The Democrats and the Abortion Wars

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: metzlerd @ 08/26/2008 3:49:22 PM

    The biggest issue about this is this:
    McCain got a free pass on the question of when life begins. He said, as if he had thought about his answer before showing up, "at conception."

    The correct thing to do was to say, "Why?" Or, "Prove it."
    This would have led McCain to actually have to think about it, and defend his answer which would probably have been amusing at least!.





    He could just have easily said

  • Posted By: willnotvoteobama @ 08/26/2008 8:07:05 AM

    Democrats have suddenly developed an interesting sense of morality. John Edwards has been banned from making a speech at the DemocraticConvention for having an affair and lying about it. Bill Clinton will be speaking in his place. and michelle's speech is so scripted that anyone could predict what was going to be said so much for being like you and me !! p.s. if they are like you and me then where the hell is my 4 million from last year ?

    • Posted By: just_askin @ 08/26/2008 3:19:32 PM

      It's in Iraq. Go get it.

  • Posted By: willnotvoteobama @ 08/26/2008 8:13:00 AM

    the biggest problem with this debate is the late term abortion i am pro life ! but if people want to support the abortion issue then the women that do it should at the very least have it done before the baby get to ( 6 7 8 or 9 months ) come on people that is murder the child can survive outside of the womb if your gonna do it then it should be done in the zygote stage or before (embryo stage ) and to all the women out there who support abortion then be ready to be judged by GOD weather you believe in him or not !!

    • Posted By: summer4077 @ 08/26/2008 9:51:16 AM

      Late term abortions account for only .20% of all abortions, so I'm not sure why it's such a big issue. As botheyesopen noted, we have killed many innocent children in our war-mongering ways. As far as your observations of democratic morality--it's called politics. Neither side acts with much consideration to morals, not just dems. Both sides are equally shameful.

      • Posted By: JimKetzle @ 08/26/2008 12:12:47 PM

        Maybe it's a big deal because .20 percent of abortions in America is 300,000 babies slaughtered.

        • Posted By: JimKetzle @ 08/26/2008 12:15:49 PM

          Sorry, I meant 3,000, not 300,000.

          Still, as many a year as died on 9/11.

          But no big deal.

          • Posted By: just_askin @ 08/26/2008 2:21:47 PM

            Lots of non-combatants have been killed in Iraq. Tens, if not hundreds of thousands. But as you say, no big deal. Once you're out of womb, you're just grist for the mill.

      • Posted By: Lee Holmes @ 08/26/2008 11:55:25 AM

        We are unsure of this. Even the authoritative GUTTMACHER,the go-to guys for all things abortion,observes that the very privacy of these records cannot make for an accurate number. It IS occuring. But in what numbers? You will be reminded that these practices were occurring when the United States was involved in no wars.

  • Posted By: unspun @ 08/26/2008 2:06:56 PM

    #
    Posted By: tutink777 @ 08/26/2008 1:58:53 PM

    Comment: I am going to assume that you have never been pregnant Jim. If you had, I bet you would not be so quick to give up the credit of "creating" the baby to God. I created my children. My husband helped get it going, but I did the heavy lifting. If God did anything, it was creating the soul of my children. But I certainly made the bodies, brains, etc. That was all me and my nine extremely long months of hard work. Don't be so quick to take away my miracle. Not God's, mine.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------wow, talk about being a controlling mother
    Wow

    ------------------------------

    • Posted By: tutink777 @ 08/26/2008 2:15:13 PM

      That insipid reply needed to be posted twice unspun?

  • Posted By: unspun @ 08/26/2008 2:05:50 PM

    tutlink777: "I created my children. My husband helped get it going, but I did the heavy lifting. If God did anything, it was creating the soul of my children. But I certainly made the bodies, brains, etc. That was all me and my nine extremely long months of hard work. Don't be so quick to take away my miracle. Not God's, mine." --------------------------------------- (Wow, talk about a controlling mother....)
    -------

    ----

  • Posted By: momofacrew @ 08/26/2008 10:44:33 AM

    It's a matter of: "do we, as a nation, want to protect the innocent, or not?"

    • Posted By: bwlear @ 08/26/2008 11:16:27 AM

      That is a tired excuse that sounds a lot better then it is acted upon. Repubs have no desire to protect the innocent. Look at the laws that have been enacted under this administration to erode the right of those of us already here in this life. If you want to curtail the number of abortions done here, use the enegry and time you waste trying to sound so much more moral then I on improving the lot of mothers and children in this country. Your actions will speak far louder then your hollow words and make the decision to have a child easier because there is a place to care and suppot the child if I am unable to.

      • Posted By: JimKetzle @ 08/26/2008 12:29:14 PM

        How do you know the motivations of Republicans? Have you ever met one? Have you ever been one?

        The idea that you need to spend every wakened moment improving the lives of mothers in order to oppose abortion is like saying you need to spend every moment improving the lives of Jews to oppose the Holocaust.

        • Posted By: just_askin @ 08/26/2008 1:58:29 PM

          "How do you know the motivations of Republicans?" You judge a tree by its fruit.

          Oh, and we do remember fondly Republicans like Goldwater and the like, before the theocrats drove them out of the party.

        • Posted By: bwlear @ 08/26/2008 12:56:57 PM

          Your argument has no merit because the two acts have no relationship. And yes, my father was a Repub so not only have i met several, I was created with the help of one. Why dont you try to act as if you care after the child is born or is that too much of an invasion of privacy?

  • Posted By: okie3 @ 08/26/2008 12:50:02 PM

    It's the economy, stupid!

  • Posted By: cstanley0625 @ 08/26/2008 11:36:35 AM

    Abortions should be LEGAL, SAFE, & RARE

  • Posted By: bzehetner @ 08/26/2008 11:26:01 AM

    Mr. Weigel,

    This is from your article...

    "For decades now, pro-life advocates have been arguing, on the basis of reason informed by science, that nothing human was ever anything other than human, and that nothing not human will ever become human. These are things we can know prior to our theological convictions (or lack thereof). Does Senator Obama disagree with these claims?"


    I hope Senator Obama disagrees with these claims because they are false. Our atoms have passed from organism to organism for millions and millions of years. Read Bill Bryson's "A Short History of Nearly Everything" and you'll see how this science works (Excellent book by the way...from the NYT best seller list). Remember, matter is not destroyed...it just moves on to occupy space and create another entity elsewhere.

    Brian Zehetner MS,RD,CSSD

  • Posted By: tbourlon @ 08/26/2008 9:44:09 AM

    dkcloud hasn't been paying attention. The ban on partial birth abortions was passed during the Bush administration.

  • Posted By: neos @ 08/26/2008 9:03:44 AM

    If you are truly against abortions, as I am, and serious about decreasing the incidence of abortions rather than simply spouting off to show how morally superior you are, then you will vote Democratic. Republican policies ensure decreased health education, simplistic and failed planned parenthood policies, poor health care, continued poverty and the widening seperation between rich and poor - factors insuring the continuation of abortions, It would be great if preaching responsibility to teenagers were enough, but in our real world that hasn't worked. Let's work together to eliminate the social and economic causes of abortion.

  • Posted By: Malfoy @ 08/26/2008 7:08:11 AM

    Re: Squeezyr

    They appoint the judges. Do you think Clinton or Obama would have appointed John Roberts as Chief Justice? The answer is no.

  • Posted By: squeezyr @ 08/26/2008 4:28:48 AM

    Will or can the evangenitals realize that the ONLY group that can alter abortion standards is the U.S. Supreme Court. What can any candidate do about it??

    (the comment text is so light that it is unreadable while typing)

  • Posted By: Christ_Did_Not_Promote_Hate_Speech @ 08/26/2008 12:27:46 AM

    Why is this even an issue?! The Republicans are just as much pro-choice as the Democrats or else they would have changed the law when they had total control over the house, senate, and presidency! The fact that both political parties use a woman's womb as a political football when they are dodging the real issues of the economy, healthcare, and the wars in Iraq and Afganistan is appalling. What is even worse is all of us poor schmucks fall for it every election! Have we not realized that when the important issues might sway the election one way or the other, they pull out the heartstring issues of abortion and gay marriage as a distracter? Get real people! Vote for the better of our country and not heartstring issues that niether party has any intention of changing!

  • Posted By: Lee Holmes @ 08/25/2008 11:31:19 PM

    Of course they are. The issue,in Obamas case,was not ''zygotes''or even the maturation of the fetus allowed by ROE to see lawful termination. It was an issue deriving from babies that were already delivered at full maturation and then allowed to die after botched abortion surgeries[The Chicago Christ Hospital mess in 1999 that led to large-scale Catholic and pro-life protests that introduced the Illinois BAIP Act that Obama found himself first defending,then squirming on. It is the spotlight on his quandry that brought pro-lifer Bob Casey[D-Pa],out of the bullpen to Go To Denver And Deliver Up Obama To The Doubting Pro-Lifers].
    In Pelosis,it is the ignorance of her own church,claiming as she did yesterday before Tom Brokaw on Meet The Press where she described herself as an ''ardent Catholic'',while yet playing a ploy with her Invent-A-Gawd[TM],hoping that no-one would notice by stating that the Catholic proscribing against abortion was ''only 50 years old'',which is ridiculous on its face as for centuries,Catholics and popes have railed against the practice going back to the first century AD.
    What is causing the Democrats to play dodgeball with this issue is that if we were only speaking of ''zygotes'',everyone would sleep more comfortably. Government would ''keep their hands''off the womans body,''pro-choice''Catholics would be able to speak to their God with a straight face,nominally pro-choice seculars including the Bob Caseys and Bob Fords would not make much racket,and the law of ROE would remain intact.
    But when they are no longer ''zygotes'',but are well beyond the third trimester on the poise of live-birth,with a functioning central nervous system,the ability to feel hunger and pain,and are even able to see with the full development of corneas,eardrums,digestive and circulatory systems,and the demand is to still kill these, Catholics[or all who advocate the presence of a ''God'',which includes Obama], are left with two choices. Remain pro-choice,or join the ranks of Jesus'Pharisee hypocrites and await their celestial fate.[while those who could care a fig about ''religion''yet find such practices in an ostensibly liberal,civilized society to be barbaric].

  • Posted By: SAGG @ 08/25/2008 10:29:32 PM

    In other words, you want the Dems to be exactly like the Repubs when it comes to abortion, right? Tell you what: You figure a way how to keep people from having sex (rape and incest of course do NOT count, having nothing to do with sex), make the daddies who are gutless in not taking responsibility for their carelessness (while in some cases being married to their wives), and forcing many women (though not all, I'll admit for other reasons) to go through their truma about keeping their baby alone, then we'll talk. I'm personally oppoed to abortion, but I have no intention of dictating to a woman (I'm a man, btw, I couldn't possibly understand, just sympathize) what she should do with a part of her body. She and the doctor who performed the abortion will have to answer for that someday.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse