Union Dues

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: gvillagran3 @ 08/26/2008 12:46:55 PM

    jill from Florida. I am curious...... You don't like Obama and the Democrats, you don't like Bush and the Republicans, but some how you like Mccain... A man that has voted 95% with Bush and the Republican agenda of NAFTA, big oil, globalization, etc, etc. what gives?

    In some of your postings you sound like an independent, but in others you sound like a rabid Republican. I detect some confusion in you. Let me try and help. Since you grasp the concept of party platform you most understand that every candidate Obama, or Mccain most conform to the agenda of their party first and foremost. The agenda of their respective parties is defined, it is not up for debate, and it is the basic blue print that will be utilized to govern.
    With Bush we knew that we were empowering the Right -Conservative wing of the Republican party..... We got Neo-Cons, a war in Iraq that was not necessary, the return to fiscal irresponsibility, the rise of big oil, no energy policy, no foreign policy at all, etc. etc.
    With McCain we used to have a maverick. One of the very few Republican leaders independent enough to actually go against the party platform..... But no more. In order for McCain to win he will have to do what the "base" of the GOP asks him to do period. The problem with it is that the "base" of the GOP is ....... Yes, you guess it...... The same neo-cons, Republican right wing nuts that supported Bush.

    Now I don't know about you, but that kind of "change" is precisely the one I do not need, and our country can not afford any more. After 8 years of an incompetent ideolog in the WHite House, real change can't come too soon..... Even if it is from some of those hated "Liberals"..... For if Obama turns out to be even half the president "liberal" Clinton was , I for one will take it any day from the likes of a "conservative" W Bush.



    Obama can be a lot of things dear, but he is not in the pocket of the Neo-cons, right wing nuts..... McCain is now, that is if he wants to win of course. If not, he can go back to his old job of being the quaint maverick of the Republican party.

    • Posted By: Spacer @ 08/26/2008 5:11:05 PM

      "You don't like Obama and the Democrats, you don't like Bush and the Republicans, but some how you like Mccain... A man that has voted 95% with Bush and the Republican agenda of NAFTA, big oil, globalization, etc, etc. what gives?"
      ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      I asked the same exact thing, but you can't get a straight answer out of these people on that subject. They just dodge the question and launch into more smears of Obama.

    • Posted By: Jill from Florida @ 08/26/2008 1:35:12 PM

      You talk about Party Platform, as if it were constitutional law. You are so incorrect there. That is set up for the masses, to tell us what we want to hear and that is how the candidates are chosen. The platform is nothing more than propaganda.

      Why was Casey allowed to run under the Democratic party if he is Pro-life? The platform is Pro-choice. How can Obama be for the Death Penalty under certain circumstances? The platform is Anti-Death Penalty.

      Again, it's the neoliberals and neoconservatives that are working against the welfare of this country and our citizens.

      • Posted By: pearsoncrz @ 08/26/2008 3:48:41 PM

        Hey Jill, did you get that email from Obama after he had tied up the nomination asking what you wanted in the platform? I thought it was pretty funny since he supposedly had already said where he stood on things. But then he doesn't hesitate to change his position if he thinks it will help him get elected.

    • Posted By: pearsoncrz @ 08/26/2008 3:47:10 PM

      Obama's in the pocket of whoever will pay to play. Here's an Obama Tale for you. In a campaign influenced by Walmart, instead of backing the pro-labor candidate, Obama backed a "Walmart tool."

      There was little surprising about Obama's endorsement given his self-interested allegiances to the politically powerful City Hall regime of Chicago's Mayor Daley, with whom Obama shares the same big money campaign super-consultant (David Axlerod) and numerous big money sponsors.

      For the first time Mayor Daley had vetoed an ordinance by his normally obedient City Council, and he did not want the council to bring the measure up again. It was originally passed by the council under pressure from a remarkable grassroots campaign, and would have required giant retail corporations like Wal-Mart, Target, Lowes, and Home Depot to pay workers a modest minimum wage of ten dollars an hour by 2010.

      Wal-Mart and Target announced that they were putting a number of "big box" retail developments on hold in Chicago, and launched a preemptive public relations strike, threatening to disinvest in the city unless a "favorable business climate" was restored. Daley made a special point of wrapping his veto in the flag of racial justice, claiming it was required to permit the flowering of economic development in the city's abandoned ghetto neighborhoods.

      Pat Dowell, the recipient of significant support from the Service Employees' International Union (SEIU), was running against Tillman, and Dowell had strongly criticized Tillman for siding with Daley and Wal-Mart.

      Obama needed the support of the powerful campaign finance magnet Daley, and endorsed Tillman, over labor-backed Dowell.

      Obama's wife Michelle then received $51,200 in 2006 for attending a few board meetings of TreeHouse Foods, a giant firm that relied heavily on its close business relationship with Wal-Mart. The granting of high-pay/do-little board posts to the spouses of politicians is a longstanding tool of the "old," corporate-dominated politics that Senator Obama claims to reject.

      Mrs. Obama resigned from her position with TreeHouse in the summer of 2007, citing "increased demands on her time" in connection with her husband's presidential campaign.

    • Posted By: Davole @ 08/26/2008 1:32:27 PM

      gvillagran3

      You claim that ???the agenda of their respective parties is defined, it is not up for debate, and it is the basic blue print that will be utilized to govern.???

      Do you not realize that Obama has been ???all over the map??? with regard to what he is trying to ???sell??? as the democrat platform?

      You state that McCain has been a maverick, but not now.
      Is there any so-called Maverick Party, and if so, what finances does it have to promote a campaign?

      Naturally a candidate running for election as a Republican is expected to reflect the platform of the base of the GOP, just as Obama must reflect the platform of his campaign???s financial masters (George Soros and moveon.org).

      You call the Republican right wing ???nuts??? - would you also call George Soros and moveon.org by the same terminology?

      If you are willing to maturely investigate the democrat political corruption and backroom agreements with radical socialist entities which are determined to undermine America???s ability to set its own objectives and foreign policy, do an internet search on George Soros and moveon.org.

      You will be enlightened!

    • Posted By: Jill from Florida @ 08/26/2008 1:06:50 PM

      I don't like EXTREMIST Democrats and Republicans. Period. I LIKE moderate Democrats and Republicans. Period.

      Up until 2007, I was a card carrying Democrat who volunteered every election and was the typical party-line voter. After the Democrats won the majority in both Houses, I started watching C-Span 2 (I work out of my home, so I can watch what I want, when I want.). I was flabbergasted to see the Democratic leadership in work, and the few resulting laws that passed. And, the flimsy excuse always used by the Democratic Chair, "This isn't perfect, but it's the best we can agree to."

      I started researching the laws that I considered to be the most detrimental to our nation's economy: NAFTA, Windfall Profits Tax of 1981, to name a few. To my chagrin, it was the same Democratic leaders I campaigned for who wrote, supported and voted for those laws. And, all the time, they are pretending that they are concerned with the lack of manufacturing, lack of good jobs, lack of adequate affordable health care, lack of affordable college education. If they had not written the laws that gave tax incentives for manufacturing plants to move overseas, that took away tax incentives for small businesses, we would not have the economy we have today.

      I did more research to the parting Democratic leadership - Tom Daschle, Gary Hart, Zbigniew Brzezinski, etc - and discovered an amazing connection between the Extremist Left and the Extremist Right. None other than the Council of Foreign Relations (CFR). The neocons and the neoliberals are in the exclusive membership of the CFR. The CFR dictates our foreign and national policies.

      Now, do you understand WHY I do not like Obama and Bush? They are both puppets for the CFR - the extreme Left and extreme Right. Neither has real concern for the welfare of the United States of America citizens, only their own goals and prosperity.

      Until a strong third party can represent the average working people, the last thing we need is the Congress and the POTUS to be of the same party. At least if Congress cannot continue to pass the devastating bills, we will have more time to vote off all of those who are actually passing laws against the USA.

  • Posted By: rungirl @ 08/26/2008 9:03:41 AM

    I don't own any guns and I am not a blue collar worker, I am a life long Democrat but no way could I vot for Mr. & Mrs. Dumbo!

    • Posted By: coach740 @ 08/26/2008 9:44:26 AM

      Dumbo? To whom are you referring? Certainly not Michelle and Barack! Dumbo hardly describes two hard working, pull yourself up by your book straps lawyers who went to Harvard and then returned "home" to work for the common folk! They epitimize the American dream.

      • Posted By: pearsoncrz @ 08/26/2008 9:55:54 AM

        Coach740, it's a reference to their ears.

        Personally I don't care about the ears. I won't vote for Obama because he used cocaine for years. There are other reasons, but we have too many better qualified candidates to allow this kind of "role model" to become POTUS. And McCain won't be able to do anything without democratic approval from congress, so it isn't much of a risk to vote for him, in fact I find him more honest than Obama, more trustworthy.

        • Posted By: raddave @ 08/26/2008 4:52:30 PM

          You find McCain more honest and more trustworthy than Obama? Now who has been using cocaine for years?

      • Posted By: klavigne @ 08/26/2008 10:37:03 AM

        Yeah, they returned home and did what for their communities? Took health care away from the poorest in the south side. Look it up, they worked on a committee at the University of Chicago that turned away poor people who didn't have insurance. Yeah, I want him to have control of my health care, lol. Seriously, do some research people, he is an empty suit with a smooth tongue, nothing more! I know he's charming, but if you believe all the crap the media is stuffing down your throat your not doing your part as a good American. MCcain08 all the way!

    • Posted By: Niaphoenix @ 08/26/2008 10:11:28 AM

      You really show your educational level when you call 2 Harvard educated attorneys 'Mr. & Mrs. Dumbo'. Yes, Rungirl, run on home, I think it's time for your nap. I think the problem for some people is that the Obamas' success makes them (in comparison) feel like losers. rungirl is a perfect example.

    • Posted By: ex_republican @ 08/26/2008 10:05:51 AM

      Why?

  • Posted By: abadreview @ 08/26/2008 9:08:46 AM

    "Perception"--I noticed that you snidely mentioned that you don't know what Obamas energy policy would be. Well, if you fo to BarackObama.com, there is a link to a PDF which contains his energy policy proposal, as well as just about every other policy you could possibly want to know about. This information has been available since this past January, so it's high time that people like you stop pretending that Obama and his policies are some kind of enigma, and just do some research. If you don't like Obama, that's one thing. But this whole game of the Obama critics whining about how they don't really know who he is or what he stands for, is just silly. He has given hundreds of speeches, he has a couple of extremely revealing biographies out, and he has persistently and patiently, explained what his goals and policies will be as President. The truth is out there, go lasso it in. If you like what you hear/read, please join this call for change.

    • Posted By: pearsoncrz @ 08/26/2008 9:17:25 AM

      Yes, he has something posted, and he has given many speeches, but he might change his mind at any time, and he is not clearly committed to anything other than opposing drilling here.

      Sophistry at work, Obama says a lot but never actually pins anything down.

      • Posted By: raddave @ 08/26/2008 4:50:48 PM

        Obama oposed to drilling here is a lie. Obama has said he is open to allowing more oil leases if it is part of a larger energy package. OIl companies have over 40 million acres in leases that have not been explored or developed.

      • Posted By: pearsoncrz @ 08/26/2008 9:35:38 AM

        BTW, the Bush administration has spent millions on research and development in the energy field, working to advance clean, renewable energy resources at a commercial level. Check it out for yourselves at the Dept. of Energy website. If McCain=Bush on R&D in the field of renewable energy, then he is way ahead of Obama's wait and see plan.

  • Posted By: abadreview @ 08/26/2008 9:28:20 AM

    Actually Obama has stated that he supports the research and development of new energies, thereby minimizing our reliance on foreign oil. If you think drilling is the answer you'll be waiting at least a decade to see results from such an endeavor. Tthere is no easy way out of our energy problems, and at least Obama is man enough to admit it. McCain is the master at selling false hope wrapped up in a coastal drilling package. If you're looking for a quick fix to the current gas prices, you're living in dreamland, because no such quick fix exists. It will take years to get of this mess either way, so we might as well accept the fact that we're going to have to make sacrifices while we work on bringing new alternative energies to the mainstream. Otherwise, we'll just be passing down our problems to the next generations all in the name of convenience.

    • Posted By: pearsoncrz @ 08/26/2008 9:53:15 AM

      Oh, he supports research and development, exactly how does that differ from what Bush has been doing?

      Go to the Department of Energy and Department of Agriculture and check out the energy R&D programs under the Bush administration.

      How is Obama going to improve on those? He doesn't say. Instead he backs away from developing oil reserves off our shores. like the one off the coast of Florida that China and Cuba are tapping into.

      • Posted By: raddave @ 08/26/2008 4:48:15 PM

        he hasn't backed away from developing oil reserves, oil companies already have over 40 million acres that they have not researched or developed. And the story about China and Cuba drilling off our cost and tapping into our reserves is false. http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/are_the_chinese_drilling_off_the_coast.html
        and the florida straits oil find is within Cuban territorial waters, not U.S. waters.

  • Posted By: vippy @ 08/26/2008 9:49:44 AM

    Even if I did not know any of the candidates I would vote for the one who says he will give
    those making less than $ 150,000 a tax break and tax the ones above that more. Which in my book makes sense, earn more, pay more taxes. That what happens to me when I work
    on Sundays, Holidays, etc., I pay more in taxes though it is hardly worth it to make the extra
    money because Uncle Sam wants his right away. Why would anyone even consider NOT to vote for Obama is beyond me. His tax policies affect us all.

    • Posted By: willnotvoteobama @ 08/26/2008 10:55:40 AM

      people that earn more do pay more if your paying 20% of your earning in taxes and make 100,000 a year then you pay 20,000 if someone else makes 300,000 then he pays 60,000 so is he paying more ? the answer is yes but not by percentage but income geeze i thought that some liberals were smart but wait thats right because he makes 300,000 he should pay say 100,000 in taxes so that he can support some lazy s.o.b. that sleeps till noon everyday and parties till 4 am my bad i see your point ! ( FYI ; IF EVERYONE WHO WORKS PAYS TAXES AT 20% ACROSS THE BOARD THEN IT WOULD COVER ALL GOVERMENT EXPENSES ALONG WITH THE TAXES THAT CORPS PAY ) IE; SALES TAX, PROPERTY TAX, WORKERS COMP TAXES, SOCIAL SECURITY TAXES , STATE AND FEDERAL TAXES , THE BUSH TAX CUTS SIMPLY WAIVE SOME TAXES ON IMPORT&EXPORT AND SOME RELIEF ON FEDERAL !

      • Posted By: raddave @ 08/26/2008 4:35:03 PM

        Did you know that our tax dollars pay for more than just some lazy S.O.B.? They also pay for our military, education, highways, FBI, CIA, etc...

    • Posted By: pearsoncrz @ 08/26/2008 10:35:29 AM

      hey Vippy,

      How did Alabama get the new automobile plants? They gave the companies tax breaks.

      But that ADDED to the tax base, so in the end the state got more money from the income taxes paid by the individuals the companies employed than they gave to the companies in tax breaks to get them to build here.

      So you do the math.

      Raise taxes on corporations and they leave.

      Cut taxes on corporations as an incentive to retool and retrain their workers, and more people find better paying jobs.

    • Posted By: pearsoncrz @ 08/26/2008 10:32:31 AM

      Vippy, in case you didn't already know it, those who earn more do pay more taxes. Even if they move away, their income gets taxed.

      But if we raise taxes on corporations (which is what Obama is proposing) they will take their business elsewhere. That means more jobs leaving, more people who need services with a smaller tax base, which means those who do have jobs will eventually have to pay more in taxes to take care of those who can't find anything but minimum wage service jobs that are left behind.

    • Posted By: Jill from Florida @ 08/26/2008 10:19:42 AM

      If we got rid of the majority of the waste in the federal budget, all of our taxes would decrease. Let's start with Congress itself.

      Why are we paying Obama and McCain to take 2 years off of their job to campaign? They should be given their salary just as we are - take leave without pay. Congress should receive the same amount of paid vacation as the American Workers - factoring in time for their constituents. Congress should not be given tax dollars to fly home every Thursday and return every Monday - their travel allowance should be drastically cut and limited to the number of taxpayer paid trips. We should stop funding the 24/7 limo drivers for many of the agencies and Congress. Limos, Hummers and SUVs should be replaced by hybrid cars. Pensions for the Congress should be set up like a 401k - they must contribute or no pension. Congress should not be able to receive ANY freebies or contributions from any company or interest that they oversee. (Dodd should not receive any $ from banking or mortgage employees. Stevens should not receive any $ from oil companies.) Spending budgets and expenditures per Senator and Representative should be reviewed for reimbursement JUST like it is with a real business.

      I could go on just with the amount of money that Congress is DIRECTLY wasting on themselves. The millions/billions saved just on them each year would be a great start to reducing our debt - and they are just a small part of the government waste and abuse.

  • Posted By: mrzoid @ 08/26/2008 4:32:47 PM

    Since there seem to be so many stories about Obama, and posts with links to his statements; well here are a few for John McCain:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w4DrL8-UA4U&feature=bz302

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GEtZlR3zp4c&feature=related

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HwTKM_u-7j4&feature=related (i especially like the last 20 seconds of this one)

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M6pu5nf8dAU&feature=related (very enlightened view on illegal immigration and the American worker.)

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ioy90nF2anI (Straight Talk)

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0Nm260SzCw (And his views on his front runner for the VP slot)

    Straight Talk Express #1!!!!!!!!

  • Posted By: Davole @ 08/26/2008 3:36:34 PM

    McCain uses Vietnam ordeal against jibes over wealth
    REUTERS by Andrew Gray Aug. 25, 2008

    BURBANK, California (Reuters) - John McCain, who often invokes his ordeal as a Vietnam war prisoner to show his devotion to his country as he runs for U.S. president, drew on the experience again on Monday -- this time to deflect sniping over the number of houses he owns.

    McCain's Democratic rival Barack Obama last week accused the Republican senator of being out of touch with ordinary people after he was unable to say in an interview how many houses were owned by him and his wife Cindy, a wealthy heiress to a beer distributorship.

    In an appearance on the Tonight Show with Jay Leno, McCain, 71, said his priority was to keep Americans in their homes in tough economic times.

    Then he recalled his Vietnam experience.
    "I spent 5 1/2 years in a prison cell without -- I didn't have a house. I didn't have a kitchen table. I didn't have a table. I didn't have a chair," he said.
    "I spent those 5 1/2 years ... not because I wanted to get a house when I got out."

    U.S. HOUSING WOES
    Rising energy prices and the faltering economy have become central issues in the race for the White House. The next president will inherit problems including a mortgage crisis that has cost many Americans their homes.

    McCain said he was prepared to deal with that and sought to play down the controversy over his family's assets.

    "I'm proud of my record of service to this country and it has nothing to do with houses. What it has to do with (is) putting Americans in houses and keeping them in their homes. And that's what I know how to do," he said to loud cheers from the studio audience.

    On the show the Arizona senator listed four homes he and his wife have -- one in the Washington area, two in Arizona and one in California. Media reports and Democrats have said the couple have at least seven properties when investments are included.

    McCain said he was proud of the way his wife's father had built up a large business after fighting in World War Two.

    With the Democrats engaged in their convention in Denver this week that will formally nominate Obama and the Republicans due to meet next week, polls show the two candidates locked in a dead heat in the popular vote. McCain predicted a tight finish in the November 4 election

    Obama's house in the affluent Chicago neighborhood of Hyde Park is worth more than $1.5 million, and he has made millions from the publication of two autobiographical books.

    • Posted By: metzlerd @ 08/26/2008 4:27:44 PM

      If being a POW is the reason for not knowing how many houses you own, then what else will it be a reason for.

      I can see it now...
      Reporter in 2012 -
      "Mr. McCain you were elected in 2008 you made all sorts of contradictory promices, one of which was about getting us off of foreign oil. Well, we've drilled and drilled, and still oil imports are higher than they've ever been. Why is that?"

      McCain -
      "Well you forget... I was a POW and when I was in prison, we didn't have tables. we didn't have energy. We didn't have oil. You should be thankful!"

      We don't need somebody who is just going to make excuses!

  • Posted By: vindido @ 08/26/2008 10:08:09 AM

    Who cares how many homes McCain owns?Obama is a multi millionare himself.And hes a lawyer,his wife also.did McCain ever have a sweetheart real estate deal with a convicted felon aka Tony Vesco? Please.Obama is the only democrat the party could nominate that cant beat McCain.

    • Posted By: Jill from Florida @ 08/26/2008 10:27:22 AM

      Because Cindy McCain owns the homes and investment houses, John McCain really doesn't own them. Her finances are completely separate from his.

      Does everyone know exactly what their spouse spends their money on and how much? Or have in their personal account? Or have stashed money away? If that were true, there would be no need for forensic accountants.

      • Posted By: raddave @ 08/26/2008 4:19:50 PM

        They keep their finances separate so Mrs. McCain doesn't have to divulge how much she is worth.

    • Posted By: sparky716 @ 08/26/2008 10:47:00 AM

      no one cares how many houses he owns...its the can't remember that scares the hell out of me....do you know how many you own?....do you know what kind of car you drive...John mcBush can't...thats what scares me...how can you execpt him to run a government if he can't remember that...all working class Americans can answer both of those quistions...all he can remember is he was a pow...well there were lots of pow's and they don't talk about it every day...he's to old and slow of mind to be president

      • Posted By: Jill from Florida @ 08/26/2008 10:59:23 AM

        I think that Obama campaign is grasping at straws there. McCain could forget half of what he knows and still be better qualified to be POTUS than Obama.

        Sunni - Shite - you tell me the difference in their philosophy and their greatest distinctions.

        • Posted By: raddave @ 08/26/2008 4:18:45 PM

          The only thing McCain hasn't forgotten was that he was a POW for five and a half years.

      • Posted By: Jill from Florida @ 08/26/2008 11:30:57 AM

        Are you worried about Obama's mental facilities too? He did introduce Joe Biden as the next PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. And how about Joe Biden's mental facilities? He stated BARACK AMERICAN would be the next President.

    • Posted By: raddave @ 08/26/2008 4:18:00 PM

      Obama didn't have a sweetheart real estate deal with a convicted felon either. Obama got a sweetheart deal on his house because his bid was the highest. Obama did buy a portion of the property adjacent to his house from Rezko's wife at $40,000 above market value, doesn't sound too sweet to me. And when he purchased the land, Rezko was not a convicted felon.

  • Posted By: wildlifeusa @ 08/25/2008 11:14:07 PM

    If you cannot see that Barrack Obama is a compassionate and kind human being, you are an idiot. The same kind of idiot who put an evil man in power, George W Bush.
    Maybe it is time for you all to start looking into people's eyes. When I first looked at Bush, Cheney, Rice, Rove, I could see the evil in their eyes!! I was right!! When I look into MC Cain's eyes I see the same evil and the guy really freaks me out. He won't hesitate to push on the red button, believe me!

    • Posted By: valadezaj @ 08/25/2008 11:19:35 PM

      Yeah Obama was pretty kind and compassionate when he listened to goddamn america every sunday. I guess his judgement was wright on eh?

      • Posted By: max in fl @ 08/26/2008 4:18:29 PM

        But he is Muslim according to some, No he is a Christian listening to Wright repeat EVERY week,, EVERY month, EVERY year for two DECADES *** **** America. Likely

        Try listening to that clip for 20 years. I just wait until you have a bad day and you yell at your wife or kids so I can rush in recording and call you a verbal abuser. Like that Balwin tape, I'm sure he was talking that way to his kid all along. Likely.

    • Posted By: loriw @ 08/26/2008 1:20:22 AM

      Oh yeah, he's so compassionate and kind that he voted to allow infant that were born alive after botched abortions. He stated that is was "too burdensome" to require the quack abortionist to call a doctor to provide care for the baby. He's so compassionate that he thinks it is OK for these babies to be left to die in the clinic or hospital's dirty utility room. He's compassionate and kind toward abortionists but not toward babies

  • Posted By: sparky716 @ 08/26/2008 11:05:38 AM

    McCain would be a 3rd term of Herbert Hoover.....were almost there now....but don't worry Obama will be our Franklin D. Roosevelt and our John Kennedy !!!

    • Posted By: Jill from Florida @ 08/26/2008 11:13:02 AM

      Is the Cold War going to be full strength again under an Obama regime?

      Blame the backers of Obama - the same ones who joined with Big Business Republicans to eliminate manufacturing in our country - for our economy. This has been going on full-force since the Carter days.

      • Posted By: RO in Reno @ 08/26/2008 12:20:38 PM

        Well Jill you seem to have a lot to say and it's a shame you don't know what you are talking about.
        The insistent push for lower priced labor, the effort to destroy Organized labor and ultimately to ship jobs to countries with cheap labor, the belief that CEO should get mega wages and then trickle down dollars on the rest of America are all Republican issues.
        It was Reagan who invented "trickle down economics" and perfected by the Bush's.to drain the Treasury of the United States of America and the pockets of the people.

        • Posted By: Jill from Florida @ 08/26/2008 12:29:34 PM

          And exactly how did any of Reagan's plans get voted into law? By the DEMOCRATIC CONGRESS! Please. No law would be voted in without the Democratic support - unless the Republicans had absolute majority - and they didn't. Extremist Democrats joined the Extremist Republicans for the damning laws and policies, and we are now suffering the consequences.

          Check out the Windfall Profits Tax of 1981 - under the 96th Congress, implemented during Reagan's first term. That killed our manufacturing more than NAFTA. And, it was the Extremist Democrats who wrote it. Unfortunately, the moderates of both sides normally do not have the leadership of the parties, and are now outnumbered 2 to 1 in both Houses.

          Just as if the Democrats has really wanted to stop funding the Iraqi war, they could have prevented any spending bill from giving $ to the war. You are being spoon-fed propaganda, and don't even know it.

          • Posted By: pearsoncrz @ 08/26/2008 3:56:10 PM

            Hey Jill, lets get together and form a new centrist party, one with "liberal" social policies and "conservative" fiscal policies. Since Obama and the DNC are showing the Clintons the exit, maybe they would help us identify a good candidate before 2010. People should be ready for some real leadership, ready to bite the bullet and address the debt by then.

            • Posted By: Jill from Florida @ 08/26/2008 4:15:13 PM

              Now that would be a party I could be a member of. Something HAS to be done and sooner than 2010. Certain Representatives and Senators from both parties need to be shown the door now and every election until they are gone.

              I feel that most of the working class do not want handouts- they want a fair shake at life. With the Dems and Repubs outsourcing all our manufacturing and non-college-degreed jobs, people are having a tough time just to survive. I think if the entire economic policy, including taxation was revamped, not socialized, we could go back the future of good economic times. - Pre-Carter days. When only 1 parent needed to work and the other could stay home and raise the children.

              I believe that Bill was demonized from his later years in the office. After the Republicans gained control, he toned down his liberalism agenda (against the wishes of the CFR) The "OLD" party backers ran to Obama back in 2003 as their intended. While I still blame him and the party leaders for NAFTA, I do believe that Hillary was against NAFTA from the get-go. I know I was.

        • Posted By: Davole @ 08/26/2008 2:17:23 PM

          RO in Reno -

          Did you participate in some of Obama's identity exploratory experiences several years ago?

    • Posted By: Rocky2001 @ 08/26/2008 11:13:58 AM

      So who will be our next Marilyn Monroe?

      • Posted By: Davole @ 08/26/2008 2:11:16 PM

        Rocky2001 -

        The democrat next Marilyn Monroe - Michelle Obama!

      • Posted By: Jill from Florida @ 08/26/2008 11:17:51 AM

        Britney Spears or Paris Hilton

  • Posted By: Rocky2001 @ 08/26/2008 10:34:27 AM

    Maybe just maybe his 200 weeks as a Senator has something to do with it.............

    • Posted By: Jill from Florida @ 08/26/2008 10:39:06 AM

      You added in 2007 & 2008 for which he was on Paid Leave from the Senate.

      • Posted By: raddave @ 08/26/2008 4:14:10 PM

        Obama has a much better attendance record than John McCain has had during this time period. McCain hasn't even bothered to show up and vote on a single piece of legislation since Apri.

      • Posted By: Rocky2001 @ 08/26/2008 10:58:35 AM

        Well the ObamaBots would have had a hissy-fit if I didn't include his Paid Leave.......LOL!!!!

  • Posted By: gvillagran3 @ 08/26/2008 10:06:41 AM

    I love the comment that the Bush administration has spent millios on R&D in the field of renewable energy!!
    True enough, but absolutely misleading. If one looks hard enough, there is no area of government where money is not spent by the millions. renewable energy is just one more example. Obama as Bush, and Mccain does have a renewable energy plan... Not a "wait and see" plan..... Please look up Obamas renewable energy plan before you talk dear sir.

    The difference between Obama and Bush or McCain is that in the case of the Republicans the focus is to drill more, and in the case of the Democrats it is to come up with alternatives to oil. You Republicans might not like to run your cars with anything other than oil, but drilling in Alska, off the coast of California, Florida or even in your living rooms is NOT GOING TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM.
    Any new drilling dear Republicans will only go into the world oil markets to be sold to the highest bidder. Last I checked no oil conglomerate is telling us that they will sell only to Americans at a set fix price .... Or did you Republicans?
    The economies of many third world nations are exploding. China, India, Brazil, Indonesia just to name a few countries have put 7% + growth in their GDP for years now..... And they all need oil to feed their economies.... But Republicans think 3% of the proven reserves in the world that are represented by the Alaska, and off shore reserves can make a difference!!!!
    The answer is not only no, but hell no!! Any five year old can do the math. Of course the math for oil loving lobyst is " we drill more, we make more" ... That's the math they can take to the bank , and we (the American people) can take to our economic grave.
    When I see McCain give us the dril, drill, drill B.S. as some kind of solution, it makes me feel sad and angry for the Americans that actualy buy this kind of nonsense.

    • Posted By: pearsoncrz @ 08/26/2008 10:29:25 AM

      So I guess you don't mind China drilling off the coast of Cuba and draining our reserves?

      Why can't we do both? Obama has no answer to that question.

      • Posted By: raddave @ 08/26/2008 4:09:42 PM

        The story of China drilling off the cost of Florida is false.
        http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/are_the_chinese_drilling_off_the_coast.html

      • Posted By: Jill from Florida @ 08/26/2008 11:33:34 AM

        Don't forget about Russia, Norway, Netherlands, Canada, China etc drilling in the Arctic.

    • Posted By: Davole @ 08/26/2008 2:26:00 PM

      gvillagran3 -

      Regarding your denigration of drilling for oil now in favour of developing alternate energy alternatives, I don't see Obama travelling around in a fleet of volkswagens outfitted with masts and sails!

  • Posted By: valadezaj @ 08/25/2008 10:45:33 PM

    Obama and the whole democratic is quickly becoming a joke. It's not that I don't believe in the cause it's that the party always *** it up in the end. What the party needs is a good ole fashion purge. God I wish I were Stalin. I would send the DNC leadership to Siberia and replace it with people who actually know how to win elections. Right now the democratic party is nothing but one big joke. Anxiously awaiting McCain's victory speech.

    • Posted By: max in fl @ 08/26/2008 4:03:08 PM

      And who would you have as our guaranteed winner Stalin?

    • Posted By: joel99 @ 08/25/2008 11:11:33 PM

      A tiny joker. Your view doesn't worth a drop of piss. So get lost.

      • Posted By: valadezaj @ 08/25/2008 11:16:50 PM

        The truth hurts huh? :)

  • Posted By: calico @ 08/26/2008 12:08:00 PM

    Stellar African American families like the Obamas HAVE paid their dues well enough.
    It is FAR PAST TIME for these so called "blue collar" union constituents to STOP "CLINGING" to narrow-minded "bitter" and USELESS racist idology. They WEAR this type of thinking and point of view
    like a badge of honor.
    America is on the verge of being LEFT behind the rest of the world as long as we TOLERATE this ingrained crusted over, toxic, type of thinking, especially endorsed by MSM publications like NEWSWEEK. The type of "code" words used consistentlyl by MSM "exotic", "we don't know who they are" , they have to "redefine" themselves is DISGUSTING. Aftican American familes are JUST LIKE EVERYBODY else, with the same work ethics. morals and dreams. WHAT A DRAG, literally, this kind of BACKWARD diatribe has become.

    • Posted By: Jill from Florida @ 08/26/2008 12:19:14 PM

      This ain't the Democratic primaries anymore. The working class people will hold Obama accountable just as they will hold McCain accountable. There is NO affirmative action for the POTUS. Skin color is ignored by all but the Obama supporters. The working class are looking at character, and they do have common sense.

      It's about time you quit pulling the race card and start taking responsibility for your actions. If the only reason Obama is qualified to be POTUS is because he is black, he should not be voted in.

      • Posted By: chicago blues @ 08/26/2008 12:46:17 PM

        And what, praytell, has HRC done that makes her so incredibly qualified to hold the title of president? Is it her gender because she sure doesn't have any more experience in the Oval office than BHO other than her time as the "wife". Not understanding your point Jill because it appears that you are just rattling off statistics and trying to sound "educated" and "enlightened" when all you push forth is shallow, devisive commentary. What is your highest education obtained? And where was it from? Exactly what makes you so qualified? I thought so.

        • Posted By: pearsoncrz @ 08/26/2008 3:52:55 PM

          It's not experience in the oval office, it's experience serving the public, serving in executive positions for non-profits and charities, devoting your time and resources to helping others. That's what HRC has that Obama does not.

          No, I don't count his "civil rights" legal work, because I can't find any (see my other posts on this), and I don't count his work "organizing" community groups to partner up with Rezkos fraudulent low income housing scam, because he got paid by the firm to do that. So what else is there? His work with the foundation he and Ayers served? Let's see the records before we agree on that. He's fudged on so much else that I don't trust his claims to public service.

        • Posted By: Jill from Florida @ 08/26/2008 1:17:41 PM

          I think that the most of those who ran for President in both the Democratic and Republican parties do not have the welfare of the United States of America. The ones who did make sense and were genuinely concerned were deemed as crazy. Mike Gravel and Ron Paul were the two most concerned about our country, and who spoke the truth.

          I am not saying that I would want either one as POTUS. While there are many ideals of Ron Paul that I could agree with, there were more fundamental ideals I cannot.

          I am just looking for the candidate who is the lesser evil of the two. And right now it is McCain who is the lesser evil.

  • Posted By: lilacs2 @ 08/26/2008 1:22:32 AM

    An elistest has nknow idea the struggles of the working class and neither does his well educated better than the working supporters.America should have the intellagence to pick better candidates then Obama or McCain, but then they did vote bush and Channey twice.

    • Posted By: jnakhoul @ 08/26/2008 9:42:05 AM

      mccain has never received a salary in all his life and obama is the elitist, please get your head out your ass

      • Posted By: pearsoncrz @ 08/26/2008 11:13:23 AM

        Sorry but the military does pay. Our servicemen and women work hard, unlike Ivy League College elite who go abroad and never work. I bet Obama wouldn't survive basic training, he wouldn't get past the drug tests, and he'd be hacking his smoke filled lungs out. He doesn't understand the buddy system, and he's too self focused to be a good soldier. And they don't serve arugula in the mess hall.

        • Posted By: jnakhoul @ 08/26/2008 3:44:47 PM

          i meant a 9-5 not military service

        • Posted By: max in fl @ 08/26/2008 1:40:27 PM

          Elite, there you go again. He worked studied hard, became a lawyer dreamed of having the finer things in life, so he is now considered elite. Isn't that why you go to college in the first place. Every doctor, every lawyer, every businessperson that has ever made it is an elite. Then why strive let's all not go to college, I would hate to be called an elistist.

          I get it you wanted HRC to win.

    • Posted By: wildlifeusa @ 08/26/2008 2:32:42 AM

      I never voted for Bush! and I think Obama has far more brains than any republicans ex candidates..
      Black is in, white is out!!l

  • Posted By: wildlifeusa @ 08/26/2008 2:47:33 AM

    Funny how the ones who ask about moral values are the gun clinging idiots, criminals,liers, corrup and of course not the brightest of american society. Bush and Cheney are typical example. You republicans have a great reputation!

    • Posted By: wildlifeusa @ 08/26/2008 2:50:45 AM

      Oh, and that's not all, I would add, narrow minded, racist and in large majority, religious! typical republican! How do you like being seen by the rest of the world??

      • Posted By: pearsoncrz @ 08/26/2008 8:40:40 AM

        "Race is an issue that I believe this nation cannot afford to ignore right now" -- Barack Obama

        • Posted By: jnakhoul @ 08/26/2008 9:40:21 AM

          and its not, so... whats your point

          • Posted By: pearsoncrz @ 08/26/2008 11:08:40 AM

            Racism should not be tolerated from any corner, not from blacks and not from whites.

            Making race an issue, appealing to blacks to vote for him because of his race is a campaign tactic that would have rightfully been decried and opposed if any white candidate had done the same, and it will only insure his failure in the general election, and do more to undermine MLK's dream of a nation where the color of a person's skin doesn't matter than anything a white candidate could have done.

            So much for Obama being a great uniter. If he was so good at working with those he disagreed with, with those who opposed him, he would have found a way to bring HRC into his operation. Instead, he is "showing the Clintons the exit" and I'm glad.

            • Posted By: jnakhoul @ 08/26/2008 3:43:19 PM

              we're not there yet. smoothing it over or ignoring it completely because it makes white voters uncomfortable is not solving anything. ignoring problems is not solving them. is it the most pressing issue NO, should it be addressed YES, and its about damn time

            • Posted By: max in fl @ 08/26/2008 12:39:52 PM

              Were you on HRC's staff? I know they are not racists, The comment just was a reponse to something that was said. It appears whenever he says nothing he appears soft.

              This perception happens all the time, I was in church and at the end of mass the priest decided to celebrate birthdays and very old black man walk up to priest who was also old and the priest said good boy. I remembered thinking "that's odd" The old man should have responded I'm sure, I remembered thinking he is too tired and old to care about a coy racial or at the very least demeaning comment. The priest said something he probably said a million times before, what is the big deal,right. . The big deal unintentional comments are now being challenged..

              Just like when a woman kept interupting Obama, Obama responded "one momemt sweetie "and for that he is a sexist. I'm sure that was a slap in the face but he stopped. You are writing as if Clinton were so distraught they just about died. They're tougher than that.

              Some people like Obama because they HATE the Clintons that much and visa versa. The two on one ticket would just confuse people..

  • Posted By: gmgl @ 08/25/2008 11:16:59 PM

    Wake up please Mr. Fineman. Reach out to Clinton supporters? The Obama campaign has been too busy taunting and humiliating Clinton supporters or shouting at them to get over it. Explain the timing of a 3am phone call to announce of course that his veep is someone else, that's as petty and awful as it gets. I could understand the smearing of Bill Clinton as a racist because at least Obama got the nomination with it. However, taunting Clinton and in effect her supporters through timing the VP announcement at 3am was just plain hubris. Perhaps they can get away with it this year courtesy of the legacy of Bush. Perhaps not. In any case it wasn't necesarry and Obama could have put this whole election in the bank by being classy enough to simply put HRC on the ticket. Instead the bonehead baits by a 3am call. I don't mind vicious as a candidate, however I do mind stupid. That was stupid. If Obama doesn't win in November that was the turning point.

    • Posted By: max in fl @ 08/26/2008 3:12:00 PM

      That was witty,, I would not want a president that doubted his ability HRC had her spot on the humor stage. McCain choosing spots in the US identical to the spots Obama visited in Europe was also playful.

      Singing about bombing IRAN however is crossing the line.

      • Posted By: max in fl @ 08/26/2008 3:38:56 PM

        They tried unsuccessfully to paint Obama as a racist, and they are still trying. No... what you want is HRC in the VP spot or Obama hasn't reached out.to Clinton supporters.

  • Posted By: Davole @ 08/26/2008 3:16:57 PM

    Republicans Spread Message of Democrats??? Disunity
    The Hill by Sam Youngman Aug. 25, 2008

    DENVER ??? Republicans have infiltrated the Democratic National Convention as they seek to exploit and widen the divisions between supporters of presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama and his former primary rival Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton.

    The Republican National Committee (RNC) has set up shop in downtown Denver, and a number of high-profile Republican surrogates are making the media rounds at the Democrats' convention. They???re pushing the idea ??? disputed by Obama (Ill.) and Clinton (N.Y.) aides ??? that the Democratic Party is badly divided and Republican Sen. John McCain (Ariz.) is poised to peel off Clinton supporters.

    The Republicans are breaking somewhat with tradition, launching a much larger presence at their opponents' weeklong party than in the past. While rapid-response teams from both parties are generally dispatched to the opposing party's conventions, this year Republicans are being much more aggressive.

    Alex Conant, the RNC press secretary, said Monday that he doesn't think this year's effort is more aggressive than the one in 2004, but he said that the accommodations this year are more convenient and more "media ready."

    The RNC has two-dozen staffers on the ground in Denver, Conant said, and they will have at least one high-profile McCain surrogate in town every day of the convention. Victory 2008 Chairwoman Carly Fiorina was in town Monday, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney will be in town Tuesday, former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani on Wednesday and Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty on Thursday. Pawlenty and Romney are considered finalists to be McCain's running mate, and Giuliani is the keynote speaker at next week's Republican convention.

    At the heart of the GOP's efforts is a Democratic convention that still has an 800-pound gorilla of a question ??? party unity. Republicans continue to point to a poll last week that showed only 52 percent of Clinton supporters lining up behind Obama, with 21 percent saying they will support McCain.

    And CNN released a poll Monday that showed 66 percent of Clinton supporters are now backing Obama. That's down from 75 percent in the end of June. And 27 percent of her supporters now say they'll support McCain, up from 16 percent in late June.

    "We didn't create all the disunity in the Democratic Party," Conant said. "I think Barack Obama did. We'll do all we can to shed light on it with the goal of reaching out to Hillary Clinton supporters."

    Conant added that all the Clinton supporters in the convention hall "are not the product of the RNC."

    Because of the Republican offensive, senior advisers to Obama and Clinton were furiously trying to extinguish constant reports of party unrest Monday morning before the convention had even officially begun.

  • Posted By: gvillagran3 @ 08/26/2008 1:58:06 PM

    Jill. Fair enough. You discovered that politicians are nothing but a bunch of liars. And that goes for Republicans and Democrats alike. Now if you are fair with the facts, you would come to understand that as bad as Democrats are, and trust me I agree with you that they are bad.... They do not compare with how bad it can get when a Neo Con right wing extremist ideolog is empowered...... That Jill is frankly ruinous for our country... And we had those nuts running the country for eight years and now they want more !!!

    Let's be honest here. McCain needs the Right Wing extremist to win..... Obama does not need the extreme left to win. I hope you understand that when it comes to power, the Right Wing of the GOP has it over the Republican party , and any GOP candidate, while the Liberal extremist of the Democratic party can't even come close to that kind of leverage.

    The Republican moderate is by all accounts an endangered species, and is in my opinion a big loss for our country. Clinton on the other hand could arguably be called a moderate Democrat and he was in power for eight years. tell me Jill, when was the last time we had a moderate Republican in power with a moderate GOP majority as his/her base?

    The way I see it is not about Obama, or McCain for they will tell us wherever the polls dictate . This election is about how we see the future of our country, that is to say controled by extremist, and blind partisans or not. Good or bad we have to deal with Democrats and Republicans extremist I know that, but in my view the key is not to let them get too much power, or if they do, keep it for very long....... I repeat, I do not want to have even the remotest possibility of having the Neo-Cons Right wing extremist remain in power....with Obama I have that certainty, with McCain I do not.
    There. Nothing against McCain ... In fact I like the man and I believe he could be jsut as good a president as Obama..... But like I said, Obama is the enemy of the Right WIng/ Neo-Con nuts and that's all I need to hear to vote for him.
    Change Jill happens when we put our elected officials on notice that we will not tolerate extremism and incopetence...If Obama ends up with a bunch of Liberal Nuts dictating policy, trust me I will be the first one to tell them to take a hicke and give a Republican a chance.

    • Posted By: Jill from Florida @ 08/26/2008 2:51:17 PM

      Let me state this in layman terms:

      The extremists in both parties have the same goal. The Right Wing and Neocons want globalization for big business, wealth and power. The Left Wing and neoliberals want globalization for big business, wealth, power and a cleaner landscape. The two have been working in the backrooms for decades to achieve the same goal. The Presidential candidates are selected by the CFR and endorsed by the media. (Remember how everyone wanted to have a beer with George W Bush?)

      This election was to be Obama (Democratic candidate) and Romney (Republican candidate). The Republican voters went against the media and went FOR McCain - the non-sanctioned candidate. The Democrats were split, so the DNC and the CFR superdelegates stepped in to ensure their sanctioned candidate won the nomination.

      While Obama, Bush and the CFR members refuse to acknowledge that there is even a plan for the North American Union (Or American Union), John McCain was asked if he was going to allow it to happened. He admittedly stated, "NOT ON MY WATCH. THAT WILL NEVER HAPPEN ON MY WATCH."

      Now tell me that Obama is better for the United States of America. (Isn't part of his seal - Obama for AMERICA?)

    • Posted By: Jill from Florida @ 08/26/2008 2:29:45 PM

      Excuse me. The Democratic party IS and HAS BEEN run by the extremists for decades. Do you really think that the working class would have voted these people in if they knew that their ulterior motive was globalization? If they told the truth about what they are trying to achieve from the get-go, they would never have gained the control that they do have.

      Democratic Congressional members of the CFR - John Kerry, Chris Dodd, Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi, John Rockefeller, Evah Bayh, Dianne Feinstein, Tom Harkin, Jack Reed, Jane Harman, James McDermott. Oldies - Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, Sam Nunn, George Mitchell, Bill Richardson, Tom Daschle, Gary Hart, Brzezinski, George Soros, James Johnson, Caroline Kennedy, Richard Holbrooke, Teresa Heinz Kerry, Lee Hamilton, Bill Bradley

      Republican members of CFR:
      Mitch McConnell, Trent Lott, George H W Bush, Dick Cheney, Anthony Gates, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Alan Greenspan, Condolezzaa Rice, Tony Snow, David Petraeus, Henry Paulson, Katherine Harris, Bill Frist, William Cohen, Elaine Chao (McConnell's wife), John Bolten, Michael Bloomberg, Howard Baker

      Of course, major media and anchors are members along with presidents, CEO's and CFO's of the major banking, mortgage, telephone, oil, educational industries.

  • Posted By: Davole @ 08/26/2008 2:43:12 PM

    Senior Dems Concerned Over McCain Gains
    The Hill by Alexander Bolton Aug. 25, 2008

    DENVER ??? Senior Democratic politicians are signaling concern about Sen. Barack Obama???s (Ill.) slip in the polls and are urging him to regain his edge against GOP rival Sen. John McCain (Ariz.).

    Rep. John Dingell (Mich.), the longest-serving House Democrat, said Obama must realize the primary season is behind him and Republicans will ???run a very rough campaign against him.???

    Dingell???s critique comes in the wake of polls showing that McCain has gained ground on Obama since the Democratic senator left the campaign trail for a family vacation in Hawaii. A CNN poll released Monday showed McCain and Obama in a dead heat.

    ???The campaign has not yet taken off,??? said Dingell in a telephone interview. ???He???s got to address things that go into a presidential campaign as opposed to a primary campaign. They???re very different campaigns.???

    Even Obama???s allies, including Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), the co-chairman of Obama???s campaign, acknowledge McCain has gained ground. Durbin said Obama???s absence from the news cycle during his Hawaii vacation, combined with Russia???s invasion of Georgia, gave McCain a chance to dominate the race over the last 10 days.

    ???We realize over the last week or 10 days that John McCain has had a 12-0 run in this basketball game,??? said Durbin, who hastened to add: ???We know the momentum can shift.

    ???My observation is, and I talked a little bit about it with Barack after [his] tour overseas with dramatic positive results, that we expected an evening of the playing field,??? he said.

    Dingell said Obama can regain momentum if he addresses substantive issues such as a withdrawal of American troops from Iraq, rebuilding of the nation???s roads and infrastructure, and the lack of health insurance for an estimated 47 million Americans, including 1 million in Michigan.

    Dingell???s words carry weight because of his seniority in the House and his knowledge of Michigan politics. The AFL-CIO, an important ally of the Democratic Party, has identified Michigan, Ohio and Pennsylvania as the three most important battleground states of the campaign.

    Durbin said Obama???s family vacation was ???well-deserved,??? but blamed Russia???s invasion of Georgia for focused media attention on McCain???s national security credentials. McCain is a former prisoner of war and senior Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee.

    ???All those things came together in a moment giving McCain the field ??? I mean, a stronger position than he might have otherwise have had,??? Durbin said.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse