Nagging Doubts

Part 1 Who got Obama started in his political career? William Ayers, of course, is the Weather Underground bomber. And Obama began his career, his coming out party in 1995, and Ayers and Bernadine Dorns home.
And then for, you know, some 20 years, Obama has been working with Ayers, certainly since 1995, on a series of foundations: the Annenberg Foundation and the Woods Foundation. The boards of directors together, or in the Annenberg Foundation, Ayers created it, and Obama was on it. And together they spent the money of these foundations to implement their radical socialist agenda.
A lot of people say, no, they just know each other. They???re not friends. Just because -- you know, just because they worked on boards together.
Obama was in 1995 going to take the seat of Alice Palmer, who is also an extreme socialist. She???s an African-American who had actually gone to Russia and had attended communist party meetings and reported on them. And it was all very much of a leftist gathering.
Ayers and Dorns were like the stamp of approval on Obama, introducing them to their click of leftist friends for funding and for advancing his candidacy. So that very beginning was a chosen intentionally association with Ayers and Dorns to launch Obama`s career, and Obama knew exactly what he was doing picking him.
Senator Obama is the one who???s saying, "This is just another guy in my neighborhood," but in fact, that???s not true at all. It may turn out to be that they had a much closer relationship through their work together on the Annenberg Challenge to create their ideas to control the government and its people that???s the challenge!
His agenda -- I believe, in 2001, in which Ayers was unrepentant, saying that he wished he bombed more. And obama???s greatest influence is
Saul Alinsky he was a radical socialist organizer. His main book was "Rules for Radicals." His methodology was you go in as a community organizer. That means, really, a rabble-rouser.
You rub raw the discontent of the community, almost in a communist sense. You find class antagonisms. You learn to speak the grievances in the people???s own logic and language, and then you go for radical redistribution of income and wealth through gaming power and mobilizing the community. Making them think that your working for them by doing small stuff that seems to help but ultimately you gain far more than the people you help it???s a trick to get them on your side because it seems you care about them and in turn they move you to the top of the political ladder!

The speech last night was boilerplate. I've heard scores of them. I don't like promises of grand programs and tax cuts for 95% of the people when we are in such debt. Maybe I'm the ultimate idealist but what's wrong with TELLING THE TRUTH for once. Under the circumstances we can't have it all right now. I'm sorry but politicians like Mr. Obama assume the gullibility of people by telling them what they want to hear. A different kind of politics? So far, it's pretty run of the mill. There is no utopia out there - there is just..life.

Why would the debate over experience be moot now? Consider these--
1. Palin worked her way up and had more executive experiences than Obama and Biden combined.
2. Considering the number of VPs taking over the presidency over the entire US history, I'd bet she will stay as VP for the entire term. I don't mind Obama as a VP on a Dem ticket while gaining crucial experience to get ready for the real presidency.

I'm at odds with Palin on many social issues, but she did do some good deeds and after all, she's the VP candidate.

I believe Obama may make a great US president, but not now without the experience or the predictability from an established track record.

Eight is enough.......my what a great president Bush has been!! A pox on all republicans!

''Can win and should win''. Geez NEWSWEAK. Why not slap a red star on your Bolshevik pamphlet and be done with it?

The non-partisan THE HILL,observed something we already knew. Last nights speech,and to a man-woman, every single last person with a green press badge were jumping up and down for joy for His Edifice. [and then,like MSNBCs chief executive,have the laughable temerity to call themselves ''impartial''at almost the same moment that Matthews launched into a tirade aimed at Bushs picks of Powell and Rice and using all of the Thesarus adjectives for the word''fawning''to describe Obama].
What a pack of lamebrains. H.L.Mencken,who used to write for the old Baltimore Sun before even he became disgusted with the Fourth Estate,would be having a field day dragging you bovines through your self-made muck.
The introduction of Palin into the political equation is already creating more Obama headaches. They cannot properly nail her for ''experience''becasue she has acted as a large states chief executive. A position Obama never had. Pork and ''business-as usual''will not work either as Obama has more ties to pork waste,and created such with his pal Biden[who is swamped in earmarks up to his eyebrows],than the anti-Stevens Palin. A nominal pro-choicer,Palin knows where to draw the line in a way that has many Americans shocked at Obama for his percieved callousness in defending full-birth abortions[a stance that even FACTCHECK,almost reluctantly it seemed,could not take issue with based upon the evidence]. Unlike Obama and Biden, Palin doesn't seem to have anything to hide either. Biden still has not explained to the American people why his pork earmarks went to directly benefit his own son. Obama is still squirming on the ANNENBERG Papers controversy,and their only tactic thus far is to react with the un-American trampling of free speech using minions. Obama is a smooth empty [BARNEYS],suit. Little more. A pox upon the media including this rag,for their overarching ,blatant partisanship at a time when we have had enough of it coming from this quarter of the national ''news'' services..