father. The making of a self-reliant man.

 
 
The Greediest People of All Time
From Bernard Madoff to AIG, Wall Street has reinvented excess. But the Masters of the Universe didn't invent greed. A look at the despots, robber barons and others who made our shortlist.