Sorry, Pal, You're Rich

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: jtlmd @ 08/28/2008 2:24:39 PM

    Awesome article. I'm sick of people whining about money when they make over 6 figures. If they'd only learn to live within their means, they'd find out how well they could do. I make $175,000 annually in a midwestern city and feel very fortunate. As a physician I know many other docs earning tons more and complaining they don't make enough. I paid off my loans, owe nothing on my cars or credit cards and am aggressively saving for retirement and my kids college education. We take regular vacations and are able to afford the luxuries that are important to us.

  • Posted By: Dyadya Vanya @ 08/28/2008 2:24:38 PM

    My husband and I work our tails off and come home with about $35,000 after taxes. $10k+ of that goes on medical premiums and out-of-pocket, $6+ on our mortgage. We owe nothing (except that mortgage), drive 15-year-old vehicles in excellent condition, and have never taken a government handout, not even unemployment. And we're rich as Croesus, because we pay our own way and can hold our heads high. I just wish we could save more for retirement, which is less than a decade away, but oh well...

  • Posted By: 2McAbre @ 08/28/2008 2:24:37 PM

    Gasp! So if those making $250K annually are middle class, then I must have had it wrong all these years! Goodness, and I thought my single $40K salary had me living "La Vida Loca"!

    Jeesh who would have thought that I was actually living well below poverty level if $250K is a base for Upper, Mid and Lower class!

    Wow so then, hmm I guess my neighbor who is only taking home $15K annually is in the ultra poverty zone huh? Wow! Who da thunk it? Hmm and they even went to Disneyland this summer, after saving for three years to do so.

    Personally I am an advocate for a single, simplified flat tax. For every dollar you earn you pay 10% or 15%. Save the millions (or is it billions?) wasted by the IRS every year processing, tracking down, auditing, cutting checks, printing new forms and pamphlets by getting rid of "ALL" tax breaks, and everyone simply pays one rate. PERIOD!

    This would effectively halt the rich from getting "much" richer by eliminating all those "pretty" tax shelters they are oh so fond of, that the bulk of us "normal" people cant afford.

  • Posted By: rjamjr @ 08/28/2008 2:24:32 PM

    Taxes are not only raised by Democrats, the total fees I have paid for "government services" have gone up plenty in the past 7-1/2 years, a direct result of the actions of Mr. Bush and the GOP-controlled Congress. All their tax cuts did for most folks (making under $250K) was push the tax collection requirement to other jurisdictions. To make up for the shortfall, states and local governent have increased property taxes, trash collection fees, motor vehicle fees, water and sewer fees. The list goes on and on. The fact that federal taxes were reduced but spending was not has caused the mess we are in today. Mr. McCain claims he can fix it by reducing spending in parts of the government while keeping the Bush tax cuts in place. But without seriously cutting the Defense budget and Health & Human Services (Medicare etc), the numbers just don't add up. Mr. Obama doesn't have anything better to offer. The fact is, taxes need to go up or services at all levels of government need to be eliminated. That means less money for schools, infrastructure (roads & bridges), healthcare, military, disaster response, you name it. So who wants to volunteer to have their services drastically reduced so we can fix the budget problems without paying more taxes? Anyone? I don't see any hands raised? Don't worry, we can continue borrowing from China and the MIddle East, they like us, don't they?

  • Posted By: rblanch @ 08/28/2008 2:24:28 PM

    Dear mremington I wish the tax rate for someone making 500k was 5% try 35% and 8% state. Most people making 500k only take home 50%of there check.

  • Posted By: nomoretax @ 08/28/2008 2:03:14 PM

    Steve Forbes has the best tax plan out there. A modified flat tax that will tax everyone at a relatively low rate. This will allow everyone to contribute something for the freedoms they enjoy. Why should the rich pay almost all the tax bill when we all enjoy the freedoms of this great land. I am not rich nor poor but it is totally unfair to expect something for nothing. THE poor don't pay taxes, they get an earn income credit, and they have never provided jobs for anyone. Raise taxes and stop growth. History has shown this over and over. Are we all just stupid!!!!!

    • Posted By: 4astrongamerica @ 08/28/2008 2:23:48 PM

      I don't mind paying my fair share in taxes. What I do mind is that not only are we rewarding people for not working through welfare / social handouts, but we actually encourage it. What exactly is the purpose on Earned Income Tax Credit? It doesn't encourage people to work. It encourages them to quit working before the benefit runs out. Trust me, I know. I have family that will work part time so that they don't make more than the EIC maximum. I have prepared taxes for people that are furious that they are not getting thousands in EIC dollars when they only worked for two or three months the entire year. Not because they couldn't find a job, but because they didn't want a job. The handouts have to stop. If we stop subsidizing laziness and cut out all the pork that the politicians (DEMS & REPS) throw in, we could all receive a reasonable tax bill.

  • Posted By: chloe659 @ 08/28/2008 2:23:43 PM

    The salary of my husband and myself combined (NET) is $70,000 and we are doing better economically than ever before.. We want for nothing, have a huge, beautiful house with 20 acres of land and have wonderful jobs. I don't understand why people can't live within their means. If you can't afford the home then look for one cheaper and if you can't afford the neighborhood or state then go to another state where things are drastically cheaper. We came from California where if we tried to buy the same home with the amount of acres we have now we would have had to pay at least $1-5,000,000, but we paid a fraction of that price for what we have and are so blessed and Thank God every day for how wonderful he is to us. If you put your trust in God he will take care of you. $250K to us is extremely rich, but we consider ourselves middle class.

  • Posted By: spatton @ 08/28/2008 2:23:30 PM

    We are all missing the point here. The problem with the tax situation in this country is earned income versus unearned income and corporate earners vs. small cash business owners. I know a multi millionaire who got a tax rebate from the government.

    Here is a tale of two families in NJ. Both making $500,000 a year. One works for a major corporation, the other is a small business owner, landscaper, which is a cash business. One pays taxes on his entire income, one declares $150,000 only. This is the problem. The corporate worker is very grateful and feel fortunate for his situation; however, he does not live extravagantly. The landscaper lives in a mansion, drives a BMW, and send his kids to private school. Tell me the fairness in that.

    The article over simplifies the problem. And the press has not spent a lot of time on the real problem of tax evasion and unearned income taxes.

    When John Kerry ran four years ago, he said the same thing Obama is saying. He was a billionaire who paid very little taxes on his wifes unearned billions. That's why I didn't vote for him and that's why I won't vote for Obama.

  • Posted By: 2McAbre @ 08/28/2008 2:23:27 PM

    Gasp! So if those making $250K annually are middle class, then I must have had it wrong all these years! Goodness, and I thought my single $40K salary had me living "La Vida Loca"!

    Jeesh who would have thought that I was actually living well below poverty level if $250K is a base for Upper, Mid and Lower class!

    Wow so then, hmm I guess my neighbor who is only taking home $15K annually is in the ultra poverty zone huh? Wow! Who da thunk it? Hmm and they even went to Disneyland this summer, after saving for three years to do so.

    Personally I am an advocate for a single, simplified flat tax. For every dollar you earn you pay 10% or 15%. Save the millions (or is it billions?) wasted by the IRS every year processing, tracking down, auditing, cutting checks, printing new forms and pamphlets by getting rid of "ALL" tax breaks, and everyone simply pays one rate. PERIOD!

    This would effectively halt the rich from getting "much" richer by eliminating all those "pretty" tax shelters they are oh so fond of, that the bulk of us "normal" people cant afford.

  • Posted By: randomthought @ 08/28/2008 10:59:19 AM

    in respons to cjsteve, according to your math (which I am not disputing), someone earning $250,000 in New York City would net 66.1% of their salary whereas someone earning $50,000 in Pennsylvannia would net 68.8% of their salary. The difference is 2.7% ($6,768.54 from the "rich person's standpoint"). That comes down to $130/week extra tax for someone earning $250,000/year. Who needs this money more? The single mother with three kids working two jobs and 60 hours a week? Or the guy living an above-par life bitter about the next door neighbor's $2 million bonus? Have some compassion. And EffYou, don't pretend as if you would voluntarily "help the less fortunate." Claiming that on your income tax return under false pretenses does not count. Widening the income gap is not beneficial for any country or economy.

    • Posted By: TN Woman @ 08/28/2008 12:17:14 PM

      ":The single mother with three kids working two jobs and 60 hours a week? " The single mother of 3 should have stopped having children after #1 (thats all she could have afforded), and should be getting child support from dad/dads of child #1, #2, and #3. It is called..... Personal Accountability!

      • Posted By: SphinxatUF1 @ 08/28/2008 2:22:49 PM

        What if the dad died? Everybody assumes a single mother is a slut who makes poor financial decisions-- dads cheat, abuse, and die, you know!

    • Posted By: Fred Norris @ 08/28/2008 11:10:22 AM

      You clearly have no idea how the tax structure works - the $50k person would pay (on average) less than 17% a year... Learn the tax code before you comment

  • Posted By: revolution30 @ 08/28/2008 2:22:46 PM

    I think this is bull. For generations my family has worked hard and have stuggled to get by at times.(paycheck to paycheck) Now from struggle, sweat, and very hard work we own our own business and make above the $250,000 a year. We are more comfortable and can afford to do much more, but haven't we earned it. I'm tired of people in this country that think that because they don't make what my family does that I should be punished for it. There are so many cry babies out there that don't want to get off their ass and work. They sit around complaining that things aren't fair and waiting for a free handout! Instead of punishing the "wealthy" for making it in this world and helping build the economy why not punished those that take advantage of the system everyday that drain our system dry. Trust me, there are alot of people that lie everyday on the paper work to recieve govt. help that don't need it. Why not start cracking down on these scam artists and them maybe we wouldn't need so many taxes!!!

  • Posted By: MKII @ 08/28/2008 2:05:56 PM

    The article is about liberals preparing us for a ???better??? redistribution of wealth???end of story.
    It would be easier if congress put a check box on the 1040 form that simply states if you feel you are not paying your fare share please indicate how much more you would like to contribute. Then all the Hollywood libs could send in their fare share and leave the rest of us alone!!!
    I earned it and I DO NOT want to give it to a bureaucrat to hand out to feed his ego !

    • Posted By: jblackwell88 @ 08/28/2008 2:12:03 PM

      If Communism comes to pass, I will leave the United States and its parasites behind, and build a future for my family somewhere else.

      • Posted By: MadMatt @ 08/28/2008 2:22:42 PM

        You could try Great Britain, Canada, France, Germany,, Italy, - oh wait, those commie countries support universal medical. You could try Belarus, Czec Repub, Georgia, Vietnam, Cambodia (oh wait, those were former communist countries, can't trust them). You could try China, Russia, er. wait, those are still communist countries (sorry). You could check out Brazil but then your taxes would be helping subsidize alternative energy programs. Nix that.. OK, maybe you should try Zimbabwe, Nigeria, Somalia, Sudan, or any other dictatorial republic whose leadership values building wealth and power for their party while the country falls to ruin around them. Good luck, let us know where you land.

  • Posted By: coopthehdrider @ 08/28/2008 2:22:40 PM

    I think the idea of the artice boils down to something my Grandfather used to say, "You've got a whiskey taste, with a beer wallet" Bluntly meaning, live within your means. Maybe some americans should stop trying to "keep up with the Jones" We make less than 100K, and can live comfortably, I also consider us rich.... money doesn't make the man, or woman.

  • Posted By: newage_lightbulb @ 08/28/2008 2:22:39 PM

    Ah, The daily Obamaweek. What would we do without this blatantly biased rag electing our next president for us?

  • Posted By: RKOBINSKI @ 08/28/2008 12:38:05 PM

    i am a disabled semi driver. i have never made even close to $250,000 per year. Now that i am disabled, i make $8,034.00 per year. Do any of you who make $250,000 per year want to switch places? I'm really sure I can do any of your jobs with alittle training. Now, you have the arguement that you have to make this kind of money to live how, and where you do. You chose to buy the houses for the money you paid for them. If noone would pay the high prices for those houses, How long do you think they would be on the market for those prices? The only ones to blame for the high prices that you've paid, is yourselves.

    • Posted By: gcb009 @ 08/28/2008 12:49:37 PM

      And who is to blame that you chose to be a truck driver? Who is to blame that you are disabled? Not me for either. I worked hard for what I have, and I don't believe a little training will replace my 20 years of experience. If it would, you wouldn't be making only $8,000 a year. I use my hard earned money for retirement, kids and disability insurance among other things. I don't spend it on beer, cigarettes, drugs or anything beyond my means. And I surely don't do it for the government to take 60% of it and give it away like it is a free christmas.

      • Posted By: ivy rain @ 08/28/2008 2:22:38 PM

        GC,if not for those truck drivers how do you think food would get to the stores so you can buy it for your table,be realistic

    • Posted By: Fred Norris @ 08/28/2008 12:44:45 PM

      Then get the training and stop wishing to switch places (we all did).

  • Posted By: JAC_887 @ 08/28/2008 2:22:01 PM

    Your not rich because you only own a million dollar house compared to your neighbors 5 million dollar house, Your not rich because your neighbor owns a beach house and you dont, Your not rich because your neighbors child goes to a more expensive private school....

    Your not rich because your not able to substain in the best neighborhoods, your child cant attend the best private schools, etc. You know how many Blue collared americans live with an income of 40,000-50,000. They dont complain that they cant travel to Europe, that they only have one car...all this people want is a tax break to be able to keep maintaining with this rediculous GAS PRICES and HOUSE MORTAGES.

    I guess its better than what McCain proposes which is just take away some taxes, in which the wealthy come out on top

  • Posted By: amm0302 @ 08/28/2008 1:49:37 PM

    okay you all complain that $250,000 is not enough... try this!! my husband and i make $55 K a year combined. he works his butt off building the ridiculously huge homes you people buy and the thanks he gets from you is what...? nothing but perhaps a glance down from your high horse!! i work for a pretty well to do company that you probably buy from. the thanks i get is your bitching because of cost. you are spending hundreds of dollars on sheets and complaining that you are paying too much for shipping!! here i am trying to help you and i get chewed out over $20. i barely earn that in two hours. it is just so frustrating to listen to you complain about having it rough. we have two little kids and one car. we can hardly scrape by every month (somehow we do... i'd call it faith) and you complain that $250k is not enough....WAKE UP ***!!! you are rich!! if i had that kind of money, i would never struggle to get by again!! maybe if you didn't owe so much to the credit card companies, you would be alright too!!!

    • Posted By: hot_tamale @ 08/28/2008 2:21:29 PM

      Maybe you both should have gotten an education like the majority of the people making 250k instead of whining that you have to do your job.

  • Posted By: susanmidwest @ 08/28/2008 1:55:33 PM

    Agree with PaxTerminus. $250K a year is a real blessing in many ways. It can allow you to send your children to good schools, have a vacation, put away some money for retirement and financially assist others through your church or charitable organizations. But, "rich" is a stretch. If your priorities are in order, you aren't able to afford a grand home, expensive cars and other trappings that I would equate with being rich, especially the all-important tax shelter! Actually, the $200K-$300K income group might be the best of all worlds. It's certainly enough income to be comfortable and take care of your family without worry, but not so much to bring with it the greed and arrogance that can so often be the downfall of the truly wealthy and powerful.

    • Posted By: toolkien @ 08/28/2008 2:21:16 PM

      I've been reticent in dropping details of my situation in like others have, but I can only concur with what you have said. My wife and I don't make this magical $250,000, but we're a neighborhood down the block. But we have made a conscious decision to put quite a bit away and have not overextended ourselves and should be able to live on one income (with provender) if need be. We have saved enough to live quite a while if we both lost our jobs, but not forever. We likely could hold out longer than many other people, but that is because we have much less house than we could afford and much less car(s) than we can technically afford. But, again, it is to save for which we know we will not be subsidized for in the future. I cannot abide the notion that not only should we have our self imposed limitations forced upon us, but have that excess money get sucked into the socialist vortex. I'm not living in half the house and driving a $19,000 car for fun. it's to provide for MYSELF when I can no longer labor. NOT to pad the bureaucracy. I don't drink lattes, i buy second hand CD's and DVD's, our vacations have been very modest by the standards tossed about by the Prols (driving to St. Louis and visiting the zoo, we even pop for a ride on the train). So the notion that people near the neighborhood being discussed, who have kids and mortgages on modest (but nice) houses, and college to pay for, are lighting cigars with dollar bills is pure class bias and economic ignorance.

      If it helps, growing up, I lived in what I consider to be a lower middle class environment, and outright poor during the deep recession of 1979-1981. I had all of one pair of pants for the whole sixth grade. But we were by no means dirt poor. But I know what life without vacations is like. I know what it's like to live in a rental that isn't kept up. I know what it's like to have winters where it is 45* at best in the house. I know what it's like to have the sewer back up with regularity and little done about it. And I can honestly say what I have now is much better, but is ain't rich. Two kids (with daycare expenses), a mortgage on a middle class house, two middle class cars, modest vacations, second hand purchases, and a desire to SAVE us much as I can. Not to have my labor used to buy votes for someone else's glory.

  • Posted By: JAC_887 @ 08/28/2008 2:20:42 PM

    Your not rich because you only own a million dollar house compared to your neighbors 5 million dollar house, Your not rich because your neighbor owns a beach house and you dont, Your not rich because your neighbors child goes to a more expensive private school....

    Your not rich because your not able to substain in the best neighborhoods, your child cant attend the best private schools, etc. You know how many Blue collared americans live with an income of 40,000-50,000. They dont complain that they cant travel to Europe, that they only have one car...all this people want is a tax break to be able to keep maintaining with this rediculous GAS PRICES and HOUSE MORTAGES.

    I guess its better than what McCain proposes which is just take away some taxes, in which the wealthy come out on top

  • Posted By: frog123 @ 08/28/2008 2:20:25 PM

    Dan: Do you live in a shack somewhere in Texas? Do you have a family? If so, are you planning on sending your kids to college? Do you have any idea how much a reasonable standard of living cost? I???m not talking Mercedes and living large either. You obviously are ignorant of what is cost to live out there in the real world and are using the standard liberal tactic of class envy to pit the lower middle class against the upper middle class. I don???t make near $250k /year so I???m not as you define ???rich??? but a lot of my friends do earn up to that amount and they certainly aren???t rich either. How about this for a premise: Once one makes over $80k-$100k/year there is a huge disincentive to earn more than that amount because of taxes, less tuition breaks, and as the media falsely claims, ???you???re rich, you should share with the less fortunate.??? There???s much too much worrying about how much the other guy is making (and how to take it away from him). Get a job! If it doesn???t pay enough, get one that does!

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse