Sorry, Pal, You're Rich

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: ahawkeye1 @ 08/28/2008 2:40:43 PM

    Reading through the comments, I found that no matter what side of the issue a person is on, they still can find something to bitc# about. If your happiness if coming from an outside source,that's where the problem is. No amount of money can make you happy. Stop comparing yourselves to others, be happy with what you have, and you'll see a great improvement in your lives.

  • Posted By: sharkman @ 08/28/2008 12:34:47 AM

    newsweek you suck all you liberal pukes suck.....

    • Posted By: yowfunk @ 08/28/2008 2:40:01 PM

      thats a nice educated, open minded post....

  • Posted By: Old Joe @ 08/28/2008 2:37:14 AM

    For sure you've got to admire the depth and subtlety of commentary by folks like Sharkman. I'll bet his IQ is well over 3!

    • Posted By: RangerDan @ 08/28/2008 2:39:59 PM

      Thanks Old Joe, great observation. I bet Sharkman has views on many other current newsworthy topics that might enlighten us.

  • Posted By: joe1232 @ 08/28/2008 2:39:48 PM

    In order to make that amount, I would bet that they work over 60 hours and nights and weekends. It is the people that work 40 or less hours that consider the "rich" either lucky or scewing evryone. let the people that earn thier money and buy things like houses and electronics and cars keep thier hard earned money. they move the economy along for everyone.

  • Posted By: msamp2 @ 08/28/2008 2:08:12 PM

    I feel that using an "income level" to base the payment of taxes is not the correct way to do it. I believe that a flat tax across the board will do more to bring the government more money. A flat tax puts an equal burden on all of the people. If we were to eliminate the tax code, tax tax rules and the portion of government that must continually audit people taking too many deductions or not reporting income properly or just plain making mistakes we could generate billions of dollars. Let us not forget the the time our elected officials spend in developing these tax breaks and or tax increases. It is my opinion that all the citizens of this country should contribute to the services we have in place. From the poorest to the richest. Just because I can be more generous or can purchase a bigger house with a bigger mortgage interest and real estate deduction doesn't mean I shoul be in an "effective" 11% tax bracket because of my gross income against my net taxable. Paying a flat tax on all my income would place me on an even scale with every other citizen. Now for the bonus! Think about all the accountancts, tax services and lawyers that would have to find something else to do rather than charge from under a hundred dollars to tens of thousands of dollars preparing our tax returns because they are so complicated the average man cannot do them. Think of all the businesses that would no longer be looking to create new ways to avoid taxes and the accountants, tax services and lawyers that spend untold hours trying to justify deductions to the Internal Revenue Service. I do not believe the man earning $10,000 per year can raise a family but then again at that income level you have to be an idiot to think you can. Not everybody can own a mansion and attend private schools. It is simply a fact of life but at least from the lowest to the highest we would be paying equally for the particular life style we lead. On my soap box by MS, Jr.

    • Posted By: j_smith89 @ 08/28/2008 2:39:19 PM

      Love the Idea. but you also need to make sure to tax "benefits" as well.

    • Posted By: Jayber @ 08/28/2008 2:20:35 PM

      An "equal burden on all of the people"? Are you kidding me? If a person works their rear end off for 25k a year or even 30k, and you tax that person at 10% and someone else makes 250k and they are taxed the same, are you saying that both bear an equal burden? Not to mention that the rich get better goverment services, better "justice", and their kids are far less likely to enter the military to protect everyone elses rights. Equal burden? I say it's just greed.You don't want to share in the expenses that this country incurs. Be proud about it if you want to be, that is your right, but don't play the victim.

  • Posted By: monti7301 @ 08/28/2008 2:16:25 PM

    People get a grip! If your family is pulling in over $200K. I'm proud to burst your bubble, you are rich. I noticed one comment in which a woman mentions her husband works 94 Hrs a week and makes $200k. She was complaining about $4000 in car insurance. Either her family does not know how to drive or her cars are over the top. Check out Ebay motors I'm sure you can pick up a daily commuter for $4k, hence the insurance on such a vehicle would drop considerably let alone the payments your makingon it. It's a matter of choices you make. It's the foods you eat, the workout club you join, the cable TV service you purchase. Remember back in the day, the rabiit ears or the TV antennae on the roof, you can pick up your local stations in HD for the cost of two months cable bill. Even that Internet Access, these taxes people are stressing about, part of your local taxes goes to your local library which usually has free internet access. Hey who knows while your in the library you might even pick up a discounted movie rental or, "God forbid!" a book. Remember people with $200k, your able to say yes alot more with these decisions than if your making $6k - $30K a year like some of my family members. Hence in respect to me and the rest of the nation, "YOU'RE RICH." With a government for the people, of the people and by the people, the 80% of people not making more than $250k are gonna elect to have your excessive income taxed higher than ours. Sorry but majority rules.

    • Posted By: TheTruthHurts2008 @ 08/28/2008 2:39:06 PM

      Last time I checked, we are a nation of laws and not mob rule.

    • Posted By: syringa @ 08/28/2008 2:23:12 PM

      Bush received 62 million votes to Kerry's 59 million in 2004. Yes, BO will get lots of votes next election, but I think you'll wake up on Nov 5 and realize it was not enough. Sorry to burst you bubble.

  • Posted By: sjm6202 @ 08/28/2008 1:52:39 PM

    This is the most ridiculous thing I???ve ever heard. I have a friend who is a doctor she makes about 300k a year her husband is a teacher which probably makes 40k a year. They have 3 kids and they have a nice house but nothing special for the area considering all the houses in the area are gated communities in Florida where they live. Well they pretty much live paycheck to paycheck probably do to the fact of their debt from their educations. They don't drive fancy cars they have a Honda mini van which is two years old and they do not own multiple homes they are just average working people like you and me. They should not be targeted as wealthy because they decided to do better for themselves and go to school for 10 years and not sit at home collecting a welfare check every month. This woman put in her time and she is helping people every day curing heart disease which is the number one killer now a days. Maybe you news organizations should stop promoting a president because he is black or white and you should look at the real issues.

    Obamas tax plan makes no sense. I was in the military and we use a term called ???reinforcing bad behavior??? when you have people that are eligible for a earned income tax credit getting back thousands of dollars when they do not even pay taxes and Obamas plan is to triple that, Why the hell would they want to better themselves and get better jobs if everything is giving to them.

    Here is another catch 22 Obama if you tax corporations more then they have less profits so fewer dividends are paid which drives down stock holder values. Is this guy deliberately just trying to ruin what???s left of the economy?

    You know what I love best is all the people who buy into the energy commercial Obama is running. ???The hands that install roofs can install solar panels on roofs??? hey last time I checked 1 hp is 750 watts of electricity. A solar panel produces hardly any power that???s why they are used in low voltage DC current applications. Get real people you???re living a dream???. go spend a few thousand on beautifying your house with solar panels so you can save 5 cents a month on your electric bill great idea from a guy who wants to be president.

    Seriously are we really getting stupider as a nation???

    • Posted By: GoBoilers @ 08/28/2008 1:57:04 PM

      I am sorry, but if they make $340k then they are rich. That is a ton of money and they need to pay their fair share. I believe that everyone should pay their fair share, though, and not just people making over $250k. Everyone making over $30-40k should be paying taxes, but a graduated system is reasonable.

      Arguing on principal (excluding Obama's tax implications), someone making over $250k is definitely rich.

      http://www.beyondthemargin.net/2008/08/capitalist-ideal.html

      • Posted By: user501 @ 08/28/2008 2:39:03 PM

        what is their "fair share?" is it twice as much as your fair share? 10 times as much? what do they get in return for paying their larger "fair share?" do they get access to a special national park only for "rich" people? why should they pay so much more for the same government services, many of which they won't even be eligible to receive because they are "rich."

  • Posted By: tngal @ 08/28/2008 2:39:02 PM

    I don't usually get involved in a back and forth on the internet, but something that 66percent said just hit a button with me. I have a college education from a STATE school as does my husband. We have one child who is one year old and live on one income. I am a stay-at-home mother while my husband works non-stop at a state job to make less than $35,000 per year. Even if I got a job, we would have to put our daughter into daycare and by the time we paid for that and gas, we wouldn't be making anything extra. We have made sound decisions with our money but there is no pad for us to fall on. You make it sound like everyone who is "low income" is on drugs, didn't go to school, had kids out of wed-lock, is in a gang, commits crime, and doesn't support their community. And as for your daughters wedding, my husband and I got married for less than $1500. We both received student loans to send ourselves to school that we both are paying on now. We have a house mortgage and a car payment. We don't have credit cards because we believe that if we don't have the money then we don't need what we were going to buy. We may not be able to afford all the latest gadgets and nicest clothes but we don't hurt for food, shelter, and love. Furthermore, I have a grandmother who worked her whole life and all she gets is social security to last all month. I honestly don't see how she does it. Maybe it won't be here for me when I get older but she is 84 years old and can't go to work. What should she do, starve?

  • Posted By: emmahe @ 08/28/2008 2:36:55 PM

    The problem is how they determine "income". My husband and I own a business, and paid taxes on nearly $800,000 in supposed income. However, we owe over $15 million, and used up most of our income in paying interest on our bank notes. So, that said, we earn way more that that level for being rich, but we actually don't really end up with any where near that amount after taxes and business expenses. The whole system needs to be overhauled.

  • Posted By: drbrichardson @ 08/28/2008 2:36:47 PM

    I don't think anyone would honestly dismiss the fact that $250K means you are well off. However, the way the tax system is set up the separation between someone earning $250K and someone earning $50K is not 5 times as Daniel tries to imply. I made $267K last year and paid $78K in federal/state taxes, leaving me with $189K to live on (an ample amount, I'm not complaining). But my office manager that makes $50K and has a few kids ended up getting all the money she paid in taxes back and then some. So, I effectively made 3.5 times what she did. In addition to this fact, I pay $100K a year on a loan for the very business that provides her income. This means I am taxed on that $100K in income but I don't see a dime of it in my take home pay (so really the amount I put in my bank account was $89K last year). This means that my pay was 1.8 times that of my $50K a year employee. Still think I'm making 5 times someone who earns $50K a year? You cannot simply look at the percentages of where one falls in the AGI tables of the IRS.....surprise, these are very misleading. Think the Bush tax cuts should be rolled back and tax "the rich" more? That would take my take home pay from $89K to roughly $69K and make my pay almost equal to that of my $50K a year employee. Daniel needs to understand the actual numbers to understand how the tax system works. Many of us earning $250K a year never actually see that money. We own businesses and create jobs through taking on debt....for which we are taxed on principal repayment (money we don't ever see unless we someday sell our business). So, $250K only means you're rich if you put that in the bank. Why don't you look at what people actually deposit in to their accounts before determining what classifies as rich.

  • Posted By: WarhammerThree @ 08/28/2008 12:40:15 PM

    All I have to say is anyone out there who is complaining about helping the poor, or saying, "I worked hard and I deserve all the money I make," better not profess to be Christians. If you're not Christian, fine. Go on being self absorbed. That's your right. But if you're Christian, you best rethink your stance. After all, Christ was a socialist. "Sell your possessions, give it to the poor and come follow me," is what He said. It was about putting the needs of others before the needs of yourself in hopes that others would put your needs before their own. If everybody did that, we'd eliminate poverty, hunger, homelessness.

    That's what it means to, "Love God and love they neighbor as thyself." So to those of you who say, "Why should my taxes go to take care of the crack mom who pops out 6 kids," you best not consider yourself Christian. And even if you're not, I dare you to look into the eyes of any of those kids and say, "Sorry, kid. You gotta go hungry tonight. It's not my job to feed you cuz you're mom's on dope." How can anyone punish the kids like that? They didn't ask to have a drug user as a mom. They're innocent. And chances are, they are not well loved or attended to. So will they get the support they need to do well in school and in life to pull themselves out of their crappy situation. So you know what? They end up just like mom. Sure, some can do it. Some can overcome. But it's few and far between and I bet it's only because they got help from outside the family. because someone, a teacher, a social worker, a neighbor, helped them, guided them, gave them what they did not get at home. None of us, not a single God blessed one of us got where we are today all by ourselves. We ALL had help, from somebody somewhere. And if you think otherwise, you're lying or diluted.

    • Posted By: jd_free @ 08/28/2008 1:15:02 PM

      Christ was most certainly not a socialist. He did not advocate forced redistribution of assets. He advocated giving out of love. There is a huge difference. He also advocated stewardship, which means managing what you have well and living within your means. He did not advocate being charitable with other peoples' things. Only the free market allows people to be as Jesus preached - CHOOSING to give to those in need. Think back to Genesis - why did God give people the ability to sin?

      • Posted By: WarhammerThree @ 08/28/2008 2:36:43 PM

        Yeah, y'know what? I take it back. Christ wasn't a socialist in the conventional sense. He preached that everything we do, every decision we make should be for the benefit of society, not one's self. To me, when you put the needs of society above your own self interests, that's socialism. And if you had to say which form of social structure Christ would advocate, looking at his teachings, the closest thing we have would be socialism. I can guarantee you it WOULD NOT be the every-man-for-himself-dog-eat-dog ideals of capitalism. And y'know, Jesus didn't ASK us to give to the less fortunate. He TOLD us to do it. "Every time you do for the least of my bretheren, you do also for me," or something like that. :) Sure, we could choose not to, but that's not the choice God wants us to make. So as a Christian, I have no problem with the government taking my money and helping those without. Like I said, there are those that abuse the system, but there are many more who truly do need the help. Why punish them? If anything, we should be working to fix the system rather than just trash it. I mean, for Pete's sake. We can put a man on the moon but we can't figure out a way to make sure nobody in this country goes with food or medicine? We can all rally behind a war or two but can't rally around making sure people don't go to bed hungry (if they even have a bed, that is). You tell me, which is the more Christian thing to rally behind?

    • Posted By: jblackwell88 @ 08/28/2008 12:59:58 PM

      Better dead than Red.

      Christianity has done nothing except contribute to the death of the West. Christianity is fraudulent in any case. Research Mithraism. Mithra was born of a virgin in the presence of three wise men, died, was resurrected and ascended to heaven. Romans celebrated his birth on Dec 25th, and practiced both baptism, and communion with bread and wine. These ideas predate, and are not authentic to, Christianity. The divinity of Jesus wasn't even agreed upon until 325. The bottom line is that you're using an historical lie to justify your politics.

      • Posted By: WarhammerThree @ 08/28/2008 1:22:12 PM

        Better dead than Red, eh? So if you were down on your luck and someone came along and offered you food and shelter, you'd turn down the help? Hey, your choice, pally. Sounds like a boneheaded choice, but, y'know, whatever floats your boat.

        And thanks for the theology lesson, but if you'd get down off of your self-righteous and condescending horse, you'd see that I was pointing out the hypocracy of people proclaiming to be Christians not living up to Christian ideals. Obviously, you're not Christian, so by all means, go on doing whatever it is you do whether it be self-serving and greedy or outreaching and charitable. After all, I don't know you from Adam (other than you belitteld a belief that I try to structure my life around), so I won't judge you otherwise. And y'know, even if Jesus wasn't Christ, even if He didn't exist at all (which is a question I struggle with all the time on my faith journey), I still think that the messages in the New Testament attributed to Him are good ones to live by.

    • Posted By: nicka @ 08/28/2008 12:49:34 PM

      WarhammerThree, I think you and CharlieGen have really hit the nail on the head. Well said to both of you.

    • Posted By: WarhammerThree @ 08/28/2008 12:42:41 PM

      And if you don't think it's your obligation, not even as a Christian but just as a HUMAN BEING, to take care of others like the drug user's kids, then you have your priorities severely skewed. It is our jobs as PEOPLE, as HUMAN BEINGS, to take care of each other, everyone. I make 75K a year. My wife makes 50K. We have two kids in day care and pay about $6000 a year in property taxes. We get taxed federally at about 38%. We make too much to get a lot of the tax breaks offered. Sure, my house isn't very big and I can't have the new iphone or a fancy flat screen HDTV. But I have a roof over my head and food on my table. And that's more than what some have. So yeah, tax us if it means some kid gets to eat dinner tonight or the public school will provide breakfast to some kid who won???t get it at home. And yeah, there???s abuse of the system. But my wife I will not, as Christians, deny help to some because of the deceit of others. We won???t. So tax us and help those who have less than I have.

      And yeah, it's easy to say, "Oh, they're lazy or bums or drug users or whatever." It's easy to judge them without walking in their shoes. It's easy without knowing all the circumstances that transpired in their lives which led them to this point. Until, God forbid, something tragic transpires in your life that FORCES you into their shoes. Your company downsizes. You lose your job. You have savings and it'll go for a while but you have a hard time getting a new job because you???re older and companies won't pay you what you were making previously so they won't extend an offer. Then you get sick. Hospitalized. Your savings go out the window. You lose your home. Whose fault is that? Was this guy lazy? Is it not your problem? Easy to judge until, God forbid, it happens to you. We all need to take care of each other, folks. We need to take care of each other.

  • Posted By: beefdog @ 08/28/2008 2:36:18 PM

    66percent is proving Gross's precise point: wealth is all relative, but a line has to be drawn somewhere, right? So from where 66percent is sitting, being wealthy would mean having the wedding paid for, the house paid off (and a vacation home to boot), heavy-duty investments that perform well, etc. But from where the rest of the bell-curve sits (and that is the VAST majority of us - 90+%), it sure must be NICE to have a MORTGAGE since that means you have a home; it must be NICE to have retirement, college savings accounts, real estate, and the ability to donate to numerous charities because that means you have EXPENDABLE INCOME (and apparently plenty of it). And this is to say nothing of the presumed fact that all of your other basic needs are met: food, clothing, utilities, medical insurance, etc. You are, in fact, so fortunate that it is easy to forget what "less fortunate" looks like. This is not a judgment - this is relativity.

    My father has always said, "The more you have, the more you spend." And the more you spend, the less you feel like you have. In actuality, you have more and more CHOICES to spend your money, but somehow those choices feel like necessities...but there was a time when you didn't need those things, right? You were probably about 23. Relativity.

    The main issue I have with the Republican point of view (and apparently the view of 66percent) is that it is so self-absorbed. "I have worked so hard...I have put myself through school...it is MY money, don't tell ME what to do with it...etc." People seem to feel so bitterly entitled to what is THEIRS that it clouds their ability to think beyond themselves (and I'm not just talking about donations here - I'm talking about the very basic philosophy that if we choose to benefit the lowly, we also in turn benefit ourselves). If the Republican way works so well, then why did it take Clinton 8 years to get us out of the trickle-down hole that Reagan put us into? Why are we in the greatest national debt in America's 230+ year history under Bush II? And let's not forget: bridges, levees, national transportation, social security, unemployment, courts, Post Offices, etc., are all things that EVERY AMERICAN relies upon - we are remiss to underestimate the important role our government infrastructure plays in our everyday lives. This is absolutely why I truly ignore the "taxes" portion of my paycheck every month - I figure I will make do with my pay, and be thankful that I live in a country where I have reliable electricity 24-7, freedom of speech, and assurance that even under the most flagrantly arrogant administrations I am safe and lucky to be an American - I'm OK with paying 25 or 28 or 30 or 33% of my income for that anyday.

  • Posted By: jgardnerdo @ 08/28/2008 12:55:52 PM

    Flat Tax, Forbes had it right. Who cares if you are "rich" or not? What's fair is fair and I don't believe that Robin Hood ideals are the way to go for any country, let alone this great one. Stick to fairness and people won't be as likely to worry about economic status. Don't punish people for being good with their money or for working hard to get it.

    • Posted By: Jayber @ 08/28/2008 1:06:02 PM

      What's fiar is fair? Your problem isn't just that you have no perspective when it comes to fairness, your porblem is greed. Just call it what it is, claim it, shout it from the rooftops if you wish, because it is your right, but don't cry about fairness. Well, unless you think the follwoing is "fair". A man works his butt off for 50 or more hours a week to get, say, 25k a year. Your rich little brat inherits income of 250k a year. We take an "equal" 10 percent from each. Who is adversely impacted by our taxation? This isn't even bringing into question who benefits more from society. It doesn't take into account that the rich are FAR less likely to ask their brats to sacrifice their lives for "freedom". Please, you have only one problem with paying your taxes. Your monumental greed.

      • Posted By: jblackwell88 @ 08/28/2008 1:18:22 PM

        You are an irrational person who is no doubt jealous of others. Grow up please. People AREN'T equal and they never will be.

        • Posted By: paquito314 @ 08/28/2008 2:36:06 PM

          Totally agree with you. Equal chance and opportunity, that is all we need. And to my way of thinking what we have. Greed? this guy is jealous and wants to take from others for what he can not achieve on his own.

        • Posted By: Jayber @ 08/28/2008 1:48:57 PM

          Do you see how much more effective your argument might be if you read and responded to the points I made? Or, you could just keep listening to Fox and repeat the talking points.

    • Posted By: jblackwell88 @ 08/28/2008 1:07:38 PM

      Russia has a 15% flat tax. Its interesting that so many Americans are screaming for socialism, but they ignore the lessons of how the USSR, with its centrally managed economy utterly FAILED, and was only able to recover by way of capitalism and free enterprise. If America becomes socialists, I will pick uproot my very industrious family and leave this country to its own devices.

  • Posted By: Just-an-Opinion @ 08/28/2008 2:35:36 PM

    I think if you make $100,000 or greater you are very upper middle class and if you make over $180,000 you are the beginning of rich. Most people are in the $38,000 to $85,000 area and that is middle class. So most of us are lower-to- middle middle class.

  • Posted By: Cruel Aarony @ 08/28/2008 2:34:49 PM

    Id like to point out that all the people that should have particpated in the poll were too busy working, and that even 150,000 is ALOT of money in most areas of the country. Its true that poor people have a higher average weight than rich people (look it up, I did!) but that is due to their diets being composed mostly of starch and fat. But just looking at the dry fact that poor people weigh more, one could become confused. I cannot afford a car worth more than $700, my food tastes terrible, my water is not fit to drink, and the air in my town is not fit to breath. If somebody gave me a one time payment of 250,000 I could solve all of these problems for myself! So dont let me hear you complaining about your 250,000 not being enough to keep up with the Jones' If your making over 250,000 and you THINK your just scraping by, then its time to move away, or go to your shrink. You might have to sell your Hummer to afford it, but thats okay with us,.....the rest of the country that is,........by the way, if you can even afford to get your child into a private university, you have forfeited your right to complain about anything. Tell your kids to get loans. The more I think about this, the more I think what a wretched, snivvleing, pathetic race of scum the rich are! They hold total domination over thier fellow countrymen, and they are in complete denial about it. Two people working for $250,000 will bring in $1/2 MILLION in one year,....how much money do you need?

  • Posted By: Naswipp @ 08/28/2008 2:26:45 PM

    I know of a great system to redistribute wealth like most of you want, it's called communism. First step take everyone's money and give it to the poor, second step steal everyone's ownership of ideas, third step stop being innovative and trying in life at all. Then we can be another failure country like the rest in the world.

    I work hard for my money. I'd love to not wear a condom, have 12 kids and claim I can't work because I have to stay home all day. Sounds great! Open your eyes people, the people making all this money, do so for a reason. They are smarter than you, they work harder than you, and they make a lot more sacrifices than you. If you aren't happy with your situation in life, work harder to improve it. That's what made this country great.

    • Posted By: adamwells @ 08/28/2008 2:30:34 PM

      Well said. The American experiment will be over the day become a country where the majority is willing to sit on their hands and use the ballot box to enslave the a minority do the work. Reat "Atlas Shrugged".

      • Posted By: jblackwell88 @ 08/28/2008 2:34:31 PM

        The original American experiment was over about 50 years ago. The bigger question is where hard-working industrious people can go anymore and invest themselves while our system collapses under the weight of parasites.

    • Posted By: syringa @ 08/28/2008 2:29:30 PM

      They need IQ's higher than 85 to do that.

  • Posted By: GoBoilers @ 08/28/2008 2:29:31 PM

    It is all about consumption preferences and habits... A truly middle class person might be happy with dinner at Applebee's - a great family outing for that household. Someone making $250k would scoff at such a concept. They both don't feel like they have tons of extra cash but they just spend it differently.

    http://www.beyondthemargin.net/2008/08/escaping-burdens-of-consumer-debt.html

    • Posted By: NYCliving.00 @ 08/28/2008 2:34:02 PM

      I would LOVE to be able to go eat at Applebee's, or Friday's or anywhere else for a change besides packing a lunch or eating at home.

  • Posted By: david4021 @ 08/28/2008 1:55:29 PM

    This is an interesting but meaningless discussion. The end point is what does 'rich' mean. If you vote for Obama it means you pay a staggering amount of additional taxes on top of the %35 Fed Tax, $7200 FICA tax , %15 Capital Gains and then local and state tax. My wife and I are well educated and have spent 20+ building careers and businesses. Our rewards for effort and dedication cannot be still more socialist redistribution of wealth.

    • Posted By: yowfunk @ 08/28/2008 2:11:45 PM

      Lets be very clear. Obama plans to raise taxes on those earning more than 250k per year and lessen the tax on those making less. For decades the middle class has shouldered the tax burden of this country and the wealthy liked it that way. It is time the wealthy take some of the burden and give the working class backs a break.

      • Posted By: firemedic258 @ 08/28/2008 2:33:35 PM

        Amen! He is not "raising" taxes on the wealthy. He is simply taking away all the tax breaks that their wealthy friends (AKA Bush) in Washington gave them. The Bush tax cuts were all directed towards the wealthy and we all know what the end result has been. The wealth in this country has been systematically redistributed upwards to the rich for the last eight years. None of the rich complained about wealth "redistribution" when it went in their direction. Suddenly when the tax cuts are going to go away and they have to pay their far share, my God, it's the end of the world. This "wealth redistribution" to the middle class is socialism and will destroy America. No, all it is doing is fixing the damage that Bush did.

    • Posted By: MadMatt @ 08/28/2008 2:09:17 PM

      You are paying a "staggering" amount because of the excess spending the existing administration has piled onto you. This is not about redistributing wealth marxist style, it is about paying for the annual operating expense of the US government. Most who are wealthy run businesses themselves. At the end of the month or year you have to balance the books. You do that by either spending less or earning more. How does the government earn more? By taxing. Even if no additional single program were introduced by a new administration, we're still spending $250B more than we take in annually. Instead of slinging characterizations that are simply ridiculous why not help think of a solution to the problem? Got any ideas on how to trim government spending in areas that really aren't helping the american people much?

  • Posted By: rpearlston @ 08/28/2008 11:28:44 AM

    Speaking truth to power can be difficult, and will always be challeneged. But it's necessary and Mr Gross, your article was worth it.

    The truth is that it isn't about not being able to "make do" on a family income of $250,000. The truth is that if you are, say, a couple with a minor child and have a family income of $250,000 and are feeling pinched, you need to look around at HOW you are living. Do you need an 8 - 10 room house? How many cars can you possibly drive? Is it necessary to take elaborate vacations or is it better to spend the quality time with each other and with your child, something that can be done without leaving your home.

    Earning $250,000 a year or more puts you in the elite of the country. Isn't it time to act that way? Haven't the elite historically, in every culture and in every period of history, been the ones to feel more of the burden and to act on it?

    If you're making $250,000 or more a year, YOU ARE RICH. Start looking past the end of your noses and see the rest of the country and the rest of the world, as they really are. And for heaven's sale STOP WINING.

    • Posted By: Texas-conservative @ 08/28/2008 12:10:00 PM

      It's not about someone who makes $250k being pinched. It's about having the liberty to work hard, get a good job, and EARN their piece of the American pie. Why should someone feel entitled to my hard earned money? I work hard because I choose to. I work hard establish a certain lifestyle for my family and me.
      No one is holding the person making a lower income back from working hard to achieve their dreams, so why are people trying to hold me back from achieving mine?

      If you don't like the way you're living, then change it. If you have 3 kids making 30k a year, then that is a result of your own decisions. Why expect someone who makes more than you who already pays a higher tax rate (percentage of their income in taxes) to support you. Get a federal education loan, get a degree in nursing or some other field that will guarantee a job and a decent salary, and change your life. Don't blame others for your condition.

      I'm sorry if this sounds cold, but I am tired of people trying to spend my money because they think they are more deserving of it than I am (who just happened to work and earn it).

      • Posted By: PAKatie @ 08/28/2008 2:33:31 PM

        Hate to break it to you, but according to 2004 data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, registered nurses earned an average of $52,330 per year. The middle 50 percent averaged between $43,370 and $63,360. The bottom 10 percent earned under $37,300, while the top 10 percent made more than $74,760.

        Still not even close to your $250K. So get over yourself already.

    • Posted By: funkdome @ 08/28/2008 11:34:28 AM

      By all world standards, you are rich too. So you should only take what you need and give the rest away.

      Do you really need a tv? Couldn't you find a cheaper car? Couldn't you live in a trailer? Couldn't you have a few less kids?

      I love how liberals feel that they are entiltled to their little luxaries, without regard to how much better they are living than many in our country, let alone around the world.

      I think your last line is a Freudian slip.

  • Posted By: Jeb Toole @ 08/28/2008 1:52:04 PM

    Renter of apartment in San Francisco, lives with wife...not rich. $250K a year in SF isn't rich...please. Come live here, price homes or condos on weekends, pay petrol prices, grocery prices... It adds up quick. Happy to be alive and be with the woman I love - in this respect I am wealthy beyond comparison.

    • Posted By: loli717 @ 08/28/2008 1:57:54 PM

      You're probably wealthy in more ways than you know. Go check out soup kitchens and unemployment lines and see. Not everyone in there is a drug using *** trying to bleed the welfare system (not that you said that, but many posting here have).

      • Posted By: Jeb Toole @ 08/28/2008 2:05:02 PM

        I have worked in a soup kitchen, once a week, for 16yrs... I don't see a line of comparison. 15% of our gross income goes to charities of our choosing. I sleep well at night knowing that I help my fellow man. We are not stuffy people - but we work very very hard for what we have. Penalizing us with more tax makes no sense. It puts the power in the hands of politicians. Power to the people, remember...???

        • Posted By: loli717 @ 08/28/2008 2:33:14 PM

          I never said people should pay more taxes, and I'm glad you do help others. I don't know what you mean by "I don't see a line of comparison." but I hope you recognize that hard work doesn't always translate into six figure salaries.

    • Posted By: Poor?CollegeGrad @ 08/28/2008 2:07:39 PM

      TO ALL WHO LIVE IN SAN FRAN, NY, LA, ETC...COME LIVE HERE AND SEE THAT YOU ARE RICH.

      • Posted By: Jeb Toole @ 08/28/2008 2:13:06 PM

        "here???" Where's that...???

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse