Sorry, Pal, You're Rich

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: pfwpearl @ 08/28/2008 12:37:31 PM

    sgollus: I get your point, but remember that my family which made about $70,000 last year has all teh same responsibilities yours does. I pay for my own health issurance at about $600/mth, I pay social security on ALL of my income - I don't get to reach the cap and then pay nothing. I wish I had enough at teh end of the month to pay into a 401K, but with student loans and a college student inmy household it is simply cutting too close to the bone (gas, groceries or retirement) that I cannot participate at this point in time. I'm glad you have teh opportunities to get where you are in life congrats on your accomplishment, you must have been blessed with good health and plenty of opportunites to get all those degrees and teh means to move around as needed. But you are not being punished for being successful. You are participating in the social experement that is the US. If you have a horrible illness and everything you have vanishes, it's great that we have in place some sfety nets that will help hold you up until you can get back onyour feet. I understand that once everything is taken into account you bring home less tan you make. Guess what same thing happens to everyone who works.

  • Posted By: sewnerjhawk @ 08/28/2008 12:37:06 PM

    Surt: Luck has nothing to do with it. Well almost nothing. Its choices and willingness to step out and risk. You could do my job and make more, but you haven't yet made that choice, and that's OK, but don't say I should pay twice as much as you because I have made better financial choices along the way. Flat tax is the only way to be fair.

  • Posted By: EJLP @ 08/28/2008 12:36:47 PM

    I am sorry Mr. Gross, but you are completely shortsided on this issue. My wife and I both work. We have 2 kids, at preschool age. We need a full time babysitter (going rate there is over $16/hr). We live in southern Connecticut about 50miles outside of NYC, in a town very close to some of the towns on your top 25 list. We have no public pre schools to speak of so private is necessary). Here is what you miss: My wife's occupation requires her to work in and around NYC- (her occupational skills set requires her to be there, not Paducah, KY). We need a full time babysitter because we both work. In order to give our kids a head start, we send them to pre-school (we want to put them in a position to make a lot of money later in life so they can give most of it back to the government). We pay the same high gas and oil prices as everyone else (CT actually has some of the highest in the country). We pay the same high prices for groceries. And perhaps one of the biggest faults of your agument is that you forget that the reason the median income is so much lower outside of certain metropolitan areas, is that the high paying jobs just aren't there, and there is limited opportunity and potential to move up. Increasing taxes is the easy way for the government to push their problems on to the public. The question really should be, how are we educating those people on welfare in order for them to get better jobs? When are we going to stop paying $900 for a hammer? When are we going to train those receiving disability payments to do jobs that they are physically able to do? Fix these problems internally before you come to me and my family to bail you out. And last but not least, did you forget that by taxing America's so called "rich", you are decreasing their gross spending dollar, which limits the amount that go back into the economy, limits the amount that we can save for college, and limits the amount we can save for retirement, all problems that the government is supposedly trying to fix. The cashier at the supermarket is not receiving any favors by limiting my family's ability to spend more at the grocery store. We have worked hard for what we have. We are nowhere close to being able to afford retirement, and we are being penalized for working hard, being somewhat successful and doing right by our kids. I am thoroughly disgusted by the democrat's version of their so called "American Way".

  • Posted By: robbanks @ 08/28/2008 12:32:44 PM

    If us peasants don't have money to spend, how is that good for the economy, small businesses or even corporate execs? Does Bill Gates visit your medical practice? Does Warren Buffet buy his cars from you? Does Mark Cuban dine at your restaurant? I'm not advocating massive wealth distribution, just trying to point out that allowing working class families to keep more of their money can be just as beneficial to the economy in general as tax breaks for businesses. Raising the Standard Deduction while adding a percentage point or two at the top of the food chain actually makes good economic sense for EVERYONE.

    • Posted By: jblackwell88 @ 08/28/2008 12:36:43 PM

      Maybe we can get Bush and the Democrats to print off some more money for you like they did in May. Industry, hard work, intelligence... these things don't matter, right? Just print up a buttload of Benjamins and buy another round of crap from China. The reason we're in a recession is because energy is high and we aren't manufacturing anything that the world wants. You can cannibalize the "rich" middle class in the short term, but it won't make a damn bit of difference long term.

  • Posted By: interium @ 08/28/2008 12:36:41 PM

    My wife and I have two children; own two homes, three cars and pay a lot of taxes ???on what WE EARNED???. What sucks is we work hard and made our money the hard way "we worked" and never ask for hand outs. The sad part is we make only 200K combined and the Dem???s think we are rich? I had to take a personal loan to pay my taxes; even after I maxed out my holdings and invested in my 401k. I personally would like the DEM???s to look at my checking account and call me rich...we are not rich, but we pay a lot of people money to teach our children, work on our cars, work on our houses, dinners, clothing, etc, etc, etc. We are not rich, but I aspire to be rich ???it???s my God given right???!!!

    Fact is, we are the middle class people that are paying for the lazy "hand-out taking, non-working, excuse making" losers that look for the loop holes in the system and take my/our hard working money. The non-working lazy people are the real criminals, not the people who make money!!! Tell me? Why should my family get punished for making honest money? There is nothing more depressing than to see a bonus and/or commission check that you worked hard for; get cut in half because you did your job and earned money for your family!!!

    What is truly sad is we live in a country that if you work hard and make honest money; you get losers that look down on you because you worked hard and they didn???t!!! Think about it we live in a world that we give children trophies for just showing up at a soccer games and the truth is they are not good enough to earn that trophy. We punish coaches for being hard on our children by pushing them to do better and/or telling the kid the truth ???they are not good enough to play or the didn???t make the team??????Does that mean we give everyone ???A???s??? for just showing up to school or better yet give everyone in the class ???C???s??? on tests after half the class failed and the other half studied hard and got ???A???s/B???s???, it doesn???t sound right??? I???m sorry, but our world is being run by the Soccer Mom???s and Dad???s that want everyone to win, so Jonny???s feelings don???t get hurt. The same goes for the working ???grown up world???. We are raising and training hand-out taking kids that graduate collage and instantly expects to make the same or more money than the senior hardworking guy/gal earned, by climbing the latter of success over years of hard work.

    If you earn it and work hard for it, than you should be rewarded. Not everyone is a MVP! We should stop rewarding everyone trophies and make them earn it the hard way and ???yes??? get their feelings hurt!!! And for you people that say they got dealt a bad hand???I was one of five with one parent and dropped out of collage to raise our first child. If anyone has an excuse I did; but, I still never asked for hand outs and that is more rewarding than a fat bank account. Well maybe not, but it sounds good!!!

  • Posted By: jwwsu @ 08/28/2008 12:36:00 PM

    Unless one makes or inherits enough money to a point where it is no longer an issue, people making, say, $250,000. or more have to watch how they spend it like the rest of us who make a lot less. If someone making 250K lives beyond that amount that's their problem. Anyone with half a brain should be able to do quite well as long as they realize how far it will go and not go beyond what is prudent.

  • Posted By: borisblade @ 08/28/2008 12:35:16 PM

    Ignorance at its best. Fact: The top 5% of income earners in this country paid 60.1% of the total income tax for the entire country. To be in the top 5% your adjusted gross income was greater than $153,500. Meanwhile folks in the bottom 50% of all filers paid only 3% of the total income tax. The lowest actually had a negative income tax rate because of the Earned Income Credit. So when you hear "thats another tax break for the rich"

  • Posted By: sewnerjhawk @ 08/28/2008 12:34:58 PM

    Just charge everyone the same, and its all good. No argument

  • Posted By: Maolin34 @ 08/28/2008 12:34:22 PM

    I won't try to say that 250K is or is not alot of money. RB below said that there was a time when 15K was a good sum of money. Let me tell you, for most peope...15K is still and will always be alot of money. Give 15K to families and you can save their home, buy transportation, save a life, pay for education....you can do alot with 15K. The question is how many people that "work" in this country have a disposable 15K? Not as many as you might think....or that I would hope for. I'm 33 yrs old, and I have worked since I was 15. I have gone through very rough times as a child, and good times as well. Today when I make my 60K a year at my desk job, it doesn't seem to feel like much. I'm single, with no dependents. I want to live a certain way, and everyone does...but I can't live the way I want to on 60K. It's enough for a 2 bedroom condo, a car, and a TV as I watch 25% of my gross pay for Cheney's limo. People make decisions in their lives based on how much money they , and how they want to live. Making 250K for a single person is wealthy....for a single working parent with 4 kids, it's affordable...but just barely. And let's not forget, that those that make 250K now have a significantly better chance of making more than 250K the following year. I will look forward to my little 3%. And I don't understand the statement made by "RobertBabione"...."Is it the person who makes a good living's fault that the other person did take advantage of a college education, etc." I assume he means "did NOT take advantage"....and that implies that the opportunity was always there, just waiting for you. Fault me for having a 3.8 GPA all through my private school years from 1-12, and then the lack of funds for my undergrad years. Scholarships not offered to me because my father made too much money? What did I not take advantage of? I have worked hard all of my life, with my hands, and my head. Hold your judgments about whats right for you vs me, when you don't know me...and you don't know anybody else. The president, good or bad, must make decisions that will have an affect on all of citizenry as a whole. Some it helps, some it hurts...the question is how do you help everyone in "some" way, if not the "same" way.

  • Posted By: Xysea @ 08/28/2008 11:32:15 AM

    Fred Norris -
    I'm interested in knowing why you feel someone making less per year isn't working as hard as you do? I'm sure a lot of ditch-diggers would disagree. You seem to have taken the elitist's view....

    • Posted By: ssbn777 @ 08/28/2008 11:35:20 AM

      So by your line of reasoning, the less someone makes, the harder they work? Is that right?

      • Posted By: yahoo @ 08/28/2008 11:39:16 AM

        Having worked in a variety of work environments (government to law firms to retail), I'd have to say "yes" - in general, those earning over $100k a year don't work as hard as those making less than $30k. And they almost always have paid health care benefits, paid sick days, paid vacation time, profit-sharing, 401k's, etc., etc. They simply don't realize what it's like to live without those things. Or worry over how much a gallon of milk costs.

        • Posted By: JackWilcox @ 08/28/2008 11:50:36 AM

          Ummm... have you made over 100k per year? Maybe from your experience in government and law firms its that way. Oh yeah... the government is run by lawyers, so that is why it seems that way to you. I am not saying the people who make less don't work hard. When a small business person gets above 100k (which can take a lot of time), you work every waking hour. You never quit working, except when you sleep, even then, there are many sleepless nights that you spend worrying about paying your bills, your employees, and, oh yeah, nearly 70% of your salary in taxes.

          • Posted By: gmcneil08 @ 08/28/2008 12:34:09 PM

            For someone who never quits work except to sleep you certainly have a lot of time to post ridiculous comments.

      • Posted By: Braes @ 08/28/2008 11:42:02 AM

        It does wonders at Wal Mart. They have adopted the military mindset on personnel there. "The beatings will continue until morale improves."

  • Posted By: comatoast @ 08/28/2008 12:31:31 PM

    Hang the rich.

    • Posted By: jblackwell88 @ 08/28/2008 12:33:55 PM

      And then what, tax yourselves? ROFL

    • Posted By: Fred Norris @ 08/28/2008 12:33:10 PM

      Please define Rich (which is the only true argument on this page)

  • Posted By: nobama2008 @ 08/28/2008 11:09:53 AM

    Great idea - tax the "middle class" more so we can all be equal... comrades. Has anyone bothered to look at how much the middle class and higher give to charitable organizations on an annual basis. Guess what, that won't be happening when the taxes skyrocket. Our new charity will be the U.S. government and we know how well they manage that money.

    • Posted By: Whigparty @ 08/28/2008 11:19:56 AM

      lower income and middle income give a much higher percentage of their income to charity vs high income people. When I'm on the train it's always the Black women who give money to local begger (i'm white). I work with some extremely well known captians of industry and I have been very shocked at how little they truly give. And when they do give it's for business recognition -- ie let's buy a table for at a charitable dinner for this company we're trying to do business with. Do they tith and % of their income for charity - hell no!

      • Posted By: ssbn777 @ 08/28/2008 11:23:03 AM

        Giving to charity is supposed to be optional. That's the whole point of "charity" now, isn't it?

        • Posted By: Whigparty @ 08/28/2008 11:31:37 AM

          yes and the point is if your not giving now it's doesn't matter if you pay more taxes because you weren't giving in the first place. In other wards nobama2008 arguement is void. If you truly believed in giving then taxes are not going to stop you.

          • Posted By: Texas-conservative @ 08/28/2008 12:32:45 PM

            Perhaps the higer income folks just write a check to the united way for the amount that yields the best tax deduction. Just because someone doesn't give a dollar to a homeless person doesn't mean they aren't charitable....or that they don't pay tithing either.

          • Posted By: ssbn777 @ 08/28/2008 11:38:59 AM

            I don't give to charity, because I "believe" the poor get enough of my money, taken from me by force by the governemnt....

    • Posted By: Braes @ 08/28/2008 11:23:40 AM

      No, I think the plan is eat the rich. The middle class is gone.

  • Posted By: mockbadoc @ 08/28/2008 12:31:34 PM

    Who really cares, anyway? Unless, of course, your goal is to "level the playing field" by punishing success through taxation. There is no shortage of places where everyone has about the same amount of stuff by governmental decree, and where there is no risk of losing your shirt, but also no chance to be a gazillionnaire. Those places are just not what the U.S. is. Neither way is wrong - they're just different. So I guess I am a bit tired of all this talk of who is and isn't "rich". It isn't a contest. I am working my tail off and I'm trying to do everything I can to give my family everything I can possibly give them. Presumably, that's what other Americans are doing, too. So why even make an issue of it? Oh, yeah. Because if your voter base is formed exclusively from the class-envious and chronically jealous, you must stoke the fires continually. As for me, the decision is not about whether I should buy an Escalade or a Range Rover, as seems to be the implication here. Instead, I spend my time wondering if I should continue pursuing the American dream, trying to make the most of what my hard work and a little bit of luck can produce, or whether it is simply time for Atlas to shrug. Then I can fall back into the welcoming arms of those who will pay for everything for me. The cost of membership? My consistent vote and my perpetual and very vocal misery.

  • Posted By: 1Brad1 @ 08/28/2008 12:18:28 PM

    My wife and I make 210K to 280K depending upon bonuses. We are MIDDLE CLASS!

    • Posted By: username201 @ 08/28/2008 12:20:57 PM

      and where is all that money going?

      • Posted By: jblackwell88 @ 08/28/2008 12:26:18 PM

        I'm sure at least half of it goes to the government, where some percentage is lost via waste and corruption, and the rest in turn used to subsidize poverty. Of course anything you subsidize, you get more of.

        • Posted By: username201 @ 08/28/2008 12:31:26 PM

          even if half was going to the government ... that's still at least 105K. A sizable amount. Again, where's it going? for instance, how much is your mortgage, how many car notes do you currently have .... are you paying tuition for any schooling. How much is going to entertainment expenses?

  • Posted By: KrystOutlander @ 08/28/2008 12:19:55 PM

    -sighs, shaking his head- Rich or not this country is in terrible straights when it needs to tax its citizens of their hard earned money. We need to bring back the industry, the factories and the manufactoring. Eliminating our need on outside trade and once again charging high tarrifs to outside companies that want to sell their products within the United States of America. In 1913 our country's government ran entirely on taffits and at the end of the year we had a 5 billion surpluss after all our bills and dues were paid. What does this have to do with 250,000 dollars being middle class or not? The point of this fact is that in what part of the constitution of the United States does it give the government the right to tax people of their hard earned money. People who make 250,000$ a year, BEFORE taxes, did not get handed this position on a silver platter. A very very few of the well to do conencted big leages son of the CEO of companies like Dupont etc, might, but the majority got there through hard work and many many years of smart spending and investment and a desire to improve upon his or her lifestyle. They got there by standing out from the rest of the crowed in that same rat race early on and not feeling entitled to promotions and salary raises but by working to earn them. Those who feel they should be entitled to or get this same ammount of money might first want to consider that not every one is qualified to earn this ammount and that it takes skills that go above and beyond in the wowrk place to make it here. It takes more than hard work. More than dedication. More than a desire to succede. It takes all three and more. The government has no right to increase the taxation of these people any more than it has the right to give the money taxed to the poor for socialist programs. When these high paid people have that extra money they do buy things like a new house and move into it. They buy things like a boat, or rent a beach house. They buy things ilke new cars and sell their old ones WITHOUT CREDIT. Mind you i will not get into what credit has done to this country from people buying the before mentioned items who had no business doing so. But the people who can buy these things stimulate the economy in a good way and not on unpaid credit. Bottom Line - 250,000 before taxes is not rich, it is upper middle class. We should be working to increase this class of people, and working to invite more and more people into it through hard work not stripping them of their hard earned money in a effort to decrease the middle class. The Middle Class is a phenomena that appeared in the United States where you were neither rich but you were neither poor financially. We should be working to promote the upper lowere class to becoming lower middle then middle and even upper middle class families and workers. Not the other way around.

  • Posted By: kelsen1 @ 08/28/2008 12:31:24 PM

    Many of these "rich" people are the ones who take extreme economic risks to incur large debts to start small businesses. These are the businesses that employ the "median income workers". Just because you may have a large salary in a particular year doesn't mean that you're wealthy. It may take years of salaries in the $250,000 range to pay off debts incurred in starting small businesses. Go ahead, increase our tax burden and see how it impacts the economy. If we lose a larger portion of profits to taxes, that leaves less to invest in the future of our businesses. This will hit first at the very people that Obama's tax plan is trying to help.

  • Posted By: sgollus @ 08/28/2008 12:28:44 PM

    I guess I understand that you have to set a bar somewhere, but to gross over $250,000 in a 2 income family is not that difficult. Throw in the mandatory Social Security, Medicade/care and state tax deductions (remember, we are in the top tax bracket), contribution to our own 401K (because we know there is no way in h**l Social Security will be around when we retire) , deductions for our own health care insurance, and you would be surprised how little of that actually makes it home. I woked very hard for multiple Masters degrees, relocated where good paying jobs are, and my husband is retired from the military. Now we are being punished because we worked hard, by increase taxes on a salary that we don't even actually get to see. Something is just not right.

  • Posted By: JackWilcox @ 08/28/2008 11:17:31 AM

    COMMENTS:
    The wealthy want people to focus on how much you earn in a paycheck while they sit back with their 10,'s of millions in assets, pay no taxes and don't work. Tax them. This is the great lie. Have people who actually pay taxes fight about how much they pay, while the truly wealthy sit back and suck on their Cohibas. They suck on them whether they are in their mansion in NYC Central Park $40 million, 20,000sf condo, or in one of their $20 million, 10,000 sf beach houses, or one of their Ranches in the Rockies... oh yeah, they also own homes in the Caribbean, central america, and europe. They are laughing at all of us people who actually work for a salary and pay taxes. No matter how you slice its these people that have robbed everyone else. They are modern day robber barons.

    • Posted By: ssbn777 @ 08/28/2008 11:21:02 AM

      I thought stereotyping was only done by Republicans?

      • Posted By: JackWilcox @ 08/28/2008 11:28:30 AM

        How is it stereotyping that the superwealthy control everything, own everything and don't pay taxes. Truth is truth... its not stereotyping. Either you pay a fair proportion of taxes or not. Either you own nearly everything or not.

        I am not against being wealthy, but again, this whole article is a red herring. Wealthy need to pay more taxes... not working stiffs.

        working stiff=anyone who works for a salary whether its 25k per year or 250k per year.

        If you want to look at wealth distribution, the super wealthy don't care as much, because its not their wealth that is being distributed, its the successful people who work hard for a salary that is having their money taken and redistributed.

        • Posted By: Texas-conservative @ 08/28/2008 12:28:14 PM

          I am glad we have someone here that can speak for wealthy poeple. What makes you think that they would care as much about paying 50% of their income in taxes? Plus, since they buy bigger toys and invest in the economy (stocks, properties, businesses), they pay plenty in taxes.

          it probably makes plenty of people sick who make $300k gross when they see they only actually netted less than $150 before paying their bills.

        • Posted By: ssbn777 @ 08/28/2008 11:37:33 AM

          On your last point, I agree. Which is why we need a flat tax structure, or a "fair tax" system. Uniformly applied to everyone, with no loopholes or exceptions. Simply raising taxes on the "rich" is not the answer.

    • Posted By: jblackwell88 @ 08/28/2008 11:22:03 AM

      There has never been a time when some people weren't rich, and there never will. You could seize and redistribute all the money and land, and it would happen AGAIN. Many of them would be the same people. If you're jealous, just take it as a consolation that even the rich die.

    • Posted By: Braes @ 08/28/2008 11:21:27 AM

      Sir, you are correct, we really do not tax wealth at all, and it is the ones with that, and not wages, who silently move the levers. A soul could make 400k/yr and never see, let alone wield, power.

  • Posted By: Fleetside @ 08/28/2008 12:41:41 AM

    Yes, 250K is rich but we don't need to start pulling money from the folks that work yard and earn it.
    We need to put our Federal Gov't on a new budget. Good grief! those crooks (Rep and Dem) take a good chuck our hard earned money away from all of us every paycheck and every year end and spent it faster than they collect it.

    Why can't we the people redo the federal budget?
    We definately do our best to budget our personal income.

    • Posted By: username201 @ 08/28/2008 12:26:46 PM

      YES! Why is there a penalty for hard work and a desire to "make it". Though I defintely think a salary of $250,000 is wealthy, raising taxes on that extra income is a Socialist mentality. This is capatalism people. And here, you make your own choices as to what you can do for a living. SOme have it harder than others in making those choices and having the breaks, but ultimately it is up to you.

  • Posted By: joshandjenn916 @ 08/28/2008 12:08:17 PM

    toolkien, your comments have nothing to do with this discussion. We're not stupid we know the nation is in debt, that;s not going to change overnight with a replublican or democrate. It took years to accumulate and will take years to fix as well. What need to be address right now is the taxing of middle and low income families. If the rich get taxed a little more they cut back on the fancy cars or the lattes, but if the middle class and poor get taxed more they have to start cutting back on necessities like decided between putting food on the table or paying the electric bill. Without the poor and middle class the rich would not survive. Who's gonna wash your car rick jerk? I'm glad to see that Obama is taking a stand for those of us struggling to get by were as Bush was helping his buddies!

    • Posted By: toolkien @ 08/28/2008 12:26:40 PM

      1) I'm glad you see fit to declare what is germane. As I said, since other people brought in such concepts as the war and other "non-relevant" opinions that I would too. I didn't start it.

      2) Since you are such a fan of Obama, please provdie me ONE example where he said ANYTHING about our huge national debt and the plan to do something about it. To resort to classic classicism about lattes and what not is EXACTLY the partisan sniping that has led us down the rabbit hole. Neither Obama OR McCain has offered a thing other than the same old rhetoric. PLEASE read the Financial Report of the United States Government available in pdf out on the internet, or better yet read the last four reports paying particular attention to what Comptroller Walker has included in each respective report. It IS non-partisan and scary as hell. If you prattle on about lattes and fancy cars, you are part of the problem, not part of a solution.

    • Posted By: jblackwell88 @ 08/28/2008 12:17:15 PM

      Likewise, without the "rich" the poor would have no one to tax except themselves, which is laughable. The reality is that we're in for some tough times ahead, and the ones who realized a drop in their standard of living are looking for political ways to cannibalize the next tier. What is left unsaid is that even once the rich are eaten, its not going to make a difference. The rich have paper money, and sure, you can take it and spend it on a few things, but 95% of its is going to go to China and we'll all be back in the same boat.

    • Posted By: Fred Norris @ 08/28/2008 12:11:30 PM

      your income choice is your own, stop looking for handouts. Most of us were handed nothing and we busted our ass to make what we do (from very humble beginnings)

      I don't feel bad for you, I was there once and you need to pull up the boot straps and change yourself.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse