Munawar Hosain / Fotos International-Getty Images
Christina Applegate
BREAST CANCER

No Guarantees

Like Christina Applegate, more women are choosing prophylactic mastectomies. But does the radical procedure increase breast-cancer survival rates?

 
Sponsored by
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

 

Last November, Rachel Meiser, a 33-year-old nurse, learned that she had a cancerous lump in her right breast. Just a few months earlier, she had tested positive for a rare genetic mutation called CDH1, placing her at a high risk of developing breast cancer, which killed her grandmother, and stomach cancer, which killed her father.

So in January, Meiser had both her breasts removed, even though only one was cancerous. Given her genes and family history, her doctor advised her to get the double mastectomy, and she agreed "absolutely," she says: "You either do it and go on with your life, or you don't, and you risk the possibility of dying."

Like Meiser and, more recently, actress Christina Applegate, a small but growing number of women with cancer in only one breast are opting to get their healthy breast removed too. In a study published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology last October, researchers found that the rate of bilateral mastectomies among women with cancer in only one breast more than doubled from 1998 to 2003, from 1.8 percent to 4.8 percent. "The main motivation is fear," says Stephen Sener, a doctor and former president of the American Cancer Society. "Some women say, 'I can't live with the anxiety of having this happen again'."

For many women, a double mastectomy alleviates some of the concern about becoming one of the more than 40,000 U.S. women who die from breast cancer each year. A 2005 study in the Journal of Clinical Oncology found that a decade after the procedure, 83 percent of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with their choice. "A lot of women really feel that it's liberating," says Jocelyn Dunn, a breast surgeon in Palo Alto, Calif. "Regrets are rare."

Many of those who choose to get prophylactic mastectomies of healthy breasts are young women, like Meiser and Applegate, who don't want to worry about recurrence or frequent testing. Applegate, 36, told ABC on Aug. 19 that once she looked at her options, the choice she made was the "one that seemed the most logical."

But the decision isn't always that straightforward. Not everyone has the resources that a celebrity does to take time off from work for recovery or to pay what can be substantial out-of-pocket reconstruction costs. And for women who don't have the gene that predisposes them to breast cancer, the medical benefits are less than certain. (Only 5 to 10 percent of women diagnosed with breast cancer have a hereditary form of the disease.)

Prophylactic mastectomies do reduce the incidence of breast cancer by as much as 90 percent, but studies have not yet shown that that means women who get them will live any longer than those who don't. "Fewer women are choosing to have just one breast removed," says Todd Tuttle, chief of surgical oncology at the University of Minnesota and lead author of the Journal of Clinical Oncology article. "[But] if they believe it's going to improve their survival rate, then we've got a problem."

Some women simply overestimate the risk of getting cancer in the opposite breast. The typical patient has about .5 percent to .75 percent risk per year of developing a new cancer in the healthy breast, which works out to a 20 to 30 percent chance of developing a new cancer by age 80 if she is treated and diagnosed at age 40, says Seema Khan, co-leader of the breast cancer program at the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center at Northwestern University.

 
Discuss
Member Comments
  • Posted By: Kassandra @ 09/15/2008 10:05:30 AM

    Comment: Women considering a pre-emptive masectomy should read the documents posted by "The Iodine Project" doctors on the Internet. Save yourself some time, money and worry.

  • Posted By: Elovena @ 09/14/2008 11:17:29 PM

    Comment: Thankfully I live in Scandinavia where such operations are virtually free, one gets money during sick leave, too and no one can take your job while you're ill and reconstructions are also very affordable: one pays only for the hospital days and the cost is about 30-35 dollars a day. Health care should not be a priviledge but one of the basic rights for everyone.

  • Posted By: Kassiegirl97 @ 09/10/2008 8:55:06 PM

    Comment: @ 38 I had a mod. rad in lt breast. I begged them to remove the other too .. but it wa '82 and the philosophy was" if it atint broke, don't fix it" I did the diep flap 5 yrs later w/ implant, but have been very dissatisfied w/ it ever since. I still have to use a swim form over it to fill out the cup. The only way to look "normal" again is to start over and remove the rt. one or reduce it to match the left. I would definitely have them both removed if I could go back in time. It is a matter of aesthetics, viable solutions, and of course reducing possible reoccurance, it would be the best all-around fix.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
The Peek
 
 
STRATEGIES

Isn't it ironic: Xerox is hoping it can profit by teaching companies how to reduce their printing.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
NATIONAL SECURITY
Sponsored by
 
 
 
loadingLoading Menu