Sorry, Pal, You're Rich

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: justlookingfornow @ 08/28/2008 1:59:05 PM

    Wealth is a state of mind. But consider this situation. My wife and I grew up in lower middle class households. We borrowed a great deal of money to go to college. We both went to medical school and borrowed every penny to do that. Residency and Fellowship were years of further 'delayed gratification' during which we began to pay back loans. We took loans to pay back loans (and probably qualified for food stamps, etc., but didn;t feel it was right to do so).

    Along the way, we had three kids whie in medical school and in residency. We needed child care, send them to private schools (including preschool) and vowed never to leave them with the debt we were experiencing. They all went to private colleges that we are still paying off!

    We don't live in a McMansion, make reasonably good income-- my wife is now 'retired' but in our late 50s, have never done --or be able to afford--many of the things I know others have. After taxes, paying mortgage (refinanced several times to pay for educational expenses) and continuing to pay off loans, I don't particularly feel rich.

    In the end, it may not be what you earn, but what you have left after expenses.

    • Posted By: jerimys @ 08/28/2008 3:29:51 PM

      If you can afford to pay for your kids college instead of making them pay for it themselves, then you're rich, end of story.

  • Posted By: Dollared @ 08/28/2008 2:48:19 PM

    I second Cruel Aarony, and let me name some names:

    NYCLiving, what a goddamn whiner! I"ve done what you've done, including the loans. On your path, what will your income and expenses be in 10 years? Yes, $500k/year and whateve-you-please. You are the very definition of rich. And yes, it took some pain and sacrifice. I guess you expected it to be free of pain....?
    Reg61: You should pay progressive tax rates because as your income rises and your essential expenses (I don't mean premium cable) are paid, you have more disposable income that people poorer than you. AND BECAUSE you make more money in a rich economy because the GOVERNMENT paid for your roads, pays for your public safety (including for your business AND your home), pays to educate your employees and your customers, and when you retire, will pay your retirement and medical. Did you think it was all @#%$#%@$#^$%&free? You are taking more benefits and so you pay more.

    Now the rest of you rich whiners. Try, try try to imagine this: You are at home. You have two children. Your family income is $60,000 and you have a standard employee medical plan with 10% co-pays. Your talented ten year old daughter wants to pursue her dream of being a doctor, but you can't afford private schools. Your 12 year old son dropped a baseball bat on his foot and he needs two surgeries and a 6 months of therapy to run again. To cover the co-pays, you need to sell your second car, and then take the bus to work every day.. And you are 45, and have 20 years to work to pay for retirement, but your company recently laid off 70% of its workers over 50.

    Can you imagine yourself in that position? And you want tthat guy to pay the same tax rate as you?

    Now - do y

    • Posted By: Fred Norris @ 08/28/2008 2:52:18 PM

      Yes -

      • Posted By: Kristiecsu @ 08/28/2008 2:56:17 PM

        I'd rather be a rich whiner than a poor whiner. I see whining on both sides, but markedly more from the poor people listing their misfortune like it's some kind of game show. Newsflash:complaining won't make you any money.

        • Posted By: bgf1991 @ 08/28/2008 3:17:09 PM

          Newsflash - having money doesn't make you rich if you look and speak down to those who don't. It just make you sad - and still a whiner.

          • Posted By: tjenning @ 08/28/2008 3:29:26 PM

            Intelligence and ambition are two totally different things. Serfdom has allowed millions of people to live happily for thousands of years, but I'll bet you would know the first thing about planting potatoes.

  • Posted By: Philly Middle Class @ 08/28/2008 2:31:08 PM

    A thought provoking article. Yes, I'm one of the 'whiners' who makes more than $250,000 - and I know I am not rich. I'm not complaining...at least not until an article like this one comes up. Three daughters in college - two private, one public - NO financial help, sooo - $100K per year gone. Does it bother me that those making under $50K can have their children in premier private schools attend for free? - not really. They should. Does it bother me that those earning less than $35K pay almost no income tax ?- no, not really. It is appropriate that these benefits are in place to level the playing field. But in the greater Philadelphia area, with Philly city payroll tax of 4%, high state, property, and taxes insurance rates, not to mention a fairly large mortgage to live in the 'so called' luxury of a 2,600 square foot house, I sure don't feel rich. Oh, and because I get no fixed pension that many who in the $35-50K range trade off for, I put 20% away so I can afford to continue to live where I live as the taxes et. al. continue to go up after I retire.
    I would tell you that most in the $250K -$350K salary range consider themselves middle class, maybe upper middle class. I have no boat, never mind a yacht, I have no summer home at the Jersey shore, my vacations are relatively modest. I drive a Chrysler, my wife an SUV gas guzzler we will need to trade, and my daughters share a 2000 Jetta when they are home from college. My life is not appreciably different than my neighbors who make up to $150K less than I do, primarily due to my need to save for retirement. I have no doubt that my reward will be to have folks like the author of this article say I should be ashamed of collecting social security retirement benefits, and that I should get less than those who made and/and or saved less.
    The only real measure of one's wealth that can be used to classify them as wealthy is their asset wealth, not their income...unless they are making $1 Million or more. The challenge is to get more people into the higher salaries, not to punish those who have climbed to do so. Low taxes creates job growth...its a fact. And by the way, its my money, not the governments, so when you 'roll back the Bush tax cuts' you are saying its the government's money. Sorry, they didn't work 60-70 hours a week to earn it. I did. I'll pay my fair share...I already do. Just don't seek to create the one America John Edwards claims to want by dividing us by income and attacking those who earn more. Just wait...taxes will rise, and the overall quality of life of this nation will drop.

    • Posted By: jerimys @ 08/28/2008 3:26:28 PM

      If you can afford to pay for your kids college instead of making them pay for it themselves, then you're rich, end of story.

  • Posted By: skinfxr @ 08/28/2008 2:50:36 PM

    I agree with sewnerjhawk. A flat tax is the only completely fair and easy way to tax, but the beauracracy and the IRS would never allow this to happen

    • Posted By: druked @ 08/28/2008 3:02:44 PM

      Here! Here!

      • Posted By: ruby99 @ 08/28/2008 3:26:25 PM

        With flat tax there would be no IRS (no need) so I have a feeling they would fight hard to save their jobs... this is what Steve Forbes wanted years ago when he ran for president.

      • Posted By: tjenning @ 08/28/2008 3:19:17 PM

        The problem with a flat tax system is the fact that it is simple. Geez, doesn't sound like a problem, but it is. There are literally hundreds of thousands of IRS and tax services jobs that would vaporize overnight due to a simple tax code. It is not a trivial concept and I believe that this is why Forbes didn't get very far in his run for Prez.

  • Posted By: manfernandez @ 08/28/2008 3:00:38 PM

    Well let me tell you MY friends sob story. While Slick Willy was president, a friend lived in an apartment with his epileptic wife and two daughters. His wife had an episode and was injured physically because of the attack. She could not work. His apartment was sold as a condo. I gave him hundreds of dollars (while I was making $8 an hour) he had to move to a hotel since they sold his apt. When he finally went to ask for help the refused hime the help becasue he did not have a residence. HE truly needed it and was not helped. The system only gives to those who have made it a career to work the system. The ones that TRULY need the help do not get it. I had a business for 6 years with a partner. My partner bought a huge house, spent 50K on a pool, 14k on a dinning room set. I however stayed living in my 3 bedroom home and saved. When we started doing bad, he told me HE should get a paycheck and not me since I had money saved. People have gotten into this realesate problem becasue they got in over the heads. I pay over 1500 a month on health care, Obama gives me nothing on his plan.

    • Posted By: TheTruthHurts2008 @ 08/28/2008 3:24:55 PM

      This is yet another example of why government should not be in the business of income redistribution and social programs. They do not do it well... at all!! It should be left up to the communities and churches to help people in need. The government's social programs will always fail because they do not know the people that are applying for the assistant and whether they truely need it or not. They only see numbers. Many of government social programs benefits the ones that do not need it more than the ones that actually do. When will people realize that government can't take care of you. You, your friends, or family should share this burden.

  • Posted By: Cabot @ 08/28/2008 3:23:45 PM

    Mr Gross, Move to France where you can pay 60% of your income to help out your 17% unemployed fellow man out. You must have been a John Edwards supporter (class warefare) The answer for the rest of us is a Fair flat tax, or National sales tax and get rid of the IRS. Let me out of a failing Social Security plan. Create only one more government program, The office of Governmental efficiencies, Fire everyone and rehire only the needed and look at every dollar that we are spending and make cost cutting proposals to Congress. Its not the taxes that is the problem its way too many Government employees and wasteful programs.

  • Posted By: reg61 @ 08/28/2008 2:34:31 PM

    Please, I am self-employed so i lose over a third of my income to taxes and social security ??? something I am sureI will never see. Because when the time comes they will say I have saved to much. Since my first job when I was making $13,500 a year I paid my bills and carried no debt. Now, my sons who are in the college receive no financial aid ??? and I am ok with that except I can't take their tuition as a tax deduction because we make too much money. I am asking to be taxed at the same rate as everyone else. Don't penalize me because I have busted my tail. I went to state schools and worked full-time while there to be successful... and my husband did the same. But our sons college tuitions will cut our income in half. (So technically I will no longer be rich!) Flat Rate Tax is the only fair tax!!!

    • Posted By: jerimys @ 08/28/2008 3:23:39 PM

      If you can afford to pay for your kids college, then you're rich, end of story.

    • Posted By: jerimys @ 08/28/2008 3:18:02 PM

      If you can pay for your sons college, then you are rich, end of story.

  • Posted By: chrismoody @ 08/28/2008 3:12:00 PM

    Rock on Flat Tax! The complex tax code keeps many folks from understanding how much they are really being taxed. That contributes to the kind of ignorance that believes "rich people" are the problem and the government is the answer. "Rich people" are not a problem. Greedy People are. There's a difference and we as voters do a lousy job of sorting them out. Greedy ones seem to keep showing up in State and National Legislative Branch.

    • Posted By: jcjohns91107 @ 08/28/2008 3:22:56 PM

      You could put in place a flat tax that went from 0% - 25% and probably double the tax base and you know what, those really are rich would probably be fine with that.

  • Posted By: living in north east @ 08/28/2008 11:00:39 AM

    Making 250K in the metro DC area is not rich. If you think it is you don't live here. I live in Alexandria, Virginia in a 1500 sq foot house that cost $630K. The guy who makes what we make but lives in say Montgomery, Alabama has a much higher standard of living than I, yet we pay the same Federal income tax! Not fair!! There needs to be a cost of living factor in regards to federal income tax

    • Posted By: bjablonski@wave2wave.com @ 08/28/2008 3:22:50 PM

      then move....state taxes go to state programs....Federal taxes have no bearing on where you live, we are all Americans. You were not required to buy a $600,000 plus home by anyone were you? Its great you make 250k, and others too, but now you want everyone else to help pick up additional federal costs because you live where you live...gimme a break. And I too earn 250K, you sound like the democrats.

    • Posted By: antipartisan75 @ 08/28/2008 11:10:56 AM

      Interesting. I live in the same DC metro area and make 33K a year and somehow manage to survive. So if you can't make it on 250K a year, you're clearly a moron. No sympathy here for all the whiners who don't know how to manage a budget and can't imagine a life without their mercedes' and gym memberships and country club memberships...boo hoo hoo

      • Posted By: Fred Norris @ 08/28/2008 11:23:54 AM

        too funny - some of us like to have nice things and work hard for them - If you want to scrape by and not better yourself, I'm fine with that. But please don't reach into my pocket to take anymore than you already do...

        • Posted By: living in north east @ 08/28/2008 11:58:46 AM

          Thank you, Fred!

      • Posted By: living in north east @ 08/28/2008 11:57:33 AM

        I didn't say we weren't making it. Clearly we are, but I don't consider myself rich, that's all. Yes we travel and drive nice cars, but I would set the standard for rich alot higher in the metro DC area. Guess it depends what you expect out of life. We work for every penny.

    • Posted By: andrew1983 @ 08/28/2008 11:06:59 AM

      how is it not fair? you choose to live where you live, same as the other person. move somewhere else if you want a higher standard of living with the same salary.

      • Posted By: Fred Norris @ 08/28/2008 11:19:03 AM

        You clearly miss the point - it costs more to live in these areas because the pay is more (a vicious cycle). Unfortunately for most people who want to work in certain fields (Law, Advertising ...), we need to work in these areas and $250k a year barely makes ends meet.

  • Posted By: hughm8 @ 08/28/2008 3:21:39 PM

    Oh wow, I???m richer than the median household people in New Canaan CT, Greenwich too? Well then, lets buy a home. Oh, too bad, can???t afford one, by a lot. Oh, can???t afford Stamford either, or Norwalk or Westport or Ridgefield. Lets hit Westchester, wow, maybe this 3BR starter for $700k? Oh no, $20k property taxes! Non-deductible? State taxes too? Damn, what an AMT clownshow. Lets try Bergen county NJ, it???s still expensive but Maybe, as Mr. Gross implies, I can stop being so stubborn and find a ???dream??? house in a depressed area of Hackensack, hope that all those property taxes have delivered good schools. Oh no, this place sucks! But, hold on, it???s what Daniel Gross would do if he was this rich. After-all, he???s armed with his stats on medium incomes and if those people in New Cannan can get by on $231k, then I???m obviously under achieving, a slacker. So, sure, raise my taxes, take more dollars. Got to get the boss to pay me in medium dollars I suppose.

  • Posted By: Nola Mike @ 08/28/2008 1:30:24 PM

    I make about $250,000 per year which some of yo say is rich. Let's see. Taxes $100,000. Parochial school tuition for my 4 kids since the public schools in the city are useless at $9,000 per year each is $36,000. Retirement minimum recommended is 10% for another $25,000. Phone, utilities, etc. about $700 per month for another $8400 per year. Food is about $1000 per month (of course that includes only basic meat choices when trying to feed 6 people on $250 per week) for another $12,000. Two modest cars (a Chevy Aveo and a Dodge Minivan) at about $500 per month for another $12,000 per year. Medical insurance and out of pocket is $420 every two weeks for another $11,000 per year. Gasoline is $400 per month for $4800 per year. Clothes are about $300 per month for a family of 6 shopping at department stores for $3600 per year. I guess I do take a little luxury by sending my kids to music and dancing school for a total of about $500 per month ($90 per month per kid for music lessons and $125 per month for the 3 girls to go to dancing schoo) for another $6000 per year. Put money away for college at $300 per month per child so they can be rich like me which is another $15,000 per year. That leaves about $16,000 per year to cover everything else - car and home repairs, vacation, an occasional concert or movie, girl scout cookies, etc.

    So $250,000 makes someone rich. What exactly did I list that makes me a rich person? No mercedes benz, no mansion ($300,000 homes are about $2300 sq ft), no exotic trips. The only luxury is music lessons for my kids.

    • Posted By: jalexis @ 08/28/2008 1:59:29 PM

      I would say that sending your kids to private school is a luxury since you choose to do so because the public schools are "useless." What about those who live in your area and have to send their children to the "useless" schools because they don't have an additional $36000 a year to choose private school. Which adds $36000 per year to your luxury category, more than my mother made while raising two children alone. We went to public school and got scholarships to pay for college along with some student loans. I now have a Ph.D. and if I ever reach a point in my life where I am making 250 k a year I will feel incredibly blessed and share that blessing with those less fortunate around me. You at least have the luxury of making choices about what to do with your extra money. I'm not saying that someone who makes 250 k is "rich" but definitely privileged and it would be nice for people to acknowledge that they have more than most (98% of the population). I feel very privileged to have a job and be able to save for the future and I live on 40 k a year.

      • Posted By: yowfunk @ 08/28/2008 3:15:56 PM

        I dont feel sorry for you. I feed a family of 4 on about 100 dollars per week...no name brands and a lot of cheap meals. They go to public schools. Our newest car is a 99 accord and my husband drives a 94 saturn with 350k miles on it. We have old tv's, one computer, live in a house built in 1900 with 3 bedrooms and one bathroom. We dont go on vacations, have very little credit card debt and still live paycheck to paycheck. We were living better 10 years ago when we made 20k less. Our bills consist of a house payment, one car payment, car insurance on 4 cars (mine, my husbands and my 2 children), homeowners insurance, car insurance, property tax, electric, gas, garbage, cell phone and cable (basic). I don't consider the cable and cell phone luxuries as we live in the country and have to have cable to get any stations and the cell phones are necessary as I will not have my children out on the road with no way to contact us in an emergency. I would love to be able to set aside 300 a month for college and 10% for retirement. My family would not know what to do if I could spend 1000 a month on groceries.

        • Posted By: Nola Mike @ 08/28/2008 3:20:38 PM

          You should go to college or get a in demand trade.

    • Posted By: NickiDrea @ 08/28/2008 1:45:28 PM

      I'm sorry, but your comment fails to move me at all.

      (1) You are not required to send your kids to private school. It isn't as if you have no alternative. You CHOOSE to send your kids to a private school because you believe that the public schools in your neighborhood are of lower quality. That's a fair concern, but you could still send your kids there. Ppeople don't have the option where to send their kids to school.

      (2) Do you and your husband have cell phones? Get rid of them. You'll save a ton. You can get an internet phone for $10/mo if you chose to.

      (3) Two car family. Cut it down to one, it will save you car expenses and gas. We Americans are very spoiled now. In the past families were lucky if they even had one car and they survived just fine. Now people need two and three cars. It's a lifestyle choice, not a necessity.

      (4) It's harsh, but cut out the kids' lessons. Your kids won't die without music lessons or dancing school.

      (5) No vacations.

      (6) Shop in bulk at Costso or BJ's for food, snacks, supplies.

      Almost everything you listed (with the exception of health insurance, retirement and college savings) is a LUXURY, not a necessity.

      • Posted By: Nola Mike @ 08/28/2008 3:00:13 PM

        You want me to give up the things I've worked to accomplish, so I can live a poor lifestyle like you. Instead of asking me to give up what I worked for, why don't you work to build your own future.

    • Posted By: Nola Mike @ 08/28/2008 2:57:36 PM

      BTW, I went to public school, then used federal grants, loans and work study to go to collge. I did however pay my own way through graduate school. By the way all you folks that think I'm rich, how did you pay for your collge education? You probably didn't go nor did you learn a solid trade. If you did you wouldn't be complaining about us that did the work to create a middle class lifestyel.

    • Posted By: Nola Mike @ 08/28/2008 2:47:24 PM

      Obviously you folks don't know what middle class means. You think anyone who can afford a few small things for their family is rich. I'm not saying I'm poor, but I'm certainly not rich. If you guys would get an education and work your way up the ladder you may end up middle class one day yourselves.

    • Posted By: sweetmaggie1996 @ 08/28/2008 1:49:25 PM

      For Nola Mike: First, you should consider yourself rich indeed if you have four children that are happy and healthy. You have a home, and a job. That in itself is a rich thing. I am a hardworking single mother with two years. I make about $28000 a year and have just bought a single wide trailer for myself and my children. While I live in an area where I am considered as making good money, I consider myself the richest woman in the world as i have a home and children. while I can't afford the luxury of putting my boys in sports, I was able to get them a dog this year. Go Me!!! I hope that all of you can see what is truly important in life and it isn't the bottom line.

    • Posted By: random black guy @ 08/28/2008 1:43:25 PM

      wow, what do you want, sympathy? You are saving for retirement, when I know of dozens of people who are working poor well into their sixties! No retirement for them? You buy clothes every month, WTF! dancing school for your kids! seriously, you want sympathy because your house is 2x the size of the average person? 1000 a month for groceries, seriously!! Holy cow, reading your post is a prime example of what people are speaking of here. what's next, you'll complain that you only have 2 plasma TVs and your dog can only afford avian water, when they deserve perier? seriously, you messed yourself up by listing your expenditures, when most poeple would pray to be able to pay that much for bills. LOL, wow. What's next Mr Howell, will you complain that you had to lay a butler off? man, you are almost biblical in your greed and martyrdom. You should really take yourself off your high horse and know you pay for food every month than most people make in a month. Thanks for the laugh Mr Howell, i'll forward your post to my friends in Iraq and Afghanistan, and see if they can sympathize with your "poorness". Poor guy, only can afford to send your kids to a state college. wow.

  • Posted By: Songcriket @ 08/28/2008 12:22:04 PM

    I just find it interesting that my family and I live on less than $40,000 ayear and we are still able to save some and we are slowing working onpaying off our student loans. We have very little credit card debt and we are working on saving enough to come up with the down payment for our first home. My husband is a PHD student in the last year of school, and is also a member of the Army Medical Corps. And I am a stay at home Mom off two children under two. If $250,000 quaifies you for tax breaks, and you are considered "middle class" Why is it then that the rest of the country must work two or three job, and still not be able to afford medical insurance? Why is it that the people that make $250,000 a year get to complain that they don't have enough to live one, when 90% of the rest of the world can live on only a few dollars? Just a little food for thought.

    • Posted By: Fred Norris @ 08/28/2008 12:25:17 PM

      It's a location issue - I assume you do not work in Manhatten. I love when people tell us to move (because it's expensive here). Why don't they move and make more?

      • Posted By: loli717 @ 08/28/2008 12:47:12 PM

        Ugh, learn how to spell Manhattan idiot. they even correct it for you on the posting box. You're an idiot. Where you live is a commodity. You could easily live in the Bronx, or Brooklyn and commute to work. Then your $250,000 salary wouldn't be just enough to make ends meet would it. You think everyone who works in New York needs that much money just to make ends meet? The location of your home is a convenience, not a necessity. You deserve it because you work hard to earn that money, but that doesn't meen that you're not rich.

        • Posted By: HenryKrinkle @ 08/28/2008 1:27:36 PM

          Being from the Metro NY area- I wouldn't want to live in the Bronx or Brooklyn...you see Lollipop, most people making decent money usually decide to live in upper tier neighborhoods with good school systems.

          • Posted By: loli717 @ 08/28/2008 1:44:56 PM

            What does making decent money mean? And what great public school systems are there in Manhattan? You can find good private schools in Brooklyn, I assure you. And believe me, if I lived in NY I would want to live in Manhattan too. BUT I JUST WANT TO MAKE IT CLEAR TO THOSE WHO ARE THICK HEADED, THAT IT IS STILL A CHOICE. Don't complain about how rough it is coming from the ghetto's of Greenwich Village.

            • Posted By: Fred Norris @ 08/28/2008 2:10:50 PM

              Loli - you are missing the point of this entire thread - it is about unfair taxing of what some describe as "the rich". You need to get over your jealousy of what peole make and where people live and stick to the topic at hand. You belive that you should tax certain people at a greater rate than others - which is the start of communism.

              (does this sound familiar?) - Communism

              A system of government in which the state plans and controls the economy and a single, often authoritarian party holds power, claiming to make progress toward a higher social order in which all goods are equally shared by the people.

              • Posted By: loli717 @ 08/28/2008 2:38:15 PM

                I'm not jealous of what anyone makes. I'll have you know i make a fair amount of money, and pay my taxes without bitching and moaning. AND I HAVE NEVER SAID THAT I BELIEVE WE SHOULD TAX PEOPLE AT GREATER RATES THAN OTHERS. I'm just tired of people saying stupid things. First of all, you're an idiot. The world isn't black and white. It's not communism vs. capitalism. It's about creating an environment that gives the most opportuniteis to the most amount of people. someimes socialistic plans are made. Ever heard of something called the New Deal? wow, the united states must have been some kind of communism back then, huh?

                • Posted By: Fred Norris @ 08/28/2008 3:20:19 PM

                  New deal = start of unions = downfall of america

                  way to go...

                  FDR's Folly: How Roosevelt and His New Deal Prolonged the Great Depression, by Jim Powell, New York: Crown Forum, 352 pages, $27.50

      • Posted By: loli717 @ 08/28/2008 12:41:38 PM

        I don't think anyone works or lives in "Manhatten." However, I do know some who live in Manhattan. Fact is, 250,000 is not middle class. Plenty of people work in Manhattan but live in either worse off areas or outside of it, like in the Bronx, or Brooklyn, and they commute to work. No one is telling you to live in the city either. You pay for your comfort, and believe me, that's a luxury.

        • Posted By: Fred Norris @ 08/28/2008 1:16:59 PM

          very true - I cannot spell, but that does not mean I should pay more in taxes :-)

          Where I live is my choice, I realize that. It's not about how much I have left after taxes (or how much i spend on housing), it's how much more can they take? Raising the SS bar and highest tax bracket just isn't fair. If you were on this side of the fence, you would see it the same way.

          • Posted By: loli717 @ 08/28/2008 1:27:56 PM

            I'm not commenting on the tax system. I'm commenting on the fact that you keep saying the "move somewhere else" argument is stupid. I'm glad you acknowledge that where you live is a choice, even if you can't spell it.

    • Posted By: KrystOutlander @ 08/28/2008 12:37:52 PM

      I would say that people who make 250,000 do not complain they do not have enough. They do have enough. They have enough to be secure in knowing so long as they have their job that they can afford to live as they do and pay for the things that they do. People who make 250,000 Lost HALF of that in taxes. So in the end it is only 125,000 and Barack wants to penalize them even more? It is the american dream to be safe and secure and in no way should you be penalized for having achieved it. I would even say, come and join those who make this much. My father, whom I speak for, only began earning this much in the last 8 years. What do youk now about 'shouldering' the cost of every one else? That is not any ones responsibility but your own. He was 1 of 5 children from a WW2 Veteran, and began working at Dupon as a Assembly line manager and worked his way up from there. It took him his whole life to get where he is and now he is retiring at the age of 65. The Ultra wealthy, whom you all think people like my father must be are small. They are the ones like Bill Gates and the founder of Apple, who donate alot to the social programs of the United states in order not to pay personal Taxes. Why do you want to Tax the PEOPLE EVEN MORE?! Go after the business's that make billions a year in profits, and the oil companies, but leave the American people alone. We are all one people rich middle or poor. Do not lay the blame or point fingers saying these people are not paying enough. Why should they? Why should my father have to pay already, half of his earned money, and then MORE as you say people who make 250,000 should? What do you know about people that make this much? How cold and jaded you must be when you feel that people who made it to this point are suddenly undeserving and not 'shouldering' their burden of the government and social programs for making it to this point.

  • Posted By: marys236 @ 08/28/2008 3:20:18 PM

    It depends on how many people you are supporting on the $250,000. If it's a single person, sure, they are rich. Try supporting a family of 4 or more, not so rich. Housing alone in some areas will eat up that $250,000 salary pretty quick.

  • Posted By: socalguy12345 @ 08/28/2008 2:18:36 PM

    So you mean to tell me that a married couple that both make $125k per year is rich? Sorry to inform everyone, but this is a decent salary (nothing more) in many parts of the country. Consider the cost of living difference from state to state. For example I grew up in the midwest where $100k - $200k could buy you a decent home. The same home in many parts of California (where I live now) goes for $500k - $600k or 3 - 5x more, therefore if you live in the midwest you should consider each spouse making $25k per person year rich as well. Maybe that will help put a few things into perspective....

    • Posted By: spjon @ 08/28/2008 3:19:48 PM

      Uhhh....good try. If you make $250,000 a year then you can certainly afford a $500,000 home just forget about the beamer and some of the more luxurious things. I think what is really happening is that the people that are making $250,000 and over had these huge ambitions about that money before they started making it and have been disappointed by how much it really is. I'm not saying that it's still not a lot but what I am saying is that I'm sorry you dreamed of owning a 60in plasma tv and found out you can only afford the 48in.

  • Posted By: yorkielover2 @ 08/28/2008 3:19:41 PM

    I used to think like so many of you...."Why should my hard earned money go to someone who only wants to get a government hand out using my hard earned tax dollars."...until I met a girl at work that had just come from that government dole and was crying her eyes out one day. She had just started working (husband still looking) and had 2 children under 8 years old. After working for only two weeks she was taken off the government program because she was now working full time and no longer qualified for the assistance her family used to get. Her husband developed an absessed tooth and needed emergency dental work. The assistance program they used to have would not pay the bill for 30 days to give them time to determine how much she was making per month, and the dentist wanted her to pay up front because the family was uninsured. Now here's a family that's trying desperatly to make ends meet on her $8.00 per hour pay, and the government was pushing them right back into the hole they wanted out of. She was forced to quit her job so her husband could get the surgery he needed. Had the system allowed them to keep their assistance for just a couple more months until they got back on their feet, they would have had that family off the public dole and back to the productive citizens they longed to be. So the system itself should also be to blame for why so many are still on it. It's a very flawed and broken system if this is an example of how it works. How many more families have tried and failed because the system is set up for failure.

  • Posted By: bgf1991 @ 08/28/2008 2:59:31 PM

    Hmm. . . it's amazing how each person has taken a point out of this article and made it the center of the story - even if the article was largely about something else. The bottom line is this - it doesn't matter how many hours/days per week you work to earn and it doesn't matter where you live; at $250K per year, you still make more than 98% of the nation. Period.

    I do not agree with the Democratic tax plan, but there are those who make more and pay less (at least percentage wise) in taxes because they can afford to hunt out the loopholes for tax breaks. For the middle-class or "median" income earners, we pay our 28-40% and move on. There is no multi-million dollar beach house to offset taxes with property value loss, etc.

    • Posted By: user501 @ 08/28/2008 3:13:04 PM

      That is the argument the article makes, that wherever you live, even manhattan, 250K is still numerically in the top 2% nationwide. No way around that. But that argument does not support the conclusion he draws, that if you make 250K, no matter where you live, you are "rich." Not comfortable Not doing ok. Not better than most, but rich. A dollar simply does not go as far in manhattan as it does in Ohio. On 250K, you'd be lucky to be able to afford a very small 2BR apartment in manhattan. Shoehorn your wife and kids into that and tell me if you are still "rich."

  • Posted By: davidinKS @ 08/28/2008 3:16:19 PM

    Two things, I make about 100K with bonuses. My wife does not work and has raised our 2 kids. I work in an area that is more expensive than the exburb where I live. So, I drive 40 miles each way to have a less expensive home and the cheaper local taxes of a small town. It's about the choices you make. If you are financially stressed, make better choices. (btw, I drive a Honda civic to keep the commute costs down) I???d also suggest everyone reading this to open up their minds to voting for what they want rather than the lesser of two evils represented by the Democrat/Republican choice we make every two/four years. Personally I vote Libertarian. We need to get inefficient government out of the social services business and pursue a foreign policy of non-intervention. We need to allow the wonderfully charitable American citizens take care of the needy through efficient private organizations and all other costs of ???Constitutional??? government be borne by user fees and tariffs. This would allow capital at all levels flow into private (non governmental) businesses, creating jobs and prosperity.

    • Posted By: GoBoilers @ 08/28/2008 3:19:22 PM

      Agreed! Well said. It is all about choices. Quit looking for people to bail you out or provide you handouts. Have some personal responsibility.

      http://www.beyondthemargin.net/2008/08/escaping-burdens-of-consumer-debt.html

  • Posted By: marys236 @ 08/28/2008 3:19:19 PM

    It depends on how many people you are supporting on the $250,000. If it's a single person, sure, they are rich. Try supporting a family of 4 or more, not so rich.

  • Posted By: JoshS @ 08/28/2008 3:19:09 PM

    yorkielover - in your attempt to advocate government support for the poor, you identified the biggest problem with our attempts at that to date: they punish people for trying to improve their situation, and thereby servesto perpetuate people in poverty. Our attempts at a "great society" were not a war on poverty - they were a war FOR poverty. It's just fortunate for us that we have so many new immigrants (legal and illegal) who are eager to work and haven't figured out the system yet.
    I'm all for helping people in the situation you described for your friend, but government programs are a hopelessly expensive and unwieldy way to do so.

  • Posted By: Sickman80 @ 08/28/2008 3:09:04 PM

    Turnerindc...you follow the exact stereotype the author talks about here. You chose to send your kids to a "Private University" that costs $400K...They could go to a local community college for a few years to get the generals out of the way then go to a top ranked state college that affords the same education for a fraction. Second, I paid my own way through one of the top engineering colleges in the nation without help from my parents or any other assistance.

    I would say $250K is very rich...it???s all about how you spend your money. Is your idea of "needing" a new car a new Mercedes or BMW as well? What, does your "old" need new tires, but want a new one instead of changing them? Remind us, what is your neighbors name again...is it the Joneses???

    Warren Buffet recently became the riches man in the world again over Bill Gates and he still lives in the same house he bought for $31,500 and he gets one car a year...a Cadillac-which he gives away at the end of the year. His salary for the year in 1996 was $100,000 and he didn???t complain that he wasn???t able to touch the rest of his fortune.

    Sam Walton drove an old beat-up pickup truck until the day he died. He actually fired one of his executives for building a nice-big new house in town, because he said, "I don't pay you that much money to flaunt it" (Obviously it???s different now that his kids run it).

    You are in the financial situation you are in, because you chose it. $250K is very rich, you simply make financial decisions that makes it look poor.

    • Posted By: manfernandez @ 08/28/2008 3:18:17 PM

      OMG!!!!! Are you serious. Bill Gates own the entire top floor of the Ritz in Grand Cayman. These guys are living large and use the corporate expense accounts and offshore accounts to live their life. If money is so insignificant, why make it? So we should not drive a Benz (I do not by the way)? Why don't we just all send our money to the government and have them provide housing , transportation, food etc, Let live like Cuba

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse