Sorry, Pal, You're Rich

Can you be middle-class and earn $250,000?

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: lm24 @ 04/08/2009 11:43:09 AM

    my husband & i are in out 40's, live in nyc area, work real hard to make about $220k per year. My grandparents were very conservative and saved alot of money, and now they are gone, leaving me with a nice nest egg for our retirement, but bring our income up to $260k. My accountant told me this morning we are in the 44% tax bracket??!! Seems insane to me that almost half the hours I am working is to give to the government!!!! Why doesn't it feel good to be "rich"???

  • Posted By: DINKS_LA @ 04/04/2009 6:33:12 AM

    My husband and I make over $300,000 a year and we are not rich by any stretch of the imagination. In order to make $300k a year, we both went to graduate school, have over $250 thousand dollars in student loans and can't afford a two bedroom condo because we live in Los Angeles because we were responsible. Because we are both wage earners (instead of having investment income like the "rich"), we get no deductions for student loan interests, no first time home buyer credit, no tax stimulus refund, not to mention we get hit with significant AMT. We both work 14 hour days and often will have work left over to do on the weekends. I understand that we may be considered "rich" by those who make less than we do... however, we also have significantly more debt and work longer hours than the average American. Do I think I need to shoulder my responsibility in paying taxes? Yes... but do I think it is fair to automatically group us in the "rich" bucket... No. At the end of the day, on a balance sheet basis, we are still in the red (and that does not include a mortgage)

  • Posted By: chrishill @ 03/05/2009 3:04:37 PM

    The fact is I personally don't know anyone that makes 250,000 a year. Living in Arkansas you do good to make 40. Thinking that anyone making that about of money would complain about paying taxes is crazy. On top of that, you tell me that these people work? They don't know the definition of work. I have worked till my hands were blistered just so they could eat if their fancy restaurants, and drive their fancy cars. I do good to make 30 a year and work 60 hours a week on a short week. These people are jokes and so is Obama for thinking he will ever help the lower and middle class. You have to know them before you can help them.

  • Posted By: NgaThuong @ 08/28/2008 7:33:08 PM

    Who is richer and who should be paying more taxes?
    1. A single person who makes $100,000 a year
    2. A family of six with 4 college bound children with a single wage earner of $250,000
    If we talk about family value and the need for raising good kids, we should give tax credit to the family with children regardless of their income level. Maybe this is too difficult for the politicians to understand.

    • Posted By: loriw @ 08/29/2008 3:40:13 AM

      Actually McCain promised to do that for families with children-give them a tax cut of up to $7K.

      • Posted By: NgaThuong @ 09/09/2008 8:45:44 PM

        Then he will probably have my vote.

        • Posted By: janexx @ 02/28/2009 3:51:28 PM

          Isn't there already a deduction for dependent children? Your children aren't necessarily a gift to society. I'm sure you're a good parent and you might be raising good kids. But don't be so misguided as to think you should be rewarded for reproducing. It's a choice you made just like your other life choices that cost you something. There are already proposals for ensuring that kids can go to college. From my standpoint, you owe us (society) to raise upstanding citizens. Sure you might be producing productive members of society but having kids creates more pollution in the form of driving them all over the place and it increases product waste because of all the items you have to purchase for them. In other words, having kids (4, for heaven's sake) carries with it a huge footprint. Consider that.

  • Posted By: henrytut2 @ 11/14/2008 3:10:34 PM

    I make over $250K. I see higher taxes in order to benefit someone less fortunate as both the cost of doing business, and a form of charity. I think I'm privileged to be an American and don't feel that having to pay "more than my share" is unfair or an undue burden.

    Anyone who makes more than $250K and thinks that paying an extra few percent of their income so that the country as a whole is a better place is, in my opinion, unpatriotic and ungrateful for what they have. That isn't to say that I don't believe that they struggle to pay for their house payment and private school tuitions, but it's just that it wouldn't kill them to live with a few percent less.

    • Posted By: burbank @ 11/15/2008 1:17:04 AM

      To: henrytut2
      fm: burbank
      Sir, You state in your missive that you don't mind paying more in taxes to help those less fortunate and that those who would protest this redistribution of wealth are somehow less patriotic or love their felow man or their country less than yourself. I believe in this regard, sir, you are mistaken. Those who work hard to make the kind of money (250k) that puts them in the realm of the so called rich should be allowed to spend their money as THEY see fit, giving them the option to contribute to the charities or causes of their choice. That choice should not be made for them by the governmnet.

      • Posted By: Jeff from Sacramento @ 02/27/2009 10:45:46 PM

      • Posted By: NYSmartGuy @ 02/24/2009 7:31:34 PM

        Funny how those who earn $250K wont offer how much they actually PAY in taxes. Yes, we know the tax rate is near 40% at the top, but are ANY of them forking over 40 cents on every $1 earned? Please ! Even Buffet offered that he paid 18%. 18% ???? How is that right? Face it folks. The rich own Congress and tax codes are written to help keep the wealthy from paying their fair share. Time to change the codes folks and let the wealthy pay their way.

    • Posted By: NYSmartGuy @ 02/24/2009 7:30:46 PM

      Funny how those who earn $250K wont offer how much they actually PAY in taxes. Yes, we know the tax rate is near 40% at the top, but are ANY of them forking over 40 cents on every $1 earned? Please ! Even Buffet offered that he paid 18%. 18% ???? How is that right? Face it folks. The rich own Congress and tax codes are written to help keep the wealthy from paying their fair share. Time to change the codes folks and let the wealthy pay their way.

  • Posted By: nickgr @ 11/14/2008 5:40:10 PM

    The Dem plan is tricky.

    Will they overtax individuals who earn 250K +,

    or couples earning that much ?

    A couple at 250k+ already pays almost 50% of it in total taxation...

    So at 125K net a year,they certainly are not rich. Just well of.

  • Posted By: Indy01 @ 08/28/2008 9:02:57 PM

    Wake Up!! Those who earn more also pay more in taxes. Plain and simple. It is not earn more pay less concept here.Not only do you pay more when you earn more you also put more into the econnomy and into the job force and into Social Security. My husband made over 250,000 yet what we paid in taxes would
    surprise many of you on here. So do we deserve a break like the rest of Americans? ABSOLUTELY!!

    • Posted By: Wisconsin Voter @ 08/29/2008 2:16:38 AM

      No you don't. When someone making 10% of what you make has to pay a higher % then you that's not fair.

      • Posted By: loriw @ 08/29/2008 3:38:10 AM

        I would call that incentive to get a better job so you could lower the % you pay...

        • Posted By: AntonBursch @ 08/29/2008 7:14:31 AM

          well, it costs a lot of money to just pick up and move to China or India. not everyone can do that.

          • Posted By: ALily33 @ 11/14/2008 12:33:35 PM

            Maybe you're just not smart enough to get a better job.

    • Posted By: yahoo @ 08/29/2008 1:08:23 AM

      No, not Social Security - you only have to pay Social Security tax on the first $102,000 you earn. Just one of a multitude of inequalities in our tax code that DO result in lower-income people paying a bigger percentage of their gross income in taxes than those in the $250k plus range.

      It's a myth that the rich pay a bigger cut of their income in taxes. Last year, Warren Buffett said that he was taxed at 17.7 per cent on the $46 million he made, without trying to avoid paying higher taxes, while his secretary, who earned $60,000, was taxed at 30 per cent. He challenged the CEO's of the Forbes 400 companies to prove that any one of them paid a larger percentage of their income in taxes than their secretaries. So far, not one has taken him up on it.

  • Posted By: Lee Holmes @ 11/13/2008 9:58:53 PM

    Uhh,Gross. Is not ''250,00$'' the ceiling sought by Democrats in agitating for the SCHIP program?

    Why would your ''rich people''need taxpayer dollars to provide their kids with government health insurance?

    I mean,..being ''rich'' and all................

  • Posted By: fig124newton @ 11/13/2008 12:41:15 AM

    Sorry you don't feel rich with $250k, but I live and work with people who kill themselves to eat , send children to college , have a home. They have college educations, but the fat bosses would rather ship jobs overseas then pay a good wage. It is amazing how america has taken the fight out of these people, the only hope they have is that their children will fair better. If you don't like the promise of a higher tax rate, take your 250K and leave the country with the jobs being outsourced! fignewton

  • Posted By: oceansky @ 11/12/2008 8:35:53 PM

    I am a 57 year old Library Manager and my husband is a 61 year old Director of Operations for a national fast food chain. Together we make 250K. and don't see retirement in our future any time soon. We have worked over 25 years to get to this point in our life, put two sons through college, one through law school with one still to go. School loans, mortgage, car payments eat nearly every penny we bring home-lucky but certainly not rich.

  • Posted By: peoplesmart @ 10/31/2008 12:36:27 PM

    Boo Hoo! So you don't cut it. So what. Still doesn't mean "thou shalt be penalized for working and making more than your average American who probably was asleep most of his life". Those making $250K and up still pay around 48% of their income in taxes. So let's make them pay more and re-distribute wealth. Sounds like you should be living in Cuba. O darn, sorry no food there for everybody except for the elite dictating class.

  • Posted By: BeeBear @ 08/28/2008 6:32:37 PM

    To the person was said they make $500k per yr. - and "stop trying to take an unfair portion of what I worked for" - why is it that someone who makes $98k per year should pay the exact same amount as someone making $500k?? Social Security tax is only taken from the first $98,700.00 a person makes, why is that? Percentage wise the guy making $500k should be paying 5 times the amount as the guy making $100k - now who's getting away without paying their fair share?

    • Posted By: jdemoura @ 08/28/2008 9:33:54 PM

      You obviously have no idea what you are talking about. First of all we may pay the same amount into SS but we get the same amount at retirement. This was the governments way of getting all the lazy spend thrifts to save some money. Your not entitled to any more than what you put in. Furthermore....this is one of the smaller taxes we pay. I have had years when I paid 50k in Fed Taxes and years when I have paid 500k in fed taxes. All, thoses taxes pay for the interest the goverment pays on the debt they issue to return the tax money to the people who were to lazy to listen in school or not willing to sacrifice to get ahead. We already pay substantially more than 98% of america. I guarantee that if the average business owner who makes 250k to 1mil a year had their taxes lower to say the 28% tax bracket, they would hire more people and unemployment would drop like a rock. I work anywhere from 60 to 80hrs a week and employee 35 people. If I did not end up paying 48% of my income to the state/fed/ss and other misc tax organizations I would hire 2-3 more people and work less hours. I do believe that weathier americans can pay more than the average american, but if you bury us in taxes we will lay people off and work 70-90 hours instead. Remember who employees most of America. Its the small and mid-sze business owners not the large corporations.

      • Posted By: Eat_the_rich @ 10/31/2008 11:31:50 AM

        You should be shot.

    • Posted By: Fred Norris @ 08/28/2008 6:45:41 PM

      What is hilarious is I'm not even eligible to collect when I retire! And the SS tax is approx 7% so it wouldn't be 5 times of what you are paying overall - I guarantee I pay more of a percentage of my earning than you do (since I have not made this money for a long period of time (I'm still relatively young) and I do not have excessive investement earnings)- not complaining, just don't want to keep throwing my money at a broken gov't...

  • Posted By: Taxedtoomuch @ 08/28/2008 7:21:55 PM

    I know that I make a lot of money. $400,000-$500,000 a year. But I also am taxed at a much higher level while at the same time use my remaining spendable income into the economy. I hire a gardner, a pool man and a maid service. If they raise my taxes it won't kill me but it will hurt those I hire to do the tasks I speak about above, because I may hire a neighbor kid to do my yard work and take care of the pool myself. It is not the rich you will hurt by raising the taxes on those that pay the majority of all revenue, it is all the workers in those nice restaurants, car washes, etc... that will be hurt. I will find ways to make more money, it just won't go back into the economy like it does now.

    • Posted By: Eat_the_rich @ 10/31/2008 11:28:53 AM

      Shut your mouth right now.

  • Posted By: Wallace7788 @ 10/29/2008 8:49:19 AM

    Tax wealth.. Not Income...they are different. A couple that as only a few assets is not wealthy no matter how much they make no matter their lifestyle or no matter what they think. If they lose their jobs they in up living in a van down by the river.

    We should either tax wealth or spending ( i.e. sales tax which translates to life style). Don't tax people for being productive or for investing in other peoples production.

  • Posted By: dlonce @ 10/27/2008 8:37:18 AM

    people like you have been making a living feeding class envy for so long, and it is so, so tiresome, you covet what others have and it rots you so that you don't even realize your contempt. When I move into the $250,000 income it will be from hard work, and a great investment of time and money in building wealth. In your world making my money and wanting to keep it for me and my family is considered greed, while taking my money by force in the form of taxes and redistributing it is called compassion.

  • Posted By: smlbusiness @ 10/26/2008 9:07:28 AM

    What most people don't realize when it comes to small business is banks don't lend to most or provide any real credit to. Unlike large companies that seem the way to qualify for a loan is to have a few hundred million if not billion of debt. Which means during slow times the business owner has to do their own funding and with taxing in the highest tax bracket makes it very difficult to save for rainy day funding which lately it's been raining alot. The truth of the matter is poor business owners pay the highest bracket. Because all the really wealthy hide under dividends and long term capital gains. which means most millionaires pay 15 percent taxes. and both dems and rep. know this and avoid the topic when it comes to taxes. Making you wonder where the tax laws come from.

  • Posted By: Thomas Costagliola @ 10/21/2008 10:35:24 AM

    ???Can you be middle-class and earn $250,000???? is the wrong question to define ???Rich???. Rich is a function of NET WORTH and age. If you are a 5 year old with a $250,000 trust fund you are rich. If you are an elderly couple living in a high cost of living area and have a $250,000 net worth you are certainly not rich. In order for the USA to have a fair tax system we need to have a flat tax on net worth with and an exemption based on age.

  • Posted By: ashur508 @ 10/14/2008 12:52:00 AM

    cost of living is such a key factor in this whole issue. also, when they tax on the gross amount, business owners will barely make a profit, if one at all. people are afraid of the unemployment rate now...just wait. the only choice businesses will have is to layoff, reduce wages, or send companies overseas. on a lighter note, i was just excited paducah, ky was mentioned!

  • Posted By: kimmy8247 @ 10/13/2008 9:30:09 PM

    What happens when all these smart people who earn more than $250,000 decide that they will not work for you? So they slow down (don't work 80 hour weeks) and make certain that their salary is not above $250,00. So who does the government tax then? Maybe you?

  • Posted By: KenneyPNY @ 10/08/2008 12:54:19 PM



    Here is what I am not getting! Individual business owners making over $250k per year are small in comparison to the rest of the small business owner. As mentioned overhead cost can eat away at profits making the want-to-be 250k-business owner bring in way less than 250k. Does not that overhead cost come out of (a) the business expense account? (b) out of what that business owner would be paying themselves?

    Next trickle down economy does not work. Business these days would rather make their present employees "work smarter" or longer hours or heap on more responsibility to existing employees rather than hire new ones. American has tried trickle down since Regan and where has that gotten us. Why not try trickle up. Give average Americans more money and guess what, they will spend it. That spending will in turn cause business owner to have to hire new employees to keep up with demand of free market.

    Lastly, eliminating the tax cut that Bush gave the small upper income individuals is a tax increase, but only on the affected people. The rest of us (majority of us) would not loose a thing and in fact because we don???t have golden parachutes and/or make over $250k a year would then actually see a tax decrease.

    • Posted By: jrcommando @ 10/09/2008 11:38:16 PM

      i agree with you. it seems logical for any small business to have a very large overhead, however i believe that if you taxed componies on the amount that the individual owners are making, its quite respectable. i live in a household in california thats worth over 1 million. my family can just barley get by with an income of 54,000. to think of the things that we would be able to do with an income of 250,000 is astounding.people that say they can barely get buy with an income of 200,000, either made a lot of poor investment decesions, or are living an extremely extravagant life. people that bought there homes and didn't refinance were smart. my house was bought 20 years ago aand not refinanced, because of that are payments are nice and low. we ow about 300,000 toward our house and are still able to make it by. simply changing the things you buy and where you buy them can make differences of many 10's of thousands. thats my 2 cents from a middle class family.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse