POLITICS

On the Hunt

Sarah Palin, a moose-hunting, lifetime NRA member guns for D.C.

 
GALLERY
Who is Sarah Palin?

From beauty queen to vice-presidential candidate. A look at the life and career of John McCain's historic choice for a running mate.

 
 
Sponsored by
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

 

Like many Alaskans, Gov. Sarah Palin is a lifelong hunter and strong proponent of Second Amendment rights. A longtime member of the National Rifle Association, she told USA Today when she was running for governor as a Republican in 2006 that "We hunt as much as we can, and I'm proud to say our freezer is full of wild game we harvested here in Alaska." Her own parents had just returned from hunting caribou when they learned that she had been tapped as Sen. John McCain's running mate.

Most Alaskans wouldn't bat an eye at such a lifestyle. (Palin's favorite food? "Moose stew after a day of snowmachining," she told Vogue.) But in selecting a pro-gun female running mate who can probably skin and process a deer, Sen. John McCain may be inviting a debate on gun control into the campaign—and he could be seen as extending an olive branch to the wary right wing of his party: a recent independently-produced video clip by a Palin supporter included footage of her firing an assault rifle with Alaska National Guard soldiers. Such imagery stands in contrast to Sen. Barack Obama, who, in accepting the Democratic Party's nomination yesterday, said assault weapons pose a threat to city's streets. "The reality of gun ownership may be different for hunters in rural Ohio than they are for those plagued by gang violence in Cleveland," he said, "but don't tell me we can't uphold the Second Amendment while keeping AK-47s out of the hands of criminals."

Palin publicly applauded the Supreme Court's recent 5-4 ruling in District of Columbia vs. Heller that struck down the District's 32-year-old ban on handguns. Obama hedged, stating that he "always believed that the Second Amendment protects the right of individuals to bear arms, but I also identify with the need for crime-ravaged communities to save their children from the violence that plagues our streets through common-sense, effective safety measures." His supporters describe Obama's stance on guns as nuanced; opponents call it deliberately vague. Eugene Volokh, a legal commentator and UCLA law professor, described Palin's stance as "very mainstream, while Obama has been cagier."

"The lines are being more clearly drawn on the gun issue," says Dennis Hennigan of the Brady Center, a gun-reform lobby group. "One day after Senator Obama made it clear that he thinks assault weapons should be banned in a remarkable portion of his speech, here Senator McCain selects someone who is not only proud to be endorsed by [the NRA], an opponent of that ban, but apparently is pretty enthusiastic about the guns themselves." Perhaps. But Palin has a long history of supporting gun-safety education for kids and nobody would expect her to be thrilled by the prospect of AK-47s flooding the streets of Anchorage. "Of course, we want to keep any firearm out of the hands of gang members and felons and drug dealers," says NRA executive vice president Wayne LaPierre. "But there is no way that Senator Obama can make a claim to be a supporter of the Second Amendment based on his voting record. Governor Palin understands the values of the American public on these types of issues."

Gun ownership in Alaska has little to nothing to do with gangs and everything to do with hunting, which comes with its own array of complicated issues. In 2003, residents in the interior of the state began complaining to state game officials that wild wolves and bears were eating too many moose calves, depleting the stock for hunters (who also presumably love a hot dish of moose stew). Over the past five years the state has intensified its "predator control" program, which reduces the numbers of wolves and bears in the wild in order to inflate the populations of moose, caribou, sheep, deer and other ungulates. Statewide, an average of 1,000 to 1,500 wolves are taken through hunting and trapping each year. Of that total, about 120 to 150 are "harvested" through the predator-control policies, according to Doug Larsen, director of the Division of Wildlife Conservation Department of Fish and Game. In a handful of regions, as many as 60 to 80 percent of the wolf population is targeted.

The practice of deliberately exterminating animals to manipulate the populations of other species is not without controversy. "Palin is on a massive extermination program for wolves across large swaths of Alaska to artificially inflate caribou and moose populations to pacify trophy hunters," says John Toppenberg, the executive director of the Alaska Wildlife Alliance. "It's totally illogical, it's extreme, it's the draconian manipulation of bears and wolves in Alaska." But it is a practice that predates Palin's governorship and remains popular with a majority of Alaskans.

"Her approach to environmental issues generally reflects someone who has grown up and depended upon natural resources, and has the perspective that resources should be used and used responsibly," says Jonathan Adler, director of the Center for Business Law and Regulation at Case Western Reserve University School of Law. "You don't want to reduce the wolf population too much, or it will drop below a sustainable level. There is a certain amount of uncertainty in the field on how to do that. But the consensus is that the folks in Alaska tend to know what they're doing." And as one of their ilk, Palin may be giving Democrats some pause on the eve of the Republican convention. The hunter has them in her sights.

© 2008

 
Discuss
Member Comments
  • Posted By: Anton-63 @ 10/25/2008 4:46:15 AM

    Comment: The story of pistols. The history of small arms. http://www.cneat.ru/bullet-3-en.html

    The maleficent American shooting school has a strong negative effect on the training and the morale of the armed forces (the customers) ??? ???the enemy needs not only to be killed, but to be torn apart???. A pistol is a standard weapon borne by the personnel of the force structures and the man-hating propaganda gradually becomes the philosophy of the whole society..

  • Posted By: doug6057 @ 10/08/2008 11:44:05 PM

    Comment: Granted there is a difference between rural and urban uses and the need for guns. I feel that i need one for protection much more in an urban area than at home in a rural area. More gun laws are not necessary. If judges and politicians would enfore the laws that are already on the books a lot of our problems would go away. My family lives off of wild game because we like it, not because we can't afford to go to the grocery store. No gun owner in their right mind should even consider voting for the Obama/Biden ticket. This is a proven fact - politicians will say whatever they think you want/need to hear in try and get your vote. What comes out of their mouths is meaningless. Check their past voting records. Obama and Biden both have voted for the majority of the gun control bills that have come through Washington during their respective tenures. Both have an "A" rating with the animal rights groups. This does not bode well for anyone associated with firearms, hunting, Wildlife Mgt or the livestock. industry. On the other hand McCain isn't perfect either. Sarah Palin shows the most common sense approach of any of them to the aforementioned industries and activities. If you care anything about firearms and hunting , the McCain - Palin ticket is the only way we can vote. To vote Democrat may very well be suicide for the way of life we love and cherish.

  • Posted By: ChuckyDee @ 09/23/2008 12:12:08 AM

    Comment: I believe Sarah palin brings good, commom-sense views on the proper use of guns and hunters in wildlife management, and is correct in supporting the rights of law abiding citizens to defend themselves against the thugs the Democrats refer to as another "disenfranchised group." Don't forget that hunters also make a huge contribution to the economy: I believe they spent over $11 billion on their sport for equipment, lodging, and transportation, and this is one industry that cannot be outsourced! Of course, our National Parks System is totally off-limits to hunting of any kind---a bit of a shame when you have thousands that would PAY for the opportunity to hunt an animal the government PAYS PROFESSIONAL HUNTERS hundreds or thousands of dollars to kill to keep the ecosystems in-balance. This is a waste of taxpayer money, and the hunting seasons usually coincide with periods of very light use by the general public anyway. Why not turn it into a MONEY-MAKING opportunity for the Parks System, which has to scrap for every dime Congress gives them?

    As for having a gun for self-defense, 40 years of "jello-mold" social engineering has given us several generations of hardened criminals that have absolutely no concept of right or wrong---or that their actions WILL and SHOULD have consequences that match their brutalness of their criminal actions. The anti-gun activists have been whipped into a frenzy by zealots who proclaim they're only after outlawing this or that type firearm because it is "more deadly" than the others, but statistically speaking, HOSPITALS and AUTOMOBILES are MORE DEADLY THAN ANY OT THESE SO-CALLED "DEADLY GUNS"-----but where is the outrage against the HOSPITALS and CARMAKERS????? I guess because of some of the cozy advertising and marketing ploys of "managed health care and auto makers, maybe these "radical" views have been declared "off-limits " by the media. With all of the career criminals let loose by our liberal courts and our unwillingness to hold PEOPLE ACCOUNTABLE for their actions, we CAN and DO need guns to protect ourselves. The police can't be everywhere, and even when they DO catch the bad guys, they end up back on the street in just a few hours anyway. Sarah Palin and the others of us--- like her--- believe in finding our helping hands, not in the form of a government handout or promise, but at the end of our own two arms! Those two hands SHOULD be ABLE and ENCOURAGED to tote a gun, if they feel the need. Rugged individualism and self-reliance are the traits that settled this great country and made it great------not total dependence on the government for everything.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
The Peek
 
 
STRATEGIES

Isn't it ironic: Xerox is hoping it can profit by teaching companies how to reduce their printing.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
NATIONAL SECURITY
Sponsored by
 
 
 
loadingLoading Menu