Sorry, Pal, You're Rich

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: tiredofidiots @ 08/28/2008 1:14:35 PM

    $250K per year is making an awful lot of money. I will say that MOST of these people deserve their salaries. However, if we had a better taxing system, we could solve a lot of our problems. I don't believe there should be ANY tax breaks because you are wealthy, whatever bracket you fall into, that is what you should pay. This removes potential income from the system. I believe even more that government overspending is a much larger issue. They spend budgeted money just to get the same amount the next year (which is crap) and a waste of OUR money. Instead of replacing or purchasing items that aren't and will never be used, this money should go to paying off our national debt, starting USEFUL programs for underpriveleged or give some of it back to the people (the one's that make it in the first place). Oh, and if we took away the benefits provided FOR LIFE to our politicians and made them pay taxes, including social security, I bet we would see a super fast change in our politics and policies.

  • Posted By: COBlueBlood @ 08/28/2008 12:58:48 PM

    I know that my wife and I are "average". We make a little under $100k per year and are doing okay. Things have tightened in the recent past, mostly due to inflation and decline in the values of investments. However, if our income went up by 150%, I would feel "rich". The author of this article hit is spot on.

    Taxes are not meant to be "punishment" - its a method of funding programs for the greater good of society. We all have to pay them, we all benefit from them. We should all pay more in taxes, especially to pay off this astronomical deficit we now have. If you look, about 30% of the total US annual budget is dedicated to just paying ot the interest, yes interest (not principal) on our national debt. - an absolute joke.

    • Posted By: jblackwell88 @ 08/28/2008 1:14:06 PM

      Part of the problem is Diversity. Americans are not linked by blood, culture, religion or even language; we are merely residents in a geography. We're just part of a giant consumer market, and as such, there is a diminished sense of civic obligation to one another. No one wants to see their taxes used to grow and subsidize another population when they can't afford children of their own. And this is the way it will be until such time the people who can flee do so, and the remainder of this experiment burns to the ground.

  • Posted By: printer_bellamy @ 08/28/2008 12:18:09 PM

    I don't think Obama was worred about whether someone making $250K would be able to take the 10 day Carribean or European vacation or put their kids into the best private school or buy their new hot luxury car. He's talking about those folks who actually worry about the utilities, food and gas. Also, Obama was asked to quote a minimum figure for the classification of "rich". And yes, I think the tax rate should be higher on the "rich" than on those of us who are worrying about the utilities and food. The discussion isn't about what rich is, it's about what is enough that you're not worrying about providing the basics for you and your family. I don't think anybody can make an argument that the middle class and poor are better off than they were 8 years ago.

    • Posted By: motcc @ 08/28/2008 1:13:28 PM

      What gives you or the government the right to dictate how much someone earns or how much they should be taxed? Are their those that don't deserver it, yes, but don't make it more than it is. You would seem to imply that there are millions of Americans that are wealthy. Oh and by the way, I am better off than I was 8 years ago. I have less debt because I manage my money. I worked hard to achieve what I have and my wife and I don't make $250. Do you want me to just write you a check because you need more money? Who doesn't? It is interesting that you don't discuss the bigger problem of people, in all income ranges, buying things they shouldn't have on credit. It called living within your means and that is way more taxing on this country than increasing taxes.

  • Posted By: Judge Smails @ 08/28/2008 1:13:25 PM

    Well the world needs dich diggers too.

  • Posted By: Judge Smails @ 08/28/2008 1:12:49 PM

    Well, the world needs ditch diggers too.

  • Posted By: jaroffiles @ 08/28/2008 1:11:41 PM

    Wow! People going off left and right about anything and everything NOT pertaining to the article. All Daniel was saying was that those who make $250k annually are far from middle class. Yes, they may have debts that are greater than others...they may pay more taxes via local and state governments (live somewhere else), but the entire idea of the article is that $250k is far geater than a 'median' income.

  • Posted By: jhnsnclln @ 08/28/2008 12:44:37 PM

    This article is great. I've also been able to experience the other side of the coin. We live outside of Chicago and our household income was ~$250,000 before my husband lost his job. We lived comfortable and we were able to afford nice things. But I constantly felt like we did not have enough money. Now living on 1/2 of that income, I really know what it's like to feel the pains of the current economy. We now just have to appreciate what we have and the time we have together and have lower expectations of what "nice to have" means. We drink cheaper wine, never go out to eat, buy kids clothes at Target, etc. While we consider these sacrifices, this is probably closer to the way me and my husband were raised. Due to a robust economy, a lot of us have been very fortunate to lead a nicer lifestyle. Simpler might not be all that bad!

    • Posted By: SphinxatUF1 @ 08/28/2008 1:11:24 PM

      Right on! To be honest, we could afford more expensive wine, clothes, and going out to eat, but hey, I like Target and cheap wine, and I love being able to brag to my husband that I got 3 pairs of pants from the consignment shop for less than $30. Just because I can afford to pay more, doesn't mean I want to. (Not that we make anywhere near 250k, but you know what I mean.)

  • Posted By: nsdarren @ 08/28/2008 1:11:22 PM

    This whole discussion is foolish if you don't consider the age of the person(s) making the money and their experience. A person whos is making $250,000 at the age of 50 with two college going children living in Los Angeles is in fact a lower middle class hard working person. And how many people make more than $250,000 in cities other than New York, san Francisco, Los Angeles and similar citoes? If we can replace the income tax with a consumtion tax, yes, I can admit $250,000 is a very decent income.

  • Posted By: interium @ 08/28/2008 12:37:31 PM

    My wife and I have two children; own two homes, three cars and pay a lot of taxes ???on what WE EARNED???. What sucks is we work hard and made our money the hard way "we worked" and never ask for hand outs. The sad part is we make only 200K combined and the Dem???s think we are rich? I had to take a personal loan to pay my taxes; even after I maxed out my holdings and invested in my 401k. I personally would like the DEM???s to look at my checking account and call me rich...we are not rich, but we pay a lot of people money to teach our children, work on our cars, work on our houses, dinners, clothing, etc, etc, etc. We are not rich, but I aspire to be rich ???it???s my God given right???!!!

    Fact is, we are the middle class people that are paying for the lazy "hand-out taking, non-working, excuse making" losers that look for the loop holes in the system and take my/our hard working money. The non-working lazy people are the real criminals, not the people who make money!!! Tell me? Why should my family get punished for making honest money? There is nothing more depressing than to see a bonus and/or commission check that you worked hard for; get cut in half because you did your job and earned money for your family!!!

    What is truly sad is we live in a country that if you work hard and make honest money; you get losers that look down on you because you worked hard and they didn???t!!! Think about it we live in a world that we give children trophies for just showing up at a soccer games and the truth is they are not good enough to earn that trophy. We punish coaches for being hard on our children by pushing them to do better and/or telling the kid the truth ???they are not good enough to play or the didn???t make the team??????Does that mean we give everyone ???A???s??? for just showing up to school or better yet give everyone in the class ???C???s??? on tests after half the class failed and the other half studied hard and got ???A???s/B???s???, it doesn???t sound right??? I???m sorry, but our world is being run by the Soccer Mom???s and Dad???s that want everyone to win, so Jonny???s feelings don???t get hurt. The same goes for the working ???grown up world???. We are raising and training hand-out taking kids that graduate collage and instantly expects to make the same or more money than the senior hardworking guy/gal earned, by climbing the latter of success over years of hard work.

    If you earn it and work hard for it, than you should be rewarded. Not everyone is a MVP! We should stop rewarding everyone trophies and make them earn it the hard way and ???yes??? get their feelings hurt!!! And for you people that say they got dealt a bad hand???I was one of 5 with one parent and dropped out of collage to raise our first child. If anyone has an excuse, I did and I still never asked for hand outs and that is more rewarding than a fat bank account. Well maybe not, but it sounds good!!!

    • Posted By: iheartnyc @ 08/28/2008 1:10:57 PM

      Okay not to be obnoxious or judgmental here but why do you have two homes and three cars then? It's obvious you are living way above your means. I know you have worked hard and feel you have earned certain things and I totally agree with you. However, if you don't have the money to pay for those things and still live comfortably then you have no business having them and complaining you can't make ends meet. If you were to manage your money properly and downsize, you would be a lot more comfortable.

      And I'm with you on the background. My parents are dead broke to this day but I was able to pull myself up and do everything on my own. Sure that knowledge has yet to be used as credit towards buying a new Louis Vuitton, but it still makes me intensely proud.

  • Posted By: Shops @ 08/28/2008 12:58:41 PM

    250k is alot of money... until you have to give 100k of that to taxes, some of which support people who chose not to work as hard as you do. To those who work three jobs, I'm excited that you're not on the welfare rolls. Now make sure your children do well in middle school, highschool, & college so they have an easier time finding one job that can pay the bills.

    • Posted By: 40isnotold @ 08/28/2008 1:09:54 PM

      Thank you shops! I agree 100%. The amt my family pays in taxes is unbelieveable. No deductions, do stimulus check, no 'bonuses' (for lack of a better term) off my tax return for working hard and being successful.

  • Posted By: jd_free @ 08/28/2008 1:09:37 PM

    Mr. "vippy":

    If taxes were as you say, the average rich person would pay far less than they do now, and the poor would pay more. And regarding hard-working people - hard work is not enough. If I got a job scrubbing pools with a toothbrush, I might work very hard and still accomplish very little. Productivity is a function of working hard and working SMART.

  • Posted By: marknmau @ 08/28/2008 1:07:01 PM

    and......this isn't even considering coparissions to the rest of the people on this planet,plain and simple greed! right on!

  • Posted By: junkmail6 @ 08/27/2008 10:35:57 PM

    If $250K is middle class, where do I sign up for food stamps?

    Pastor123-

    I think you responded to the wrong article...

    • Posted By: BwanaD01 @ 08/28/2008 1:04:38 PM

      I make $250k / year. I live in Chicago with the highest sales taxes in the country and have 3 kids in college. I am paying over $100 per year to three colleges. Plus side - because of my income I can afford it. Negative side - between taxes and college payments, there are no fancy cars, vacations are spent flying to college towns to visit kids.

      I will be the first to admit I am well off, but it really irks me when people use Gates and Buffet as examples who make more in an hour than I make in a year. I may make five times the median, but don't use as examples people that make 1,000,000 times the median to make a point

  • Posted By: velociraptor @ 08/28/2008 1:04:36 PM

    meg619: You didn't receive any handouts?!! Were you protected by the US Military (most of whom earn far less than $250K)? Drive on any interstates? How about airplanes? You certainly use the Internet. Eat any food inspected by the FDA or USDA? Breathe clean air? Go to a public school?

    No handouts? What a joke. You got rich on the backs of every other American who makes this country great. Well, good for you. In America, we drink to your success. But don't pretend that everyone earning less than $250K doesn't work hard for what they get. Bottom line: You can easily afford the taxes as they were under Clinton. A small price to pay to get our country back on track.

  • Posted By: RKOBINSKI @ 08/28/2008 1:04:06 PM

    I am a disabled truck driver. I have never made $250,000 per year in my life, even when I was driving 1 million miles a year, which was and still is illigal. I now make $8,034.00 per year. Any of you who make $250,000 want to switch places? I know I can do your job, with alittlte training to know what the job entails. As far as I'm conserned, anyone who pays such outragious prices for houses, gets what they deserve. Have you ever thought of how the prices got so outrageous in the first place? Some idiots will pay any price to try to have, or be better than the next guy. If you wouldn't pay $1,000,000 on up for houses, then prices wouldn't be so high. As far as taxes goes, if we, ( the people) would not of let the Government be the biggest Employer of this country, then we wouldn't have so much to pay out. You've got to stop to consider, who is paying for their saleries. That is the problem now days, people want to have everything done for them, the only thing is, someone still has to pay to get the job done. Lets get back to letting the states and cities pay their own way, and let the Federal government get back to the job that they was intended to do.

  • Posted By: DAH! @ 08/28/2008 1:03:12 PM

    Having worked in the government, I know there is a lot of waste, and a number of folks who almost never show up for work. There is a bunch of pork barrel projects that do not fit in the real priorities of the country. I suspect that we could cut budgets by 15% in the government and not impact real services at all, IF we reformed the civil service rules and forced people to do their jobs or leave. In many cases I have seen people who hire a contractor to do their job and then supervise the contractor. This is not a slam at everyone in government - most of the people do work hard and do their job, but there are enough people who take 4 hour lunches and "work" from home, that it would not be hard to make things more efficent if there was a real desire to do so. I would like to see people clean up the waste prior to reducing services, or raising taxes.

  • Posted By: widewillie @ 08/28/2008 12:49:23 PM

    Writers using anecdotal interpretations of cherry-picked numbers to make their case...now that's "rich"!

    In New Canaan, Conn, based on the numbers provided, there are as many people making $460K/year as there are people making $115K/year. Yet somehow, inexplicably, even in New Canaan, Mr. Gross believes that $250K/year makes you "rich"!! I hope you and your family enjoy that 2 bd/1 ba condo...with no parking, a communal washer/dryer and paper-thin walls (all the better for listening in on the other "rich" people who live right next door)!

    Fortunate, yes...better off then many...sure...but, rich...NOT EVEN CLOSE!! If someday you're fortunate enough to make anywhere near $250K you'll understand. Until then you're just hatin'.

    • Posted By: username201 @ 08/28/2008 1:02:18 PM

      It is why I don't live in New Canaan but further north. My salary would be peanuts in New Canaan. Sure, i need to commute an hour to work and get that salary, but there's the sacrifice. Don't need to say "look at me! I live in New Canaan!". That's a different class of people all together, I call it shallow to sacrifice quality of living in an effort to maintain a brand.

    • Posted By: Fred Norris @ 08/28/2008 12:52:12 PM

      So true -

      How long before the first post of "why don't you move then?" comes in...

      • Posted By: almalak78 @ 08/28/2008 12:55:50 PM

        it will come soon, but the article would probably have to be about Mexicans, or immigrants.

    • Posted By: username201 @ 08/28/2008 12:53:41 PM

      That salary would allow you to be rich even 30 minutes outside of New Canaan, CT. The choice to live in New Canaan is just that, a choice. And the fact that one can live in New Canaan in itself is a luxury.

  • Posted By: zapspot7 @ 08/28/2008 12:59:50 PM

    My pardon, the second and third previous comments...

  • Posted By: GEMq @ 08/28/2008 12:37:44 PM

    Granted,$250K is a good amount of money to most people and I don't fit into that category, but my wife an I do fit into the upper 20%.

    I grew up in the projects in South East PA and moved to Florida before I ended up dead or in jail. I worked hard in school and joined the AF. I comleted 60 credit hours of college in 14 months working full time and being a singe parent. My son never miss an event relating to Little League, Karate, or soccer.

    I worked my butt off to have the lifestyle I have right now and it is unfair for me to pay a higher rate of tax then someone who can't get to work without a hangover every morning. There are a lot of people out there saying they don't have the opportunity and you know that is bull. This is America and everyone has the same chance that I had. And it is not fair that my income goes to some social program for some lazy bum who doesn't have the time nor the energy to better himself.

    I'm 52 years old and getting ready to go back to college to complete my MBA. I do this because I may be able to increse my standard of living--not someone else's

    Don't be bitter at the wealth of this country because they made the sacrifices to put them where they are at.

    If you want a fair tax, endorse the Fair Tax Bill in congress. It has major consideration for the poor.

    • Posted By: KrystOutlander @ 08/28/2008 12:58:15 PM

      I applaud your hard work, and question if I would be able to do what you have done. Your money is your own and should be used to improve upon your families standard of living. Of helping a brother, or sister, or mom and dad our if they are still around. God bless them if they are not. But I agree it should not be law, nor a REQUIREMENT that families hard earned (or not) money be used to pay for other people. There are plenty of histories of families who went through several generations of bottom line poverty before a shining star rose and became a multi billionaire. None of us are entitled to what we have, nor are we entitled to more. You work for it, and you work hard to get it and if you do not then you go right back to work for it again.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse