Sorry, Pal, You're Rich

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: user501 @ 08/28/2008 1:49:08 PM

    You are of course correct that it is impractical to try to tailor the federal income tax system to account for geographical differences in costs of living. But thats not the point of your story. Your claim is that 250K/yr. makes you rich in an economic sense regardless of where you live, even if that is in Manhattan. And that is demostrably false. Its not just that the 250K/yr. manhattanite feels poor in comparison to his "filthy rich" investment banker neighbor. And its not just, as you put it, that one might not be able to afford their "dream house." Its that 250K/yr. in Manhattan won't even buy you a decent 3BR apartment in a decent neighborhood. Its very hard even to find a decent 2BR apartment for under $1M. You can say 250K is "pretty good coin," and most of the people who read your article and live outside Manhattan will eagerly agree that any such person is "rich" because they simply cannot appreciate how high the cost of living is in some areas of the country. But stop for a minute and consider the fact that a family of 4 in Manhattan on 250K/yr. cannot afford separate bedrooms for their kids and a living space that will accomodate both a couch and a dining room table. How can you credibly call such a family "rich" in any objective financial sense?

    If you're going to raise taxes on everyone making over 250K/yr., including those that reside in Manhattan and other areas with extremely high cost of living, at least be honest and tell them its because you've determined its necessary. Don't insult them by insisting they are "rich" by definition and therefore deserve it.

  • Posted By: Poor?CollegeGrad @ 08/28/2008 1:49:04 PM

    Oh my! I can't believe some comments I've read. I live in suburbs of Chicago. My husband and I make $60,000 a year, have about $50,000 in 401K, are in our forties, have one child, and no savings. We say we live paycheck to paycheck and mean it! We can only afford to pay minimum payments on our bills and end up having to Craigslist items, borrow money, or avoid paying regular bills if anything unexpected comes up. We even sleep on a mattress on the floor because we can't afford the luxury of a bedframe. And we used to think we are middle class but I guess we aren't. I guess we are lower class. Yet, we live in a house, own two cars (although one has no muffler) and live in a very culturally diverse neighborhood. I have a sibling who lives in an exclusively white neighborhood, makes above 100,000 maybe above 200,000 I don't know for sure and says they live paycheck to paycheck. They pay all their bills in full, have a maid, their three children go to private school, and they pay all unexpected bills immediately. How can we both be middle class and live paycheck to paycheck. People always want more money in our capitalist society. That's why someone who earns $250,000 doesn't want to say they are "upper" middle class--because they want to blend in with the commoners and our struggle to make ends meet. Additionally, if they say they are "lower upper class" they just can't get around the term lower so they actually believe they are middle class. Ya know, I have a friend that lives in an apartment, is a single mom, has no savings and makes $25,000 a year. I asked her if she thought I was rich and she said of course not! So not everyone thinks people are rich just because they make more than oneself. I'd love someone who makes $250,000 a year to tell me where I stand in the classes.

  • Posted By: michellencp @ 08/28/2008 1:49:03 PM

    Thinking you're middle class when you bring down $250K is insulting. I am college-educated with more than 10 years in my field, and I still only make $52,000 PY, largely because I live in the Southeast. Try paying $1,000 per month for daycare on that salary.

  • Posted By: bdaley @ 08/28/2008 1:48:48 PM

    hershey1 is an idiot. McCain said 5 million net worth is rich, not an annual salary.

  • Posted By: Independent_taxpayer @ 08/28/2008 1:48:31 PM

    When you factor in the Alternative Minimum Tax and the rate of inflation $250,000 is rapidly becoming the upper level of the Middle Class. The way the tax structures are currently set up and skewed toward the very wealthy percentage wise there is very little difference between a person makining $250,000 and another making $2,500,000. Those attacking the Obama plan like to state that the upper 25% pay 86% of the taxes which is more than likely true. The problem with that statistic however is the percentage paid at the level of income. McCains plan is more like the Bush plan where he is not going to raise taxes but also not going to lower anyones taxes. This will of course lead to the same thing we have now. So if you are asking the question will $250,000 become the middle class it would depend on the tax structures. If we continue on the current plan without indexing the Alternative minimum Tax, yes it will be. The distance between the wealthy and the poor will continue to grow.

  • Posted By: username201 @ 08/28/2008 1:41:22 PM

    Too often do you see a teenager who is generations away from their immigrant ancestors just hanging around at a job while the fresh off the boat immigrant is working as hard as 5 of them. Temperate Americans do not know the meaning of hard work. How do you explain foreign children that can barely speak english excelling in the schools our temperate children are failing in? If you choose to work hard and take chances you will be rewarded. Complacency is no excuse and doesn't buy you a reason to expect these hard working people should pay more than the lower brackets. Keep it fair, keep it even. I'm not even close to 250k but I have the common sense to know its not out of my reach. All I need is to want it.

    • Posted By: username201 @ 08/28/2008 1:44:37 PM

      BTW, I am at least a 5th generation american, don't work hard at all and consider my household fairly well off for pulling in around 110K. Stop crying and get some initiative.

      • Posted By: username201 @ 08/28/2008 1:48:21 PM

        And for all you crying about not being able to make it in the 250K range. You need to give the money back because you're clearly not responsible enough to handle that much coin.

  • Posted By: cbartelt @ 08/28/2008 1:47:24 PM

    I come from a small town in northern Wisconsin. My family makes approx. $50,000 a year and in no way are we stressed for money. My sister just completed four years in college and I am beginning my first and money has not been a major issue in our education as of yet. Many people in my community make far less than my family and there are a few who make more but in such a small setting, the competition to out-do your neighber just doesn't seem apparent.

  • Posted By: hershey1 @ 08/28/2008 1:46:54 PM

    According to John McCain, he does not consider you rich until you earn $5,000,000 (FIVE MILLION DOLLARS!) !!!! To him earning $250,000 makes you poor! Talk about living in another world!

  • Posted By: kwynne @ 08/28/2008 1:09:55 PM

    my husband and i make a combined income of about $265,000 a year. but we work in nyc, live in the northern, nj suburbs of nyc, in a $500,000 house, with one baby in full-time daycare and another one on the way. between the cost of commuting, home heating oil, gas and electric, water, car payments, home, car, and life insurance, two mortgages, taxes, groceries, gas, cable, phone, and household items, we have virtually no money left over every month. forget about putting any money into our fixer-upper home. we essentially live paycheck to paycheck. we have no debt [we just paid it off], but we still cannot put much away in savings. in fact, we have zero savings. we do, of course, put money into our 401K's. we took one $3000 trip this year. we eat out about 3 times a month max. so you tell me, are we rich? we don't think so, but i guess everyone else does. that's the point. you can make what seems like a large salary in this country and have absolutely nothing to show for it. that's why everyone seems to be hurting economically, from the poverty level to people like us, who are technically "rich."

    • Posted By: neeps @ 08/28/2008 1:46:44 PM

      Sounds to me like someone totally over-extended their income. Don't expect many to feel empathy for you.

    • Posted By: spjon @ 08/28/2008 1:16:04 PM

      Cry some more about all your bills. Everybody has those exact same bills. My parents combined income is less than yours and they managed to own a house that costs the exact same, pay the same bills, put me and two of my brothers through school, and not complain about their taxes. You need to figure out what you're doing wrong and quit blaming everyone else.

    • Posted By: Cdat @ 08/28/2008 1:13:38 PM

      Spending 3K on a trip would be an incredible luxury to most folks.
      It's all relative. Easy to become blind to how "the other half" lives when you have no contact whatsoever with them.

  • Posted By: jimthompson @ 08/28/2008 1:45:58 PM

    Rich has more to do with net worth than income, and this writer is typically naive in not understanding the difference. An income of $250,000 means you are in a high tax bracket with nearly every tax break phased out (college tuition credit as a nice example). Two kids in college? Take $60000 pretax off the top b/c you pay for college pretax and you need to earn $60k to have $40K left over to pay the full loads of both kids; you are too "rich" to qualify for aid. We need to calculate rich as net worth; not income. You can be a billionaire and show a negative income.

  • Posted By: ccrider27 @ 08/28/2008 1:45:44 PM

    I make just over 250,00 , I feel very secure, but do not feel rich. Let's talk about Net incomes not the Gross number. I pay well over 100,000 dollars in taxes between state and federal and everything in between. How can anyone say I do not pay my fair share. Yes I feel secure because I save money so I am not dependent on anyone else, I invest my money that keeps the capital in this country flowing and spend my money that keeps the capitalist wheel turning. I do not expect many people to have empathy for me but their is a big gap between me and the John Kerrys and warren buffets of this world. Again About Half of my income goes to taxes. This tax code is used to bottle up the middle and upper middle class as well as the lowest incomes of the so called rich catagory.

  • Posted By: hershey1 @ 08/28/2008 1:44:25 PM

    John McCain doesn't consider you rich unless you earn 5 million dollars,!!!!! So ,to McCain if you make $250,000 then you are poor. Talk about living in another world!!!

  • Posted By: jtrianamd @ 08/28/2008 1:43:53 PM

    Regardless of how much you make, the important thing is your taxation. We should be taxed on spending our money and not making it. if we are to be taxed on our income then the fair thing would be a flat tax for everyone, less than 15% and increase the sales tax across the board to make up for the differences.

  • Posted By: independent1 @ 08/28/2008 1:29:23 PM

    $250,000 is only considered rich to those with no ambition, no drive and no ability to rise above their current condition. 90% of America is living just above paycheck to paycheck. I fought like hell to reach my current income level which is way above the mentioned level and found myself being taxed to a level of punishment for being successful. Americans are fat and lazy hate to see someone else have more than they do. I will continue to exploit every tax break I can find.

    • Posted By: NickiDrea @ 08/28/2008 1:36:28 PM

      You're clearly ignorant- and a snob at that. I grew up in a wealthy family- my dad is a surgeon, my mom is a business executive- and I consider $250K to be a TON of money. I graduated college summa *** laude and law school magna *** laude. I spent over $100K for my education (my parents paid for undergrad, I paid for grad through loans). I went to law school to help the less fortunate, and that's what I do as a public defender. I make less than $50K a year and with my student loan debt, I'm almost drowning, but it's worth it to me. I'm not lazy and I obviously have a lot of ambition (I'd like to be judge one day), and I'm still making almost no money. I'm not complaining, this is the life I chose and it's the right life for me. But don't assume that just because I don't make six figures, I have no ambition. What I have is a heart- I care about people. Money is NOT everything. I know that at only 26, hopefully you will learn the same.

      • Posted By: jblackwell88 @ 08/28/2008 1:42:51 PM

        Out of the two, I'd have to side with independent1.

  • Posted By: Doc Blue @ 08/28/2008 1:42:39 PM

    I think some of you have it wrong. From what I hear the DEMS want to role back the Bush tax cuts for individuals making over 250K to what they were during the Clinto days. Spouting that the Dems will raise taxes is untrue. Last I remember, most people did pretty well during the Clinto years. The first thing most want to do is curb spending by cutting food programs to kids in pre-K, when they should be curbing spending on this ridiculus war we are fighting in Iraq. This from a well educated veteran who certainly understands world politics and National Security issues.

  • Posted By: sweetmaggie1996 @ 08/28/2008 1:42:04 PM

    For Nola Mike: First, you should consider yourself rich indeed if you have four children that are happy and healthy. You have a home, and a job. That in itself is a rich thing. I am a hardworking single mother with two years. I make about $28000 a year and have just bought a single wide trailer for myself and my children. While I live in an area where I am considered as making good money, I consider myself the richest woman in the world as i have a home and children. while I can't afford the luxury of putting my boys in sports, I was able to get them a dog this year. Go Me!!! I hope that all of you can see what is truly important in life and it isn't the bottom line.

  • Posted By: brew05 @ 08/28/2008 1:40:23 PM

    To the people who name off all their bills and say there not rich. atleast you can AFFORD all the stuff that you just named off. Lets here from the people who make 50k a year and can't afford all the as you would call them little luxuries like sending their kids to private schools and dance lessons, the "occasional" concert or movie. Lets here them name their bills and i guarentee you after 3 they are officially in debt with the money they make. "aww man i only have 17k a year to do w/e i want with it. I know families that would kill to have 17k to pay off there debts. So walk a mile in the real poor peoples shoes before you go complaining about your 17k of disposable income a year.

  • Posted By: brew05 @ 08/28/2008 1:41:08 PM

    To the people who name off all their bills and say there not rich. atleast you can AFFORD all the stuff that you just named off. Lets here from the people who make 50k a year and can't afford all the as you would call them little luxuries like sending their kids to private schools and dance lessons, the "occasional" concert or movie. Lets here them name their bills and i guarentee you after 3 they are officially in debt with the money they make. "aww man i only have 17k a year to do w/e i want with it. I know families that would kill to have 17k to pay off there debts. So walk a mile in the real poor peoples shoes before you go complaining about your 17k of disposable income a year.

  • Posted By: icehead @ 08/28/2008 11:44:13 AM

    I can't cry about making above $250K per year because as you eluded to in your post, it just wouldn't be right. I have to say that all the hard work that has gone into getting my income to this point has gotten me some exceptional perks like, paying in full for 3 college educations, huge property and state tax burdens and overall being treated like someone who makes $250 million dollars per year. Why not a flat tax rate in the US. Let everyone pay 20% across the board, disband the IRS (saving billions) and then it would be fair for all. If you make less, you pay less etc. Also let's stop fooling ourselves about who we are helping with all this additional revenue. People have to pull themselves out of poverty thru education and hard work like I did and not through additional social programs. I know in NJ we pour money into our inner cities and things have gone from worse to unbelievable as a result. We are now going on generations in the welfare class and still little has really changed. You have to WANT to better yourself and your family and you need to work for it everyday. It is hard and I dare say taking my money and giving it to those who benifit from their own lack of sefl-determination really upsets me. I was poor, now I am not and nobody ever handed me a thing. I resent paying more so those who sitting home having children without any means of support and who don't give a damn about their future other than when is the next check arriving are getting money my kids would put to good use. I also don't believe that taking more money from us that we would normally invest or spend will do any good things for our economy. We will buy and invest less and small business will take the hit. That is where real job growth occurs and when we stop spending small business will stop hiring so at the end of the day we continue to perpetuate the cycle of socialization for our growning and flourishing welfare class.

    • Posted By: MiamiMike @ 08/28/2008 11:49:03 AM

      Do you honestly think that a large portion of your tax goes to social programs. The majority of what you pay goes to the military "IRAQ".

      • Posted By: PAKatie @ 08/28/2008 1:41:08 PM

        I work for one of those social programs and we've seen a lot of people in the $200,000K + range try to apply for benefits. What they do realize is just how poor you have to be in order to qualify for benefits. You have to be less than 185% above poverty to qualify. And this includes the working poor--people who work 2 and 3 jobs just to make it. Anyone who thinks most poor sit home on their butts doing nothing but collecting their handouts is delusional. They work. They go to school. The problem is that the media has built up this idealistic dream of what "success" is. A McMansion. Two Mercedes. Private schools...no one has the right to look down on anyone else just because they don't earn $250,000 a year. That's more than what 98% of US workers earn. I guess the rest of us must be real slackers.

        The people applying for my program think they are middle class, but in a city where the median income is roughly $32,000, they are wealthy.

        I live in a suburb where the median income is roughly $42,000. I make $35,000. And it's not for a lack of education or hard work. My father would not allow my sister or me to go to college unless we paid for it ourselves. And this is a man who made $50,000 at a time when the poverty level was $5,000. Because he made so much, I didn't qualify for grants or scholarships. Twenty years later I am STILL paying off my college loans. I would like to go to grad school, but one of my kids will be starting college in 6 years. I cannot justify that expense--the increase in salary wouldn't offset the cost of obtaining that degree. I sacrificed my earning potential to raise my family--how dare anyone judge me for that?

        Anyway, on that $35,000 a year (pre-tax at a 28% tax rate which puts my real income at just over $26,000), I manage to afford a mortgage, utilities, and two children with all their expenses. Not only do I manage to afford it, I also manage to put money away for college, retirement, cash for a new car, and paying off my student debt (hopefully before the kids start college). No child support, no help from the government or anyone else. Contrast that with my sister. She and her husband (an engineer) make a combined salary of over $250K. They nearly went bankrupt a few years ago. They bought a house they couldn't afford (6 bedrooms and no kids), two $65,000 vehicles (one of which went on a credit card), a boat, a summer home in Florida.

        If I can live on $35,000--and it gets tight at times, believe me--why can't they do the same on $250,000?

        It's all in your choices.

  • Posted By: meg619 @ 08/28/2008 12:55:40 PM

    gcb009--I couldn't agree more!! The liberal's attitude that they are entitled to take from hard working people just makes me sick.

    • Posted By: sfreiner @ 08/28/2008 1:03:00 PM

      Damn right. No one should be taking away my money that I worked so hard for. All of us are not born equal but we are all born with equal opportunity. If people chose to not work and sit on their arses all day, I will damn if the government have me share my $$$ with them. I am sick of people complaining and not doing any thing about it. Come on, go to work like the most of us.

      • Posted By: spjon @ 08/28/2008 1:40:53 PM

        So if I'm working to the best of my ability and still only getting paid $35,000 a year, then your answer is "The h**l with him"?

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse